Video & Transcript Research : 'split payment'

Page 1 of 401
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • As long as the developer continues to give them some payment.
  • They found that recipients of payments and other adults in their household reduced work by 5%.
  • This bill is focused on using taxpayer money to just give cash payments to individuals.
  • It has to do with you taking taxpayer money and giving cash payments to individuals.
  • That 18-month pilot ended in November along with our payments.
Bills: HB21, HB211, HB223
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 31st, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Payments of refunds often result in local governments negotiating.
  • on a house because I found that I could pay the payment for as much as the rent would cost.
  • My county, like many others in the state, allows property owners to split pay their property taxes by
  • don't receive their tax bill until after the deadline for the first split pay payment.
  • House Bill 2742 addresses this possibility. by allowing property owners to pay their first split pay
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • think two sessions ago, in another area that directed, I think, the Department of Finance to make the payment
  • In fact, in Florida property owners have the right to negotiate the payment.
  • owners have the right to<01:21:08.239> negotiate<01:21:09.199> the<01:21:09.520> payment
  • c><01:21:10.239> I<01:21:10.560> think<01:21:10.640> that's to negotiate the payment
  • I think that's to negotiate the payment.
Summary: The committee first approved the June 10, 2025 minutes, then took up House Bill 198, Angela’s Law, sponsored by Representative Samara Heavrin. The bill would add a new aggravating circumstance in death-penalty cases when an offender abuses the corpse of a kidnapping or murder victim by engaging in deviate sexual intercourse, sexual intercourse, or sexual contact. Representative Heavrin and the victim’s parents described the underlying case and argued the current law does not adequately account for postmortem sexual abuse, leaving the offender parole-eligible despite the family’s view that the conduct warranted harsher punishment. Several members expressed sympathy and support, and one member suggested the proposal should be drafted carefully so it would apply broadly enough to cover co-conspirators or multiple offenders. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided. The committee then heard an informational presentation on KRS Chapter 202C from Judge Lisa Payne Jones and Shauna Mitchell of the Kentucky Judicial Commission on Mental Health. They explained that Chapter 202C, enacted in 2021 to close a gap in the civil-commitment statutes, applies to respondents found incompetent to stand trial who are charged with qualifying serious offenses such as capital offenses, certain Class A and Class B felonies causing death or serious injury, rape in the first degree, or sodomy in the first degree. The process begins with a Commonwealth’s petition, followed by a prompt evidentiary hearing, appointment of a guardian ad litem, and then a commitment hearing if the offense is proven. The presenters outlined the procedural standards and recent statutory changes. At the evidentiary hearing, the Commonwealth must prove the charged offense by a preponderance of the evidence before a judge, with the respondent able to present defenses; if the Commonwealth fails, the respondent must be released. If the case proceeds, the commitment hearing requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of at least one involuntary-commitment criterion, and the hearing may be before a jury if requested. They noted that a 2024 amendment changed the commitment criteria from requiring all four factors to only one, and added language about recent criminal behavior and prior involuntary hospitalizations under Chapters 202A or 202B. If commitment is ordered, the respondent is placed in a designated forensic psychiatric facility, currently KCPC.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government May 12th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Many counties across the state of Texas allow property owners to split-pay their property taxes by paying
  • You know, Senator, I need to split my bill out in half. Just take a breath. Okay, thank you.
  • And then, of course, this specifically addresses the situation where they're wanting to make a split
  • payment and they don't get notification of the amount of the payment in time to even make that first
  • And this is about split payments catching up on the right month.
Summary: The Committee on Local Government heard and discussed a series of House bills dealing with municipal structure, tax payment timing, local provider participation funds, firefighter cancer screenings, sunset review of the Trinity River Authority, replacement certificates of occupancy, and open meetings enforcement. HB 303 would remove the 501-resident floor so very small type A and B municipalities can convert to type C cities; HB 2742 would give property owners a later first split-payment deadline when tax bills are mailed after November 30; HB 3305 and HB 3348 were local provider participation fund measures with committee substitutes; HB 198 would require political subdivisions to offer occupational cancer screenings for firefighters; HB 1535 was a sunset bill for the Trinity River Authority; HB 4753 would allow a municipality-issued proof of a certificate of occupancy to substitute for a lost original; and HB 3711 would treat certain Open Meetings Act violations as offenses against public administration and require public explanation when prosecutors decline to act. Testimony was generally supportive or limited, with several witnesses and senators emphasizing practical fixes, firefighter health and cost savings, local government transparency, and administrative cleanup. For HB 198, firefighter representatives gave emotional testimony about cancer deaths and the value of early screening. On HB 3711, a witness supported the bill but urged stronger enforcement and broader application. Several senators raised policy concerns on HB 2715 about routing removal proceedings through a regional presiding judge rather than the local county, arguing it could politicize the process. The committee took no public testimony on most bills and repeatedly left them pending subject to call of the chair before later voting them out. HB 21, HB 30, HB 1535, HB 1520, HB 198, HB 303, HB 2742, and HB 4753 were reported to the full Senate, generally by unanimous or near-unanimous votes, and several were also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. HB 30 passed on a 5-1 vote, while the other reported bills were approved unanimously or with no recorded opposition. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill is focused on using taxpayer money to just give cash payments to people.
