California Assembly Bill AB1772

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/26
• Refer: 3/23/26
• Report Pass: 3/23/26
• Refer: 3/24/26
• Report Pass: 4/23/26
• Refer: 4/28/26

Caption

An act to amend Sections 2301 and 2303 of, to add Sections 2301.1, 2301.2, 2301.3, 2301.4, 2301.6, and 2301.7 to, and to add Chapter 3.6 (commencing with Section 2305) to Division 3 of, the Fish and Game Code, relating to fish and wildlife.

Impact

The implications of AB 1772 are significant, as it would impose stricter regulations on watercraft and impose new responsibilities on water supply operators to prevent and address infestations of invasive mussels. This encompasses the introduction of mandatory decontamination protocols and the establishment of minimum standards for the inspection of vessels. Furthermore, the bill establishes a framework for collaboration among various state entities, including the Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Parks and Recreation, and Food and Agriculture, to promote comprehensive aquatic species management strategies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1772, introduced by Assembly Member Papan, aims to bolster California's defenses against the spread of invasive mussels, particularly the golden mussel. This bill amends existing laws relating to the possession, transportation, and management of invasive mussels. It outlines new enforcement measures that allow law enforcement officers to detain or impound vessels suspected of harboring these invasive species until they are properly decontaminated. This measure reflects the state's commitment to preserving water quality and preventing ecological damage caused by invasive aquatic species.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB 1772 appears to be largely supportive among environmentalists and legislators concerned with the ecological impacts of invasive species. Advocates argue that the bill is essential to safeguard California's waterways and maintain recreational access for future generations. However, there may also be concerns among the recreational boating community about the potential burden of compliance costs and logistical challenges stemming from the bill's strict regulatory measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential economic impact on the recreational boating sector, as some opponents may argue that the financial responsibility for invasives management should not fall disproportionately on local boating communities. Additionally, some stakeholders may express concerns over the extensive powers granted to law enforcement under the bill, such as detaining vessels and enforcing decontamination measures, arguing that these could lead to overreach or unnecessary disruptions for recreational users.