Transcript Highlights:

• David Carter, Colonel, United States Air Force, retired, on behalf of the American Policy.
• It's important to understand that this simple bill establishes a Texas Geothermal Energy Production Policy
• The council will study the development of geothermal and energy industries in the state and make recommendations
• relating to the commission's policy framework for geothermal energy.
• , low-to-zero carbon energy for the state and the world.

Bills: HB1647, HB2612, HB3125, HB3158, HB3240, HB3506, HB3516, HB3707

Keywords: carbon sequestration, environmental policy, Texas, energy, climate change, regulatory council, geothermal energy, workforce development, education and training, energy industry, apprenticeship, energy production, energy policy, renewable energy, state council, administrative law, public information, transparency, government accountability, judicial process

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm a senior energy policy specialist at the Washington State Energy Policy Office at the Department
• I’m the regional and state policy director for the Northwest Energy Coalition.
• I think whether it's in our energy strategy or not, increasingly our state's energy policy is relying
• types of renewable energy throughout the state.
• We support including advanced nuclear energy in Washington's state energy options.

Bills: HB2090, HB2215, HB2245, HB2272

Keywords: nuclear energy, renewable energy, energy strategy, sustainable development, state energy policy, climate change, fuel regulations, compliance obligations, sustainability, environmental policy, consumer-owned utilities, clean energy, port districts, market customers, energy transformation, ski areas, winter sports, terminology update, recreation, regulatory changes

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several bills. House Bill 2272, a simple housekeeping measure, would update state park ski-lift inspection language to align with current equipment and federal standards; the sponsor and State Parks said it would not change existing inspection authority, and there was no opposition or vote. House Bill 2245 would expand Clean Energy Transformation Act coverage to include port districts that distribute electricity, consumer-owned utilities with a single customer, and certain affected market customers such as data centers or self-generating entities; supporters said it closes loopholes and ensures a level playing field, while PUDs, ports, business groups, and industrial users warned of unintended consequences for single-customer utilities, cogeneration, port economic development, and compliance burdens. Ecology and Commerce supported the bill with cautions about allowance impacts and possible double counting, and the hearing was closed without action. House Bill 2215 would lower Climate Commitment Act thresholds for gasoline, diesel, biodiesel, and propane suppliers from 25,000 tons to 500 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent and, in some cases, shift compliance to purchasers of fuel from non-covered sellers. Supporters said the bill would close a loophole, capture emissions from smaller fuel distributors, and improve transparency; Ecology supported the goal but urged changes to avoid double counting and preserve existing Clean Air Act reporting authority. Fuel distributors, propane suppliers, grocery and convenience store representatives, and business groups opposed the bill, arguing it would sweep in small family-owned businesses, raise costs, and create regulatory complexity. Ecology estimated about 50 additional covered entities could be brought into the program. House Bill 2090 would direct the Department of Commerce to develop a nuclear strategic framework for inclusion in the state energy strategy, contingent on outside funding. Supporters from local governments, Energy Northwest, labor, business, and pro-nuclear groups argued nuclear could provide firm, low-carbon power, support reliability, reduce land-use impacts, and help meet rising demand. Opponents, including tribal representatives, environmental groups, and some energy analysts, said the bill gives special treatment to nuclear, relies on private funding that could bias the study, and raises unresolved concerns about tribal consultation, Hanford, waste storage, cost, and technical readiness. The committee heard extensive testimony but took no final vote in the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Zach Baker, and I'm the regional and state policy director for the Northwest Energy Coalition
• I'm a senior energy policy specialist at the Washington State Energy Policy Office at the Department
• We know that in order to meet our clean energy goals in the state, we have to do lots of big things,
• But hey, let's do what we can to help people do what's right and create more clean energy in our state
• , regulatory policy?

