Video & Transcript Research : 'shoreline properties'

Page 1 of 469
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA Public Hearing 02-06-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is not our property problem. The whole shoreline is connected.
  • both the beaches and the shoreline both the beaches and the shoreline properties<01:21:57.520>
  • real property adjacent to the shoreline real property adjacent to the shoreline and<01:27:34.239
  • And it's not just shoreline — whether the property is on the shoreline could affect, you know, whether
  • the property is on the shoreline whether the property is on the shoreline that<01:37:05.440> could
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures, beginning with SB 2982 on campaign finance, which would prohibit foreign entities and foreign-influence businesses from making contributions and expenditures. The Attorney General’s office testified first, followed by the Campaign Spending Commission, which supported the bill but asked for clarification on constitutional review authority and additional implementation time for certifications, forms, and procedures. Common Cause also supported the measure, arguing it would help protect elections from dark money and foreign influence. No vote was taken. The committee then took up SB 2367 on a state boating facilities lease program for the Ala Wai small boat harbor. DLNR supported the bill, while UPW opposed it, warning about privatization of a public asset and possible job displacement. Several members of the public supported the concept but urged amendments to protect public access, affordability, youth ocean programs, and state employee jobs. Committee members questioned DLNR about the scope of the lease, the role of the Board of Land and Natural Resources, and whether public access and existing concessions would remain protected. DLNR said current leases would remain, the board would retain approval authority, and employees would not necessarily be displaced, but members indicated more discussion and possible amendments were needed. For SB 2818 on boating penalties, DLNR testified in support and there was no opposition testimony. The committee also heard SB 2944 on conservation, which would require wildlife viewing guidelines that substantially conform to NOAA guidance and reporting requirements; DLNR said it stood on its written testimony. SB 2022 on water code penalties drew support from DLNR’s Commission on Water Resource Management, which said the bill’s two-tiered penalty structure would preserve deterrence while keeping the current $5,000 penalty for first-time or non-harmful violations. The Board of Water Supply submitted comments, and Ulupono Initiative supported the measure as a needed enforcement tool. Committee members discussed whether the higher penalty ceiling should be phased in and asked for stakeholder input on the amount of the penalties. Finally, the committee began SB 2240 on land use, which would require water availability certification from the Commission on Water Resource Management before a district boundary amendment proceeds to the Land Use Commission. DLNR supported the bill and said it often reviews project documents that lack sufficient information on water needs and availability, so the measure would allow earlier review and comment. The committee also indicated it would seek amendments and further feedback on the water penalty bill before it moved to the next committee.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • shorelines are public for the public. shorelines are public for the public.
  • is to minimize uh shoreline hardening. is to minimize uh shoreline hardening.
  • the shoreline in one place.
  • the shoreline in one place.
  • <00:51:29.359> Um, shoreline in one place. Um, shoreline in one place.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Agriculture & Livestock Mar 11th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 294 would amend Chapter 217 of the Local Government Code and Chapter 202 of the Property Code
  • So at the time of sale, there may be restrictions placed on that property that go with the property,
  • We're just trying to keep things tidy and, uh, in order for, uh, maximizing property values.
  • Try to get, you know, high density in Houston because property is expensive and that results in, in,
  • So, um, a lot of these are on private property, right?
Bills: HB294
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Mar 19, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • KBSC is a group of nine condominium properties and one residential shoreline parcel in Ka'anapali on
  • KBSC is a group of nine condominium properties and one residential shoreline parcel in Ka'anapali on
  • properties and one residential shoreline properties and one residential shoreline parcel<00:33:28.280
  • and also have a lot of investment like burials and other historic properties on the shorelines.
  • and also have a lot of investment like burials and other historic properties on the shorelines.
Summary: The Committee on Water and Land heard testimony on SB 5253 SD2 relating to conservation and SB 2401 relating to regional shoreline mitigation district, with the chair emphasizing short testimony limits and the need to finish before session. On SB 5253, DLNR said it stood on its written testimony and answered questions about the bill’s proposed nonprofit endangered species sanctuary. Members asked whether existing entities or agreements, such as land trusts, private landowners, and DLNR safe harbor agreements, could accomplish similar conservation goals without creating a new entity. DLNR said similar work already exists, but it was not aware of a comparable sanctuary model in the state. A member also questioned language suggesting for-profit businesses in the sanctuary, and DLNR said the intent appeared to be sales of outreach or similar materials, though it agreed that such activities could be handled by a nonprofit. The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2401, which would create a regional shoreline adaptation/mitigation framework. The Department of the Attorney General said it had concerns about inconsistent use of the terms “mitigation” and “adaptation,” warning of possible title-subject issues. DLNR said it was neutral on the terminology and more concerned with the substance, and noted that the bill would not waive permits; any plan would still require environmental review and applicable state and county permits. DLNR also supported OHA’s recommendation to consider impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during regional planning, and said the bill’s language on temporary shoreline protection measures could help address the gap between emergency permits and longer-term planning while avoiding a hardening-only approach. The Office of Planning supported the regional planning concept but noted it is not a regulatory agency and would need to work with DLNR and the Land Board. OHA supported the bill’s planning-based approach but recommended amendments to require assessment of impacts on Native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices during plan development and to clarify that environmental review would still apply at the project level. Testifiers from the Ka‘anapali Steering Committee strongly supported the bill, saying it would provide a regional framework for ongoing erosion problems while preserving full regulatory authority and normal permitting, and they proposed amendments to standardize terminology, create a limited pathway for temporary shoreline protection, and address ownership and maintenance responsibilities. Members discussed the meaning of “mitigation” versus “adaptation,” the scope of shoreline hardening, and whether the bill would help the legislature take a broader, more holistic view of shoreline decisions. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • 00:08:37.919> private<00:08:38.719> owners<00:08:39.200> of<00:08:39.840> property
  • Hawaii and private owners of property Hawaii and private owners of property between<00:08:40.800
  • the and parties, the State of Hawaii and the and the<00:09:11.520> private<00:09:11.920> property
  • ><00:09:12.320> owners<00:09:12.560> with<00:09:12.800> respect the private property
  • owners with respect the private property owners with respect to<00:09:13.600> the<00:09:14.320
Bills: SCR159
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Civil Law and Procedure May 26th, 2026

