Transcript Highlights:

• If we prioritize community-led, renewable, and locally available energy and food systems, we can build
• fuel option to renewable energy just says it all right there.
• fuel option to renewable energy just says it all right there.
• fuel option to renewable energy just says it all right there.
• fuel option to renewable energy just says it all right there.

Bills: SCR96, SCR109, SCR164, SCR172, SCR166

Keywords: electric reliability, renewable energy, interconnection, Hawaii Electric Reliability Administrator, Public Utilities Commission, capacity shortfalls, energy policies, mail-order pharmacy, insurance, healthcare access, chronic disease management, cost savings, rural access, emergency healthcare, patient adherence, critical infrastructure, foreign influence, local control, energy dependence, economic resilience

Summary: The Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce heard several Senate concurrent resolutions related to utilities, pharmacy access, critical infrastructure, and energy policy. STR 96 SD1 asked the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to report on the progress of the Hawaii Electric Reliability Administrator; the PUC offered written comments and the measure later advanced as is. STR 109 SD1 urged the insurance commissioner to study expanding mail-order pharmacy use. Testimony was split: DCCA’s insurance division, HMSA, and the Hawaii Association of Health Plans supported the study, while Shipa and the Hawaii Pharmacist Association opposed it, arguing mail-order pharmacy is already available and that in-person pharmacist counseling should be preserved. The measure was ultimately deferred. The committee also heard STR 164 SD1 on protecting Hawaii’s critical infrastructure from foreign influence. Greenpeace Hawaii and 350 Hawaii strongly supported the resolution, framing it as a consumer protection and resilience measure tied to reducing dependence on imports and strengthening local food and energy systems. No opposition was presented, and the resolution was moved out as is. STR 172 SD1 HD1 directed the PUC to conduct a comprehensive analysis of ways to maximize cost reduction and minimize financial risk while meeting state goals. DCCA, the Hawaii State Energy Office, and the PUC offered comments, and Earthjustice supported the measure; it was also advanced as is. For STR 166 SD1, which concerns how the PUC should evaluate generational energy commitments, DCCA, the Hawaii State Energy Office, and the PUC provided comments, while 350 Hawaii, Greenpeace Hawaii, and others opposed any move toward LNG, arguing it would harm ratepayers and conflict with Hawaii’s renewable goals. After discussion, the committee amended the resolution to add language directing the PUC to evaluate any LNG or other imported-fuel proposal for its potential effects on or delays to the state’s renewable portfolio standards, including the 2045 deadline. The amended resolution then passed, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that what we need is a lot of support for our transition, because it is an important transition
• But, yeah, we really would like to see us move to a fully renewable generation.
• in really what is a homegrown type of energy generation.
• Energy policy is economic policy.
• I, too, am actually a fan of nuclear energy.

Bills: SB1041, SB1363, SB1418, SB1419, SB1445, SB1447, SB1488, SB1519, SB1523, SB1560, SB1580

Keywords: electronic monitoring, nursing care, assisted living, resident rights, privacy, consent, surveillance, marijuana, rural opportunity, dispensary, economic development, licensing, social equity, unserved communities, Arizona, small modular reactors, energy regulation, environmental compatibility, utility construction, agricultural use

Transcript Highlights:

• Convening the Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection.
• committee on energy, environment, and protection.<00:06:04.320><c> My</c><00:06:04.440><c> name</c><
• </c> energy commitment for the state. energy commitment for the state.
• Hawaii State Energy Office with comments in person. Not present.
• Office with comments in State Energy Office with comments in person. person. person.

Bills: SCR142, SCR39, SCR40, SCR83, SCR168, SCR96, SCR166, SCR172

Keywords: dust monitoring, public health, environmental quality, Waimanalo Gulch, air quality, particulate matter, community engagement, health risks, pollution mitigation, mattress stewardship, environmental protection, recycling, producer responsibility, solid waste management, environment, pollution, tourism, disposable bodyboards, polystyrene, marine ecosystems

