Video & Transcript Research : 'subpoena power'

Page 1 of 491
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:03:11.640> to giving these ex extraordinary powers to giving these ex extraordinary powers
  • know you've given really broad Powers know you've given really broad Powers very<01:14:19.080>
  • > on<01:14:21.199> this very broad powers and so on this very broad powers and so on this
  • <01:15:42.760> and will tell you with these powers and will tell you with these powers and
  • this position is so incredibly powerful this position is so incredibly powerful and<01:16:31.400
Bills: HF1, HF2
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Employers maintain significant power over workers.
  • Employers maintain significant power over workers.
  • If this legislation were to become law, it wouldn't transfer power to the union.
  • The bill before you provides prosecutors the same administrative subpoena power they already have in
  • The bill before you provides prosecutors the same administrative subpoena power they already have in
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 2/20/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • trying to develop within the legislative branch, but then they're still going to have investigator powers
  • inspections, and these are just kind of the subdivisions they give you the authority to inspect, the powers
  • notice of inspection, saying, 'Hey, you can't do this under most circumstances,' and protection from subpoena
  • inspections, and these are just kind of the subdivisions they give you the authority to inspect: the powers
  • Representative Hicks: "...under powers in section 9, 510 through 518, we have tens of thousands of people
Bills: HF1, HF98
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's important to note we're not voting today to authorize a subpoena to Massport. authorized subpoenas
  • The subpoena for which we will be voting to authorize is to subpoena those documents.
  • Where's the subpoena to Elon Musk? Where's the subpoena to the acting head of the FAA?
  • The subpoena authorization is breathtakingly broad.
  • Finally, this vote is not to issue the subpoena, but rather an authorization to issue the subpoena.
Summary: The meeting was convened by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, where robust discussions were held regarding the need for improved oversight within the Senate. The chairman emphasized the historical decline in oversight activities and proposed motions to authorize subpoenas related to an ongoing investigation involving the Massachusetts Port Authority and allegations of illegal immigrant sheltering at airports. This prompted a detailed examination of the current practices and measures needed to address such issues effectively, particularly in light of recent reports from O'Hare Airport. The committee engaged in deliberations that highlighted the importance of maintaining legislative oversight to safeguard national interests.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • But it's beyond the federal court's powers.
  • They are exerting policy-making power over the whole country.
  • Only if they exercise their judicial power.
  • These are questions, these are core Article 2 powers.
  • Nationwide injunctions are... or an abuse of power.
Summary: During this meeting, the committee focused on the implications of universal injunctions, which have become a significant concern in recent years. The discussion centered around various legislative proposals aimed at addressing the perceived overreach of district judges who issue nationwide injunctions that affect policies across the entire country. Several members expressed the belief that such injunctions undermine judicial authority and disrupt the balance of power between the judiciary and executive branches. Expert witnesses testified about the historical context of universal injunctions and the necessity for reforms that would limit the power of courts to grant remedies benefitting non-parties.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/27/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:19:13.919> um<00:19:14.120> consideration separation of powers um consideration
  • separation of powers um consideration that's<00:19:15.039> been<00:19:15.360> being<00
  • I know that this is still an ongoing conversation about this separation of powers question.
  • It seems to me, so if we're just going to really put all of that investigative power into the office
  • And then I also just wanted to flag a separation of powers issue on the A15 amendment, line 2.22.
Bills: HF25, HF1, HF428
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 7th, 2026 at 09:12 am

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • As a parent, and those of you that are parents, we do everything in our power from the moment we have
  • On page two, I thought this at the bottom, you cite an example and you cite the power of impeachment,
  • This is just simply listing what our powers are as a House chamber.
  • Just whatever it is that we need to do as a commission, that we have all of our powers available to us
  • We're nevertheless seeing a pattern of rich and powerful men and some women doing whatever they want
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/6/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We did more of the separation of powers.
  • did more of the separation of powers did more of the separation of powers there<00:31:57.679>
  • You cannot have a separation of power. You cannot have, you know, the executive...
  • And the final thing on the separation of powers: we've had nonpartisan staff at our meetings, and they
  • have actually said that the House version does not have issues with sub power, and the Senate version
Bills: HF1, HF1754, HF1809, HF1478
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • finally get this bill and had a few questions, especially about Article 1, Section 9, which details the powers
  • of the Office of Inspector General and lists subpoena witnesses and other authorities.
  • He said the bill lists a number of OIG powers, including subpoenaing witnesses and recommending temporary
  • I think it would be helpful to understand if this bill is adding additional powers that could specifically
  • I think it would be helpful to understand if this bill is adding additional powers that could specifically
Bills: HF1, HF1384
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 2/26/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • the Attorney General's subpoena the Attorney General's subpoena authority<00:35:03.599> so
  • <00:42:53.760> financial<00:42:54.160> records ability to subpoena financial records
  • And as Attorney General Ellison mentioned, we are also asking for subpoena power that county attorneys
  • The revision would allow us to subpoena financial records in provider fraud investigations, which we
  • In giving us this authority to subpoena these bank records that county attorneys can, is consistent with
Bills: HF3423, HF2354, HF3634
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • just interpreting that. 82 didn't give you consent and so therefore you're violating separations of power
  • to file criminal charges in district court and that is the key here is that there is a separation powers
  • of election law. 255 say that it was unconstitutional under the Texas Constitution separation of powers
  • Such an interpretation would exempt the attorney general from explicit separation of powers limitation
  • The legislature has violated the separation of powers doctrine because we are not aware of any other
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 13th, 2025

State Affairs

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 1596, which would remove short-barreled rifles from the list of prohibited weapons in the Texas Penal Code. The author, Sen. Hagenbuch, said the bill would align state law with federal realities and argued that the current prohibition is arbitrary and unnecessary. Supporters, including representatives from Gun Owners of America and Texas Gun Rights, said the bill would reduce confusion, protect lawful gun owners, and preserve the ability to use shorter firearms for self-defense, hunting, and for smaller shooters. One supporter also described a recent case in which an AR pistol was mistaken for a short-barreled rifle and led to a state charge that was later dismissed. Public testimony was split. Supporters said stabilizing braces and shorter firearms can improve accuracy, safety, and accessibility for women, children, and smaller-statured shooters. Opponents, including Texas Gun Sense and two Santa Fe shooting survivors, argued that short-barreled firearms are more concealable and dangerous, and pointed to the 2018 Santa Fe High School shooting as evidence of the risks of easier access. They urged the committee to keep the existing restrictions in place to protect public safety. After public testimony closed, the committee took up pending business. Senate Bill 1505, relating to the Compassionate Use Program, was reported favorably to the full Senate on an 8-0 vote. Senate Bill 17, relating to the acquisition of real property by certain aliens or foreign entities, was first amended by adopting a committee substitute and then reported favorably to the full Senate by a 7-1 vote. The committee then recessed until after the Senate’s adjournment or final recess.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 26, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first bill for consideration is House Bill 83, legislative subpoena penalty.
  • bill goes into existing statute 281-1110, and it amends the penalty for a violation of legislative subpoena
  • subpoena um from a $100 fine to<00:01:20.720> a<00:01:21.119> $750 to a $750 to a $750
  • What is the if I were to be subpoenaed by a court in a civil action and I didn't appear, what would be
  • old but now she has at least the power old but now she has at least the power of<00:37:58.240>
Bills: HB0083, HB0102, HB0178