Civil Law and Procedure

Transcript Highlights:
  • Task Force to study the feasibility of expropriating and redeveloping certain vacant and blighted properties
  • because we don't want any illegal takings, and I know how this body is around the takings of private property
  • This body is around the takings of private property for eminent domain purposes.
  • allow for the use of public funds to replace drinking water utility service lines located on private property
  • toward the replacement of lead pipes that have already been identified on the private side of the property
Bills: HR307, SB228
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA DEFER, WLA Public Hearings 02-13-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Transcript Highlights:
  • stream maintenance in the Westlock and Middleock shorelines and watersheds.
  • <00:03:57.680> stream<00:03:58.000> maintenance shoreline stream maintenance shoreline
  • <00:04:04.080> Testifying shorelines and wersheds. Testifying shorelines and wersheds.
  • their properties and shooting their<00:49:43.599> animals.
  • being filed to steal people's property. being filed to steal people's property.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to hunting, trespass enforcement, conservation banking, coral reef resilience, and search and rescue. SB 2130 would require DLNR to increase the percentage of public land acreage designated for public hunting areas; DLNR offered comments, the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council expressed concern, and a Game Management Advisory Commission member urged adequate funding for both study and maintenance of any expanded hunting areas. SB 2128 would require forfeiture to the state of firearms or motor vehicles used in hunting trespass on private land; the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council supported the bill, and another signer testified without additional detail. The committee also heard SB 3053, which appropriates funds to DLNR’s Division of Aquatic Resources for mangrove removal and shoreline/stream maintenance in the Westlock and Middleock shorelines and watersheds. DLNR supported the measure and noted staff involved in mangrove removal work; no other testimony was offered. On SB 20005, which authorizes conservation banks for compensatory mitigation in habitat conservation plans and incidental take licenses, DLNR supported the bill but said a House measure, HB 1802, would place key safeguards in statute rather than administrative rules. Earthjustice opposed SB 20005 for lacking statutory safeguards and said it would support incorporating the House language, while CARES supported the bill as a modernization that could reduce permit processing time and provide more predictable costs. A lengthy discussion followed on SB 3201, which would direct DLNR to prioritize coral reef resilience and set performance targets for coral cover and herbivore biomass. DLNR said it supported the intent but wanted more flexibility because outside factors such as climate and emissions policy affect reef conditions; the Nature Conservancy shared that concern and asked for more flexible language. For the bill, For the Fishes strongly supported stronger protections and suggested adding abundance as a metric, while NOAA and DLNR discussed the difficulty of setting universal benchmarks because reef conditions vary by location. Randy Kosaki and CARES supported the bill, emphasizing coral decline and the need for measurable goals, while committee members asked about restoration projects, benchmarks, and whether the bill’s deadlines were meant to require a plan rather than immediate achievement. Finally, the committee took up SB 2937, which would create a search and rescue card program and special fund to reimburse state, county, and volunteer search-and-rescue operations. DLNR’s wildlife division said it stood on its written testimony, and the Hawaii SAR Alliance supported the concept but said Hawaii first needs a stronger search-and-rescue framework, including a state coordinator, before implementing such a program. No votes or final actions were taken on any of the measures in the portion of the meeting provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Agriculture & Livestock Mar 11th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chapter 217 of the Local Government Code and Chapter 202 of the Property Code to Prevent Cities in Asia
  • Did you consider at all, including in this bill, anything to do with property restrictions?
  • But this would supersede that in a sense that are you talking about what type of property?
  • You are right so the time of sale there may be restrictions placed on that property. that go with the
  • And in order for maximizing property values, that's why we are a volunteer board. members, so I just
Bills: HB294, HB405, HB519, HB294
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Telecommunications & Broadband Apr 16th, 2025

