Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas Senate Bill SB198

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Engrossed
2/16/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Report Pass
2/21/23  
Enrolled
2/23/23  
Chaptered
2/27/23  

Caption

To Amend The Frequency At Which Each County Is Required To Appraise All Real Estate At Its Full Fair Market Value.

Impact

If enacted, SB198 would directly affect local county regulations on property assessments. It seeks to avoid a scenario where taxpayers experience confusion stemming from irregular reappraisal cycles and allows for more manageable planning for counties. The provisions outlined in the bill aim to level the playing field across counties by establishing a standardized approach that could lead to fairer taxation and better-informed taxpayers regarding property assessments.

Summary

Senate Bill 198 aims to amend the frequency at which counties in Arkansas are required to reappraise real estate properties to ensure assessments reflect full market value. Specifically, the bill proposes that counties conduct appraisals at least once every four years, a change from the previous three-year cycle. The legislative intent is to bring uniformity and consistency across state reappraisal cycles, making the process more predictable for taxpayers and aiding in budgeting for county governments.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB198 was largely supportive among those seeking greater consistency in property assessments. Advocates argued that the proposed changes would simplify the appraisal process and lead to fairer tax assessments. However, there were concerns raised by some stakeholders about the implications of extending the reappraisal cycle to five years, which may impact how quickly property values reflect market changes. Critics worried that longer intervals between assessments might lead to outdated valuations, potentially disadvantaging some taxpayers.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention during discussions centered around whether extending the reappraisal cycle might encourage fairness or create potential disparities in the property tax burden across different counties. Some lawmakers expressed that while uniformity is desirable, the differing market conditions and growth rates among counties should also be taken into account. The debate highlighted the trade-offs between administrative efficiency and the need for timely and accurate property assessments, keeping in mind the rights and responsibilities of taxpayers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB2786

Relating to the frequency with which certain appraisal districts are required to reappraise property for ad valorem tax purposes and to a limitation on the authority of an appraisal district to increase the appraised value of property.

NC S889

Property Tax Reappraisal Moratorium

TX HB4742

Relating to the ability of a school district to request an appraisal of property by the appraisal district.

TX SB467

Relating to a temporary exemption from ad valorem taxation of the appraised value of an improvement to a residence homestead that is completely destroyed by a fire.

MT HB90

Provide two-year reappraisal cycle for all real property

TX SB2538

Relating to the plan required to be adopted by the board of directors of an appraisal district for periodically conducting certain reappraisal activities.

AR HJR1012

An Amendment To The Arkansas Constitution To Repeal Provisions Concerning The Reappraisal And Reassessment Of Real Property; And To Amend Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 79, Concerning Real Property Taxes.

TX SB678

Relating to the reappraisal for ad valorem taxation purposes of certain property completely destroyed or partially damaged by an accidental fire.