Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas Senate Bill SB318

Introduced
2/24/23  
Refer
2/27/23  
Refer
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Engrossed
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Enrolled
3/29/23  
Chaptered
4/4/23  

Caption

To Amend The Law Concerning The Arkansas Manufactured Home Commission; And To Require Civil Penalties Assessed By The Arkansas Manufactured Home Commission To Be Established By Rule.

Impact

If enacted, SB318 would significantly influence the authority of the Arkansas Manufactured Home Commission, enabling it to more effectively regulate the manufactured home industry. This includes setting clear guidelines for civil penalties related to violations of federal standards or local regulations. Additionally, the bill could streamline the commission's operations by removing ambiguities currently present in state law, thereby enhancing the enforcement mechanisms available to auditors and inspectors.

Summary

Senate Bill 318 aims to amend existing laws surrounding the Arkansas Manufactured Home Commission. Specifically, the bill seeks to require that civil penalties assessed by the Commission be established through a formal rule-making process. This change is intended to create a more standardized approach to penalties associated with violations of manufactured home regulations, which currently may lack clarity in their enforcement. By formalizing these penalties, the bill aims to protect consumers and ensure compliance among manufacturers and retailers operating within the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB318 appears to be positive among supporters who see it as a step towards greater consumer protection and standardization within the manufactured housing market. Stakeholders who advocate for regulatory clarity believe that the bill will help to build confidence among consumers and potentially reduce instances of fraud or negligence within the industry. However, dissenting voices may raise concerns about the burden of regulation on small businesses involved in manufactured housing.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding the bill is the potential for increased regulatory oversight, which some stakeholders in the manufactured home industry may perceive as excessive. While the intent is to protect consumers, there is a concern that increased penalties and regulatory scrutiny could discourage smaller operators or lead to higher costs for consumers. Balancing the need for consumer protection with the capacity of businesses to operate effectively remains a key issue as discussions around the bill continue.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB561

An act to add Article 16 (commencing with Section 25258.

CA AB2747

Vehicles: manufacturers: engine labeling.

NJ S1239

Creates "Manufacturing Reboot Program" in EDA to provide financial assistance to certain manufacturing businesses; makes $10 million appropriation to EDA.

NJ A2467

Creates "Manufacturing Reboot Program" in EDA to provide financial assistance to certain manufacturing businesses; makes $10 million appropriation to EDA.

FL S0528

Manufacturing

CA AB2012

Vehicles: transportation of manufactured homes.

FL H0483

Manufacturing

VA HB375

Manufactured Home Lot Rental Act; right of first refusal, resident entities and localities.