Video & Transcript Research : 'vessel emissions'

Page 1 of 155
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment & Energy Jan 19th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Environment & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • , not to other categories of vessels.
  • emissions that occurred before 2026.
  • is not required to purchase allowances to cover those emissions.
  • So the emissions are known, but the company is not required to purchase allowances to cover those emissions
  • Ocean-going vessels released high amounts of sulfur.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Jan 28th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Environment, Energy & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • It relates to emissions from emissions-intensive trade-exposed facilities, or EITEs, under the Climate
  • We want to decrease our greenhouse gas emissions, but we also don't want emissions leakage.
  • Right now, direct emissions are the only emissions covered under the program.
  • So those emissions coming out of the smokestack, emissions from electricity or natural gas use.
  • 20% of our GHG emissions.
Bills: SB6172, SB6246, SB5932
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation May 8th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • protect public health while providing clear guidelines. for industry regarding hydrogen sulfide emissions
  • of the latest industry developments, we ensure that Texans are protected from potentially harmful emissions
  • to protect public health while providing clear guidelines for industry regarding hydrogen sulfide emissions
  • We ensure that Texans are protected from potentially harmful emissions while providing regulatory certainty
  • It's called STEERS, the State of Texas Emissions Event. Reporting system.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Transportation Feb 27th, 2026 at 02:30 pm

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Could you talk a little bit about where the vessels come from?
  • How do you feel about other zero-emission technologies?
  • How would you feel about zero emissions versus electric?
  • As we discussed last week, Switch Maritime develops zero-emission maritime vessels.
  • Hydrogen fuel cell vessels like these are equipped to operate like a diesel vessel, capable of a full
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment & Energy Jan 29th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Environment & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • tankers between 5,000 and 40,000 deadweight tons and articulated tug barges and towed waterborne vessels
  • That would be reported in our greenhouse gas emissions inventory.
  • And so although we can account for those emissions, we only have limited ability to regulate emissions
  • It does not necessarily reduce the carbon emissions that we account for here in our state in a really
  • On net, at a statewide level, that can lead to an increase in emissions when you require additionality
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Feb 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Environment, Energy & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • facility subject to a memorandum of agreement occurring before January 1, 2026, rather than all emissions
  • The bill exempts from the cap-and-invest program emissions from a coal-fired electric-generating facility
  • subject to a memorandum of agreement occurring before January 1, 2026, rather than all emissions from
  • occurring on or after January 1, 2026, if those reported emissions are due to an emergency order issued
  • If there are no questions, I'll move on to Senate Bill 6246, relating to emissions from emissions-intensive
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP-TOU Joint Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • tax and dividend special fund, gradually increases the environmental response energy carbon emissions
  • Finally, carbon cash back is based on an unproven theory that carbon taxes will reduce carbon emissions
  • We are in opposition to the portion of the bill that relates to the carbon emissions tax.
  • That's the plan to get the state to net zero emissions.
  • And equivalent cashback is emissions.
