Transcript Highlights:

• Urban growth areas are areas designated by a county in which urban growth is encouraged.
• Outside of these designated areas, urban growth is prohibited.
• Each city must be included within an urban growth area.
• by urban growth or they're adjacent to... ...in an urban growth area, but only if they're already characterized
• by urban growth or they're adjacent to an area characterized by urban growth.

Bills: HB2201, HB2154

Keywords: urban growth, city planning, county regulations, development standards, land use, land ownership, conservation districts, property rights, regulatory authority, environmental policy, 904, all

Summary: The Local Government Committee first held a work session on the Washington Zoning Atlas. Commerce staff explained that the atlas is a statewide, web-based zoning map built from local zoning codes with help from university planning students. It lets users compare zoning across jurisdictions, query where uses like residential, industrial, commercial, multifamily, or agriculture are allowed, and link back to local development codes. Members asked about using the atlas as a “single source of truth,” layering it with other state data such as transportation or public works projects, update frequency, and whether environmental sensitivity data could be added in the future. Commerce said the atlas is not a parcel-specific buildability tool, is being updated on an ongoing basis, and needs additional funding because the planned update source is not in the governor’s budget. The committee then heard House Bill 2201, which would require counties to align planning and development regulations within urban growth areas with the city’s regulations unless the city agrees otherwise or another law requires a different standard. The sponsor and several city representatives said mismatched county and city rules can undermine annexation planning, infrastructure investment, and long-term development coordination. Cities from Vancouver, Pasco, Ferndale, and Lynnwood described “donut holes,” infrastructure misalignment, and the need for better annexation pathways. The Association of Washington Cities and planning groups said the issue is real and merits more policy work, but the bill needs refinement. Counties, the Washington State Association of Counties, and other opponents said the bill is too broad, does not account for existing interlocal agreements, would add workload without funding, and fails to require timely annexation by cities. The sponsor said the bill needs more work and invited continued discussion. No vote was taken. The committee also heard House Bill 2154, which would prohibit conservation districts from buying or acquiring interests in agricultural land 20 acres or larger that is actively used for farming and would require districts to inventory certain land holdings. The sponsor argued that taxpayer-funded district purchases can drive up farmland prices and reduce opportunities for private farmers to expand. Conservation district representatives, the Washington Association of Conservation Districts, the Puget Sound Partnership, and several local districts opposed the bill, saying conservation districts use voluntary tools such as purchases, easements, leases, and donations to keep land in agricultural production, support beginning farmers, and preserve farmland from development. They said many district-owned parcels are donated rather than purchased, often leased back to farmers, and used for education, demonstration, and conservation. Testifiers emphasized that farmland conversion to development is the larger threat and that the bill would remove an important preservation tool. The hearing closed without action on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• County planning under the Growth Management Act must also designate urban areas in which urban growth
• For some brief background, under the Growth Management Act, counties must designate urban growth areas
• Urban growth is encouraged in these areas and prohibited outside.
• Generally, urban services can only be provided within an urban growth area.
• Only one county hits about 35.5% of urban growth land, and that is in Kitsap County.

Bills: HB2459, HB2480, HB2530, HB2129, HB2223

Keywords: school siting, urban growth, education policy, zoning regulations, community planning, residential development, commercial zones, mixed-use zoning, urban planning, state regulations, public facilities district, regional aquatics, sports facilities, local government, infrastructure, agritourism, agriculture, tourism, economic development, local businesses

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several local government bills, with most of the discussion focused on HB 2480, which would allow residential development in commercial and mixed-use zones for larger GMA-planning cities and limit local governments’ ability to require ground-floor commercial or mixed-use conditions. The bill sponsor and supporters, including the Lieutenant Governor, Governor’s Office, Commerce, builders, business groups, Microsoft, housing advocates, and several city officials, said the bill would help address the housing shortage by unlocking underused commercial land and reducing costly zoning barriers. Opponents and some cities, including Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, Des Moines, Bellingham, Lynnwood, Lacey, Pasco, and others, warned it could undermine walkable centers, reduce retail and tax revenue, harm small businesses, and interfere with local planning; several asked for narrower exemptions or amendments. A proposed substitute was described that would expand the bill to mixed-use zones, add exemptions, and require some height flexibility where mixed-use or ground-floor commercial requirements remain. The committee also heard HB 2223, which would create a conflict-of-interest exception allowing irrigation district directors to have a spouse employed under a contract with the district if disclosure and recusal requirements are met, similar to an existing exception for public hospital district commissioners. The sponsor and the Washington State Water Resources Association said the change would help irrigation districts recruit volunteer board members in rural areas. No vote was taken. HB 2530 would extend the deadline for forming a public facilities district for regional aquatics and sports facilities from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2028. Supporters from Olympia and Tumwater said the extension would give local governments more time to form a district and pursue a long-sought aquatic center; one testifier said removing the deadline would not slow the effort. The committee also heard HB 2459, which would expand authority to site schools outside urban growth areas and extend utilities to them beyond the current Pierce County-specific allowance. Supporters, including the sponsor, Tahoma School District, and school advocates, said it would let districts use land they already own to address overcrowding; opponents, including Futurewise, argued it would weaken Growth Management Act planning and should remain a local or regional issue. Finally, HB 2129 on agritourism drew support from farm interests and some county representatives for helping farms diversify income and preserve farmland, while counties and Futurewise asked for more work on definitions and implementation and raised concerns about unintended regulatory effects. The hearings were suspended and reopened multiple times to accommodate testimony, but no final committee action or votes were taken in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• growth area that does have subdivisions that are, you know, large.
• growth boundaries have made the availability of land.
• I'm an urban planner and very familiar with the overall process.
• We'll now move on from 6309 and open up the hearing on 6279, Wildland Urban Interface again.
• With increasing growth... ...efficiently, as many have already said before me.

