Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas Senate Bill SB46

Introduced
1/10/23  
Refer
1/11/23  
Report Pass
1/17/23  
Engrossed
1/18/23  
Enrolled
1/23/23  
Chaptered
2/6/23  

Caption

An Act For The Office Of The Governor - Legislative Liaisons Appropriation For The 2022-2023 Fiscal Year.

Impact

The bill's passage ensures that the Governor's Office can effectively maintain legislative operations by having dedicated liaisons who facilitate communication and collaboration between the executive branch and the legislature. The funding and structure outlined in SB46 are seen as essential for the proper functioning of governmental programs and legislative processes. The appropriations will directly support the operational capacity of the Governor's Office in engaging with legislative matters.

Summary

Senate Bill 46 is an act aimed at appropriating funds for the operating expenses of the Governor's legislative liaisons during the 94th session of the Arkansas General Assembly for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. The bill provides a total appropriation of $226,250 from the Constitutional Officers Fund specifically allocated for maintenance, operations, and expenses associated with these liaisons. It permits the Governor to appoint one Lead Legislative Liaison and nine additional liaisons, both serving without pay but entitled to per diem compensation while the General Assembly is in session.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB46 appears to be largely supportive, reflecting agreement on the necessity of having legislative liaisons. There is an understanding that their roles contribute to more effective governance and streamline processes between branches of government. Since the bill went through with a unanimous vote, it indicates bipartisan or general consensus on the importance of such appropriations.

Contention

While the discussions surrounding SB46 do not highlight major points of contention, the establishment and compensation of legislative liaisons can sometimes be a subject of debate in terms of fiscal priority and allocation of state funds. However, in this case, the lack of opposing votes suggests a shared recognition of the need for these liaisons despite any potential discussions on cost-effectiveness or public spending.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.