Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2100

Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/17/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/22/24  
Report Pass
1/17/24  
Engrossed
2/5/24  
Report Pass
1/22/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Engrossed
2/5/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Vetoed
3/29/24  
Enrolled
3/26/24  

Caption

Administrative completeness review; licensing

Impact

The bill is poised to streamline administrative processes within state agencies, making it easier for applicants to understand what is required for their applications. By establishing clear timelines and requirements, it aims to reduce delays and confusion in the licensing process. This could result in a more efficient system that benefits both the state and businesses or individuals seeking licenses. Additionally, by allowing applicants to challenge incomplete determinations, the bill ensures a degree of accountability and fairness in the administrative process.

Summary

House Bill 2100 aims to amend sections 41-1074 and 41-1079 of the Arizona Revised Statutes to improve the process of administrative completeness reviews in licensing. The bill requires agencies to provide a comprehensive list of items required for an application to be deemed administratively complete. It emphasizes the importance of communication between agencies and applicants, mandating that agencies issue written notices regarding the status of applications within a specified time frame. This is intended to streamline the licensing process and enhance transparency for applicants.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2100 appears to be generally positive, especially among proponents of government transparency and efficiency. Supporters argue that the bill helps create a more predictable and user-friendly licensing environment, which is vital for attracting and maintaining businesses. However, there are concerns raised by some stakeholders about the potential for agencies to interpret the requirements too rigidly, which could still lead to bureaucratic delays for applicants.

Contention

While the bill focuses on improving the administrative processes of state agencies, there may be concerns regarding the burden it places on smaller agencies that may not have the resources to comply efficiently. Opponents might argue that enforcing strict time frames could lead to inconsistencies in how different agencies apply the rules, thereby creating disparities in the licensing process. The bill's implementation will require careful management to balance efficiency and thoroughness in agency reviews.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HB2028

DWR; application; administrative completeness

AZ HB2234

municipal licensing; approvals; administrative review

AZ SB1353

Municipal development; permits; review

AZ HB4102

administrative procedures; revisions

AZ SB2371

Child care facility licensing; move all administrative functions to the Department of Human Services.

AZ SB248

Administrative Procedure Act, standard of judicial review of agency rulings revised

AZ SB1134

County water augmentation authorities; bond

AZ HB1294

Administrative rules review.

AZ SB167

Alabama Administrative Procedure Act; standard of judicial review revised regarding agency's interpretation of law

AZ HB2447

Self-certification program; administrative review

Similar Bills

KY HB6

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.

KY HB422

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations.

KY SB23

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.

KY SB20

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.

KY HB494

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations.

HI SB3182

Relating To Administrative License Revocation.

KY HB81

AN ACT relating to governmental accountability and declaring an emergency.

HI HB2417

Relating To Administrative License Revocation.