Bills: SB5633, SB6279, SB6291, SB6274, SB6309, SB5903, SB6016, SB5820, SB6132, SB6189

Keywords: land subdivision, zoning, property development, local government authority, real estate, infrastructure, wildfire, wildland urban interface, WUI, building code, fire-resistant construction, defensible space, hazard map, risk map, state building code council, department of natural resources, fire marshal, regional fire defense board, roofing standards, exterior walls

Summary: The committee heard extensive testimony on SB 5633, a major rewrite of subdivision law. Staff described changes that would move many subdivision decisions from legislative bodies to administrative personnel, limit or eliminate public hearings for plats, expand notice to nearby landowners, clarify pre-application conferences, require concurrent review of related permits, and set a 100-day decision timeline for preliminary plats. Supporters from the building industry, Realtors, and some city officials said the bill would streamline an outdated process, reduce delays and costs, and help housing production. County and city representatives, while praising the stakeholder process and some technical improvements, raised concerns about eliminating public hearings, local accountability, and implementation details. The committee also heard testimony on SB 6279, which would incorporate the Wildland Urban Interface code into the state building code after wildfire maps are completed, with local amendment authority and consultation requirements. Fire marshals and some environmental advocates supported the goal but asked for clearer environmental protections, more transparency in mapping, and more local flexibility; builders and county officials opposed or sought changes, warning about costs, timing, and the practicality of applying the code before maps are finalized. The committee then heard SB 6309, which would streamline permitting for Sound Transit and other regional transit authority projects by allowing permit applications before land acquisition is complete, allowing rail facilities to exceed some local height and setback limits when practicable, and exempting certain land divisions tied to condemnation for essential public facilities. The committee waived the five-day notice rule for the bill, and the sponsor and Sound Transit representatives said the measure would reduce delays and help deliver light rail and bus rapid transit more efficiently while preserving local coordination and cultural resource review. The committee also heard SB 6291, which would extend from two to four years the period during which local health jurisdiction wastewater inspectors may work under supervision before certification; public health officials supported the change as a workforce and training fix, saying the current timeline is too short and costly. Finally, SB 6274 would require comprehensive plans to identify infrastructure barriers, including frontage and street standards that affect infill and middle housing, and to review those standards for consistency with housing and transportation goals. Builders and some planners supported the bill as a way to reduce costly frontage mandates, while city and advocacy witnesses asked for clearer definitions and cautioned about impacts on safety, accessibility, and local street design.

Transcript Highlights:

• These are areas in which urban growth is encouraged, while outside of these areas, urban growth is generally
• There’s only 3% of buildable lands available in Washington State inside of the urban growth area.
• Requiring shrub step mitigation inside our urban growth areas undermines the Growth Management Act and
• growth area... ...alone can trigger additional studies or redesigns within an urban growth area that
• In section one, it reads land within urban growth areas is not suited for wildlife.

Bills: HB2103, HB2388, HB2316, HB2006, HB2224

Keywords: renewable energy, nonemitting generation, public entities, contracting, electric generation, distributed energy, agricultural land, energy generation, renewable resources, siting regulations, land use, urban development, vegetation management, shrubsteppe, environmental regulation, economic development, sales tax, rural counties, industrial land banks, growth management

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several local government bills. HB 2006 would extend the deadline for certain rural counties that collect a sales and use tax for economic development to designate industrial land banks under the Growth Management Act. The sponsor and county officials from Kittitas County said the bill would help create industrial land for jobs and economic growth, while Futurewise opposed it, arguing the large land banks could conflict with agricultural land protection and that the deadline should not be extended without stronger limits. HB 2103 would expand authority for public utilities and other public entities to enter contracts for the capability of renewable or non-emitting generation projects, including newer resources such as nuclear, renewable hydrogen, and fusion. Supporters from Energy Northwest, public utility districts, and the City of Richland said the bill would align contract law with the Clean Energy Transformation Act and give utilities more flexibility to secure future resources. Opponents, including several ratepayer and advocacy witnesses, warned it would shift financial risk to customers, weaken consumer protections, and repeat past nuclear power failures such as WPPSS. HB 2316 would limit local regulation of shrub-step vegetation inside urban growth areas by stating such vegetation cannot be treated as critical habitat or used to restrict development, and by barring mitigation or replacement requirements. The Tri-Cities sponsor and many local government, housing, and development witnesses said the bill would reduce delays and costs for housing and redevelopment on already urbanized land. Tribes, Audubon, and conservation advocates opposed it, saying it would remove protections for a rare and imperiled ecosystem, harm wildlife and habitat connectivity, and set a harmful precedent. HB 2224 would let a city form a single-city fire protection district without reducing its levy rate dollar-for-dollar, and would allow online notice and service contracts with municipal fire service authorities. City officials, fire chiefs, and the Association of Washington Cities supported it as a practical tool for funding fire service, while one taxpayer advocate opposed the broader trend of appointed bodies with taxing authority. HB 2388 would treat pivot-corner solar and agrovoltaic facilities on agricultural land as distributed energy resources and accessory uses, and deem them consistent with agricultural conservation. The sponsor and conservation groups supported it as a way to add clean energy without displacing productive farmland, while Futurewise raised concerns about definitions and whether the bill could unintentionally weaken farmland protections.

Transcript Highlights:

• engage in planning for future population growth, and that the comprehensive plan is the centerpiece
• Counties planning under the GMA must also designate urban areas.
• Cities planning under the Growth Management Act must also allow for Cities planning under the Growth
• This bill is really about unlocking opportunities within existing urban space.
• Within existing urban space. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the bill.

Bills: SB5820, SB5995, SB5467

Keywords: freight rail, rail corridor, short-line railroad, rail-dependent uses, industrial land use, growth management act, GMA, comprehensive plan, transportation element, land use planning, local government, county planning, city planning, critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, urban growth area, development regulations, notice on permits

Transcript Highlights:

• within those counties engage in planning for future population growth.
• The Growth Management Act requires that all counties and cities, and not only...
• For future population growth, the Growth Management Act requires that all counties and cities, and not
• Counties that do plan under the GMA must also designate urban growth areas and include in their comprehensive
• The Growth Management Act is complex.