Summary: The Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection held its final hearing of the session on April 17, 2026, and took up a series of Senate concurrent resolutions focused on environmental protection, waste reduction, and energy policy. Measures discussed included SCR 142 on dust monitoring near Waimanalo Gulch, SCR 39 on a mattress stewardship program, SCR 40 on banning disposable bodyboards, SCR 83 on a lithium-ion battery disposal facility, SCR 168 on a demolition waste reduction working group, SCR 96 on reporting on the Hawaii Electric Reliability Administrator, SCR 166 on PUC considerations for a generational energy commitment, and SCR 172 on a comprehensive analysis to reduce costs and financial risk while meeting state goals. Testimony was generally supportive of the environmental and waste-management measures. The Department of Health supported SCR 39 and provided comments on SCR 142; Climate Protectors Hawaii supported SCR 39, SCR 83, SCR 168, and SCR 172; the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development and Hawaii Reef and Ocean's Coalition submitted comments or support on SCR 168; and the Public Utilities Commission provided comments on SCR 96 and SCR 166. On SCR 166, Greenpeace Hawaii testified in opposition to LNG, arguing it would worsen pollution and climate impacts, while Earthjustice supported the intent but suggested amendments. Earthjustice also supported SCR 172 and offered friendly amendments to improve the study language. In decision-making, the chair recommended deferral of SCR 142 because an existing regulatory framework already addresses the issue. The committee then voted to pass SCR 39, SCR 40, SCR 83, SCR 96, and SCR 166 unamended. SCR 168 was passed with amendments to reflect OPSD's requested changes and to make the working group temporary, with a two-year term and annual reports due before session. SCR 172 was passed with amendments accepted from Earthjustice. Rep. Quinlan was noted as excused for the votes, and the committee adjourned after adopting the final recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are committed to the ongoing success of CETA to help advance an equitable clean energy transition,
• The legislature, when it originally developed the Clean Energy Transformation Act, recognized that renewable
• And so we want to see more renewable energy and we want to give incentive and also a little bit of a
• I'm a resident of Seattle, retired after working over 40 years in renewable energy and solar energy efficiency
• I'm a resident of Seattle retired after working over 40 years in renewable energy, solar energy efficiency

Bills: SB5982, SB6008, SB6050, SB6056

Keywords: consumer-owned utilities, clean energy, port districts, market customers, energy transformation, energy storage, residential battery, grid connection, renewable energy, incentives, distributed energy, renewable resources, energy policy, sustainable energy, state regulations, utility vehicles, emission standards, environment, regulation, exemptions

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several bills related to Washington’s clean energy and utility policy. On SB 5982, which would expand Clean Energy Transformation Act coverage to port districts and certain single-customer utilities and change definitions affecting market customers, the sponsor and supporters said it would close loopholes so large electricity users such as data centers and port-based generation are subject to the same decarbonization standards as other utilities. Supporters included environmental groups, the Department of Commerce, and Ecology, while opponents and “other” testifiers from ports, PUDs, business groups, and industrial consumers warned the bill could create unintended consequences for rural ports, single-customer PUDs, and existing behind-the-meter or self-generation arrangements. Ecology also flagged possible impacts on Climate Commitment Act no-cost allowance allocations. No vote was taken. The committee then heard SB 6008, a bill creating a statewide residential battery incentive and flexible demand program. The sponsor said the measure would help households, especially low- and moderate-income families, install batteries to lower bills, improve resilience during outages, and support grid flexibility. Supporters from solar organizations, utilities, and individuals praised virtual power plants and distributed storage as a way to reduce peak demand and improve reliability. Utility witnesses were generally supportive but asked for changes on low-income verification, program structure, compensation, and implementation details. No vote was taken. Finally, the committee took testimony on SB 6050, which would allow portable plug-in solar devices and meter-mounted devices, often described as balcony solar, and exempt them from some net metering and approval requirements. The sponsor framed it as a way for individuals to contribute to clean energy in a small, accessible way. Supporters said the bill would expand affordable distributed generation and energy equity, while utilities, labor, and safety-focused witnesses strongly opposed or raised concerns about fire risk, backfeeding, worker safety, lack of existing national electrical standards, and the need for interconnection oversight. The committee also briefly began hearing SB 6056, which would exempt utility service vehicles from certain motor vehicle emission standards; the sponsor and utility representatives supported it, while climate advocates argued Ecology can address the issue through rulemaking instead of statute. No final action or votes were recorded in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• about renewables is it tends to be the cheapest form of energy because there's no fuel cost.
• buildings and transitioning to an energy-independent, low-carbon economy.
• to an energy buildings and transitioning to an energy independent<00:54:15.680><c> low</c><00:54:16.000
• The Renewable Development Account was developed to find alternative energy forms to fossil fuels and
• The Renewable Development Account was developed to find alternative energy forms to fossil fuels and

Bills: HF1013, HF1598, HF1656, HF2162

Keywords: energy, economic development, funding, renewable resources, Clean Energy Economy Minnesota, air ventilation, geothermal, school financing, Minnesota Climate Innovative Finance Authority, geothermal energy, renewable energy, construction funding, Como Zoo, energy efficiency, HF2162, Minnesota, planning grants, renewable development account, clean energy, Department of Commerce

Transcript Highlights:

• Good morning, and welcome to the Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Committee.
• They use very large amounts of energy.
• I'm here today on behalf of Sky Energy.
• Since Food Northwest established its energy program in 2003, we have been actively pursuing energy-efficient
• transition and affirms that we're not going backward.

