To Clarify That The World Health Organization And The United Nations Do Not Have Jurisdiction Or Power In This State And Do Not Have Authority To Enforce Or Implement Actions In This State.
Summary
HB1791 would add a new section to Arkansas law stating that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN) have no jurisdiction or power within the state. It further provides that any requirement or mandate issued by either organization may not be enforced or implemented by the state or any political subdivision, including state agencies, counties, cities, school districts, water districts, and other quasi-public entities.
The bill also prohibits WHO or UN requirements from being used as a basis for state or local action, or to direct, order, or impose requirements of any kind that conflict with the Arkansas Constitution and state law. The text specifically references masks, vaccinations, and medical testing, and bars the use of WHO or UN mandates to gather public or private information about Arkansas residents.
Impact
If enacted, HB1791 would create a state-law prohibition against relying on WHO or UN directives in Arkansas government operations. It would affect state agencies and a broad range of local governmental and quasi-public entities by preventing them from enforcing, implementing, or using international organization mandates as a basis for action. The bill would not change federal law, but it would limit the extent to which international public health or governance guidance could be incorporated into Arkansas policy or administrative practice.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee discussion or votes, the available record suggests the measure is framed as a sovereignty and anti-international-authority bill rather than a technical policy change. Its sponsors appear to support a strong state-first approach, especially regarding public health mandates and information collection. Because no transcripts or vote history are provided, there is no documented committee or floor sentiment in the materials beyond the bill’s clear intent.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely whether Arkansas should preemptively bar any use of WHO or UN mandates, especially in areas such as masking, vaccination, medical testing, and data collection. Supporters would likely view the bill as protecting state sovereignty and individual liberty, while opponents may argue it is unnecessary, symbolic, or could create confusion if international guidance is used informally in public health planning. The broad list of covered entities and the explicit reference to medical measures and information gathering suggest the bill is designed to prevent future public health directives from being tied to international organizations.