Bills: SB5820, SB5467, SB5995

Keywords: freight rail, rail corridor, short-line railroad, rail-dependent uses, industrial land use, growth management act, GMA, comprehensive plan, transportation element, land use planning, local government, county planning, city planning, critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, urban growth area, development regulations, notice on permits

Transcript Highlights:

• The areas added are suitable for urban growth.
• growth so that other areas that are more suitable can be added to the urban growth boundary.
• growth so that other areas that are more suitable can be added to the urban growth boundary.
• being part of the urban growth area.
• The land that we have is adjacent to the current urban growth boundaries.

Bills: SB5903, SB6037, SB5983, SB5995, SB6016, SB6066

Keywords: cemetery districts, elections, local governance, public policy, administrative procedures, fire protection, districts, emergency services, funding, legislation, tax exemption, land transfer, governmental entity, property tax, current use classification, zero emission, cargo handling, port district, environmental impact, grant allocation

Summary: The committee heard several bills. SB 5903 would streamline cemetery district elections by deeming the sole qualified candidate elected without putting the position on the ballot; Senator Cortez said it would save local election costs, and there was no testimony. SB 6037 would change how single-city fire protection districts are formed and financed, including removing the requirement that a city reduce its levy after 2026, clarifying commissioner elections, and allowing administrative service contracts with the city; the sponsor and local government and fire service witnesses said it would give cities a voter-approved tool to fund and regionalize fire service, while committee questions focused on levy impacts and the mechanics of forming districts. SB 5983 would exempt certain current-use land transfers to government entities from additional taxes when the transfer is tied to permit conditions and limited in size; Senator Leas described it as helping a family farm avoid back taxes on a right-of-way transfer, and there was no testimony. The committee then heard SB 5995, which would remove the 2031 sunset on the prohibition against port districts and port development authorities using public funds to buy fully automated marine container cargo handling equipment. The sponsor and labor, environmental, and maritime witnesses argued that public dollars should support zero-emission, human-operated equipment rather than automation that displaces jobs, while emphasizing that the bill would still allow cleaner equipment operated by people; there was strong public interest, with testimony overwhelmingly in support. SB 6016 would adjust Growth Management Act urban growth area swap rules so critical aquifer recharge areas are treated consistently in annual and periodic updates; Commerce and several business and housing witnesses called it a technical fix that preserves environmental safeguards while making swaps easier for housing, while one witness argued it revives a weaker prior statute and could weaken groundwater protections and invite litigation. Finally, SB 6066 would let counties, cities, towns, or WSDOT designate accident risk zones on dangerous roads, require engineering and traffic studies, increase enforcement, and use doubled traffic penalties to fund safety improvements. Senator Torres and Pasco officials described repeated serious crashes at local interchanges and said the bill could help address them, while AWC and county representatives supported the safety goal but asked for clearer liability protections and implementation language. No votes were taken on any of the bills in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• The state CTR program requires public and private employers in the urbanized portion of certain counties
• Major employers are those with more than 100 employees at a single work site located in certain urban
• growth areas who begin their work between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m.
• Despite this growth, the number of people driving alone to work has been trending down year over year

Bills: HB2307, HB2374, HB2379, HB1823, HB2111

Keywords: commute trip reduction, definitions, transportation, environmental impact, urban planning, electric bicycles, electric motorcycles, regulation, vehicle classification, tolling, emergency suspension, public access, state highways, transportation improvement board, TIB, transportation improvement account, motor vehicle fund, arterial streets, local match, private match

Summary: The Transportation Committee heard public testimony on three bills. HB 2307 would remove the current 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. start-time requirement from the state commute trip reduction program so more employers and shift workers could qualify for CTR benefits. The bill sponsor and supporters from Microsoft, Transportation Choices Coalition, Move Redmond, Commute Seattle, WSDOT’s TDM Technical Committee, and Tacoma on the Go said the change would modernize the program, expand access to transit passes, vanpools, and bike benefits, and improve congestion, affordability, and equity. No one testified in opposition. The committee then heard HB 2374, which would more clearly distinguish electric-assisted bicycles from higher-powered electric motorcycles, require labeling and other consumer disclosures, and create a DOL work group to study enforcement and consumer protection issues. Supporters included city officials, school-age testifiers, bike and trail organizations, and park/recreation advocates, who said the bill would address unsafe high-speed vehicles being marketed as e-bikes, especially those ridden by minors, while preserving access for true e-bikes. Some testifiers asked for additional enforcement tools for under-16 riders and for broader representation on the work group. Finally, the committee heard HB 2379, which would require WSDOT to suspend tolling on facilities that could serve as evacuation routes during emergencies until the agency determines tolling can resume. The sponsor cited recent wildfire and flood evacuation concerns and said people should not have to think about tolls while evacuating. Staff noted the bill would reduce toll revenue during suspensions and could have indeterminate implementation costs. After the hearings, the committee recessed and then took executive action, adopting a proposed substitute for HB 1823 and passing HB 2111 by voice vote; both measures were approved with 27 aye votes and no nays, with two members excused.