Bills: SB6172, SB6246, SB5932

Keywords: Washington climate policy, greenhouse gas, GHG emissions, cap-and-invest, carbon market, emissions trading, allowances, covered entity, coal-fired power plant, coal plant, electric utility, electric generating facility, fossil fuels, natural gas, imported electricity, emissions leakage, air pollution, renewable energy transition, industrial emissions, railroad emissions

Summary: The Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Committee heard public testimony on three bills. SB 6246 would direct Ecology to recommend a long-term allowance allocation approach for emissions-intensive trade-exposed facilities under the Climate Commitment Act, require facility-specific emissions and decarbonization reporting, and condition future no-cost allowances on those submissions. Supporters said the bill preserves the CCA’s anti-leakage intent while improving accountability and planning for industrial decarbonization; opponents argued it adds burdens, may threaten competitiveness, and could worsen leakage or job losses. Ecology said it generally supports the bill’s approach but recommended streamlining duplicative reporting and noted the work would require significant agency resources. No vote was taken. SB 5932 would provide certainty for low-to-zero-carbon alternative jet fuel production by changing how electricity carbon intensity is calculated for SAF facilities under the Clean Fuels Program and by setting an earlier trigger date for SAF tax preferences, July 1, 2031, if the production threshold is not met first. The bill’s sponsor and industry witnesses from 12 and the City of Moses Lake said it would support investment in Washington’s first SAF facility and future expansion. Ecology and climate advocates opposed the Clean Fuels Program changes, saying they would weaken incentives for new renewable electricity and could increase pollution or create special treatment for one fuel, though Ecology said it had no position on the 2031 tax date. The committee heard extensive testimony but took no vote. SB 6172 would end remaining statutory preferences for a coal-fired generating plant after its scheduled closure date, including the cap-and-invest exemption, limits on additional state emission standards, and a sales tax exemption for coal used at the plant. The sponsor said the bill simply removes now-unneeded transition provisions and affirms Washington’s move away from coal. Environmental groups strongly supported the bill, while utility and business witnesses were generally neutral but raised concerns about possible allowance-market impacts and potential costs to ratepayers if the plant were ever called on in an emergency. The hearing closed without a vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• We applaud the renewed focus on maintenance and preservation that would prevent more bridge closures

Bills: SB5987, SB6170

Keywords: SB 5987, SB5987, Fairfax Bridge, State Route 165, SR 165, Carbon River, WSDOT, Washington State Department of Transportation, emergency bridge replacement, infrastructure failure, transportation emergency, climate commitment account, climate investment account, clean energy, climate funding, greenhouse gas reduction, environmental justice, renewable energy, building electrification, industrial decarbonization

Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee began with a work session on the Fairfax Carbon River SR-165 Bridge closure and replacement. Wilkeson Mayor Jamie Pololi described the bridge as a long-standing state investment that was closed after years of documented deterioration, saying the closure severed access to Mount Rainier-area recreation, hurt local businesses and municipal revenue, and created emergency access problems for Fairfax and nearby communities. Pierce County’s Melissa Littleton and WSDOT’s Steve Rourke said the bridge is 105 years old, was weight-limited before closing, and is now being studied for replacement; WSDOT outlined seven alternatives, said greenfield options were ruled out, and explained that the project is in early geotechnical and pre-NEPA planning, with construction still estimated to take years. Senators asked about detour length, emergency response, historic-preservation issues, and whether the project could be accelerated; WSDOT said the bridge’s status and the need for a new alignment limit the usefulness of emergency authority, and that additional funding will be needed beyond the $7 million already spent from preservation funds. The committee then held a public hearing on SB 5987, which would declare the Fairfax Bridge closure an emergency, direct WSDOT to restore access across SR-165 as soon as possible, grant the transportation secretary limited emergency authorities, exempt the work from Executive Order 25-07 project labor agreement requirements, and make the act effective immediately. Supporters, including the mayor, local residents, recreation advocates, and trail groups, said the bill would recognize the closure as a public safety and access emergency and help restore access to public lands, businesses, and emergency routes. WSDOT testified in opposition to the bill’s practical effect, warning it could create false expectations because most delays are driven by federal NEPA and historic-preservation processes that the secretary cannot waive. The committee reported 606 people signed in support, one opposed, and two other. The committee also heard SB 6170, which would raise the dollar limits for work performed by state highway crews and for certain procurement thresholds that allow small, veteran-, minority-, and women-owned businesses to compete. The bill would increase the state-force limit from $60,000 to $100,000 in normal circumstances and from $100,000 to $160,000 in emergencies, with similar increases for related contracting thresholds; staff said the current limits have not been updated since 2005 and the bill has no fiscal impact. Senator King, the prime sponsor, said the change would better match inflation and help state workers do more routine and emergency work in-house. WFSE and WSDOT supported the bill, saying it would help maintenance crews keep up with rising costs while preserving opportunities for outside contractors; Senator Valdez asked whether it would affect minority- and women-owned contracting programs, and WSDOT said it did not expect an adverse impact but would monitor it. Public testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, with 55 signed in favor and none opposed.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are looking at some innovative technologies to get sustainable renewable energy.
• Um and uh recognizing renewable energy.
• </c><00:36:03.839><c> energy</c><00:36:04.320><c> and</c> massive buildout of renewable energy and massive
• buildout of renewable energy and seasonal<00:36:05.040><c> energy</c><00:36:05.520><c> storage.
• </c> our clean energy future or just energy our clean energy future or just energy future<00:52:05.520

