Video & Transcript Research : 'section 35-190'

Page 1 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/26/2026 - House Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Transcript Highlights:
  • It has one classroom and 35 seats. It graduates about two classes per year.
  • It has one classroom and 35 seats. It graduates about two classes per year.
  • NARTA, as you've been told, has about 35 seats that you can comfortably sit somebody in.
  • I'll read it entirely: says the appropriations made in subsection A of this section is exempt from the
  • provisions of Section 35-190, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to lapsing of appropriations until
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2641, which would ban firefighting foam containing intentionally added PFAS chemicals. The sponsor said the bill was intended to protect firefighters and the public from carcinogenic and persistent chemicals that can contaminate groundwater, and noted Arizona had already banned the foam for training. A University of Arizona public health researcher testified that firefighters have higher PFAS levels than the general public and that AFFF use is associated with elevated exposure, while a firefighters’ association representative said alternatives exist and that the bill would remove uncertainty for departments. The committee passed HB 2641 unanimously, 15-0. The committee then heard HB 2602, a $24,000 appropriation for a 10% pay increase for Department of Public Safety employees in fiscal year 2027. The sponsor and supporters from the Arizona Troopers Association argued the raise was needed for recruitment and retention, citing vacancies, departures, and the cost of training new troopers. Several members supported the idea but raised concerns about the budget impact and the broader issue of pay disparities across agencies and state employees. The bill received a do pass recommendation on a 10-0-3 vote, with two members voting no and three voting present. Finally, the committee considered HB 2225, which would appropriate $10 million for capital costs at the Northern Arizona Regional Training Academy in Yavapai County and keep the funds from lapsing until 2029. The sponsor and Yavapai County law enforcement witnesses said the academy is overcrowded, serves multiple agencies across northern Arizona, reduces travel and lodging costs, and provides both basic and in-service training. Some members questioned whether the state should fund a county-based facility and raised concerns about the size and structure of the appropriation, while others supported the training mission but wanted the issue handled in the budget process. The committee voted to give HB 2225 a do pass recommendation, with several members voting no or present.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • and<00:35:04.359> and<00:35:04.480> I<00:35:04.720> think<00:35:05.720> I
  • > and<00:35:10.640> you<00:35:10.800> kind<00:35:10.920> of<00:35:11.040>
  • > you<00:35:12.240> can't<00:35:12.599> really<00:35:13.000> treat<00:35:
  • :24.480> where<00:35:24.720> we<00:35:24.880> are<00:35:25.640> and<00:35
  • a<00:35:37.240> lot<00:35:37.400> of<00:35:37.640> products<00:35:38.040>
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 100, which would place cigarettes, vapes, and related nicotine products under the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) system, add enforcement tools against bad actors, and regulate nitrous oxide/laughing gas sales to those under 21. Supporters, including youth advocates Mallerie Jones and Griffin Kian Neth, argued the bill would reduce youth access to nicotine products through retail licensing, compliance checks, and escalating penalties. Higdon said the bill targets illegal sales rather than most retailers, and noted the measure also updates House Bill 11 from the prior year and raises the retail license fee from $250 to $500. The committee adopted the committee substitute and then passed the bill on a roll call vote, with members voting yes and no opposition recorded in the transcript. The committee then considered Senate Bill 202, focused on cannabis-infused beverages. Senator Julie Raque Adams said the bill was intended to create common-sense public health guardrails for a rapidly growing product category sold in gas stations, liquor stores, and vape shops, and to address enforcement gaps. She explained the committee substitute would define cannabis-infused beverages at a 5-milligram limit per 12-ounce can, place enforcement under ABC while keeping CHFS manufacturing and testing rules in place, require a University of Kentucky report back to the General Assembly, allow existing higher-dose inventory to be sold through June 1, exempt festivals and fairs until January 1, 2026, and allow stores to obtain licenses to continue selling the product. The committee adopted the substitute and then heard testimony from hemp-industry representatives and a consumer. Opponents of SB 202/SB 22, including Dee Taylor of the Kentucky Hemp Association, Cornbread Hemp co-founder Jim Higdon, Annie Rouse of Cannabuzz Barn, and consumer Nancy Roberts, argued the bill would hurt a legal Kentucky hemp industry, reduce consumer access, and force sales into liquor stores. They said the 100-milligram beverage referenced in debate is actually 10 servings with a resealable top, that hemp retailers educate customers, and that the industry already operates under 2024 regulations and needs better enforcement rather than new restrictions. Higdon and Rouse objected to the 5-milligram cap, the on-premise sales ban, the move to ABC enforcement, and the taxation approach, warning the bill could wipe out a large share of business and jobs. No final vote on SB 202 was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Standing Committee on Families and Children. (2-5-26)