Transcript Highlights:

• the district's current space-wide capacity and square feet to the district's projected enrollment growth
• senior league ball fields, struggled to compete with a large complex that we might find in a more urban

Bills: HB2470, HB2353, HB2420, HB2338

Keywords: HB2470, school construction assistance, capital budget, school facilities, on-base schools, military base schools, military installations, public school construction, school plant projects, state funding assistance, superintendent of public instruction, OSPI, school capital funding, instructional space, school district construction, alternative learning experience, ALE, free and reduced-price meals, special housing burden, district growth

Summary: The committee held public hearings on three capital-related bills. HB 2353 would raise the pre-design threshold for state-funded capital projects from $10 million to $15 million and require annual inflation adjustments beginning in 2027. Staff and the prime sponsor said the change would reduce delays and costs for projects, with testimony from Steve DuPont supporting the bill as a way to avoid unnecessary pre-design work and construction escalation. The hearing on HB 2420 covered increases to the Small Works Roster threshold for public works contracts, with a proposed substitute delaying the first increase to January 1, 2027. Representative Zahn and several stakeholders, including universities, cities, ports, counties, and water districts, testified in support, saying the bill would reduce administrative burden, speed projects, and better reflect current construction costs. The committee also heard HB 2470, which would change School Construction Assistance Program rules for school facilities located on military bases. Staff explained that on-base instructional space would be excluded from district inventory calculations, increasing eligibility, and that state assistance would be based on project cost minus federal funding. Representative Leavitt said the bill would help districts like Clover Park and Medical Lake better serve military families. OSPI, Clover Park School District, and the Veterans Legislative Coalition testified in support, though OSPI noted it was working on an amendment to replace a federal-funding backfill with a 15% increase in the SCAP funding assistance percentage to comply with federal law. In executive session, the committee moved HB 2338, which would make community-scaled projects eligible under the Department of Commerce low-income weatherization program, out of committee with a due-pass recommendation by a 17-0 vote, with two members excused. The committee then held a work session with the Recreation and Conservation Office on its competitive grant programs, including the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program, youth athletic facilities, community forests, aquatic lands, boating, firearms and archery ranges, and federal trail and conservation programs. Members asked about demand, ADA compliance, match requirements, geographic distribution, and outreach to underserved communities; RCO said it uses advisory committees, regional allocation methods in some programs, and technical assistance to broaden access and improve distribution.

Transcript Highlights:

• pose a threat to the future and the ability to fund the infrastructure that we need to support the growth

Bills: HB2273, SB5188, HB2353, HB2420, HB2470

Keywords: embodied carbon, building materials, sustainability, construction, environment, broadband, infrastructure, loan assistance, economic development, technology access, HB 2353, predesign thresholds, capital construction, capital budget, major capital projects, Office of Financial Management, OFM, Washington state, state agencies, infrastructure planning

Summary: The Capital Budget Committee heard public testimony on Substitute House Bill 2236, which would update the Washington State Housing Finance Commission’s statutes. Staff explained that the bill would authorize the commission to make direct mortgage loans for multifamily housing, clarify that it is not a retail mortgage lender, extend bond counsel terms, remove notice requirements before bond issuance, and repeal outdated provisions including the housing finance program and housing finance plan requirement. The sponsor and commission representatives said the changes would modernize the agency, improve efficiency, and give it more flexibility to provide gap financing for affordable housing without using state general funds. Testimony was generally supportive, with some questions focused on housing access for communities of color, the effect of higher interest rates, and the possible role of longer mortgage terms; the commission emphasized its down payment assistance programs and work with banks and developers. The hearing on SHB 2236 was then closed. The committee then heard House Bill 2273 on reducing embodied carbon emissions in buildings and building materials. Staff described requirements for the State Building Code Council to adopt embodied-carbon reduction standards for large projects, phased implementation, reporting, a public database and website through the Department of Commerce, and random audits. The prime sponsor said the bill responds to rising energy demand and would help lower emissions and potentially reduce costs by encouraging innovation and allowing embodied-carbon savings to count in future energy-code tradeoffs. Supporters from environmental justice and architecture groups said the bill would address pollution upstream, align Washington with other jurisdictions, and could be cost-neutral on many projects. Opponents, including the Washington Aggregate and Concrete Association and Washington Citizens Against Unfair Taxes, argued the bill could raise costs, create sourcing and timeline problems, and questioned the school construction exemption. The hearing on HB 2273 was then closed. The committee also heard Senate Bill 5188, which would allow the Public Works Board to issue loans for broadband infrastructure repair and replacement under the broadband service expansion program, with priority for areas that would become unserved without the work. Staff noted operating and capital costs in the fiscal note and said an updated note had been requested. The Association of Washington Cities testified with concerns that expanding the program could signal further sweeps from the Public Works Assistance Account and undermine confidence in funding for other infrastructure needs, while a committee member raised whether the program should instead be handled through the Curb Board. The hearing was closed after no further testifiers appeared. In executive session, the committee reviewed House Bill 2353, House Bill 2420, and House Bill 2470. HB 2353, which raises the predesigned threshold for capital construction projects from $10 million to $15 million and indexes it to inflation, was passed out of committee by voice vote with an 18-0-1 result. The committee then adopted a proposed substitute for HB 2420, which increases the small works roster contract limit to $530,000 and changes the effective date to January 1, 2027; it also passed 18-0-1. Staff also briefed HB 2470, including a proposed substitute that would increase state funding assistance for on-base school construction projects by 15% and remove a federal-funding offset requirement, but no vote on that bill occurred in the transcript. The chair announced another hearing and executive session for Friday and asked members to submit amendments by 10 a.m. the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• First, background, the Growth Management Act is the comprehensive...
• The Growth Management Act is the comprehensive land use planning framework for cities and counties in
• Some examples of those goals include urban growth, reducing sprawl, and economic development.
• Thirdly, it's very important to add, I think, a new element to the Growth Management Act to proactively
• I think the new model in the center of a regional, you know, urban neighborhood under your comp plan

Bills: HB2517, HB2480, HB2588, HB1529, HB2223, HB2006, HB2573, HB2141

Keywords: municipal permitting, transit projects, high capacity transit, infrastructure, urban development, residential development, commercial zones, mixed-use zoning, urban planning, state regulations, county ferry district, ferry district, passenger-only ferry, passenger ferry, Puget Sound, Vashon, Seattle, Southworth, county transportation, local taxing authority

