Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1322

Introduced
1/30/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Report Pass
2/8/23  
Engrossed
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Enrolled
2/16/23  
Chaptered
2/21/23  

Caption

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning The Reduction Of Certain Regulatory Fees And Charges; And To Declare An Emergency.

Impact

The passage of HB 1322 would significantly impact the way regulatory fees are managed within Arkansas, particularly in terms of financial relief for organizations subjected to these fees. By establishing criteria for fee reductions based on excess fund balances, the bill aims to promote a more favorable economic environment, which proponents argue is crucial for the state's growth. The bill's emergency clause emphasizes the urgency of its implementation to bolster the economic health of the state as of the next fiscal year.

Summary

House Bill 1322 aims to amend Arkansas law concerning the reduction of certain regulatory fees and charges imposed by boards and commissions under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Health and Labor. The bill allows the Secretary of each department to implement fee reductions in cases where a board or commission has accumulated a fund balance exceeding three times its annual operating expenses. The maximum reduction permitted under this bill is capped at ninety-five percent of the applicable fees. This initiative seeks to alleviate the financial burden on regulated entities and promote economic health by reducing unnecessary regulatory costs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1322 appears to be generally supportive among those who advocate for reduced regulatory burdens on businesses and agencies. Supporters argue that unnecessary regulatory fees can stifle economic activity and that reducing these fees aligns with broader economic development strategies. However, there may be contention from those who believe that such reductions could undermine the operational capacity of boards and commissions tasked with regulatory oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the implications of such fee reductions on the capabilities of regulatory boards to perform their essential functions. Opponents may express concerns about the potential decrease in revenue for boards if large fee reductions are enacted, particularly if those fees are crucial for maintaining the necessary resources and enforcement capabilities. Additionally, ensuring transparency and accountability in how fee reductions are granted will be critical to preventing misuse or loss of regulatory integrity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IA HF85

A bill for an act providing for a regulatory relief program.

IA HF2090

A bill for an act providing for a regulatory relief program.

RI H7383

Establishes a Regulatory Sandbox program designed to provide a depository for ideas in a regulatory approach.

RI H5717

Establishes a Regulatory Sandbox program designed to provide a depository for ideas in a regulatory approach.

KS HB2291

Creating the regulatory relief division within the office of the attorney general and establishing the general regulatory sandbox program to waive or suspend rules and regulations for program participants.

OH HB176

Establish a universal regulatory sandbox program

OH SB90

Create regulatory relief division; establish regulatory sandbox

OH SB445

To amend sections 121.95 and 121.951 of the Revised Code to revise the definition of "regulatory restriction" for purposes of administrative rulemaking and to specify that certain rule changes alone do not eliminate a restriction.