California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB878

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Engrossed
4/10/23  
Engrossed
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
6/5/23  
Enrolled
6/8/23  
Chaptered
6/29/23  
Chaptered
6/29/23  
Passed
6/29/23  

Caption

Business filings: fictitious business names.

Impact

The changes brought by AB 878 are intended to streamline the filing process for fictitious business names and ensure that businesses maintain appropriate contact information that protects personal privacy. By requiring the inclusion of a business mailing address, the law aims to make it easier for the public and authorities to contact corporations or business partnerships while reducing the potential misuse of personal addresses in the public domain. In doing so, the bill also eliminates outdated provisions in the existing law that were deemed irrelevant.

Summary

Assembly Bill 878, introduced by Assemblymember Pellerin, modifies provisions concerning the registration of fictitious business names as outlined in the Business and Professions Code. The bill mandates that business registrants include a business mailing address instead of a personal residence address when filing statements related to fictitious business names. It also removes the exception that allowed for a fictitious business name statement to remain valid despite a change in the resident address of an individual, general partner, or trustee.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 878 is primarily positive, as it is seen as a necessary update to existing business regulations that align with current practices. There appears to be general consensus among lawmakers that clarifying and modernizing the business filing requirements helps protect both businesses and individuals. The bill received unanimous support during voting, indicating strong bipartisan agreement on its merits.

Contention

While there has not been considerable contention surrounding AB 878, some stakeholders may have concerns regarding the impact of these changes on smaller businesses or those unfamiliar with the filing process. However, the bill's proponents emphasize that these modifications are technical in nature and do not impose undue burden on registrants. Ensuring transparency while maintaining personal privacy seems to be the guiding principle of the legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1389

The Political Reform Act of 1974: late filing of reports.

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

TX SB2221

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB515

Trial: statement of decision.

TX HB5377

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB1789

Political Reform Act of 1974: candidate trainings.

CA SB632

Vehicles: off-highway recreation: Red Rock Canyon State Park.