Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1382

Introduced
1/31/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Report Pass
2/20/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Enrolled
4/12/23  
Passed
4/18/23  
Chaptered
4/18/23  

Caption

Pharmacy benefit managers; certificate requirements

Impact

The implementation of SB1382 is expected to significantly enhance regulatory oversight of PBMs in Arizona, promoting greater transparency in how these entities operate and interact with insurers and consumers. By requiring substantial documentation for certification and record retention, the bill aims to protect patient interests and ensure that PBMs adhere to legal standards, particularly in their dealings with health plans subject to Arizona jurisdiction. The establishment of civil penalties for non-compliance reinforces the seriousness of these new regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 1382, also referred to as the Pharmacy Benefit Managers Certificate Requirements bill, introduces new regulations for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) operating in Arizona. The bill mandates that PBMs must obtain a certificate of authority to function within the state, with specific compliance regulations that include submitting detailed organizational documents, ensuring personnel qualifications, and confirming adherence to state laws regarding their operations. The certification process involves an application fee and requires renewal every two years, ensuring ongoing compliance with state regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1382 appears largely supportive among legislators concerned about healthcare transparency and prescribing practices. Advocates argue that the bill will lead to better patient outcomes by ensuring that PBMs operate ethically and legally. Conversely, some industry stakeholders express concerns regarding the potential burdensome nature of the new requirements and the implications of regulatory compliance costs. Nevertheless, the overall legislative sentiment is geared towards enhancing the accountability of PBMs to protect consumer interests.

Contention

Notably, contention primarily arises from the varying perspectives on the regulation of RBMs. While proponents laud the bill for aiming to safeguard patients and ensure compliance with ethical standards, critics argue that the additional regulatory layers may hinder accessibility and increase costs for PBMs, which could, in turn, impact insurance premiums and the affordability of medications. The bill's provisions granting the director the power to suspend or revoke PBM certifications for violations highlight the potential for strict oversight that some industry leaders may find excessive.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

RI S3060

Requires pharmacy benefit managers to apply for certificate of authority from the office of health insurance commissioner to operate such a business in this state and empowers the commissioner to oversee pharmacy benefit managers and penalize violations.

CA SB41

Pharmacy benefits.

SC H4793

Pharmacy Benefits Managers and Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations

SC H4796

Pharmacy Benefit Managers and Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations

HI SCR69

Requesting The Administrator Of The State Health Planning And Development Agency To Convene A Pharmacy Benefit Manager Working Group To Determine The Best Policies To Lower Drug Costs For Patient Consumers And Increase Access To Health Care.

HI SR53

Requesting The Administrator Of The State Health Planning And Development Agency To Convene A Pharmacy Benefit Manager Working Group To Determine The Best Policies To Reform Pharmacy Benefit Manager Practices In The State To Ensure Transparency And Fairness For Consumers And In The Pharmaceutical Sector, Lower Drug Costs For Patient Consumers, And Increase Access To Health Care.

AK SB134

Pharmacy Benefits Manager;3rd Party Admin

WV SB907

Relating to pharmacy benefit managers and state pharmacy purchasing