An act making appropriations for the support of the government of the State of California and for several public purposes in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 of Article IV of the Constitution of the State of California, relating to the state budget, to take effect immediately, budget bill.
Summary
AB 109 is a budget-related measure introduced as a placeholder bill for the 2025-26 legislative session. As introduced, it does not make substantive policy changes on its own; instead, it states the Legislature’s intent to enact statutory changes related to the Budget Act of 2025. Bills of this type are commonly used to reserve a bill number for later budget trailer language or other budget implementation provisions.
The bill text is minimal and does not specify any program, agency, tax, or spending change. However, the context indicates that AB 109 ultimately became part of the state budget package and was chaptered as Chapter 19, Statutes of 2026. The caption describes it as an appropriations and budget bill taking effect immediately, suggesting that the final enacted version was used to support the state’s annual budget and related statutory adjustments.
Impact
As introduced, AB 109 would not directly amend any existing statutes or create new programs; it only expresses legislative intent. In practical terms, its impact is to serve as a vehicle for later budget legislation, which can affect a wide range of state laws governing appropriations, government operations, and public programs once the bill is amended and enacted. The final chaptering indicates it became part of the state’s budget enactment process, with potential effects on state spending authority and budget-related statutory provisions.
Sentiment
The available vote history suggests the bill had majority support in the Assembly, passing third reading 53-17. There are no committee transcripts or recorded policy debates in the provided materials, so the overall sentiment appears procedural and broadly favorable rather than contentious. The bill’s placeholder nature also suggests it was treated as a standard budget vehicle rather than a controversial standalone policy proposal.
Contention
There is no specific substantive policy dispute visible in the provided record because the introduced text contains no detailed program changes. Any contention would likely have centered on the broader budget package or later amendments incorporated into the bill, rather than the placeholder language itself. The recorded 17 no votes on third reading indicate some opposition, but the materials do not identify the reasons or the members/interest groups behind it.