Summary: The committee opened public hearings on HB 2141 and HB 2573, then paused for caucus and later took executive action on several bills before returning to testimony. HB 2141 would impose a 10-year pause on most State Building Code Council updates after the 2024 codes, extend future update cycles to six years, restrict local amendments until the 2036 model codes, and remove the 2031 energy-code reduction target. Supporters, including builders, business groups, counties, and some local officials, argued the bill would reduce regulatory churn, lower housing costs, and give developers and local governments more certainty. Opponents, including environmental groups, architects, fire marshals, code professionals, and manufacturers, said the bill would freeze safety and energy-efficiency improvements, raise long-term utility costs, and undermine climate goals. No final action was taken on HB 2141 during the hearing. HB 2573 would require advance notice before grocery stores, pharmacies, and similar facilities close or are sold in communities that relied on them for housing, transit, or health planning; add a health and food access goal and a new healthy communities element to the Growth Management Act; authorize zoning tools to require or incentivize grocery or health-related uses; and allow cities and counties to impose excise taxes or nuisance fees on vacant former grocery-store properties, with some waivers for temporary or community uses. Supporters said the bill responds to recent closures in places like Lake City and Everett that created food and pharmacy deserts, harmed seniors and low-income residents, and disrupted local planning. Opponents from grocery industry groups argued the bill is punitive, could chill investment, and would unfairly penalize property owners who did not cause the closure. The hearing on HB 2573 was also left open without final action. During executive action, the committee adopted amendments and reported several bills out with do-pass recommendations: HB 2517, as amended to require notice to property owners before regional transit authorities apply for permits and to add property-owner consent protections; HB 2588, expanding county ferry district authority beyond passenger-only ferries; HB 1529, allowing counties to assist cities with paving and marking streets; HB 2223, allowing limited irrigation-district contract interests involving a director’s spouse; and HB 2006, as amended to narrow and extend the deadline for certain rural counties to designate industrial land banks. After those votes, the committee returned to testimony on HB 2141, heard additional support and opposition, and then adjourned without hearing all registered testifiers.

Bills: HB1823, HB2092, HB2111, HB2114

Keywords: transportation improvement board, TIB, transportation improvement account, motor vehicle fund, arterial streets, local match, private match, grant funding, transportation grants, county roads, city streets, transportation benefit district, urban county, small city program, active transportation, pedestrian, bicycle, bike routes, transit, public transit

Summary: The Transportation Committee heard four bills. HB 1823 was described as a technical cleanup bill for the Transportation Improvement Board, updating obsolete references and repealing outdated sections; a proposed substitute would restore language that had inadvertently removed remaining bond authority. Rep. Lowe and TIB supported the bill, calling it a good-government measure, and there was no opposition. The committee then heard HB 292, which would create a Washington State Amtrak Cascades Passenger Rail Advisory Committee. The prime sponsor and supporters said the goal was to give riders and stakeholders a regular, statutory forum to provide feedback to WSDOT; several testifiers urged broader statewide representation, inclusion of disability advocates, and possible participation by rail industry stakeholders such as BNSF. Testimony was broadly supportive, with some suggestions for amendments to expand the committee’s scope and membership. The committee next heard HB 2111, which would allow the Interstate 5 bridge replacement project toll facility bond retirement account to retain its share of interest earnings instead of having them credited to the general fund. Staff and the State Treasurer’s office said the change would keep revenue dedicated to the bridge project and avoid accounting and tax concerns; the chair and a business representative from Clark County supported advancing the bill as a necessary step for the project. Finally, HB 2114 would require the Department of Licensing to waive replacement plate fees for defective plates within two years of issuance and allow waivers in some cases between two and five years. The sponsor said the bill responds to widespread plate delamination complaints, especially in eastern Washington, and county auditors and other local officials testified in favor as a customer-service fix, though they asked for clearer definitions and noted the state’s newer flat plates may reduce the problem over time. The Department of Licensing fiscal note estimated limited annual replacements but significant one-time system update costs. The hearing on HB 2114 was left open briefly for a testifier who could not connect, and then the public hearing was temporarily closed.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are struggling in Washington State with job growth. It's been abysmal.
• And in 2026, our job growth is zero. We're anticipated to see zero job growth in 2026.
• There's tremendous growth in renewable jobs, renewable energy jobs.
• The Growth Management Act was enacted three and a half decades ago, 35 years ago.
• As my neighboring jurisdictions to address the same growth and planning issues.

Bills: HB2175, HB2227, HB2528, HB2292, HB2257, HB2608

Keywords: durable medical equipment, sales tax exemption, healthcare accessibility, cost reduction, nonprofit providers, affordable housing, real estate tax, exemption, housing policy, tax incentives, real estate excise tax, REET, growth management act, GMA, local government finance, capital facilities plan, comprehensive plan, county tax, city tax, voter approval

Summary: House Finance heard a series of bill briefings and public hearings on tax and revenue measures. HB 2175 would exempt free durable medical equipment providers from retail sales and use tax on certain equipment purchases; the sponsor and a nonprofit provider testified that the bill would help charitable organizations furnish wheelchairs, walkers, scooters, beds, and similar items at no cost to patients, while staff said the Department of Revenue expects a small general fund revenue loss and some administrative costs. HB 2608, a reintroduced version of last year’s HB 1210, would require nuclear facility projects seeking the targeted urban area property tax exemption to meet specified labor standards and allow cities extra time to complete projects; supporters said it would help attract major clean-energy manufacturing and jobs, while opponents from contractor groups, environmental advocates, and others objected to the PLA/labor requirements, the tax preference for nuclear projects, and the potential impact on competition and local taxpayers. The committee also heard HB 2227, which would extend an existing REIT exemption for self-help housing to other nonprofit affordable homeownership programs such as community land trusts; sponsors and housing providers said it would lower closing costs and preserve long-term affordability, and staff said the exemption applies to the nonprofit-to-buyer sale, not later resales. HB 2528 would let counties and cities that voluntarily fully plan under the Growth Management Act impose the second local REIT without voter approval; supporters said it would give all GMA cities the same tools to fund sidewalks, ADA work, and other infrastructure, while opponents argued it would raise homeownership costs and remove voter approval for a tax increase. The committee then heard HB 2292, which would subject gains from qualified small business stock to Washington’s capital gains tax beginning in 2026. Staff said the bill would affect about 260 taxpayers and raise roughly $1.2 million in fiscal year 2027, while the sponsor argued it closes a loophole that mainly benefits wealthy investors and does not affect the standard deduction or other existing exemptions. Testimony split sharply: tax policy advocates supported the bill as a way to make the tax code less regressive, while startup founders, venture and tech industry representatives, and small business groups warned it would discourage investment, hurt founders and early employees, and push innovation activity out of state. Finally, HB 2257 was briefed as a Department of Revenue request bill making technical and administrative tax-code changes, largely to codify guidance tied to last year’s sales-tax-on-services legislation; staff said the changes are intended to clarify definitions, exclusions, sourcing, and related tax treatment, and DOR testified in support, explaining that the bill would give taxpayers statutory certainty for rules the department has already been enforcing administratively.

