Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2368

Introduced
1/17/24  
Report Pass
1/30/24  
Introduced
1/17/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Report Pass
1/30/24  
Engrossed
2/28/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Report Pass
3/14/24  
Engrossed
2/28/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Report Pass
3/14/24  
Enrolled
6/15/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Enrolled
6/15/24  
Passed
6/21/24  
Passed
6/21/24  
Chaptered
6/21/24  

Caption

Transportation; groundwater; Douglas AMA

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by formally recognizing the practice of transporting groundwater to the Douglas Active Management Area, establishing a regulatory framework around it. Well owners are required to provide evidence of historical water withdrawals and adhere to stringent guidelines while transporting water, effectively creating a historical cap on the volume that can be moved. This measure is significant in a context where water resources are critical, especially with ongoing discussions on sustainable water management in Arizona.

Summary

House Bill 2368 amends the Arizona Revised Statutes to permit the transportation of groundwater from the Upper San Pedro groundwater basin to the Douglas Active Management Area. This bill allows well owners who were extracting groundwater for transportation purposes before December 1, 2022, to continue doing so, thereby reestablishing and regulating the conditions under which this transfer can occur. The aim is to ensure that water supply needs for municipal purposes in the Douglas area can be met while adhering to existing management practices.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding HB 2368 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among stakeholders involved in water supply and management within the areas served by the Douglas Active Management Area. The bill has received backing from local water companies that seek to continue their operations based on historical practices. However, there may also be some concerns from environmental advocates regarding the implications of groundwater extraction and the long-term sustainability of water resources in the area.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding this bill center around the sustainability of groundwater resources and the management of water rights. Some critics argue that while the bill allows for continued access to water, it may potentially oversimplify crucial environmental considerations related to groundwater depletion and could set a precedent for other regions seeking similar exemptions. The balance between meeting municipal water needs and protecting vital water resources remains a contentious issue.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HB2758

McMullen Valley; eligible entities; groundwater

AZ HB2934

Harquahala; groundwater transportation fee

AZ HB2932

groundwater transportation fee; website; posting

AZ HB2933

groundwater transportation fee; counties; fund

AZ HB2270

Groundwater model; stormwater recharge; AMAs

AZ SB1520

Rural groundwater

AZ HB2572

Subsequent AMAs; groundwater rights; adequacy

AZ SB1518

Subsequent AMAs; groundwater portability

AZ HB2087

Appropriation; groundwater recharge facilities; maintenance

AZ HB2757

Butler Valley; La Paz; groundwater

Similar Bills

AZ HB2758

McMullen Valley; eligible entities; groundwater

AZ SB1610

groundwater; transporting requirements; technical correction

AZ HB2085

Groundwater; transporting requirements; technical correction

AZ HB2934

Harquahala; groundwater transportation fee

AZ HB2723

Big Chino; groundwater withdrawal; mitigation

AZ HB2731

Big Chino subbasin; Verde River

AZ HB2932

groundwater transportation fee; website; posting

AZ HB2933

groundwater transportation fee; counties; fund