Bills: HF4770

Keywords: biomass, anaerobic digester, renewable energy, sustainability, energy generation

Summary: The committee approved the March 26 minutes and then took up House File 4770, as amended by an A1 technical amendment. The bill was presented as a proposal to help Liberty Diversified International and Liberty Paper in Becker plan for replacement steam and energy supply as the Shuro facility closure approaches in 2030. Testimony described Liberty Paper’s current closed-loop steam arrangement with Shuro, the need to study future fuel and technology options, and the potential use of anaerobic digestion, biomass, construction and demolition waste, and food waste to produce steam and possibly power. Members asked about feedstock availability, the need for a feasibility study, possible backup natural gas use, and whether waste heat or wastewater heat could be useful. The bill was laid over as amended. The committee then heard a presentation from CenterPoint Energy on Minnesota heating demand and electrification. CenterPoint staff said affordability and reliability are central concerns and outlined how the utility manages customer costs through energy efficiency, contracting, storage, peak shaving, and conservation. Dr. Joel Lynch presented research on peak heating with natural gas and the “missing piece” in Minnesota’s electrification puzzle, explaining that Minnesota’s cold climate makes winter heating demand especially challenging and that replacing natural gas would require substantial new electric capacity and renewable resources. He compared his work with prior national and state studies and said the analysis used Minnesota-specific gas throughput, COP assumptions across several electrification scenarios, and January renewable capacity data. Lynch summarized preliminary findings that Minnesota’s peak gas heating throughput could be up to 40 gigawatts, with electric resistance heating implying roughly 36 gigawatts of new demand, and lower but still substantial demand under heat-pump scenarios. The presentation was informational only; no vote was taken on the CenterPoint presentation. The meeting ended with House File 4770 laid over and the energy demand presentation continuing.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:15:26.840><c> energy,</c><00:15:27.680><c> reliability,</c><00:15:28.320><c> and</c> renewable energy
• in renewable energy possible advances in renewable energy technology,<00:25:27.240><c> consider,</c>
• ><c> tax</c> renewable energy technologies income tax renewable energy technologies income tax credit
• This is the renewable energy income tax credit bill.
• </c><01:32:59.200><c> energy</c><01:32:59.560><c> income</c> Uh this is the renewable energy income Uh

Bills: SB3326

Keywords: renewable energy, energy storage, cost reduction, public utilities commission, Hawaii energy policies, 910, house, all

