Video & Transcript Research : 'revenue cap'

Page 1 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/9/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • to a full 1%, the anticipated revenue to a full 1%, the anticipated revenue raised<00:04:35.280>
  • <00:04:41.320> $7 revenues in the following manner. $7 revenues in the following manner. $7
  • Our coalition often supports policies that raise state revenue.
  • , generation of electricity or revenue, generation of electricity or revenue, efficiencies efficiencies
  • revenue source in his House File 4143. revenue source in his House File 4143.
Bills: HF4841, HF4234, HF3697
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/15/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • That is the cap that's currently under state law, and so this bill would just reduce that cap to be either
  • That 55% cap was set at 5% over the federal cap so that there be a little bit of extra room.
  • should call the Department of Revenue. should call the Department of Revenue.
  • conversation, is not a revenue conversation, is not a revenue generating<00:24:31.120> table.
  • track<01:19:59.520> and Revenues Revenues ability to track and Revenues Revenues ability to
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

Local Government Aug 1st, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, for instance, we're under the revenue cap of 3.5 percent, and the city manager and the fire chief
  • Let me get this straight, because it's not a revenue cap.
  • It's not a revenue cap. And everything you said, of course, is accurate. And I knew that.
  • It's not a revenue cap. And everything you said, of course, is accurate. And I knew that.
  • For Dallas, switching from a 3.5 to a 2.5 percent revenue cap means Dallas will lose approximately $12
Bills: SB9
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met to hear Senate Bill 9, which would lower the voter-approval tax rate for certain local taxing units from 3.5% to 2.5%. Sen. Bettencourt, the bill author, argued the change would continue the state’s property tax reforms begun in 2019, slow local levy growth, and give voters more say over larger tax increases. He and supporters cited data showing property tax levies have grown faster than population plus inflation, and said the bill would help protect taxpayers while preserving the state’s broader investments in school tax relief, water, rural law enforcement, and ambulance funding. Supporters included the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, the Texas Association of Business, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the Texas Association of Manufacturers. They said the bill would improve transparency, encourage more disciplined budgeting, and create certainty for homeowners and businesses. They argued that lower tax-rate growth would help attract and retain employers and investment, and that voters would still be able to approve higher rates when needed. Local officials and other opponents said the bill would constrain cities and counties facing rapid growth, inflation, infrastructure needs, and public safety costs. Testimony from county judges, city finance officials, firefighters, and urban county representatives emphasized pressures from jail operations, roads, water, EMS, police and fire staffing, and unfunded mandates. Several witnesses asked for carve-outs or exemptions for public safety and disaster-related costs, warning that a one-size-fits-all cap could force service cuts or shift costs elsewhere. The committee heard extensive questioning but no final vote or disposition on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/20/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • One last thing I'll note, Madam Chair and members: there is a revenue impact on this bill.
  • That's what the bill does and how much the bill would have an impact on our revenue.
  • I really appreciate Department of Revenue, too. I just talked to Ms.
  • The only way that counties can increase our revenue is through an increase in property tax.
  • The only way that counties can increase our revenue is through an increase in property tax.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the entire funding mechanism of that MUD depended upon the tax revenue.
  • When we're talking about 4% and 9% tax credits, 60% AMI is the cap.
  • This has resulted in millions of dollars in lost property tax revenue.
  • That's about three million in tax revenue lost to all the taxing entities in Tarrant County.
  • It's capped.
Bills: HB21, HB211, HB223
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Apr 14th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • This means the county can collect revenue from hotels that are not currently taxed.
  • for 2024-2025 property tax revenue is $1,064,620 over the last year.
  • As mentioned, this brings in $350,000 additional revenue to Kerr County.
  • Municipal hotel revenue may not be used for general government.