Transcript Highlights:

• a million additional units in the next 20 years, is what we often hear, to accommodate projected growth
• understand that, and I also think that there are some areas that have used that to try to prevent urban
• Under this bill, counties planning under the Growth Management Act and all cities must allow step housing
• in any zone within an urban growth area not zoned for industrial use.
• in any zone within an urban growth area not zoned for industrial use.

Bills: SB6069, SB6167, SB6201, SB6205, SB6001, SB6026, SB6054, SGA9278, SGA9279

Keywords: affordable housing, homelessness, homeless shelter, emergency shelter, emergency housing, supportive housing, permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, low-income housing, very low-income, extremely low-income, housing crisis, land use, zoning, local preemption, urban growth area, UGA, planning, development regulations, permitting

Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 6201, which would create property tax and real estate excise tax exemptions for property used as affordable housing by social housing agencies, with a 50% occupancy threshold for households at or below 80% of area median income and a 15-year covenant requirement. Staff outlined the bill’s tax and fiscal impacts, and the prime sponsor, Senator Slatter, described it as a tool to expand permanently affordable workforce housing. Testimony from social housing advocates supported the measure, saying the exemptions would lower project costs and rents, while a committee member raised questions about how the occupancy requirement would be verified at the time of purchase. The public hearing on SB 6201 was later closed after testimony from Seattle Social Housing representatives. The committee also heard gubernatorial appointments to the Washington State Housing Finance Commission from Pedro Espinoza and Diana H. Perez, both of whom described their construction, public service, and housing-related backgrounds and their interest in expanding homeownership and housing access statewide. Members asked about their experience and local housing needs, and both nominees emphasized the importance of housing affordability and collaboration with local governments. Senate Bill 6205 was briefed and heard, proposing accountability changes for the Community Reinvestment Account, the Affordable Housing Program, and the Covenant Homeownership Program. The bill would bar officers and family members from benefiting from grants, require Commerce to prioritize grants based on need, broaden priority for organizations serving people disproportionately impacted by homelessness, and require biannual evaluations of grants and loans. Senator Braun said the bill was intended to address reported misuse and improve transparency and trust in state-funded housing programs. The committee then heard and later acted on several bills in executive session: it adopted a technical substitute and passed SB 6001 on scissor stairs; rejected Goehner amendments but passed SB 6026 on limiting commercial-ground-floor requirements in housing zones; adopted a substitute and passed SB 6054 on fire-hardened building materials in common interest communities; and later heard SB 6069 on step housing, where supporters said it would reduce local barriers to shelters and supportive housing while cities and counties argued for more flexibility and operational agreements. The committee also heard SB 6167, which would prohibit homebuyers from stacking multiple state-funded down payment assistance awards, with the sponsor saying it would spread limited funds to more households and opponents/testifiers raising concerns about access and fairness.

Transcript Highlights:

• That’s not land outside of an urban growth boundary.
• growth boundary or setting their urban service boundary.
• Again, this is inside the urban growth boundary. It's already been identified.
• So you have your urban service boundary, and then you have your growth boundary, and then you have your
• I don't want to get outside the urban growth boundary.

Bills: S0218, S0380, S0936, S0948, S0962, S0984, S1020, S1180, S1434, S1444, S1612

Keywords: land use, disaster recovery, local government, federal assistance, Hurricane relief, legal notices, public accessibility, government transparency, digital publication, government agencies, temporary door locking device, emergency safety, building code, training programs, fire exit security, affordable housing, land development, starter homes, local government regulations, housing shortage

Summary: The committee took up a series of land use, housing, local government, and public notice bills, along with a firefighter cancer bill and a bill on temporary door locking devices. SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention was explained as clarifying access to death benefits and a one-time cancer payment for firefighters; it was reported favorably. SB 1612 required local governments to accept electronic payments online; it also passed favorably. SB 1180 created a recall framework for elected community development district board members and, through a strike-all amendment, also addressed synthetic turf enforcement and expanded compact urban mixed-use district definitions; the amendment was adopted and the bill was reported favorably. SB 936 allowed temporary door locking devices above the finished floor and directed the Building Commission to add standards to the Florida Building Code; it passed favorably. The committee also considered SB 380 on legal notices, which would let certain local government entities publish notices on their own websites or other designated sites instead of relying on newspapers in more cases. The Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and newspaper representatives opposed the bill, arguing it would fragment public notice access and make notices harder to find and verify, while supporters said it would modernize and reduce costs. The bill’s amendment clarified which agencies were covered, and the committee reported the bill favorably. SB 962 on affordable housing narrowed prior zoning preemption language so working farms and farm operations would not be unintentionally captured by Live Local-style rules; it passed favorably. SB 1444 on state preemption and religious expression, private clubs, and minor home construction drew support from religious freedom advocates and opposition from cities and counties, which warned of vague terms and overbroad preemption; it was reported favorably. The committee then approved SB 218, which would limit the reach of last session’s hurricane recovery land-use preemption to counties actually damaged by hurricanes and restore normal local land-use authority in unaffected counties. SB 1434 on infill redevelopment would streamline zoning and subdivision approvals for environmentally impacted parcels in certain urban counties to encourage housing on contaminated or underused land; counties and local-government groups opposed it as an overbroad preemption and raised concerns about the environmental threshold and density provisions, but the bill was reported favorably. SB 1020 on chickees prohibited local ordinances from blocking chickee construction if setback requirements are met and made unauthorized attempts to circumvent the building code a misdemeanor; it passed favorably. Finally, SB 948 on local government land development regulations and orders, as amended, proposed a statewide starter-home framework with lot-split and zoning changes to increase housing supply; local-government and planning groups warned it would function as a rigid statewide zoning code and could drive overdevelopment, while housing advocates supported it as necessary state action. The committee reported the bill favorably after extensive debate.