Bills: SB5982, SB6008, SB6050, SB6056

Keywords: consumer-owned utilities, clean energy, port districts, market customers, energy transformation, energy storage, residential battery, grid connection, renewable energy, incentives, distributed energy, renewable resources, energy policy, sustainable energy, state regulations, utility vehicles, emission standards, environment, regulation, exemptions

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several bills related to Washington’s clean energy and utility policy. On SB 5982, which would expand Clean Energy Transformation Act coverage to port districts and certain single-customer utilities and change definitions affecting market customers, the sponsor and supporters said it would close loopholes so large electricity users such as data centers and port-based generation are subject to the same decarbonization standards as other utilities. Supporters included environmental groups, the Department of Commerce, and Ecology, while opponents and “other” testifiers from ports, PUDs, business groups, and industrial consumers warned the bill could create unintended consequences for rural ports, single-customer PUDs, and existing behind-the-meter or self-generation arrangements. Ecology also flagged possible impacts on Climate Commitment Act no-cost allowance allocations. No vote was taken. The committee then heard SB 6008, a bill creating a statewide residential battery incentive and flexible demand program. The sponsor said the measure would help households, especially low- and moderate-income families, install batteries to lower bills, improve resilience during outages, and support grid flexibility. Supporters from solar organizations, utilities, and individuals praised virtual power plants and distributed storage as a way to reduce peak demand and improve reliability. Utility witnesses were generally supportive but asked for changes on low-income verification, program structure, compensation, and implementation details. No vote was taken. Finally, the committee took testimony on SB 6050, which would allow portable plug-in solar devices and meter-mounted devices, often described as balcony solar, and exempt them from some net metering and approval requirements. The sponsor framed it as a way for individuals to contribute to clean energy in a small, accessible way. Supporters said the bill would expand affordable distributed generation and energy equity, while utilities, labor, and safety-focused witnesses strongly opposed or raised concerns about fire risk, backfeeding, worker safety, lack of existing national electrical standards, and the need for interconnection oversight. The committee also briefly began hearing SB 6056, which would exempt utility service vehicles from certain motor vehicle emission standards; the sponsor and utility representatives supported it, while climate advocates argued Ecology can address the issue through rulemaking instead of statute. No final action or votes were recorded in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• And our search returned 79 policies in 35 states.
• state energy... operation in May 2020.
• And our search returned 79 policies in 35 states.
• state energy, In 2025, and were enacted by various entities, including state legislatures, state energy
• My name is Eileen Monk, and I am the Clean Energy Technology Workforce Policy Manager for our state education

Bills: SB5821, SB6004, SB6010, SB5941

Keywords: nuclear energy, energy strategy, advanced technology, sustainability, state policy, renewable energy, public entities, electric generation, contracting, SB 6010, Washington energy siting, EFSEC, Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, tribal consultation, government-to-government consultation, federally recognized tribes, energy facility siting, RCW, clean energy, alternative energy

Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 5821, which would direct the Department of Commerce, if funded through gifts or grants, to develop a nuclear power strategic framework to supplement the state energy strategy. The bill sponsor and supporters said Washington needs to keep all clean energy options on the table, including advanced nuclear, to address rising electricity demand, reliability, affordability, workforce needs, and potential economic benefits. Opponents, including the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Sierra Club, Columbia Riverkeeper, and others, argued the bill moves too quickly toward nuclear development, relies on private funding that could bias the process, and does not adequately address tribal consultation, waste, safety, or Hanford-related concerns. Supporters included Energy Northwest, Cowlitz PUD, Yakima County, and several nuclear advocates who said the bill is only a planning framework and that advanced nuclear could help meet future energy needs. No vote was taken on the bill in the transcript. The committee then held a work session with the Washington State Institute for Public Policy on its recent review of state policies supporting small modular reactors. WSIPP described 79 policies in 35 states and grouped them into categories such as feasibility studies, siting, workforce development, permitting, power purchase arrangements, and financial support. Members asked about water use, waste, land footprint, and how the report treated fission versus fusion; WSIPP said the assignment focused on fission and that some issues like waste and environmental impacts were not the main focus of the review. Senators also discussed the need to compare nuclear with other energy technologies over their full life cycle. The committee next heard Senate Bill 5941, which would exempt certain self-generation requirements from the state energy code for some commercial buildings. Supporters, including Vista and the Association of Washington Business, said the code requirement should not be imposed in all cases and that customers should not be forced into self-generation where it does not make sense. IBEW Local 46 opposed the bill, saying the state should protect and expand energy efficiency strategies instead of adding exemptions. The hearing then moved to Senate Bill 6010, which would change EFSEC tribal consultation rules by exempting most government-to-government consultations from the Open Public Meetings Act when there is no deliberation, requiring all EFSEC members to participate in consultation, and giving tribes a chance to review and correct the consultation summary before it goes to the governor. Yakama Nation, Washington Conservation Action, and Renewable Northwest supported the bill as a way to strengthen confidential, meaningful tribal consultation, while the Association of Washington Business opposed it as a possible source of delay unless timelines are added. The committee then heard Senate Bill 6004, which would update contracting statutes so cities, PUDs, and joint operating agencies can contract for renewable or non-emitting resources under CETA definitions rather than older qualified alternative resource definitions. Energy Northwest and the Washington PUD Association supported the bill as a modernization measure, while Sierra Club, ratepayer advocates, and others opposed it, warning it could shift financial risk to customers and encourage speculative nuclear projects. The meeting ended after the committee finished the remaining testimony on SB 5821, with supporters and opponents repeating their arguments about nuclear energy, costs, safety, waste, climate goals, and ratepayer risk.