Summary: The joint committees on Energy and Environmental Protection and Labor heard SB 3326, a bill concerning a study of separating transmission from generation in Hawaii’s electric system. Testimony was largely opposed. Life of the Land argued that true separation on an isolated island grid has not been shown to work anywhere and said the bill would waste taxpayer money. Hawaiian Electric and the Public Utilities Commission also opposed the measure, saying Hawaii already uses competitive bidding for new generation, that the bill would add cost, complexity, and reliability risks, and that a new study would duplicate prior work. In response to questions, the PUC explained its existing competitive bidding framework and said it had not seen an island system fully restructure in this way. The chair then amended the bill’s intent to require the PUC to open a proceeding for an independent, comprehensive analysis of the state’s energy pathways, including cost reduction, financial risk, state energy goals, and reliability, rather than narrowly focusing on separation. Both committees voted to pass SB 3326 SD2 with amendments, with the Energy committee adopting the recommendation unanimously and the Labor committee adopting it with one reservation and two no votes. The Energy and Environmental Protection Committee then took up SB 2497 SD2, which would require electric utilities other than cooperatives to provide transparent, publicly accessible customer bill impact analyses and annual reports to the PUC. The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs and the PUC offered comments, with the PUC supporting the intent. Life of the Land said the proposed disclosure requirements would be too complex for most ratepayers to use meaningfully, while Hawaiian Electric said the bill could raise costs and slow projects, though it acknowledged some of the language changes and said much of the information is already available through existing planning and regulatory processes. Hawaii Clean Power Alliance and one individual testified in support. No vote was taken on SB 2497 SD2 during the excerpt. The committee also heard SB 3183 SD2, which would bar higher-income taxpayers from claiming the renewable energy technologies income tax credit for certain residential solar systems and would change refundability rules. The Department of Taxation, the Hawaii State Energy Office, and the Tax Foundation offered comments, while the Hawaii Solar Energy Association and numerous companies and individuals opposed the bill. Opponents raised concerns about impacts on financing models and the solar market. Members asked the Department of Taxation for data on how credits are claimed by homeowners versus third-party owners and on the refundability of the credit; the department said it did not have the information immediately available but would follow up. The chair indicated decision-making would likely be deferred to allow further review, and no vote was taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• She was not only a champion of renewable energy, she was a steward of the institution itself.
• energy, she was a champion of renewable energy, she was a steward<00:21:40.880><c> of</c><00:21:41.039
• can participate. ...can participate and can benefit from the clean energy transition.
• transition, into energy efficiency and electrification, all those sorts of things.
• </c><00:59:18.720><c> Recognizing</c> clean energy transition. Recognizing clean energy transition.

Bills: HF3556

Keywords: community solar, energy, solar power, renewable energy, Melissa Hortman, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• and our total energy purchased and calculate how much that energy cost us.
• </c><00:15:25.760><c> purchased</c> energy and our total energy purchased energy and our total energy
• energy sold or energy as compared to the energy sold or energy purchased<00:15:40.560><c> to</c><00:
• it's the energy you consume. it's the energy you consume.
• That changes the dynamic on how much energy is used. tune to their energy costs tune to their energy

Bills: HF3296, HF3802

Keywords: energy conservation, data centers, electric sales, energy optimization, utility regulations, energy regulation, certificate of need, renewable energy, power production, energy efficiency, Minnesota statutes, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• committee members, staff presenters, and all who are watching live from TVW, to the Senate Environment, Energy
• An act relating to addressing emerging large energy use facilities.
• transition, and this is unacceptable to me.
• Clean energy transition, and this is unacceptable to me.
• Senator Schumake and others and I have been part of the Western Energy Caucus.

Bills: SB6124, SB6171, SB6284, SB5609, SB6172, SB6246, SB5932, SB6269, SB6223, SB5975

Keywords: appliance affordability, cost index, energy efficiency, consumer protection, Washington state, energy facilities, large energy consumers, regulation, environment, sustainability, artificial intelligence, data privacy, technological impacts, cultural resources, land use, environmental policy, exemptions, state laws, Washington climate policy, greenhouse gas

Summary: The Senate Environment, Energy, and Technology Committee took executive action on 11 bills, with staff briefing each measure and members considering multiple proposed substitutes and amendments. The committee advanced bills on an Appliance Affordability Index study (SB 624), emerging large energy use facilities/data centers (SB 6171), AI systems (SB 6284), cultural resource protection under SEPA (SB 5609), coal plant treatment under cap-and-invest and tax law (SB 6172), emissions-intensive trade-exposed facilities (SB 6246), low-to-zero-carbon alternative jet fuel production (SB 5932), motor fuel definitions (SB 6269), community-scaled weatherization projects (SB 6223), lead in cookware (SB 5975), and electric transmission system modernization (SB 5466). Several bills were described as technical or policy updates tied to climate, energy reliability, consumer protection, and land-use review. Members debated a number of substantive changes. On SB 6171, the committee rejected an amendment to remove the proposed fee on data centers and instead advanced a substitute that retained tariff, reporting, and utility-related provisions; testimony emphasized both competitiveness for data centers and ratepayer protection. On SB 6284, the committee advanced a substitute that refined definitions, added human-consideration language, extended risk-management duties to developers with exemptions for smaller entities and certain sectors, and clarified enforcement. On SB 5609, an amendment to delay or restructure cultural-resource requirements was not adopted, and the committee moved forward a substitute requiring local ordinances and a governor-led task force; supporters stressed protecting irreplaceable cultural resources, while opponents raised housing and implementation concerns. The committee also adopted an amendment to SB 6172 related to emergency DOE orders for a coal facility, then advanced the bill; it moved SB 6246 forward without amendment; and it adopted a substitute for SB 5932 intended to preserve tax incentive certainty for alternative jet fuel producers over a 10-year period. For SB 5975, the committee rejected one substitute and adopted another that tightened lead restrictions in cookware and shifted future regulation to the Safer Products Program. On SB 5466, the committee rejected several amendments on wildfire risk, corridor planning, landowner consultation, eminent domain, and liability, then advanced the proposed second substitute to Ways and Means. Most bills were reported out of committee with due pass recommendations, several to Ways and Means and others to Rules, and the meeting adjourned after all executive actions were completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• On our testifiers list, we have Hawaii State Energy Office. Monique?
• My name is Monique Sampis for the Hawaii State Energy Office.
• as we continue our pathway forward towards 2045 for renewables.
• It's going to be critical to renewables.
• </c><00:14:59.480><c> and</c> the Committee on Energy and the Committee on Energy and Intergovernmental

