HCR 2029 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would repeal Article XXV of the Arizona Constitution, the state’s “right to work” provision. If approved by the Legislature and then by voters at the next general election, the measure would remove the constitutional language that currently governs right-to-work policy in Arizona.
Because this is a concurrent resolution proposing a constitutional change, it does not itself change the law immediately. Instead, it directs the Secretary of State to place the proposition on the ballot for voter approval, and the repeal would take effect only if the electorate approves it and the Governor proclaims the result.
Impact
The measure would affect Arizona’s constitutional labor framework by eliminating Article XXV, which is the state-level right-to-work provision. Repeal would not automatically create a new labor regime, but it would remove the constitutional barrier that currently protects employees from being required to join or financially support a union as a condition of employment, leaving any future labor rules to be determined by other state or federal law and any subsequent legislation or constitutional action.
Sentiment
The bill’s sponsorship suggests support from lawmakers aligned with organized labor or labor-rights reform, since it is introduced by a bloc of Democratic representatives and senators. No committee transcripts or recorded votes are provided, so there is no documented debate or formal vote history in the materials to indicate broader legislative sentiment. Based on the bill’s subject, it is likely to be politically divisive, with supporters viewing it as a labor-rights measure and opponents viewing it as a threat to Arizona’s business climate and worker choice protections.
Contention
The central point of contention is the right-to-work policy itself: supporters of repeal typically argue that it weakens unions and suppresses wages and bargaining power, while opponents argue that it protects individual workers from compelled union support and helps attract employers. Because the resolution would send the question to voters, the most significant conflict would likely occur in the public campaign over whether Arizona should keep or repeal its constitutional right-to-work guarantee.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.