Bills: HB17, HB41, HB118, HB119, HB127, HB128, HB129, HB130, HB132, HB133

Keywords: property tax, school funding, enrollment changes, inflation adjustment, tax rate notice, ad valorem taxes, disabled, elderly, homesteads, tax limitation, diversity, equity, inclusion, LGBTQ, state agencies, prohibition, heat illness prevention, workplace safety, administrative penalties, advisory board

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> year-long policy disagreements. year-long policy disagreements.
• policy.
• </c> here in the cowboy state. And Mr. here in the cowboy state. And Mr.
• , regional, and federal energy policy developments, we have come to view this as something of a hedge
• </c> comply with that policy. comply with that policy.

Bills: SJ0001, SF0017

Keywords: mineral leasing, federal lands, Wyoming, energy policy, local control, federalism, forestry management, good neighbor authority, state lands, employee funding, donations, revolving account, 916, all

Bills: SJ0001, SF0017

Keywords: mineral leasing, federal lands, Wyoming, energy policy, local control, federalism, forestry management, good neighbor authority, state lands, employee funding, donations, revolving account, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• energy policy does not work in our state.
• As mentioned by Representative Meckeland, 28 states have already enacted energy choice in the law in
• </c><00:14:59.519><c> policy</c> because one-sizefits-all energy policy because one-sizefits-all energy
• </c> states have already enacted energy states have already enacted energy choice<00:16:39.199><c> in
• </c><01:35:24.960><c> policy,</c> about decisions around energy policy, about decisions around energy

Bills: HF4234, HF484, HF483, HF2614

Keywords: HF4234, Minnesota private activity bonds, tax-exempt bonds, bond cap, aggregate bond limitation, residential rental projects, multifamily housing, affordable housing finance, housing bonds, public finance, bond allocation, private activity bond cap, Minnesota Statutes 474A.02, tax committee, natural gas, gas hookups, residential construction, energy policy, local control, state preemption

Transcript Highlights:

• Because too often, Madam Chair, I sit in these committees and I hear policies that exempt the state from
• In the Washington State 2021 Energy Strategy, the projected growth of data centers that we're seeing
• In the Washington State 2021 Energy Strategy, the projected growth of data centers that we're seeing
• I'm a senior energy policy specialist at the Department of Commerce, which provided technical support
• Chair Dolio, members of the committee, my name is Dan DiOrio, vice president of state policy for the

Bills: HB2515, HB2343, HB2301, HB2272, HB2367

Keywords: energy facilities, large energy use, regulation, state oversight, infrastructure, water quality, game farms, public health, environmental protection, regulatory oversight, extended producer responsibility, paint waste management, environmental regulations, sustainability, recycling, ski areas, winter sports, terminology update, recreation, regulatory changes