  • This bill is focused on using taxpayer money to just give cash payments to people.
  • It has to do with taking taxpayer money and giving cash payments to individuals.
  • And what was the monthly payment you all were offering, $500 a month?
  • Social Security payments have worked for many, many years.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman and members, many counties across the state of Texas allow property owners to split payments
  • I need to split my bill out in half. Okay, thank you.
  • pay and they don't get notification of the amount of the payment in time to even make that first half
  • Without objection, so ordered. 3742, which is the payment. Right, okay.
  • Payments catching up on the right month.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/15/26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • compromise language that we worked on the last couple of weeks and mainly encompasses the farmer down payment
  • department through June 30th of the year 2030, which I think is a very important aspect to the down payment
  • department through June 30th of the year 2030, which I think is a very important aspect to the down payment
  • is a very important aspect to<00:02:57.640> the<00:02:57.720> down<00:02:57.920> payment
  • to the down payment assistance program. to the down payment assistance program.
Bills: HF3548
Summary: The Agricultural Finance and Policy Committee met on April 15, 2026, approved the April 13 minutes with a correction to Assistant Commissioner Peter Kesset’s name, and then took up House File 3548. The bill, moved by Chair Anderson for re-referral to Ways and Means, centered on the farmer down payment assistance program and the Department of Agriculture’s budget and policy provisions. Anderson described the DE4 amendment as compromise language that reserved up to 25% of funds for applicants with purchase contracts, removed a proposed marijuana exclusion, and allowed appropriated funds to remain available through June 30, 2030 rather than reverting to the general fund at the end of the biennium. Laura Schreiber of the Land Stewardship Project testified in support, emphasizing the importance of keeping funds available and urging that grants remain capped at $20,000 so more farmers could participate. The committee then adopted several amendments. A23, described as the governor’s budget request and department policy bill, was adopted and included moving the Emerging Farmers Office into the Agricultural Marketing and Development subdivision, combining some reports into the Agri report, and addressing delegated authority with MDA. A17, allowing certain eggs past their quality assurance date to be donated to food shelves under specific handling requirements, was adopted. A18, adjusting per diem rates for certain non-representative committee members, was adopted. A19, shifting about $20,000 to support farm land transition services such as mediation, contracts, financial planning, tax preparation, estate planning, and housing assistance, was also adopted. A22, which combined funding for wolf depredation claims and the local food purchasing program, drew the most debate. Representative Smith questioned why the two items were combined and sought to divide the amendment, but staff said that would be problematic because the funding changes were interdependent. Supporters said the amendment would pay about 80% of wolf-loss claims and add money for local food purchasing, while opponents argued the local food need was greater and the wolf depredation approach was not the best use of funds. The roll call on A22 was confusing in the transcript, but the amendment ultimately prevailed. A21, which would have removed a physical-contact requirement for farm cervidae containment, failed on a 7-7 tie after opponents argued it would weaken disease protections and supporters said the fencing costs were driving deer farmers out of business. Hansen then declined to move A24, which would have advanced a paraquat ban, saying there was no agreement and he did not want a negative vote at that time. After the DE4 as amended was adopted, the committee took a final roll call on House File 3548 as amended. The bill failed on a 6-8 vote and was laid over. In closing, members on both sides said the bill contained useful provisions for farmers, but disagreement over the unresolved paraquat issue prevented the committee from advancing it.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Financial Services Committee Mar 10th, 2026

Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • The rounding adjustment again does not affect the tax calculation, and any electronic payment from credit
  • affect the tax calculation and any affect the tax calculation and any electronic<00:07:50.000> payment
  • <00:07:50.400> from<00:07:50.639> credit,<00:07:51.039> debit electronic payment
  • <00:08:46.240> is<00:08:46.399> made to any transaction where payment is made to any
  • transaction where payment is made to<00:08:46.800> a<00:08:46.959> governmental<00:08:
Bills: HB545, HB545
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Culture, Recreation & Tourism Apr 3rd, 2025

Culture, Recreation & Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • generated more than $20 billion in local tax revenue, and provided nearly $30 billion in landowner payments
  • House Bill 3887 increases payment and performance bond thresholds to $150,000 for public work contracts
  • current law, contractors on public works projects must take out certain security bonds, including payment
  • Current state law requires payment bonds for contracts in excess of $25,000 and performance bonds for
  • House Bill 3887 raises that threshold from $25,000 to $150,000 for payment bonds and from $100,000 to