Bills: HCR202

Keywords: Hawaii, renewable energy, task force, energy independence, cost savings, decarbonization, public utilities, stakeholders, clean energy goals, 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint committees on Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs and Consumer Commerce and Consumer Protection heard HCR 202 HD2, a resolution creating a task force to study Hawaii’s electric generation mix and related costs. Testimony from the Hawaii State Energy Office was neutral and stood on written comments, while another testifier supported the resolution, emphasizing affordability, reliability, and the need to understand the right balance of thermal generation and renewables as the state moves toward its 2045 renewable goals. The chairs said they had conferred on the measure and outlined recommended amendments, including adding study of the separation of ownership and control of generation versus transmission and distribution, and adding Senate committee representation to the task force. The Consumer Commerce and Consumer Protection committee voted to pass HCR 202 HD2 with amendments; the chair, vice chair, and another member voted aye, with one senator excused, and the recommendation was adopted. The Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs committee did not have quorum at that time and said it would take its vote later. The Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs committee also heard HCR 165, concerning pickleball courts in Hawaii Kai. One resident testified in opposition, citing concerns about permanent lights, permanent nets, noise, light pollution, safety, maintenance, and the loss of multi-use flexibility. After discussion, the chair recommended passing the measure as is, and the committee said it would vote the next day because it lacked quorum. The committee also heard HCR 154 and HCR 43 with the Transportation Committee; HCR 154 was passed unamended, and HCR 43, which urged raised crosswalks near Ala Wai Elementary School for pedestrian safety, was also passed unamended. Supporters of HCR 43 described heavy pedestrian traffic, schoolchildren crossing, and unsafe vehicle turning patterns at the intersections. The Transportation Committee adopted both recommendations, while the Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs committee scheduled its votes for the following day.

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Rob Davis, and I serve as chief growth officer for the Midwest Renewable Energy Tracking System
• The rebate would go to the entity that registers with the Midwest Renewable Energy Tracking System and
• to those that otherwise can't participate in the energy transition.
• Chairman, this does not ban people from investing in renewable energy projects. It's just ending.
• energy transition.

Bills: HF2103, HF2793

Keywords: energy, renewable energy, ammonia, hydrogen, certificate tracking, funding, environment, community solar, energy policy, sustainability, solar garden program, regulation sunset

Transcript Highlights:

• called</c> renewable energy these records called renewable energy these records called ammonia<00:04
• energy transition.
• energy transition.
• energy transition.
• energy transition.

Bills: HF2103, HF2793

Keywords: energy, renewable energy, ammonia, hydrogen, certificate tracking, funding, environment, community solar, energy policy, sustainability, solar garden program, regulation sunset, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• I open the Environment and Energy Committee hearing for today, Tuesday, January 27th.
• It is a reality for a lot of the energy-intensive trade-exposed industries.
• It is a reality for a lot of the energy-intensive trade exposed industries.
• Madam Chair, so the energy from your PUD comes from where?
• So all they have to do is transform the other 20% that’s not renewable into renewables in Washington

Bills: HB2537, HB2245, HB2296

Keywords: emissions, climate commitment act, environmental regulation, trade regulation, facility compliance, consumer-owned utilities, clean energy, port districts, market customers, energy transformation, distributed energy, renewable energy, energy resources, sustainability, energy policy, 904, all

