If enacted, SB 1255 would significantly alter the approach to rulemaking in Arizona. Agencies would be required to submit any proposed high-cost rules to the administrative rules oversight committee and then to the legislature for ratification. This process could delay the implementation of regulations that affect various aspects of governance and policy-making, as agencies would need to wait for legislative approval. The bill also has specific exceptions for emergency rules, indicating that urgent regulations would still be permissible without this delay.
Summary
Senate Bill 1255 seeks to amend the Arizona Revised Statutes to enforce a legislative ratification process for proposed rules that are projected to increase regulatory costs by over $500,000 within five years of implementation. This means that such regulations will not take effect unless they receive approval from the Arizona Legislature. The intent of the bill is to ensure that significant regulatory changes are subjected to greater scrutiny and public discourse before being enacted, essentially placing a check on agencies' rulemaking powers regarding high-cost regulations.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 1255 appears to be divided. Supporters argue that the bill enhances fiscal responsibility and accountability in government, emphasizing the need for legislative oversight on rules that could impose substantial financial burdens on businesses and citizens. Conversely, opponents raise concerns that the bill might stifle necessary regulatory reforms, as the requirement for legislative action could hinder timely responses to emergent issues, such as health and safety concerns.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance of power between state agencies and the legislature, as some view the bill as an overreach that undermines the efficiency of agencies designed to respond to changing regulations. Critics also worry about the potential for political considerations to impede essential rulemaking processes, arguing that necessary regulations could become mired in legislative bureaucracy, delaying action on issues that may require immediate attention.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.
Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.