California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1627

Introduced
1/26/26  
Refer
3/23/26  
Refer
3/26/26  
Report Pass
4/7/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Report Pass
4/15/26  
Refer
4/16/26  
Report Pass
4/22/26  
Refer
4/27/26  
Report Pass
5/6/26  
Engrossed
5/27/26  
Refer
5/28/26  

Caption

An act to amend Sections Section 1029 and 1029.1 of the Government Code, relating to public employment.

Impact

If implemented, AB 1627 would impose significant changes to the criteria under which individuals can serve as law enforcement officers. This bill not only increases the scrutiny surrounding former ICE employees but also aligns with broader legislative efforts aimed at reforming law enforcement practices within the state. The law requires an assessment of moral character for those wishing to restore their eligibility after being disqualified, setting a precedent for future employment evaluations in law enforcement contexts across California.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1627 aims to amend existing laws regarding the qualifications and disqualifications for public employment as peace officers, specifically targeting individuals previously employed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during a specified timeframe. The bill establishes that individuals who worked for ICE between September 1, 2025, and January 20, 2029, shall be disqualified from serving as peace officers in California. This measure reflects a growing concern over the practices of ICE and the implications these actions may have on community trust and public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1627 appears to be polarized. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step in ensuring ethical standards in law enforcement, particularly given past concerns about racial profiling and aggressive policing strategies associated with ICE operations. Conversely, critics voice concerns about the implications for public safety, suggesting that the bill may inadvertently restrict access to qualified law enforcement professionals who could have otherwise served their communities effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates around the fairness of disqualifying individuals based solely on their previous employment with ICE, regardless of their conduct during that period. Opponents argue this may unfairly impact candidates who could demonstrate rehabilitative changes in their moral character. Additionally, the bill imposes state-mandated local costs that may require reimbursement to local agencies and school districts, raising further questions about the economic impact of the legislation on local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1896

An act to amend Sections 1029, 1031, 1029 and 18935 of, and to add Section 1025 to, the Government Code, relating to public employment.

CA SB521

An act to amend Section 1021.

CA AB583

Death certificates.

CA SB792

Childcare.

CA AB1528

An act to amend Sections 10213.

CA AB354

An act to add Section 15169 to the Government Code, and to amend Sections 13500, 13510.

CA SB1110

Early learning and care: rates.

CA AB904

An act to amend Sections 42968, 42968.1, 42968.4, 42968.21, 42968.23, 42968.30, 42968.32, 42968.34, 42968.40, 42968.62, 42968.72, 42973.7, 42976, and 42978 of the Public Resources Code, relating to recycling.

CA SB1059

Employment Training Panel.

CA AB300

An act to amend Sections 51178 and 51181 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 4202 and 4204 of the Public Resources Code, relating to land use.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.