Summary: The Environment and Energy Committee heard public testimony on House Bill 2537, which would revise Washington’s Climate Commitment Act treatment of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) facilities. The bill would require Ecology’s post-2034 report to include methods for annual allowance reductions, leakage-risk adjustments, and consignment of some no-cost allowances for facility decarbonization projects. It would also add biennial emissions/product reporting, require facility decarbonization plans every four years, and tie continued no-cost allowances and penalty avoidance to those new reporting and planning obligations. The chair said the committee would not take action on HB 2537 that day, and the hearing was later closed after testimony. Supporters, including The Nature Conservancy, NRDC, Washington Conservation Action, Climate Solutions, Ecology, and Clean and Prosperous Washington, said the bill would provide needed clarity for post-2035 policy, better data on barriers to decarbonization, and a framework to keep EITEs on a path consistent with state climate goals while still addressing leakage concerns. Ecology said it generally supported the bill’s approach, though it recommended streamlining duplicative reporting and noted the work would require significant agency resources. Several supporters pointed to Quebec’s consignment model as a useful example and said the bill could help direct public funds toward real emissions reductions. Opponents and concerned parties from manufacturing, utilities, and labor—including the Association of Washington Business, WISPA, the Alliance of Western Energy Consumers, the Northwest Pulp and Paper Association, the Association of Western Pulp and Paperworkers, Food Northwest, Simplot, Kaiser Aluminum, Newcor Steel, and Cowlitz PUD—argued that the bill could increase compliance burdens, raise costs, and worsen leakage risk without solving major barriers such as electricity availability, permitting delays, and the high capital cost of industrial decarbonization. They emphasized recent facility closures and job losses, said many low-cost reductions have already been made, and urged more flexibility, better protection of confidential business information, and additional state investment in clean power and industrial upgrades. The committee also took up House Bill 2245 during the meeting, adopting a proposed substitute and voting 11-8 to report the substitute bill out of committee with a do-pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• And the last measure on this agenda is SP 2033 relating to renewable energy.
• </c><00:13:17.600><c> energy.
• </c><00:13:18.639><c> The</c> relating to renewable energy. The relating to renewable energy.
• </c><00:43:33.200><c> energy</c> competitive bids for renewable energy competitive bids for renewable
• </c> renewables, hopefully to 100% renewable renewables, hopefully to 100% renewable by<00:48:16.240>

Bills: SB3326, SB2911

Keywords: renewable energy, energy storage, cost reduction, public utilities commission, Hawaii energy policies, intoxicating liquor, direct shipment, breweries, distilleries, Hawaii, 912, senate, all

Summary: The committees heard SB 3001 on artificial intelligence in a joint Commerce and Consumer Protection/Labor and Technology hearing. Testimony included support from the Department of Education and Google, comments from the Office of Consumer Protection and the Attorney General’s office, and late opposition from Agentic LLC. The Attorney General raised constitutional and vagueness concerns and suggested clarifying amendments, while Google said the bill’s risk-based approach and proposed amendments could help establish industry-wide safety standards for minors. The committees recessed and then voted to pass SB 3001 with amendments, adopting DCCA/OCP recommendations on data minimization for minors and UDAP clarity, the Attorney General’s proposed clarifications and deletions, and Google’s nonconflicting amendments; the effective date was deferred to July 1, 2050. The vote passed unanimously among members present, with some members excused. The Commerce and Consumer Protection committee then took up several previously heard measures in decision-making. SB 2045 on combat sports passed with amendments reflecting DCCA and boxing commission recommendations, including clarifying the on-site medical professional requirement, reporting duties, promoter payment, removal of the combat sports registry and ambulance requirement, and other technical changes; the effective date was deferred to July 1, 2050. SP 2347 on the residential landlord-tenant code passed with amendments striking landlord requirements so OCP could work on a multilingual tenant-rights notice, and SP 2495 on consumer protection passed with amendments requiring OCP to publish an annual report on potential code violations. SB 2777 on insurance was deferred to February 17, 2026 for further decision-making. At a later CPN decision-making agenda, SB 2471 and SB 2829, both relating to the powers of artificial persons, passed with amendments clarifying the preamble, removing language about foreign artificial persons, and making other consistency and non-substantive changes; both effective dates were moved to January 1, 2027. SP 2033 on renewable energy also passed with amendments clarifying the definition of grid-ready homes, cost-sharing provisions, applicability to interconnecting customers, and safety/certification compliance, with the effective date deferred to July 1, 2050. In each case, the committee voted to adopt the recommendations without objections from members present. The committees also heard SB 3000 on insurance, which would authorize the Attorney General to bring civil actions to recover costs and losses tied to climate-attributable harm and future climate risk, including costs incurred by state insurance-related entities. The Insurance Division and Attorney General’s office offered comments seeking clarification and warning about redundancy, implementation issues, possible representation of private insurers, and concurrent litigation concerns. Supporters, including the Center for Climate Integrity, a resident testifier, Sierra Club, and Green America, argued the bill would help shift insurance costs to fossil fuel companies responsible for climate harms and address rising premiums and nonrenewals in Hawaii. Opponents, including the American Petroleum Institute, argued the bill singled out one industry, raised constitutional concerns, and should be deferred because related climate litigation is already pending. The transcript ends with the committee continuing testimony and discussion on SB 3000 and then moving into SB 3326 on energy, where the consumer advocate and Hawaiian Electric opposed the bill’s proposed separation of generation from transmission and distribution, while the PUC stood on written testimony, Retail Merchants of Hawaii supported it, and Life of the Land raised concerns about assumptions and the need for more substance.

