SB 156 authorizes the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, subject to appropriation, to purchase nonvoting preferred shares in the Alaska Commercial Fishing and Agriculture Bank. The purpose of that investment is to provide capital for the bank to make loans to people in Alaska’s commercial fishing industry, with the bill specifically tying the program to loans secured by pledged limited entry permits. The legislation sets detailed terms for those loans, including a fixed 15-year term, a fixed interest rate, and interest caps tied to the prime rate and an absolute 5.25 percent ceiling.
The bill also creates a state review and repayment mechanism. The bank must provide loan information to the department, which then conducts a one-time review to compare projected interest earnings before and after the new loan program. If the projected earnings difference for all covered loans is less than the par value of the shares purchased by the state, the department must require the bank to buy back enough shares to make up the difference. The shares are to be repurchased after 20 years, and the department may appoint a receiver if the bank fails to do so. The program is funded using money equal to the unobligated balance of the former Alaska capstone avionics revolving loan fund, and the new section is repealed on January 1, 2027.
Impact
SB 156 amends Alaska law by creating a temporary, state-backed financing mechanism for the Alaska Commercial Fishing and Agriculture Bank and by directing the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development to use designated funds to purchase preferred shares in the bank. It affects the bank’s lending authority, the terms under which it may originate or refinance certain commercial fishing loans, and the department’s oversight role. The bill also establishes reporting, review, and share-repurchase requirements that are intended to protect the state’s financial interest while supporting lending to commercial fishers secured by limited entry permits.
Sentiment
The voting history indicates strong bipartisan support for the bill. It passed the Senate 19-0 on third reading, passed the House 40-0, and later received Senate concurrence on the House amendments with only one dissenting vote. No committee transcripts were provided, but the unanimous or near-unanimous floor votes suggest the measure was broadly viewed as a targeted economic development and industry-support bill rather than a controversial policy change.
Contention
The main policy questions embedded in the bill concern the use of state funds to capitalize a private bank, the degree of state oversight over the bank’s lending program, and the use of limited entry permits as collateral for loans. The bill also includes a mechanism that could require the bank to repurchase shares if projected interest earnings fall short of the state’s investment value, which reflects concern about protecting public funds. Despite these structural safeguards, the recorded votes show little overt opposition, indicating that any concerns were limited or resolved before final passage.
Property tax: assessments; inapplicability of pop-up to taxable value resulting from interspousal transfers of ownership interests in legal entities; clarify. Amends sec. 27a of 1893 PA 206 (MCL 211.27a).
Property tax: assessments; transfer of ownership of certain real property to certain individuals; exempt from uncapping of taxable value upon transfer. Amends sec. 27a of 1893 PA 206 (MCL 211.27a).
Allows Right to Farm Act complaints to be filed with county agriculture development board in adjacent county under certain circumstances and creates alternate voting members on such boards.