  • House Bill 3118 relates to municipal hotel tax revenue.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Economic Development May 21st, 2025

Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • As a reminder, this bill ensures accountability for the use of municipal hotel occupancy tax revenues
Summary: The Senate Economic Development Committee heard and laid out several measures focused on school safety, Texas-Taiwan relations, defense manufacturing, business formation, hotel tax policy, and NASA relocation. HB 1851 would allow surplus DPS vehicles and law enforcement equipment to be transferred to school districts in economically disadvantaged areas for use by school police and security personnel, with a two-year resale restriction. HCR 127 expressed support for the Texas-Taiwan relationship and trade ties, HCR 118 supported expanding warship manufacturing in Texas, HCR 141 urged Congress to move NASA headquarters to Houston, HB 346 (with a committee substitute) revised business filing and fee authority while making permanent a franchise tax exemption for new veteran-owned businesses, HB 2974 was an omnibus hotel occupancy tax and qualified hotel project bill, and HB 5596 addressed accountability for municipal hotel occupancy tax revenues in coastal communities. Witnesses generally supported the measures, including the Texas Hotel and Lodging Association on HB 2974 and resource witnesses from the Texas Veterans Commission and Secretary of State on HB 346; no opposition testimony was registered on the laid-out bills. After public testimony, the committee took up pending business and adopted committee substitutes where applicable. HB 1851, HB 346, HB 2974, and HB 5596 were each reported favorably to the full Senate, with HB 346 and HB 2974 also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. HCR 127 and HCR 118 were reported favorably as well, and HCR 127 and HCR 141 were likewise recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also reported HB 4320 favorably, though the transcript repeats that motion several times. The meeting ended with the committee standing in recess until 7:00 a.m. subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • . lawful revenue.
  • . revenue.
  • They have kept those revenues. in the community. The 'but for' is rent reduction.
  • We just talked about hundreds of millions in dollars and lost local tax revenue.
  • But they were pulling in about a 10% per year increase in total revenue, like that.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a special type of improvement district that raises revenue from eligible hotel property.
  • And then they use that revenue to promote the area the hotels are in.
  • And then this revenue is leveraged in a big marketing strategy for the region.
  • I know you recognize what week it is this week, and we generate a lot of revenue for what the state does
  • Then we can do things like contract with the Park Board in Galveston in order to create more revenue
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, the committee substitute replaces the term "tax revenue" with language to ensure that no
  • It authorizes the issuance of revenue bonds to fund public health and wellness initiatives.
  • Revenue, so it's not a cost to the taxpayer whatsoever.
  • The one thing is ESDs are unique in that their tax cap, their limit...
  • But if a city takes away those revenues by annexing a portion of the district.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • harmless, revenues have reached record levels. ...urban revenue sharing in 2021 from 15% to 18% to hold
  • cities quote-unquote harmless, revenues have reached record levels.
  • That's nearly a tripling of shared income tax revenue over the last decade.
  • It simply requires transparency and voter approval before exceeding a modest cap.
  • It's constitutionally... ...capped.
LA
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government Apr 14th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • By basing tax rate calculations on realistic, collectible revenues rather than disputed value, Senate
  • It helps municipalities avoid overestimating revenue and make tax collections more predictable, reducing
  • They have kept those revenues in the community. The but-for is rent reduction.
  • We just talked about hundreds of millions of dollars in lost local tax revenue.
  • Right, and they were pulling in about 10% per year increase in total revenues. Like that.
