Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1937

Introduced
3/31/25  
Refer
3/31/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Engrossed
4/7/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Enrolled
4/15/25  
Chaptered
4/17/25  

Caption

To Amend The Method Of Valuation For Mineral Rights Under Arkansas Constitution, Article 16, § 5; And To Clarify The Method Of Valuation For Oil And Gas Well Production Equipment.

Summary

HB1937 amends Arkansas property tax valuation rules for mineral rights and oil and gas production equipment. The bill states that it is remedial and intended to clarify existing law. It revises Arkansas Code § 26-26-1110 to define “well” and “production equipment,” and it directs county assessors to assess producing mineral interests separately from the fee simple interest when the mineral ownership is separately recorded. The bill also changes how oil and gas production equipment is valued for ad valorem tax purposes. It requires production equipment to be assessed as real property at $1.00 per foot, except for casing rendered inoperable by a cement or mechanical plug, which is exempt from taxation. It further provides that increases in average daily production are treated as newly discovered property only when the increase comes solely from a new geologic zone or horizon not previously produced from the existing well. In addition, it standardizes the income and expense assumptions used in valuing wells, requiring a uniform expense allowance and use of the actual average Arkansas price for oil or gas from the prior calendar year. The bill’s impact is to make mineral-rights and oil-and-gas equipment assessments more uniform across counties and to constrain the Assessment Coordination Division’s formulas, tables, and guidance so they comply with the statute. It affects county assessors, mineral-interest owners, and oil and gas operators by setting specific valuation methods for ad valorem taxation and by clarifying when mineral interests and surface interests are taxed separately. The overall sentiment appears strongly favorable and noncontroversial. The bill passed the House 92-0 and the Senate 34-0, indicating broad bipartisan support. No committee transcript concerns were provided, and the unanimous votes suggest the measure was viewed as a technical clarification rather than a major policy dispute. There is little visible contention in the available record. The main substantive issues are the valuation methodology for mineral rights, the $1.00-per-foot assessment for production equipment, and the exemption for plugged casing, but no opposing arguments are documented. Any disagreement would likely center on tax valuation fairness, administrative consistency, or the effect on oil and gas property tax burdens, though none is reflected in the recorded votes or transcripts.

Impact

HB1937 amends Arkansas property tax law governing the assessment of mineral interests and oil and gas production equipment, primarily in Arkansas Code § 26-26-1110. It requires separate assessment of mineral interests when ownership is severed and recorded, sets a specific real-property valuation method for production equipment, exempts plugged and inoperable casing from taxation, and directs that valuation formulas and guidance issued by the Assessment Coordination Division conform to the statute. The act applies to assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been received positively and as a technical or clarifying measure. It passed both chambers unanimously, with a 92-0 House vote and a 34-0 Senate vote. The absence of recorded opposition or committee controversy suggests broad agreement on the need for uniform valuation rules for mineral rights and oil and gas equipment.

Contention

No explicit contention is documented in the available materials. The only potentially disputed issues are the prescribed valuation method for production equipment, the treatment of production increases as newly discovered property, and the requirement that assessors and the Assessment Coordination Division use uniform formulas tied to actual Arkansas prices and standardized expense allowances. If any concerns existed, they would likely have come from county assessors, mineral owners, or oil and gas operators affected by tax valuation changes, but none are reflected in the votes or transcripts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.