California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1524

Introduced
3/18/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
6/19/25  
Refer
6/19/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Refer
7/14/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  
Chaptered
10/3/25  
Passed
10/3/25  

Caption

An act to amend Sections 68150 and 70631 of the Government Code, relating to courts.

Impact

The implications of AB 1524 on state law are significant, as it amends existing regulations regarding court fees within the Government Code. By mandating that fees must not exceed the cost of services, the bill effectively enhances transparency in governmental operations and could lead to decreased courts' revenues if fees are lowered. Furthermore, it imposes a commitment on the Judicial Council to report on fee revenues and ensure that collected fees do not surpass the costs incurred. This legislation aims to protect individuals from financial exploitation in what can often be an intimidating judicial system.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1524 focuses on restructuring the fee schedule for courts in California. The bill prohibits courts from charging fees that exceed the actual cost of providing a service or product, thereby ensuring more transparent and equitable access to judicial resources. This change aims to alleviate financial burdens on individuals seeking court services and addresses concerns about excessive fees that have been criticized as barriers to justice.

Sentiment

Overall, there is a positive sentiment surrounding AB 1524, especially from advocacy groups and members of the public who view this as a step toward increased access to justice. However, there are concerns among some court officials regarding potential reduction in funding that could arise from enforcing lower fees, which may affect the operations of the courts. The debate on this bill reflects broader themes of access to justice and the balance between operational costs and public service.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the requirement for the Judicial Council to provide detailed reports on fee collections and costs incurred. Some lawmakers expressed concerns that this could create additional administrative burdens. There are fears that downsizing fee structures might lead to a decline in the quality of court services if adequate funding is not maintained. The balance between ensuring public access to court services and maintaining operational integrity remains a pivotal aspect of the discussion surrounding this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2781

An act to amend Section 116.230 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and to amend Sections 70613, 70613.5, 70614, and 70621 of the Government Code, relating to courts.

CA SB673

An act to amend Section 70624 of the Government Code, relating to courts.

CA SB54

An act to amend Section 68632 of the Government Code, relating to courts.

CA AB136

An act to repeal Section 241 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and to amend Sections 68502.

CA SB477

An act to amend Sections 12926, 12960, 12965, and 12981 of the Government Code, relating to civil rights.

CA SB16

An act to amend Section 5121 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health.

CA SB357

An act to amend Section 27771 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 827 of, and to add Section 272.

CA AB354

An act to add Section 15169 to the Government Code, and to amend Sections 13500, 13510.

CA SB149

An act to amend Sections 2301 and 2302 of, and to add Section 2303 to, the Fish and Game Code, to add and repeal Section 515 of the Food and Agricultural Code, to amend Sections 675, 676, and 676.

CA HB375

An Act To Amend Title 13, Title 16, And Title 21 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Government Records.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.