Bills: HB1617
Summary: The committees heard testimony on HB 1949, which would create a public dashboard for the green fee to improve transparency and accountability. Testimony from the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, and many community and conservation groups was generally supportive, with several speakers urging that the governor’s project recommendations remain largely intact and that community-driven projects continue to guide spending. One amendment was suggested to place the dashboard at the Department of Budget and Finance for fiscal expertise, while other testimony favored keeping it with the commission. Members asked about procurement, ETS involvement, recurring hosting costs, and whether the dashboard could be funded from green fee revenues; the commission said it could work with ETS and that green fee funds could reasonably be used. The committees then voted to pass HB 1949 with amendments. The committees also heard HB 2618, which would require the governor to submit a separate bill for amounts tied to any increase in the transient accommodations tax and, in later discussion, was expanded into a broader restructuring of future green fee allocations. Testimony from the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition, and others supported the bill and emphasized the value of more predictable, dedicated funding for conservation and climate-related work. During decision-making, the chair described amendments creating several special funds under DLNR, including a watershed biodiversity and wildfire risk reduction fund, an aquatic resources conservation fund, a coastal restoration fund, a cesspool conversion revolving loan fund, and a green fee special fund for remaining revenues, with recommended amounts discussed for some of the funds. The committees voted to pass HB 2618 with amendments. The hearing then moved to HB 1644, a consumer protection measure for residential solar sales that would require compliance with consumer protection laws, licensing or contractor affiliation for sellers, and a standardized disclosure form. Testimony in support came from the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority, DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative, the Hawaii Solar Energy Association, and several solar companies and individuals. Supporters said the bill would address complaints about third-party sales practices and improve disclosure, especially around financing. The committee then began hearing HB 2243, which would require electric utilities to provide public, electronic customer bill impact analyses and annual reports to the Public Utilities Commission; the Division of Consumer Advocacy and the PUC offered comments supporting the measure’s intent.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 4/16/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:01:08.120><c> Last</c> Last year, Gopher Resource exceeded the standard for lead air emissions
  • partially within an environmental justice area and two within 2 miles of a facility that has exceeded emission
  • So that's where we try to capture the bulk of the emissions coming from the facility to determine if
  • </c><00:10:10.480><c> coming</c> the the bulk of the emissions coming the the bulk of the emissions coming
  • The intent of the bill is for a pilot program to try new technology to monitor lead emissions and provide
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Culture, Recreation & Tourism Apr 15th, 2025

Culture, Recreation & Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • It allows Texas Parks and Wildlife to move vessel.
  • Texas has one of the largest populations in the country, with over 570,000 vessels registered and more
  • bill that we passed, has seen an increase in title fraud in cases where buyers unknowingly purchased vessels
  • House Bill 4895 adopts provisions from the Uniform Certificate of Title for Vessels Act (UCOT).
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation Apr 17th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Smarter locally tailored emissions reduction policies in the future.
  • Falsified vehicle emissions. A little off, pardon me.
  • Falsified emissions. inspection reports from the Dallas and Harris County area.
  • So we can't just unilaterally singling out emissions testing because...
  • While modern vehicles are manufactured with better emissions and have cleaner emissions, of controls,
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment & Energy Jan 27th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Environment & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • They avoid more than 77,000 tons of carbon emissions each year.
  • Reduce emissions.
  • Reduce emissions.
  • , things like aircraft emissions.
  • reductions consistent with the declining emissions cap.
Bills: HB2537, HB2245, HB2296
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Jan 19th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • law and unsafe products for customers and companies that offer illegal services, such as removing emissions
  • 2134 relates to certain regional transportation plans, providing for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions
  • The state has greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and VMT reduction targets, and this enables regional
  • cannot meet our state's climate goals, like Bryce talked about, without considering greenhouse gas emissions
  • By asking RTPOs to look directly at vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, it ensures regional
Bills: HB2096, HB2134, HB2323
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Feb 11th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 4272 is the certificate of titling for vesseling act.
  • Essentially, what this does is it establishes a formal certificate of titling system for boats and vessels
Summary: The Public Safety Committee heard several bills related to vehicle titling and VIN inspection procedures. House Bill 4272, by Representative Miller, would create a formal certificate of titling system for boats and vessels in Oklahoma to document ownership and reduce fraud; it passed 6-0. House Bill 3277, a cleanup bill on VIN inspections and salvage vehicles, clarified who may perform inspections and added salvage pools as authorized entities; it passed 7-0. House Bill 3148 made additional changes to the VIN inspection process, including salvage pool language and anti-fraud protections, and also passed 7-0. House Bill 3323 removed notarization requirements for documents submitted electronically to Service Oklahoma and passed 7-0. House Bill 4105 clarified exemptions under the Oklahoma Security Guard Act and passed 6-0. House Bill 3304, renamed the Ray Davis Safe Roads Act, requires Service Oklahoma to check the methamphetamine database before issuing commercial driver licenses and passed 6-0. The committee also considered House Bill 4287, which would change how incarcerated people are counted for legislative apportionment by using their last residence rather than the prison location. Supporters argued it would create more equal representation and address a historical anomaly, while opponents said it would disconnect incarcerated constituents from the districts that currently represent them and could affect rural representation. After debate, the bill failed 4-5 and remained in committee. House Bill 3345, a Department of Mental Health bill, would expand pretrial behavioral health and substance use screening services to any charge, felony or misdemeanor, to help identify diversion opportunities earlier and support treatment referrals. Testimony emphasized that the screenings would be done by certified local contractors at no cost to county jails and would help courts, prosecutors, and defense counsel. The bill received a 4-4 vote but was reported out as a due pass. The committee then laid over House Bill 315 until the following week and adjourned.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Feb 10th, 2026

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because emissions isn't what drives me. Emissions doesn't drive me.