Summary: The committee heard several local government and property tax bills, with most testimony focused on appraisal disputes, tax administration, and development rules. Senate Bill 1052 by Senator Hinojosa would address coastal county appraisal litigation by requiring property owners in certain large-value disputes to report an uncontested taxable value while appeals are pending, so taxing units can base truth-in-taxation calculations on more realistic revenue. Nueces County, Del Mar College, and Corpus Christi ISD testified in support, describing major budget shortfalls caused by refinery valuation disputes; the committee substitute narrowed and clarified the bill’s scope. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1052 was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1531, which would require local tax collectors to accept common electronic property tax payments such as credit cards, debit cards, and e-checks. Witnesses supported modernizing payment options and the committee substitute removed ACH/electronic funds transfer language to avoid bank-account disclosure concerns. Public testimony closed and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 325, by Senator Perry, would restore platting and groundwater-certification requirements that were unintentionally weakened by prior legislation; supporters from county government, water groups, and builders’ representatives debated whether the real issue was groundwater protection or road standards for private roads. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony and no vote. The committee then took up Senate Bill 994 and SJR 46, which would exempt certain livestock feed inventory from property tax and provide the constitutional amendment needed for that change. Feed store and Farm Bureau witnesses supported the measure as relief for seasonal inventory taxes, and the bills were left pending. Senator Paxton presented SB 467 and SJR 84 to create a temporary property tax exemption for homes completely destroyed by fire, with refunds or corrected bills based on the date of loss; both were left pending. SB 1237 would clarify charitable property tax exemptions for senior housing and retirement communities, with testimony from Catholic and Baptist retirement organizations and a resident describing rising costs and exemption revocations; it was also left pending. The committee later voted 6-0 to report SB 2073, a pending bill on appraisal district authority to purchase or finance real property, and recommended it for the local and uncontested calendar. Finally, the committee heard SB 2172, SB 2173, and SB 2063, all related to property tax administration. SB 2172 would limit when appraisal districts can require homeowners to reapply for homestead exemptions, requiring a specific reason and written notice; SB 2173 would protect new homeowners from surprise tax liabilities caused by prior owners’ erroneous homestead exemptions, with testimony describing large back-assessment bills; both were left pending. SB 2063 would bar appraisal districts from using market-value evidence in unequal appraisal protests, and testimony sharply divided between taxpayer advocates, who said market data improperly overwhelms equity claims, and appraisal district representatives, who argued market value is inherently tied to equal-and-uniform taxation and cited a recent Texas Supreme Court decision; the bill was left pending after testimony.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 4/9/26

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, the total volume cap allocation remains unchanged.
  • Uh, there is that gross revenue upper limit based on the prior taxable year.
  • Average gross revenue of the businesses receiving an award was pretty small: $188,000.
  • the<01:01:19.040> business Average gross revenue of the business Average gross revenue
  • is that your net revenue went down. is that your net revenue went down.
Bills: HF3217, HF2252
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs May 19th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • relieve the financial strain on charitable bingo organizations by increasing the operating capital cap
  • for Charitable Bingo today, who can attest to the strain placed on their operations by the current cap
  • This cap has not been updated since 2009, as the Senator mentioned.
Bills: HB46, HB272
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard several House bills and took no final votes, leaving each bill pending after testimony. HB 272 would align venue and evidentiary rules for fraudulent use or possession of credit/debit card information with existing credit card abuse law; the sponsor said it would improve prosecutions, and the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center supported it. HB 1661 would increase penalties for certain election-related offenses, including failure to distribute election supplies and early release of election results; no substantive opposition was heard. HB 551 would protect the residential addresses of people who receive campaign expenditures on public Texas Ethics Commission reports, similar to donor privacy protections, and a witness from Texas Eagle Forum later indicated support for the privacy change. The committee also heard HB 2820, which would raise the amount charitable bingo organizations may keep in operating capital from $50,000 to $100,000. The sponsor and a Texans for Charitable Bingo representative said inflation and operating costs have made the current cap too low and that the bill would help charities maintain stable operations without expanding gaming. HB 3181 would impose stronger consequences for repeated denial of court-ordered child possession and access, including limiting probation and requiring attorney’s fees after multiple contempt findings; a family court judge and a parent testified in support, while another witness argued the bill should be paired with stronger criminal enforcement and that parents already face high costs. HB 4157 would update Texas law for commercial spaceflight by recognizing liability waivers and preserving workers’ compensation rights; no one testified against it. The committee also heard HB 4145, which would let health care providers satisfy a timely billing requirement by sending bills to a patient’s legal representative in a personal injury case, closing what supporters described as a loophole in letter-of-protection situations. Finally, HB 46, relating to the Texas Compassionate Use Program, drew the most extensive discussion: supporters said it should expand access for legitimate medical cannabis patients and add more delivery methods and conditions, while opponents warned against broader marijuana expansion and questioned adding chronic pain and other conditions. The sponsor said he still supports the program and wants a balanced, regulated expansion, but noted the bill is still being worked on. All bills were left pending at the close of the hearing.