Transcript Highlights:

• Projects approved under the public hearing process must be within or abutting an urban service area,
• Projects approved under the public hearing process must be within or abutting an urban service area,
• , either an urban service area or an urban growth boundary.
• , for growth in general.
• Now we will take up tab 6, SB 548, growth management by Senator McLean.

Bills: S0014, S0016, S0024, S0168, S0288, S0548, S0686, S0830, S1138, S1234

Keywords: negligence, settlement, police conduct, municipal liability, personal injury, compensation, injuries, Miami-Dade County, rural electric cooperatives, energy production, Florida law, energy tariffs, regulation, impact fees, transportation capacity, local government, interlocal agreements, growth management, community planning, extraordinary circumstances

Summary: The committee met with a quorum present and took up a series of local claims, public records, growth management, permitting, and nuisance bills. It first heard and approved SB 16, SB 14, and SB 24, all uncontested claims bills providing relief related to injuries or settlements involving the City of St. Petersburg and Miami-Dade County. The committee also approved SB 288 on rural electric cooperatives, which narrows statutory language to protect co-op decisions on generation and power purchases while preserving consumer protections, and SB 830, which creates a public records exemption for certain personal information of county and city managers and their families due to reported threats against local officials. Members then considered SB 1138 on qualified contractors and development review, which would create a registry of licensed professionals to help local governments process pre-application reviews and plats more quickly. Local government groups raised concerns about preemption and preserving quasi-judicial authority, while private-provider supporters backed the bill; Senator Sharief voted no, and the bill was reported favorably. The committee also approved SB 168, expanding public nuisance law to include gambling houses and increasing penalties, and SB 686 on agricultural enclaves, which revises the enclave process, adds a public hearing path, limits it to certain residential projects in urban service areas, and was amended to change a date to June 30, 2026 before being reported favorably. The committee next approved CS for SB 548 on growth management and impact fees, which clarifies plan-based methodology, extraordinary circumstances, interlocal agreements, and refund procedures for improper fee collections. Testimony reflected support for clearer standards but also concerns about fee increases and refund administration. Finally, SB 1234 on building permits and inspections was reported favorably; it would extend permit validity, exempt some low-value work from permitting, create a statewide residential permit form, speed review timelines, and expand private-provider use, drawing opposition from a Miami-Dade building official who argued for continued local oversight and support from private-provider advocates. Senator Jones requested to be recorded as voting affirmatively on several tabs and negatively on tab 9, and the committee adjourned after all bills were disposed of.

Transcript Highlights:

• Under the Growth Management Act, all counties and cities are obligated to designate, where appropriate
• This exemption is contrary to the current Washington State Growth Management Act, and I will address
• It's an outlier to the Growth Management Act is really what I want to say.
• This directly conflicts with the city's planned growth under our comprehensive plan.
• We will not eliminate this vital strategic tool for Clark County's growth. We must invigorate it.

Bills: SB5820, SB6064, SB6077, SB6101, SB6013, SB6066

Keywords: freight rail, rail corridor, short-line railroad, rail-dependent uses, industrial land use, growth management act, GMA, comprehensive plan, transportation element, land use planning, local government, county planning, city planning, critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, urban growth area, development regulations, notice on permits

Summary: The committee heard several bill briefings and public hearings. SB 6064 would let certain large fire protection districts or regional fire authorities assume administration and enforcement of the International Fire Code within their boundaries, with notice to the county and displaced county workers offered equivalent jobs. Supporters said it would improve consistency, safety, and local control; opponents from counties, fire marshals, and builders argued it was unnecessary because interlocal agreements already exist and could add permitting complexity and delays. SB 6101 would require county coroners to be appointed rather than elected, while preserving existing medical examiner systems in larger counties. The sponsor and supporters said the change would address problems like the Yakima County coroner case, improve professionalism, and reduce partisan elections; opponents said it would reduce voter accountability, raise costs, and create conflicts of interest concerns. SB 6077 would extend the deadline for assessors and taxpayers to exchange valuation evidence in property tax appeals from 21 to 28 business days before a hearing, starting with petitions filed on or after July 1, 2026. Supporters said the extra time would improve due process and fairness; county assessors and some tax appeal practitioners said they were open to the timing change but wanted broader reforms to address long hearing backlogs. The committee also heard SB 5820, which would repeal Clark County-specific authority enacted in 2017 allowing freight rail-dependent uses on certain resource lands adjacent to a short-line railroad. The sponsor and supporters from FutureWise, local residents, and the City of Battleground said the prior law undermined Growth Management Act protections for agricultural and resource lands and had led to conflict and litigation. Opponents, including the railroad operator, Association of Washington Business, and former sponsor Linda Wilson, said the rail overlay supports economic development, jobs, and rail-served industrial land, and warned the repeal would harm local planning and investments. Members asked about how county and city comprehensive plans interact under the Growth Management Act, and staff said they would provide a summary of the appeals process. Finally, SB 6013 would update ski lift terminology to include aerial tramways, tows, and conveyors in the state safety and insurance requirements; State Parks supported it as agency-request legislation, and the bill was presented as a technical update with no opposition noted in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• as a city if it is already located within an urban growth area.
• So I guess I need clarification about the urban growth area.
• So if this is a, are we talking about a standalone urban growth area? Correct.
• And lastly, we are committed to the Growth Management Act and letting urban places be urban and become
• So, Alan, we're talking about an urban growth area.

