California Assembly Bill AB1779

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/26
• Refer: 2/23/26
• Report Pass: 3/2/26
• Refer: 3/3/26
• Report Pass: 4/22/26
• Refer: 4/27/26
• Report Pass: 5/6/26
• Engrossed: 5/14/26
• Refer: 5/14/26
• Refer: 5/27/26

Caption

An act to amend Section 11831.65 of, and to add Section 11831.66 to, Sections 11831.6 and 11831.65 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to drug and alcohol programs.

Impact

In terms of state laws, AB1779 would reinforce the non-remuneration stance for services rendered by recovery facilities. It prohibits such facilities from offering any form of payment, gifts, or pricing incentives aimed at influencing individuals to enter, remain in, or transfer between treatment programs. This aligns with existing prohibitions against patient brokering and aims to curtail practices that may exploit vulnerable populations seeking recovery from addiction. The modifications to the Health and Safety Code seek to better guard against corruption in referrals and treatment placements, promoting ethical practices in the industry.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1779, introduced by Assembly Member Davies, aims to amend existing regulations surrounding drug and alcohol recovery programs in California. The bill seeks to enhance the oversight of transportation services provided to individuals seeking recovery or treatment, particularly stipulating that such services must not be contingent on insurance benefits or program participation. A key requirement in the proposed legislation is the establishment of documented protocols for reporting transportation costs and retaining records for a minimum of five years. These changes are intended to provide transparency and accountability in how treatment facilities assist individuals with the financial burdens associated with accessing recovery services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1779 appears largely supportive from the public health perspective, as it emphasizes ethical standards in addiction treatment. Stakeholders advocating for patient rights and safety have expressed approval for measures that impose stricter regulations on facilitation services, citing concerns over conflicts of interest in the provision of recovery services. However, there may be apprehensive sentiments among some treatment providers who rely on flexibility in conducting their business, potentially viewing the restrictions as cumbersome.

Contention

Notable points of contention associated with AB1779 center around the additional regulatory burdens it may create for treatment facilities and the potential impact on service availability. Critics may argue that enforcing stricter transportation and remuneration rules could restrict facilities' ability to provide comprehensive care, particularly for economically disadvantaged individuals. The requirement for robust documentation and annual reporting on transportation service usage might also introduce logistical challenges for smaller facilities, which could struggle to comply with the increased administrative demands imposed by the legislative changes.