Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2973

Introduced
6/23/25  
Report Pass
6/24/25  
Report Pass
6/24/25  
Engrossed
6/25/25  
Enrolled
6/25/25  

Caption

State budget implementation; FY2026

Summary

HB2973 is a fiscal implementation bill for FY2026 that directs any unrestricted federal monies received by Arizona between July 1, 2025 and June 30, 2026 into the state general fund. Those funds must be used to pay for essential government services. The bill also applies this rule retroactively to money received after June 30, 2025. The measure further modifies the state’s budget stabilization fund rules for three fiscal years. It temporarily relieves the Legislature of any requirement to appropriate money to or transfer money from the budget stabilization fund for FY2025-2026 through FY2027-2028. For FY2025-2026, it also removes the usual cap tying the fund to 10% of general fund revenue and blocks the state treasurer from transferring any surplus from the stabilization fund into the general fund.

Impact

HB2973 would change how Arizona handles certain federal receipts and the budget stabilization fund under existing state law, particularly A.R.S. § 35-144. It centralizes unrestricted federal aid in the general fund for essential services and temporarily suspends normal rules governing deposits, limits, and transfers involving the budget stabilization fund, affecting state budgeting, cash management, and fiscal planning for three fiscal years.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been treated as a budget implementation measure with support from legislative leadership, but it also drew meaningful opposition. It passed the House Appropriations Committee 11-6 and the House Rules Committee 5-1, then passed House third reading 31-25 and Senate third reading 16-11, indicating a partisan or closely divided response rather than broad consensus.

Contention

The main points of contention appear to be the bill’s redistribution of unrestricted federal funds into the general fund and its temporary override of the budget stabilization fund framework. Supporters likely viewed these changes as necessary to fund essential government services and provide budget flexibility, while opponents likely objected to weakening the normal safeguards and limits on the stabilization fund, especially the suspension of required transfers and the prohibition on moving surplus monies to the general fund.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.