Bills: SB6132, SB6181, SB6154, SB6189, SB5903, SB6037, SB5983, SB5995, SB6016, SB5820, SB6064, SB6077, SB6101, SB6013, SB6066

Keywords: indebtedness limits, inland port districts, federal funding, infrastructure improvements, economic development, city incorporation, local governance, municipalities, state law, government structure, culvert replacement, fish passage, hydraulic project approval, Department of Fish and Wildlife, stream crossing, bank stabilization, flood control, erosion control, emergency permit, expedited permit

Summary: The committee heard several local government bills. Senate Bill 6181 would let county legislative authorities in certain large western Washington counties file city incorporation petitions without first gathering resident signatures, if the proposed area is fully within an urban growth boundary and has more than 25,000 people. Senator Conway and Pierce County officials said the change would give dense unincorporated areas like South Hill another path to a public vote on incorporation, while opponents argued it bypasses the 10% signature threshold and that the bill lacks details on boundaries and other incorporation issues. No action was taken during the hearing. Senate Bill 6132 would give the Port of Moses Lake additional bonding authority tied to a tax increment financing area so it can finish a rail project and preserve federal funding. Senator Warnick and port representatives said the bill is narrowly tailored to one port and needed because costs have risen. Senate Bill 6154 would let local governments seek exceptions from hydraulic project approval timelines and allow emergency culvert repair dollars to be redirected to higher-priority fish passage projects elsewhere in a watershed. Thurston and Snohomish county officials, along with city public works staff, supported the bill as a way to maximize fish habitat benefits and manage limited resources, while one remote commenter objected to the underlying fish habitat rationale. The committee also heard Senate Bill 6189, which extends from July 1, 2026 to July 1, 2028 the deadline for certain cities and counties to create an additional public facilities district for regional aquatics and sports facilities. Olympia, Tumwater, and regional supporters said more time is needed to complete feasibility, financing, and interlocal work for a regional aquatic center. In executive session, the committee did not act on SB 5820 or SB 6064, but advanced SB 6037, SB 5983, SB 5995, SB 6013, and SB 6066 with proposed substitutes or amendments as applicable, sending them to Ways and Means, Rules, or Transportation as noted.

Transcript Highlights:

• against violent tension, but there is a type of constructive nonviolent tension that is necessary for growth

Bills: HB1160, HB1187, HB1289, HB1339, HB1345, HB1501, HB1604, HB1798, HB1069, HB1347

Keywords: design review, local government, land use, zoning, project permits, housing density, middle housing, affordable housing, parking minimums, single-family zoning, infill development, growth management, comprehensive plan, permit streamlining, objective development regulations, architectural review, administrative review, transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, ADU

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, the Pledge of Allegiance, a National Anthem performance by Pastor Pamela Bowman, and a prayer by Senior Pastor Joseph Bowman of Integrity Life Church in Federal Way. The prayer and musical selections focused on Martin Luther King Jr. Day themes of justice, unity, service, and hope. The House then approved the previous day’s minutes without objection. House Resolution 4672, honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., was read and adopted. Representative Penner moved adoption and spoke about remembering both the promise and the struggle of the civil rights movement, while Representatives Reeves, Lowe, and Thomas also offered remarks emphasizing King’s legacy, the ongoing work of justice, the importance of nonviolence, and the need for public service and respectful disagreement. Representative Thomas also described personal experiences with racism and called for continued action rather than platitudes. After the resolution passed by voice vote, the House handled routine business: introduction-sheet items and committee reports were referred as designated, and the Rules Committee was relieved of several bills, moving House Bill 1160 and House Bill 1798 to second reading and Substitute House Bill 1066 and Engrossed House Bill 1574 to third reading. Democrats and Republicans announced caucuses after adjournment, and the House adjourned until 9:55 a.m. Tuesday, January 20.

Transcript Highlights:

• list is Senate Bill 6211, creating uniformity for the process by which cities planning under the Growth
• public works design standards to ensure consistency with current land use patterns, housing needs, and growth

Bills: SB6181, SB6154, SB6211, SB6234, SB6242, SB5633, SB6279, SB6291, SB6274, SB6309

Keywords: city incorporation, local governance, municipalities, state law, government structure, culvert replacement, fish passage, hydraulic project approval, Department of Fish and Wildlife, stream crossing, bank stabilization, flood control, erosion control, emergency permit, expedited permit, SEPA, environmental review, local government, county authority, agricultural irrigation

Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee took executive action on several bills before cutoff. Earlier, the chair announced that Senate Bills 6181, 6154, and 6242 would be removed from the executive calendar. Staff then summarized bills including SB 6211 on real estate excise tax procedures for GMA-planning cities and counties; SB 6234 on sewage grinder pumps, with a proposed substitute narrowing the bill to single-family residences, adding public utility districts, clarifying conditions for installation, and assigning maintenance and repair responsibilities; SB 5633 on subdivision of land, with a proposed substitute and a partial fiscal note showing costs to the Department of Commerce; SB 6291 on extending the time a non-certified individual may inspect on-site wastewater systems under supervision; SB 6274 on street standards and frontage improvements, requiring infrastructure barriers be identified in housing analyses and standards be periodically reviewed; and SB 6309 on regional transit authority permitting and land acquisition, with a proposed substitute allowing earlier permit applications and modifying subdivision-law exemptions, along with a partial fiscal note for Commerce. In executive session, the committee adopted the proposed substitutes for SB 6234, SB 5633, and SB 6309, and passed SB 6211, SB 6234, SB 5633, SB 6291, SB 6274, and SB 6309 out of committee. SB 5633 and SB 6309 were referred to the Ways and Means Committee, while the others were sent to the Rules Committee. One member noted concerns about the fiscal note and public input on SB 5633 before the vote, but the substitute and bill still advanced. All final actions were reported as passed subject to signatures.