Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1423

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/17/25  

Caption

To Prohibit A Person From Receiving Compensation For The Preparation, Presentation, Or Prosecution Of A Claim With Regard To A Veterans' Benefits Matter Except As Authorized By Federal Law.

Summary

HB1423 would create a new subchapter in Arkansas’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act called the “Governing Unaccredited Representatives Defrauding (GUARD) VA Benefits Act.” Its stated purpose is to stop unethical conduct and improper fee collection by people who advise or assist individuals filing claims for veterans’ disability or other VA benefits. The bill defines “veterans’ benefits matter” broadly to cover preparation, presentation, or prosecution of claims involving benefits administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill generally prohibits a person from receiving compensation for preparing, presenting, prosecuting, advising on, consulting about, or assisting with a veterans’ benefits claim, except where federal law already allows such compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 5904 and 38 C.F.R. § 14.629. It also bars paid referrals for these services, while preserving otherwise proper fee-sharing between attorneys under the ABA Model Rules. In addition, anyone who is paid for these services would be subject to the same ethical standards that apply to attorneys in Arkansas, including rules on advertising, solicitation, and confidentiality. A violation of the new section would be treated as a deceptive and unfair trade practice and also as a Class A misdemeanor under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. That means the bill would add both civil-consumer-protection consequences and criminal penalties to conduct involving unapproved paid assistance in veterans’ benefits matters. The practical effect would be to regulate nonlawyer veterans’ claims assistance and limit compensation arrangements that are not authorized by federal veterans-benefits law. Because there are no recorded committee transcripts or votes in the provided materials, there is no documented debate or formal vote history to gauge support or opposition. Based on the bill text, the measure appears aimed at consumer protection for veterans and their families, with a focus on curbing predatory or misleading claims assistance. Potential contention would likely center on whether the compensation ban is too broad for legitimate advocates or consultants, and on the scope of criminal and trade-practice penalties for paid assistance in this area.

Impact

HB1423 would amend Arkansas Code Title 4, Chapter 88 by adding a new subchapter that makes unauthorized paid assistance in veterans’ benefits matters a deceptive trade practice and a Class A misdemeanor. It would affect nonlawyer claims preparers, consultants, referral agents, and any other persons or entities receiving compensation for veterans’ benefits claim work, while preserving federally authorized attorney representation and lawful attorney fee-sharing. The bill would also extend attorney-like ethical standards to compensated veterans’ benefits representatives.

Sentiment

No committee discussion or voting record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of legislative sentiment from hearings or floor action. From the bill’s text and title, the measure is framed positively as a consumer-protection and anti-fraud bill intended to protect veterans from unethical fee practices and unaccredited representatives. The overall tone is protective and regulatory rather than permissive.

Contention

The main likely point of contention is the breadth of the compensation ban for anyone advising or assisting with veterans’ benefits claims, especially nonlawyer advocates or service providers who may argue they offer legitimate help. Another possible issue is the bill’s enforcement mechanism, which combines Deceptive Trade Practices Act liability with criminal misdemeanor penalties. Supporters would likely emphasize protection of veterans from predatory claims mills and improper referral fees, while critics may focus on access to assistance, the scope of the restrictions, and whether federal law already occupies part of the field.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.