Summary: The committee hearing covered three bills before moving into executive session later in the day. HB 2343 would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife to obtain water discharge permit coverage for publicly operated game farms, or an individual permit if needed, and to treat game farms with at least 5,000 birds as large CAFOs. Supporters, including Centralia officials, county public health staff, and residents, said the bill is needed because nitrate contamination from the WDFW pheasant farm has affected private wells and public health. WDFW testified that it had already voluntarily secured the permit the bill would require and said it would continue working with Ecology and local partners. HB 2301 would expand Washington’s paint stewardship program to cover additional paint-related products, including thinners, removers, additives, aerosols, and certain non-industrial coatings. The sponsor and industry supporters said the bill builds on a successful recycling program that already diverts large amounts of paint from landfills and could reduce costs for local hazardous waste systems. County and local solid waste officials generally supported the expansion but asked for clearer treatment of packaging, convenience standards, and compensation. Ecology supported the concept but raised implementation concerns, including the need for broader standards, reporting, and more time for rulemaking. A wood preservers group opposed including wood preservatives in the bill. HB 2515, in proposed substitute form, would regulate “emerging large energy use facilities,” mainly data centers and virtual currency mining facilities at 20 megawatts or more. The bill would require utilities to adopt tariffs or policies to ensure these facilities pay full costs, participate in demand response, and avoid shifting costs to other customers; it would also require reporting on energy and water use, set clean energy targets, create a new annual fee, and limit no-cost cap-and-invest allowances for utilities serving these facilities. Supporters said the bill protects ratepayers, improves transparency, and helps Washington meet climate goals. Opponents from utilities, business groups, ports, and labor warned it could raise costs, reduce competitiveness, create prescriptive rules, and threaten jobs and investment, while some public agencies and environmental groups supported the bill with requests for technical changes. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair called this meeting of the Energy Finance and Policy Committee to order. We have a quorum.
• system as the state invests in our energy future.
• system as the state invests in our energy future.
• This bill is a basic transparency proposal. state invests in our energy future.
• And state invests in our energy future.

Bills: HF3458, HF3777, HF3778, HF3912

Keywords: electric utilities, service areas, Tribal lands, Minnesota statute, energy regulation, utility rates, public utilities, Public Utilities Commission, PUC, ratepayer, consumer protection, affordable energy, energy affordability, ability to pay, just and reasonable rates, rate regulation, electric rates, natural gas rates, energy conservation, renewable energy

Transcript Highlights:

• Washington State Energy Code requirement to include an onsite renewable energy system on new commercial
• So we kind of looked at what other states were doing, and I wanted to put it on the energy usage.
• I'm the regional and state policy director for the Northwest Energy Coalition.
• I'm a senior energy policy specialist at the Washington State Department of Commerce.
• I'm a senior energy policy specialist at the Washington State Department of Commerce.

Bills: SB6171, SB5965, SB5982, SB6004, SB6010, SB5941, SB6050

Keywords: energy facilities, large energy consumers, regulation, environment, sustainability, retail bags, pollution, customer impact, consumer-owned utilities, clean energy, port districts, market customers, energy transformation, renewable energy, public entities, electric generation, contracting, SB 6010, Washington energy siting, EFSEC

Summary: The committee first moved into executive session on Senate Bill 5941, which would direct the State Building Code Council to exempt certain small school districts from the Washington State Energy Code requirement for onsite renewable energy systems on large new commercial buildings or additions. An amendment narrowing eligibility from districts with 1,000 or fewer students to 500 or fewer students was adopted, and the bill was then advanced from committee with a due pass recommendation to the Rules Committee. The committee then held a public hearing on Senate Bill 6171, a proposed substitute bill addressing emerging large energy use facilities, primarily data centers. Staff described provisions requiring utilities to adopt tariffs or policies to prevent cost shifts, require long-term contracts and curtailment/demand-response terms, add reporting and sustainability requirements, impose renewable energy targets, change cap-and-invest allowance treatment, and create a fee to fund energy assistance, weatherization, and higher education. The sponsor said the bill is intended to protect ratepayers, preserve grid reliability, improve transparency, and ensure data centers pay their full costs while supporting affordability and workforce investments. Testimony was mixed. Supporters included community action organizations, environmental groups, some utilities, state agencies, and student advocates, who emphasized ratepayer protection, transparency, clean energy planning, and funding for low-income energy assistance. Opponents and some local governments, ports, utilities, and industry representatives argued the bill is too prescriptive, could harm economic development and competitiveness, may conflict with existing utility practices and contracts, and could create problems with the Climate Commitment Act and CETA. No vote was taken on SB 6171, and the hearing closed with the bill left pending further committee action.