Transcript Highlights:

• on carbon-free energy rather than creating barriers to this transition.
• Section 10's clean energy or clean transition tariff can help ensure that customers are protected from
• transition.
• energy.
• On supporting the deployment of 100 gigawatts of renewable energy and electric transmission on the grid

Bills: HF2928, HF2912, HF2297

Keywords: water appropriation, data centers, environmental review, energy conservation, permit application, carbon-free energy, geothermal energy, renewable energy, Macalester College, appropriation, sustainability, solar energy, pollinator programs, license plates, agrivoltaics, environmental sustainability

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> inclusion as part of a broader energy inclusion as part of a broader energy transition.
• </c><01:04:03.520><c> So,</c> or an energy transition community.
• So, or an energy transition community.
• ><c> the</c> energy transition communities, not the energy transition communities, not the state<01:35
• Um, you know, so I actually now sit on the ETAC, Energy Transition Advisory Committee. Okay.

Bills: HF4308, HF4153, HF4703, HF4711

Keywords: HF4308, Monticello nuclear plant, Prairie Island, renewable development account, RDA, nuclear waste, spent fuel, dry cask storage, utility tax, commercial-industrial property tax, state general levy, property tax exemption, residential heating fuels, natural gas tax exemption, electricity sales tax exemption, year-round sales tax exemption, distributed solar energy standard, solar mandate, community solar, grid modernization

Transcript Highlights:

• Large electric utilities are required to use renewable energy to produce or acquire renewable energy
• House Bill 2388 promotes renewable energy while protecting our high-priority lands.
• Power grid limitations are causing delays of renewable energy projects.
• in combinations of energy efficiency and renewable energy sources.
• And there's so much we could do with our renewable energy if we had the will to do so.

Bills: HB2103, HB2388, HB2316, HB2006, HB2224

Keywords: renewable energy, nonemitting generation, public entities, contracting, electric generation, distributed energy, agricultural land, energy generation, renewable resources, siting regulations, land use, urban development, vegetation management, shrubsteppe, environmental regulation, economic development, sales tax, rural counties, industrial land banks, growth management

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several local government bills. HB 2006 would extend the deadline for certain rural counties that collect a sales and use tax for economic development to designate industrial land banks under the Growth Management Act. The sponsor and county officials from Kittitas County said the bill would help create industrial land for jobs and economic growth, while Futurewise opposed it, arguing the large land banks could conflict with agricultural land protection and that the deadline should not be extended without stronger limits. HB 2103 would expand authority for public utilities and other public entities to enter contracts for the capability of renewable or non-emitting generation projects, including newer resources such as nuclear, renewable hydrogen, and fusion. Supporters from Energy Northwest, public utility districts, and the City of Richland said the bill would align contract law with the Clean Energy Transformation Act and give utilities more flexibility to secure future resources. Opponents, including several ratepayer and advocacy witnesses, warned it would shift financial risk to customers, weaken consumer protections, and repeat past nuclear power failures such as WPPSS. HB 2316 would limit local regulation of shrub-step vegetation inside urban growth areas by stating such vegetation cannot be treated as critical habitat or used to restrict development, and by barring mitigation or replacement requirements. The Tri-Cities sponsor and many local government, housing, and development witnesses said the bill would reduce delays and costs for housing and redevelopment on already urbanized land. Tribes, Audubon, and conservation advocates opposed it, saying it would remove protections for a rare and imperiled ecosystem, harm wildlife and habitat connectivity, and set a harmful precedent. HB 2224 would let a city form a single-city fire protection district without reducing its levy rate dollar-for-dollar, and would allow online notice and service contracts with municipal fire service authorities. City officials, fire chiefs, and the Association of Washington Cities supported it as a practical tool for funding fire service, while one taxpayer advocate opposed the broader trend of appointed bodies with taxing authority. HB 2388 would treat pivot-corner solar and agrovoltaic facilities on agricultural land as distributed energy resources and accessory uses, and deem them consistent with agricultural conservation. The sponsor and conservation groups supported it as a way to add clean energy without displacing productive farmland, while Futurewise raised concerns about definitions and whether the bill could unintentionally weaken farmland protections.