California Assembly Bill AB1386

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/25
• Refer: 3/13/25
• Report Pass: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Failed: 2/2/26

Caption

An act to amend Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to health and care facilities.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1386 will impose new obligations on general acute care hospitals that currently do not provide perinatal services. Specifically, these hospitals will be required to submit a perinatal service compliance plan to the State Department of Public Health, assuring that they can integrate and offer perinatal services effectively. The implementation process, including the establishment and approval of compliance plans, will significantly enhance the standard of care in hospitals, aligning them with modern healthcare expectations for maternal and infant health.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1386, introduced by Assembly Member Bains, seeks to amend Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code in California to officially recognize perinatal services as a fundamental service required to be provided by general acute care hospitals. This legislation is intended to ensure that hospitals cater to the needs of mothers and newborns by offering essential perinatal services, which encompass care before, during, and after childbirth. By elevating the requirement for such services to the level of basic care, the bill aims to improve maternal and infant health outcomes across the state.

Contention

The potential addition of perinatal services as mandated care raises various discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders. Proponents assert that this change is critical to enhancing healthcare access for pregnant women and ensuring that hospitals meet contemporary healthcare standards. Conversely, some critics may express concern about the financial implications and administrative burdens this requirement could place on smaller, rural hospitals that might struggle with the costs involved in providing these services. The lack of required state reimbursement for associated costs could also be a point of contention, as this may place a significant financial strain on local healthcare providers.