S/C on Telecommunications & Broadband

Transcript Highlights:
  • This problem isn't with service providers; it's with property owners, some landlords.
  • Getting broadband to MDU properties, I think Chairman Morales, sorry, said sometimes can be a matter
  • The incentives at that level for a multifamily property owner to want... to upgrade access to Wi-Fi.
  • Are there competitive pressures that are brought to bear in those properties, like you might have in
  • a class A where you're chasing higher income, and properties have to compete with amenities like pools
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:07:33.800> stays sure that your property stays sure that your property stays uh<00:07:
  • properties out.
  • owners who agree to rent the property owners who agree to rent their<00:10:43.400> properties
  • their properties out. their properties out.
  • ,<01:20:23.240> reducing their investment property, reducing their investment property, reducing
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Environment and Natural Resources Jan 13th, 2026

Environment and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It should encourage more CEB and ACSC designations so that shorelines can be maintained better, with
  • In other words, dune and beach erosion has to be tolerated without repair by local government and property
  • way we do this is that the CEB designation is used by USACE as a crucial point of eligibility of a shoreline
  • So if the Legislature now considers a golf course to be agricultural use, does that mean that property
  • We're just saying... ...real property, whether it's classified ag or not.
Bills: S0544, S0636, S0848, S0546
Summary: The Environment and Natural Resources Committee met with a quorum and took up several bills. SB 636 on beach management, by Senator Leek, would create additional pathways for counties and municipalities to obtain critically eroded beach or area of critical state concern designations, shifting the process toward a more proactive approach. Senator Smith and Senator Harrell raised concerns about local capacity and funding, and the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association said the bill was an alternative pathway but emphasized the need for more recurring funding. The bill was reported favorably. The committee then considered SB 544, which transfers the Golf Course Best Management Practices Certification Program from DEP to FDACS and establishes certification and training standards there. Senator Smith and Senator Harrell asked about environmental oversight, taxation, and whether the change would affect state park restrictions; the sponsor said it would not change tax treatment or park rules and that DEP would still handle enforcement if BMPs are not followed. The Florida Springs Council opposed the bill, arguing golf courses are not agriculture and warning of weaker protections for springs, while the Florida Golf Course Superintendent's Association supported the move as a continuity and participation measure. After adopting a technical amendment, the committee reported the bill favorably, with Senator Smith voting no. SB 848 on stormwater treatment, also by Senator Trunow, was amended to clarify the role of water quality enhancement areas while stormwater rules are still being finalized and to make public-land project review forward-looking. Resource Environmental Solutions supported the amendment and bill as providing a clearer market for water quality credits, and the Florida Home Builders Association supported the measure. The committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably. SB 546 by Vice Chair Mayfield would require 30-day public notice before meetings reviewing the sale or exchange of state conservation lands, including at water management districts; after a technical amendment, it received support from conservation groups and was reported favorably. The committee also received a DEP presentation on the State Park Amenities Report, which said Florida’s 175 state parks drew over 28 million visitors and generated a $3.6 billion economic impact. DEP identified nearly $759 million in needed repairs and upgrades over 10 years and $1.39 billion in contemplated new construction and development in unit management plans. No votes were taken on the presentation, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • works to a competitive disadvantage to Minnesota resorts and, I guess, as spoken about other rental properties
  • So some of those properties, I think, are going ahead and using residential hot tubs perhaps in an unregulated
  • really work to a competitive disadvantage to Minnesota resorts, and, as spoken about other rental properties
  • , some of those properties are going ahead and using residential hot tubs perhaps in an unregulated way
  • Some of those properties, I think, are going ahead and using residential hot tubs perhaps in an unregulated
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/13/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • But if we sell off that property, unfortunately everybody likes a sand beach, and you know that shoreline
  • But if we sell off that property, unfortunately everybody likes a sand beach, and you know that shoreline
  • But if we sell off that property, unfortunately everybody likes a sand beach, and you know that shoreline
  • But if we sell off that property, unfortunately everybody likes a sand beach, and you know that shoreline
  • But if we sell off that property, unfortunately everybody likes a sand beach, and you know that shoreline
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • On this next measure, SB 2401, SD1 HD1, relating to regional shoreline mitigation districts.
  • SB 3028, SD2, HD1, relating to property tax.
  • That would benefit all the properties in that $2 million to $3 million range.
  • And then the Hawaiʻi Property Insurance Association and then other private insurers.
  • And it goes to support our content creators and intellectual property creators.
Bills: HCR93, HCR14, HR85
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Fiscal Affairs May 11th, 2026

