Video & Transcript Research : 'suitable seating'

Page 1 of 336
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • . suitable. suitable.
  • Suitable seating was the law in Minnesota in 1887, and it remained in effect for 80 years.
  • Shothurst, good morning. of such seats by such employees to such of such seats by such employees to such
  • ,<00:35:53.200> but allow workers to work while seated, but allow workers to work while seated
  • seating for employees and to permit the use of those seats when the nature of the work reasonably permits
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Mar 4th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so the law defines suitable work.
  • I think the recommendation for the long-term care seat at least should come from the APA.
  • There's some concern with some of those minor seats.
  • Some of those minor seats, specialty seats, that those could be locked into a particular congressional
  • That's a large group of employees, and so I do think that they should have a seat at the table.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House State Government Committee Feb 5th, 2025

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I saw in there the word "suitable employment." What's the... suitable employment.
  • What’s the definition of suitable employment?
  • So, suitable work is employment that is comparable to a job seeker's previous work in terms of wages,
  • Suitable! Thank you very much. Okay, any further questions or comments?
  • I actually list out all the things that shall be considered for it to be considered suitable work.
Bills: HB93, HB160, HB29, HB29, HB93, HB160
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/13/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • opening a food hall in Minnesota where a variety of different food vendors could rent space and common seating
  • There's no seating that we sell tickets to individually, and so we are coming before this committee to
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Mar 19th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It seeks to establish the District of Austin as the official seat of Texas government, ensuring that
  • The people of Texas deserve a safe and secure seat of government.
  • Uniquely, Article 3, Section 58 of the Texas Constitution declares Austin as a seat of government and
  • Um, the city of Deer Park is, is not the, the capital, capital seat. Um, it.
  • Our beloved city was established in 1837 and we've been the proud seat of government for the state of
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Finance - Part 2 - 04/27/26

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • > in the Suitable Seating for Employees in the Suitable Seating for Employees in um<00:05:25.960
  • And then the Suitable Seating in Section 10 is also being removed.
  • provision that's related to the Suitable provision that's related to the Suitable Seating<00:08:
  • And And And uh uh uh the<00:09:07.160> Suitable<00:09:07.520> Seating<00:09:08.000>
  • in Section 10 is the Suitable Seating in Section 10 is also<00:09:09.240> being<00:09:09.480>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Sitting down at work 3/24/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Suitable seating was the law in Minnesota in 1887, and it remained in effect for 80 years.
  • <00:07:21.039> Suitable<00:07:21.440> seating<00:07:22.000> was precedent for
  • Suitable seating was precedent for this.
  • Suitable seating was the<00:07:22.400> law<00:07:22.560> in<00:07:22.880> Minnesota<
  • NFIB opposes this bill, which requires employers to provide suitable seating for employees and to permit
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 3796, as amended by a DE2 amendment, and the amendment was adopted on a voice vote. Representative Jones described the bill as creating a reasonable expectation that employees can sit when the nature of the work allows it, and said the DE2 clarified language with help from the Department of Labor and Industry and added a penalty for violations. She said the bill was inspired by constituents who work in a museum and by concerns about the health effects of prolonged standing, including back and leg pain, fatigue, cardiovascular issues, and pregnancy-related harms. Supporters testified that the bill would improve worker health and safety and reflect common-sense accommodations. A former Walker Arts Center union president described a dispute over stools for gallery assistants, saying workers were told they needed a doctor’s note to use them and that the union gathered signatures and other support after the employer restricted seating. A UFCW representative said seating makes ergonomic sense, can reduce injuries and workers’ compensation costs, and may reduce ADA-related issues, especially for cashiers. Opposition came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business, both of which argued the bill was too vague and could create compliance and litigation problems for employers. They raised questions about what counts as reasonable seating, adequate numbers of seats, and reasonable proximity, and worried about impacts on small businesses, tight workspaces, and industries such as retail, food service, hospitality, nursing, and meatpacking. Department of Labor and Industry staff explained that enforcement would likely begin with technical assistance and an inform-and-educate process, with investigations and possible penalties if compliance could not be achieved. Members also questioned statewide impact and fiscal effects. The chair laid over House File 3796 as amended for further discussion, with no final vote on the bill.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Labor - 04/14/26

Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • is a blank appropriation for suitable is a blank appropriation for suitable seating<01:13:21.640
  • on suitable seating. on suitable seating.
  • <01:14:34.560> seating<01:14:35.160> that, Dibble's bill on suitable seating that,
  • complaints about not having suitable complaints about not having suitable seating,<01:14:46.800>
  • :13.760> for<01:22:14.000> employees uh, suitable seating for employees uh, suitable seating
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Labor - 03/12/26

Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, and it requires suitable seating for employees.
  • requires employers to provide suitable requires employers to provide suitable seating<00:01:24.240
  • this uh, suitable seating requirements. this uh, suitable seating requirements.
  • Uh permits, it defines suitable seating.
  • > and<00:13:55.600> to suitable seating for employees and to suitable seating for employees
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Labor - 04/16/26

Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • ,<00:02:46.520> and otherwise allow them to be seated, and otherwise allow them to be seated
  • seating requirement on employers. seating requirement on employers.
  • the suitable seating mandate and the suitable seating mandate and the automated<00:11:00.600>
  • seating requirement for all employers.
  • <00:16:46.720> seating<00:16:47.120> for ...requiring suitable seating for employees
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Legislative Audit Committee Jul 15th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • And when we talk about suitable housing for these individuals, why is it suitable housing anywhere in
  • When we go back to those two words, suitable housing,...
  • When we go back to those two words, suitable housing, why are urban areas not suitable for them?
  • Again, I'm just trying to let you know how I feel when we talk about suitable housing.
  • Yeah, I had my seat. Just now, that's what I'd like.
Summary: The Joint Legislative Audit Committee held an oversight hearing on the state auditor’s October 2024 report on California’s Forensic Conditional Release Program (CONREP) for sexually violent predators. Members and witnesses discussed public safety, the long delays in finding community housing, the role of local housing committees, and the Department of State Hospitals’ oversight of Liberty Healthcare, which operates much of the program. Several legislators from rural and high-desert districts said their communities have been disproportionately affected by placements and questioned why many placements end up in remote areas. State Auditor Grant Parks said the audit found that CONREP participants were convicted of new offenses less often than sexually violent predators who were unconditionally released, but that 18 of 56 participants had been revoked and returned to state hospitals for noncompliance. He said it took an average of 17 months to place current participants in the community, with 20 additional people awaiting placement for an average of 20 months, and that the program incurred significant pre-placement costs. Parks also said local officials were often unclear about their role, DSH had not given clear guidance at the time of the audit, and California lacks a transitional housing option used in some other states. He reported that DSH had implemented four of the five audit recommendations, while declining the recommendation to explore state-owned transitional housing. DSH Director Stephanie Clendendon and Liberty representative Ken Carabello defended the program as a court-ordered, highly supervised treatment model intended to reduce reoffending and support reintegration. They said DSH is actively involved in placement review, that Liberty searches countywide under statutory restrictions, and that community feedback and court approval are part of the process. DSH said it has now implemented guidance for housing committee designees, formal program reviews, an outcome tracker, and an analysis of whether to separate some Liberty services into different contracts. DSH continued to oppose transitional housing, arguing it would not solve the core siting and statutory problems and would add cost. Several members remained critical, arguing the program is broken, costly, and unfairly concentrated in certain communities, and some called for major statutory changes or suspension of the program.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

ECD Public Hearing - Wed Mar 19, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST

Economic Development & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:23:25.640> for what um equipment may be suitable for what um equipment may be suitable
  • for their rural communities and suitable for their rural communities and providing<00:24:54.840>
  • We humbly and respectfully request to have a seat at the table as part of the working group.
  • We do ask for a proposed amendment to add a seat for a labor organization.
  • allow um a seat allow um a seat for<01:22:22.520> uh<01:22:22.719> three<01:22:23.159
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, with most witnesses either supporting the bills or offering technical concerns and suggested amendments. On SB 338, testimony came from the Department of Taxation, Tax Foundation of Hawaii, and Surpac, and the bill later moved forward with amendments. On SB 558, testimony was largely in support from the Department of Agriculture, Ulupono Initiative, Local Food Coalition, Hawaii Food Industry Association, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and the Agribusiness Development Corporation, which described the measure as supporting rural jobs, food-system development, and use of off-grade agricultural products. ADC requested flexibility for neighbor-island siting and funding allocations, while the committee also discussed whether the bill’s language should be made more general and whether it could raise constitutional concerns about overly specific site designations. The bill was advanced with amendments and a noted appropriation allocation of $350,000. The committee also heard SB 186, which drew support from the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, Department of Agriculture, Ulupono Initiative, Hawaii Food Industry Association, Hawaii Farm Bureau, Hawaii Public Health Institute, DED, ADC, AAHU RC&D, and the Hawaii Youth Food Council. Supporters said the measure would improve coordination among agencies on food systems, help address food security and the state’s 30% by 2030 farm-to-school goal, and create a more organized statewide food systems effort. SB 328 received support from the Department of Taxation and Hawaii Farm Bureau, with Farm Bureau describing it as a way to repurpose existing dairy infrastructure to revive hog production and support livestock and farm-to-school goals; the Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed the measure as a potentially narrow industry incentive that could unfairly benefit a specific taxpayer and said a direct appropriation would be more transparent. SB 89 was described by Hawaii Farm Bureau as a labeling measure intended to protect the integrity of a culturally relevant local product, though the group raised concerns about wording and implementation timing. Later, SB 742 received support from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, the Office of Wellness and Resilience, the Executive Office on Early Learning, the University of Hawaii System, Hawaii KidsCAN, the Hawaii Workforce Funders Collaborative, and the State Commission on the Status of Women. Testifiers said the bill would improve cross-agency data sharing, support workforce and education planning, and create public-facing dashboards; the Commission on the Status of Women asked to be included in the working group or as an advisory member. In decision-making, the committee adopted amendments and advanced SB 338, SB 558, and SB 1186. For SB 1186, the chair’s recommendation added three positions, specified committee-note funding amounts for those positions and operating funds, and revised working-group membership to have co-chairs appoint five members with relevant experience and expertise.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Land & Resource Management Apr 10th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • we run into is technological, uh, needs not being met and the fact that we had a problem with, uh, seating
  • about 30 by 30, and by the time people community come in and consultant, not everybody is able to be seated
  • So it's limited seating, limited space, wouldn't house everyone that you need on a regular basis.
  • districts are in rural areas, some are in metropolitan areas, um, some may have the ability to find a suitable
  • current law in place that allows the flexibility for a district to choose a meeting location that is suitable
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee Jun 30th, 2026

Water, Parks, and Wildlife

Transcript Highlights:
  • Suitable relocation sites are extremely limited.
  • Suitable relocation sites are extremely limited.
  • Suitable relocation sites are extremely limited.
  • I've temporarily taken over the seat. Thank you. Thank you.
  • I'm temporarily taking over the seat as the chair here. Yes.
Keywords: 988, house, all
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Senate Chamber Jan 23rd, 2025

New Mexico Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Everyone may be seated.
  • So they seat the Dona Ana group together, and they'll seat Farmington together and so forth.
  • certificates: Certificate of Appreciation, Certificate Number One, and directs the Chief Clerk to prepare suitable
  • following Certificate of Appreciation: Certificate Number Two, and directs the Chief Clerk to prepare suitable
  • Directs the Chief Clerk to prepare suitable documents to express the recognition of the Senate.