Transcript Highlights:

• It realigns energy-related programs by moving the Louisiana Geological Survey under the LSU Energy Institute
• Are we seeing this in every state in the country? Every state. No question. Across the country.
• I know those states have passed.
• So he'll have to comply with the school board policies or the non-public school policies.
• So he'll have to comply with the school policies or the non-public school policies.

Bills: HCR26, HB113, HB380, HB392, HB476, HB513, HB608, HB682, HB905, HB987

Keywords: human growth, development education, prenatal education, state standards, biological science, grading scale, education reform, students, public schools, academic policy, community college, technical education, pilot program, driver training, transportation, Safe Haven Law, flyers, child safety, infant relinquishment, name image likeness

Transcript Highlights:

• I call the meeting of the Committee on Energy Finance and Policy to order, and we have a quorum.
• Hello, Committee Chair Sudzinski and members of the House Energy Finance and Policy Committee.
• bills, and it helps our state reach its clean energy goals.
• Evans, please state your name and your organization for the record. Rick Evans with Xcel Energy.
• Folks, we've got a role to play as a legislature when it comes to energy in the state.

Bills: HF2103, HF2793

Keywords: energy, renewable energy, ammonia, hydrogen, certificate tracking, funding, environment, community solar, energy policy, sustainability, solar garden program, regulation sunset

Transcript Highlights:

• Department of Energy.
• It also provides a categorical exemption from the State Environmental Policy Act for upgrading or rebuilding
• It clarifies that WITA operates without creating state debt or lending the credit of the state, so long
• That's from the state.
• Clean energy transition, and this is unacceptable to me.

Bills: SB6124, SB6171, SB6284, SB5609, SB6172, SB6246, SB5932, SB6269, SB6223, SB5975

Keywords: appliance affordability, cost index, energy efficiency, consumer protection, Washington state, energy facilities, large energy consumers, regulation, environment, sustainability, artificial intelligence, data privacy, technological impacts, cultural resources, land use, environmental policy, exemptions, state laws, Washington climate policy, greenhouse gas

Summary: The Senate Environment, Energy, and Technology Committee took executive action on 11 bills, with staff briefing each measure and members considering multiple proposed substitutes and amendments. The committee advanced bills on an Appliance Affordability Index study (SB 624), emerging large energy use facilities/data centers (SB 6171), AI systems (SB 6284), cultural resource protection under SEPA (SB 5609), coal plant treatment under cap-and-invest and tax law (SB 6172), emissions-intensive trade-exposed facilities (SB 6246), low-to-zero-carbon alternative jet fuel production (SB 5932), motor fuel definitions (SB 6269), community-scaled weatherization projects (SB 6223), lead in cookware (SB 5975), and electric transmission system modernization (SB 5466). Several bills were described as technical or policy updates tied to climate, energy reliability, consumer protection, and land-use review. Members debated a number of substantive changes. On SB 6171, the committee rejected an amendment to remove the proposed fee on data centers and instead advanced a substitute that retained tariff, reporting, and utility-related provisions; testimony emphasized both competitiveness for data centers and ratepayer protection. On SB 6284, the committee advanced a substitute that refined definitions, added human-consideration language, extended risk-management duties to developers with exemptions for smaller entities and certain sectors, and clarified enforcement. On SB 5609, an amendment to delay or restructure cultural-resource requirements was not adopted, and the committee moved forward a substitute requiring local ordinances and a governor-led task force; supporters stressed protecting irreplaceable cultural resources, while opponents raised housing and implementation concerns. The committee also adopted an amendment to SB 6172 related to emergency DOE orders for a coal facility, then advanced the bill; it moved SB 6246 forward without amendment; and it adopted a substitute for SB 5932 intended to preserve tax incentive certainty for alternative jet fuel producers over a 10-year period. For SB 5975, the committee rejected one substitute and adopted another that tightened lead restrictions in cookware and shifted future regulation to the Safer Products Program. On SB 5466, the committee rejected several amendments on wildfire risk, corridor planning, landowner consultation, eminent domain, and liability, then advanced the proposed second substitute to Ways and Means. Most bills were reported out of committee with due pass recommendations, several to Ways and Means and others to Rules, and the meeting adjourned after all executive actions were completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• facilities in Washington State.
• policy framework.
• And the bill helps provide regulatory certainty while providing more information to the state on energy
• that the state is generating, and that would... ...consistently among all energy that the state is generating
• We represent a remaining 4,000 jobs in this state.