Families & Children

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 190 is designed to provide much needed relief.
  • We also have a title amendment on House Bill 190. Do I have a motion to adopt?
  • We also have a title amendment on House Bill 190. Do I have a motion to adopt?
  • We also have a title amendment on House<00:37:07.119> Bill<00:37:07.599> 190.
  • Do I have a motion to House Bill 190. Do I have a motion to adopt? adopt? adopt?
Summary: The House Families and Children Committee met in the 2026 regular session and heard House Bill 109, which would amend Kentucky divorce law to waive the current 60-day waiting period for couples with minor children when the parties have already completed mediation or collaborative family law and are ready to finalize their decree. The bill sponsor, Representative Deetsz, argued the measure would reward families who have already done the work to resolve custody, parenting time, and property issues outside of court, and said it would not affect traditional litigation cases. She also explained that delays can be especially burdensome when retirement-account division requires a QDRO after the decree. Committee members discussed how long collaborative cases typically take, with the sponsor estimating about six months on average and longer in complex cases, and noted that some judges already require parenting classes or allow reconciliation conferences in certain circuits. David Walls of the Family Foundation testified in opposition, saying the bill would make divorce easier for parents with children and move Kentucky in the wrong direction. He argued waiting periods can encourage reconciliation, protect marriage commitments, and reduce harms to children and public costs associated with family fragmentation. He urged lawmakers to preserve or even lengthen the waiting period rather than eliminate it, and framed the issue as protecting children and strengthening marriage. During questions, Representative Bojanowski strongly objected to Mr. Walls’ characterization of divorce, saying her own divorce was necessary for her children’s well-being and that the bill simply shortens the process after mediation. Representative Elliott asked about typical timelines in collaborative cases and noted that some courts require parental education. Representative Moser asked whether counseling is required; the sponsor said it is not, though reconciliation conferences may be requested at a judge’s discretion. The transcript ends after discussion of the bill and before any recorded vote or final committee action.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Energy Resources Mar 17th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Public notice of this hearing was given on March 12, 2025 according to Rule 4, Section 11A of the Texas
  • Uh, you've created section 35A in which you define mineral.
  • because I've got that guy he was talking about that knows the whole system and, and, uh, has been there 35
  • He's worked for me for 35 years.
  • He's the only guy that knows where those lines were put in there 35 years ago.
Bills: HB206
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • "But what this would do is it would expand that to health care fraud, the trafficking section, the public
  • indecency section, and then also there's an organized crime—I think that's Chapter 43.
  • I do want to point out one area where this bill could be improved, and that is in Section 5(c).
  • I'd just say that the first section where it does create the right to counsel is particularly important
Bills: HB115
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 15th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • I just want to thank you for this opportunity to lay out SB- The Texas Water Code, Chapter 16, Section
  • 16.34, along with Local Government Code Chapter 232, Section 232.
  • Section 232.0013, Work to Assure Orderly Development of Real Property Outside the Boundaries of a municipality
  • Yeah, so when you make subdivisions of property of 10 acres and less, the Local Government Code Section
  • That was the whole crux of another bill that came through this committee. ...Section 7 of the bill, and
Bills: SB1708, SB2523, SB1450
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • commercial space, we've seen the Canada, Germany, Portugal, have all been saying they're rethinking buying F-35s
  • So as you're all keenly aware, Section 702 of FISA is an extremely useful authority to help keep our
  • Senator, Section 702, which authorizes the foreign collection of non-U.S. persons outside of the United
  • That section of CISA seems to have been destroyed.
Summary: The Senate Intelligence Committee convened for a significant meeting focused on the Annual Worldwide Threats Hearing. Prominent officials from various intelligence agencies presented their insights on emerging national security threats, including concerns over increasing cyber threats, particularly from China and non-state actors. A major discussion point included the balance between national security and civil liberties, as evidenced by conversations surrounding Section 702 of FISA and its implications for privacy protection. The challenges posed by cartels and transnational criminal organizations, especially related to narcotics trafficking, were emphasized as pressing issues necessitating coordinated responses from federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. This meeting underscored the necessity of public-private partnerships to tackle these multifaceted threats effectively.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/11/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • > the<00:35:05.599> section<00:35:06.160> 179<00:35:06.640> provision,<00
  • :35:07.040> those and for the section 179 provision, those and for the section 179 provision,
  • :35:14.720> the<00:35:14.880> next<00:35:15.040> one,<00:35:15.280> then
  • <00:35:16.720> have<00:35:16.960> testimony<00:35:17.520> and<00:35:17.680><
  • 18.240> have<00:35:18.320> all<00:35:18.480> the<00:35:18.640> time<00:35
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • 00:35:14.720> an<00:35:15.359> equal<00:35:16.359> number<00:35:16.599> of
  • :35:42.880> how<00:35:43.040> many<00:35:43.359> schools<00:35:43.800> are
  • c><00:35:46.440> I<00:35:46.640> have<00:35:46.760> a<00:35:46.880> good<
  • > we<00:35:52.680> don't<00:35:52.839> want<00:35:52.920> to<00:35:53.040
  • 00:35:54.480> don't<00:35:54.640> want<00:35:54.720> to<00:35:54.880> do
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We've got a section on that.
  • That section, I will find for you. Yes, section seven. So from filing grievances.
  • Is it a cross-section of different topics?
  • I'm Ann Newman. been following education issues for 35 years.
  • He explains all of this in detail in a section in one section. of the story very quickly in a way that
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/11/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • :35:02.280> think<00:35:02.520> it<00:35:02.760> is<00:35:03.760> shameful
  • thank<00:35:19.440> you<00:35:19.680> again<00:35:20.240> for<00:35:21.240>
  • <00:35:25.880> it<00:35:26.079> today<00:35:27.000> um<00:35:27.320> I
  • :35:28.839> have<00:35:29.520> really<00:35:29.880> got<00:35:30.040> to<
  • 00:35:31.599> when<00:35:31.720> it<00:35:31.839> comes<00:35:32.040> to<
Bills: HF1917, HF1083, HF367
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/3/25