  • Emissions doesn't drive me to my house every day. Emissions doesn't power my television.
  • But if the goal is zero emissions, then a gas-powered plant that does zero emissions would be acceptable
  • And that is intended to be an offset, a carbon emission offset equivalent to the carbon emissions being
  • So that's not causing more emissions anywhere else. That is subtracting emissions everywhere.
Bills: SB78, SB235, SB22, SB310
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 78, which would classify nuclear energy as renewable energy. Senator Thornton and supporters argued that New Mexico needs dispatchable, baseload power and that nuclear should be added to the state’s renewable portfolio standard because wind and solar are intermittent and require extensive land, mining, and battery storage. Supporters also emphasized nuclear’s zero-carbon profile, the safety record of U.S. Navy reactors, the possibility of small modular reactors, and the fact that New Mexico already uses nuclear-generated electricity from out of state. Opponents, including Senator O’Malley and Senator Charlie, argued nuclear is not renewable because it relies on finite uranium and creates long-lived radioactive waste, and they raised concerns about uranium mining impacts, waste storage, and the bill’s lack of a limiting principle. The committee voted 5-4 to do not pass the bill, with Senators Cervantes, Hamblen, O’Malley, Lopez, and Charlie voting yes on the do-not-pass motion and Senators Ezell, Scott, and Thornton voting no; the chair then explained that the vote reflected disagreement over whether nuclear should be labeled renewable, not opposition to nuclear power itself. The committee then heard Senate Bill 235, the Microgrid Oversight Act, with a committee substitute. Sponsor Senator Steinborn said the substitute would restore existing renewable benchmarks for microgrids, require large microgrids to meet zero-carbon targets by 2045, add reporting and PRC oversight, and close a loophole that could let utilities buy microgrid power and shift costs to ratepayers. Supporters, including environmental groups and community advocates, said the bill was needed to regulate large data-center microgrids such as Project Jupiter in Doña Ana County, which they said could drive major emissions, ozone, and nitrogen oxide pollution, strain water supplies, and undermine state climate goals. They also argued the bill would protect ratepayers and ensure transparency and community benefits. Opponents, including Americans for Prosperity, the Chamber of Commerce, oil and gas associations, Xcel Energy, PNM, Consumer Energy Alliance, and economic development groups, argued the bill would impose unnecessary regulation on private microgrids, slow investment, raise costs, and reduce flexibility for reliability projects and industrial development. They said microgrids are already regulated for safety and interconnection, and that the bill could discourage projects in New Mexico. In response, Steinborn said the bill was necessary because current law leaves a loophole for large polluting microgrids and because several major projects are already planned or underway. The committee heard extensive public testimony on both sides, but the transcript ends before a final vote on SB 235 is taken.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment & Energy Feb 3rd, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Environment & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I don't know. ...to the emissions reduction standard.
  • So the emission reduction opportunities, there's a long list there.
  • rather than its direct greenhouse gas emissions.
  • rather than its direct greenhouse gas emissions.
  • rather than direct gas emissions.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Feb 10th, 2026 at 09:05 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Zero carbon emissions.
  • Because emissions isn't what drives me. Emissions doesn't drive me.
  • Emissions doesn't drive me to my house every day. Emissions doesn't power my television.
  • So that's not causing more emissions anywhere else. That is subtracting emissions everywhere.
  • So that's not causing more emissions anywhere else. That is subtracting emissions everywhere.
Bills: SB78, SB235, SB22, SB310