Revenue & Fiscal Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • of blighted or derelict properties.
  • the property, and that adds value to the property.
  • taxes, or they have less $10,000 dollars of property taxes to pay on that property.
  • It stays with the property and the title property owner. The exemption is not transferable.
  • It stays with the property and the title property owner.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:08:17.759> and that are happening to a property and that are happening to a property and
  • <00:10:16.760> when original landlord sold the property when original landlord sold the property
  • So to me, this is really... that when this property was sold in uh that when this property was sold in
  • <00:36:12.760> is public resources into the property is public resources into the property
  • there may be um water near the property there may be um water near the property and<01:18:44.320
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government Feb 4th, 2026

Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have three markets in our property space, one of which is the admitted market, one of which is the
  • When a consumer of any kind goes to seek insurance coverage for their property, the first goal is always
  • It would encourage more CEB and ACSC designations as the shoreline can be maintained better with a lower
  • Travis Moore, Ocean Hammock Property Owners Association, waves in support.
  • Travis Moore, Ocean Hammack Property Owners Association, Waves in support.
Summary: The committee heard and advanced several bills, beginning with CS/SB 796, which would create Veterinary Professional Associates as a new supervised veterinary role, expand telehealth prescription timeframes, and set training and scope limits. Supporters said it would improve access to care, lower costs, and create a career path, while opponents argued the proposal lacked a clear regulatory framework, could create liability and federal-law conflicts, and would not address the real shortage in rural large-animal practice. After debate, the committee reported the bill favorably. Members also heard and favorably reported SB 1682 on local authority over derelict and abandoned vessels, CS/SB 1028 on a commercial Citizens clearinghouse for property insurance, SB 394 on exempting certain reinsurance underwriting managers from licensing, SB 636 on beach management and erosion designations, CS/SB 546 on public notice for conservation land sales or exchanges, CS/SB 302 on Biscayne Bay nature-based solutions and related coastal resiliency provisions, SB 1050 on pharmacy choice for pet medications, and SB 774 extending workers’ compensation benefits to 911 public safety telecommunicators for mental and nervous injuries. Testimony on these bills generally focused on access, regulatory clarity, environmental protection, or workforce support, with some concerns raised on insurance consumer protections and beach-management language. Senator Harrell’s bills were also taken up and reported favorably: CS/SB 480, a major overhaul of state IT governance creating DIGIT and new procurement, reporting, and workforce structures; CS/SB 1230, restricting PFAS-containing firefighting foam and adding testing, inventory, and disposal requirements; and CS/SB 1288, a naming bill designating the Andrew Red Harris Shoal and requiring markers. Finally, the committee heard extensive testimony on SB 1066 regarding restoration of the Oklawaha/Rodman system, with supporters emphasizing ecological restoration, flood-risk reduction, and economic benefits, and opponents warning about local impacts, water quality, and the loss of a world-class fishery. The transcript ends during testimony on that bill, before final action is shown.