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • ree I<00:35:41.440> representative<00:35:41.880> sensor<00:35:42.200> mura<00:35
  • c> are<01:35:26.600> the<01:35:26.760> needs<01:35:27.040> of<01:35:27.679><
  • up<01:35:32.760> with<01:35:33.239> menot<01:35:34.239> with<01:35:34.520>
  • <01:35:40.000> for<01:35:40.199> the<01:35:40.360> for<01:35:40.719> the<
  • :45.119> that<01:35:45.280> we<01:35:45.560> put<01:35:45.800> into<01:35
Bills: HF192, HF268, HF1214, HF494
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Administrative Rules REVISED: Link Added May 5th, 2026

Administrative Rules

Bills: HJR1101
Summary: The committee met briefly to consider one item, H.J.R. 1101, a rule related to the Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority that had been left out of the Business and Commerce process because it was initially thought to be a major rule. The presenter explained that it was later determined not to be a major rule, but still needed committee action for the rule to take effect. After a motion, second, and no debate, the committee voted unanimously 9-0 to adopt it. After the vote, the chair told members that several additional Senate joint resolutions were still pending and were expected to arrive later that day, with action anticipated the next day or Thursday. He said he would try to keep the process within normal procedure rather than using a rule suspension, and would notify members when the items were ready. The chair also addressed a prior exchange involving the Long-Range Capital Planning Commission, saying he had met with the commission, apologized for using them as an example of agency frustration, and that they had since withdrawn their rules and would work on emergency rules to address the issue. With no further questions, the meeting adjourned.