Bills: HB2537, HB2245, HB2296

Keywords: emissions, climate commitment act, environmental regulation, trade regulation, facility compliance, consumer-owned utilities, clean energy, port districts, market customers, energy transformation, distributed energy, renewable energy, energy resources, sustainability, energy policy, 904, all

Summary: The Environment and Energy Committee heard public testimony on House Bill 2537, which would revise Washington’s Climate Commitment Act treatment of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) facilities. The bill would require Ecology’s post-2034 report to include methods for annual allowance reductions, leakage-risk adjustments, and consignment of some no-cost allowances for facility decarbonization projects. It would also add biennial emissions/product reporting, require facility decarbonization plans every four years, and tie continued no-cost allowances and penalty avoidance to those new reporting and planning obligations. The chair said the committee would not take action on HB 2537 that day, and the hearing was later closed after testimony. Supporters, including The Nature Conservancy, NRDC, Washington Conservation Action, Climate Solutions, Ecology, and Clean and Prosperous Washington, said the bill would provide needed clarity for post-2035 policy, better data on barriers to decarbonization, and a framework to keep EITEs on a path consistent with state climate goals while still addressing leakage concerns. Ecology said it generally supported the bill’s approach, though it recommended streamlining duplicative reporting and noted the work would require significant agency resources. Several supporters pointed to Quebec’s consignment model as a useful example and said the bill could help direct public funds toward real emissions reductions. Opponents and concerned parties from manufacturing, utilities, and labor—including the Association of Washington Business, WISPA, the Alliance of Western Energy Consumers, the Northwest Pulp and Paper Association, the Association of Western Pulp and Paperworkers, Food Northwest, Simplot, Kaiser Aluminum, Newcor Steel, and Cowlitz PUD—argued that the bill could increase compliance burdens, raise costs, and worsen leakage risk without solving major barriers such as electricity availability, permitting delays, and the high capital cost of industrial decarbonization. They emphasized recent facility closures and job losses, said many low-cost reductions have already been made, and urged more flexibility, better protection of confidential business information, and additional state investment in clean power and industrial upgrades. The committee also took up House Bill 2245 during the meeting, adopting a proposed substitute and voting 11-8 to report the substitute bill out of committee with a do-pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it's preempted by any federal and state law.
• We've heard several states.
• No one in this state has made such a claim, and I doubt anyone in this state...
• No one in this state has made such a claim, and I doubt anyone in this state, city, parish, whatever,
• We would also like to see the bill amended to state that any litigation... ...amended to state that any

Bills: SB480, HB621, HB637, HB804, HB841, HB1056

Keywords: fishing gear, Oyster Bayou, shrimping, regulation, marine resources, HB621, Act 658, renewable energy, recycling, decommissioning, wind energy, solar power, solar facilities, wind turbines, energy infrastructure, end-of-life disposal, universal waste, recyclable materials, waste reduction, Department of Environmental Quality

Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources met on May 14 and approved the April 29 minutes. The committee first heard HB 1056, which authorizes transfer of certain state property in Natchitoches Parish tied to a former school building now considered dilapidated and a nuisance; it was reported favorably. HB 841, described as a landman code of conduct bill and expropriation-related measure, was voluntarily deferred so the sponsor could work on additional changes over the interim. The committee then took up HB 804, the Louisiana Energy Protection Act, which would bar future lawsuits seeking climate-change damages against fossil fuel companies and other entities. Supporters said it would prevent speculative climate litigation while preserving legitimate claims for permit violations and other existing statutory causes of action. Opponents from coastal litigation and the Sierra Club argued the bill was drafted too broadly and could affect legacy cases, property rights, and regulatory enforcement; the committee adopted Amendment 3875 to grandfather existing filed cases and make the bill effective upon gubernatorial signature, then reported the bill favorably as amended. HB 621, requiring recycling of decommissioned renewable energy infrastructure and updating the state’s waste framework for modern energy components, was reported favorably. HB 637, which revises oil field site restoration fees and lowers rates for marginal, stripper, low-pressure, and incapable wells, was also reported favorably. Finally, SB 480, as amended, allowed boats to anchor in Oyster Bayou so long as they are not within an oyster lease and someone remains on board; the committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill is called the Louisiana Energy Protection Act.
• And it's preempted by any federal and state law.
• No one in this state has made such a claim, and I doubt anyone in this state, city, parish, or whatever
• We would also like to see the bill amended to state that any litigation... ...amended to state that any
• Energy, in favor, not wishing to speak.

Bills: SB480, HB621, HB637, HB804, HB841, HB1056

Keywords: fishing gear, Oyster Bayou, shrimping, regulation, marine resources, HB621, Act 658, renewable energy, recycling, decommissioning, wind energy, solar power, solar facilities, wind turbines, energy infrastructure, end-of-life disposal, universal waste, recyclable materials, waste reduction, Department of Environmental Quality

Transcript Highlights:

• [Music] I call the meeting to order for the House Energy Finance and Policy Committee.
• bills, and it helps our state reach its clean energy goals.
• bills, and it helps our state reach its clean energy goals.
• bills, and it helps our state reach its clean energy goals.
• and policy House energy finance and policy committee<00:59:00.839><c> uh</c><00:59:00.960><c> my</c>

Bills: HF2103, HF2793

Keywords: energy, renewable energy, ammonia, hydrogen, certificate tracking, funding, environment, community solar, energy policy, sustainability, solar garden program, regulation sunset, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• in the state, generation of energy in the state, those<00:36:20.800><c> costs,</c><00:36:21.640><c>
• We have a big part to play when it comes to energy rates here in the state of Minnesota.
• policy in the state of Minnesota.
• policy in the state of Minnesota.
• can play in our that nuclear energy can play in our state. state. state.

Bills: HF4308, HF4153, HF4703, HF4711

Keywords: HF4308, Monticello nuclear plant, Prairie Island, renewable development account, RDA, nuclear waste, spent fuel, dry cask storage, utility tax, commercial-industrial property tax, state general levy, property tax exemption, residential heating fuels, natural gas tax exemption, electricity sales tax exemption, year-round sales tax exemption, distributed solar energy standard, solar mandate, community solar, grid modernization

Transcript Highlights:

• Griffith plans to course-correct and ensure that DOE's policies serve energy affordability, reliability
• , where we went from energy scarce to energy abundant.
• From energy production to agriculture to manufacturing, during our meeting you discussed the United States
• And what steps need to be taken for the United States to become more of a world leader in energy and
• state, and we know energy.

Keywords: nominations, Undersecretary of Energy, Undersecretary of Science, Preston Griffith, Dario Gil, energy policy, scientific innovation

Summary: The meeting was convened to discuss several significant nominations, particularly focusing on Preston Wills Griffith III for Undersecretary of Energy and Dr. Dario Gil for Undersecretary of Science. The committee underscored the importance of these roles in shaping American energy policy and scientific innovation. The discussion highlighted the nominees' backgrounds, with Griffith having extensive experience at the Department of Energy and the White House, and Gil bringing expertise in quantum technology and energy research. Members expressed a strong desire to understand the nominees' perspectives on current challenges facing the energy sector, including regulatory mandates and national security concerns. The meeting concluded with a commitment to ensuring thorough evaluations of the candidates and their proposed approaches to pressing issues.