Transcript Highlights:

• Tab 5, SB 762, on offices of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, by Senator Martin.
• Could that regional council decline an appointment? You are recognized? Yes. Okay.
• This was brought by the regional council that covers my geographic area.
• My name is Itan Emotin, and I'm the regional counsel for the Second Region.
• I'm counsel for Heriberto Sanchez Mayan. Mr.

Bills: S0014, S0016, S0024, S0208, S0762

Keywords: negligence, settlement, police conduct, municipal liability, personal injury, compensation, injuries, Miami-Dade County, land use, development regulations, local government, application fees, affordable housing, zoning, residential construction, criminal defense, legal representation, death penalty, indigent defense, regional counsel

Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee heard several bills, beginning with SB 762, which was amended by a strike-all to remove a one-year sunset and delete a reporting requirement to the Legislature. The bill would allow offices of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel to take on certain capital cases from outside their region on an optional basis, with supporters saying it could save money and use existing in-house death penalty expertise. After testimony from Senator Martin and the Second Region’s regional counsel, the committee reported CS/SB 762 favorably. The committee also considered three local claims bills. SB 16, relating to relief for Heriberto A. Sanchez Mayan by the City of St. Petersburg, described severe injuries allegedly caused during an arrest and transport; the claimant’s counsel supported the bill, while President Gaetz spoke against the claims-bill process generally and voted no. The bill passed 9-1 and was reported favorably. SB 14, for Jose Correa against Miami-Dade County, involved injuries from a bus-pedestrian collision and was supported by the claimant and county; it passed 9-1 and was reported favorably. SB 24, for Lourdes and Edward Latour against Miami-Dade County, was an uncontested $500,000 settlement bill and passed unanimously. Finally, the committee took up SB 208 on land use and development regulations. A late-filed strike-all amendment, described as a negotiated compromise, would make development application fees transparent and cost-based, tie them to direct and reasonable indirect review costs, and set subjective compatibility standards for residential projects, with carve-outs for PUDs, master planned communities, and historic districts. Multiple local government, planning, environmental, and business groups appeared in support. The amendment was adopted, and the committee then reported CS/SB 208 favorably on a 10-0 vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now we'll move over to tab 3, CS for SB 762 on offices of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel
• If the regional council's office has adequate qualified counsel to do so, attorneys assigned from other
• to this opportunity for other regional conflict counsel to operate.
• If regional counsel from another district are interested in taking this conflict, this amendment clarifies
• Ita Nemoiton, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Second Region, is speaking in support

Bills: S0500, S0536, S0762, S1582, S1632, S1634, S1742, S1750, S1792

Keywords: security detail, protective detail, candidate protection, election security, statewide office, governor, lieutenant governor, cabinet officer, nominee, officer-elect, FDLE, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, primary election, general election, canvassing commission, political party, minor party, campaign safety, election protection, public safety

Summary: The committee first considered SB 536, which updates Florida’s criminal gang statutes to reflect modern recruitment and communication methods, including social media and encrypted messaging. Senator Martin and supporters said the bill does not criminalize gang membership, but helps law enforcement and prosecutors establish gang-related connections for warrants and sentencing enhancements. Senator Smith raised concerns about the lowered threshold for being observed with gang members and possible unintended impacts on business owners and others; Martin said the language was not intended to cover ordinary business interactions and that a gang tattoo must be one used by the gang. After an amendment aligning the Senate bill with the House version was adopted, the committee reported CS/SB 536 favorably. The committee also favorably reported CS/SB 762, which allows chief judges to assign capital conflict cases across regional counsel offices, with an amendment requiring judges to consider judicial economy and geographic proximity. Testimony from regional counsel emphasized projected long-term savings, estimated at about $150 million over 10 years. The committee then approved CS/SB 1742, creating a new indecent exposure offense involving sexual conduct directed at minors, and CS/SB 1750, which increases penalties for serious sex crimes and child sexual abuse material offenses; both bills were amended before passage, with law enforcement groups appearing in support. The committee next took up SB 1582, which creates statewide data sharing for secondhand dealer and pawnbroker transactions without creating a new state-run database, while preserving confidentiality protections and law enforcement access. An amendment was adopted, and pawnbroker and recycling stakeholders testified in support. The linked public records bill, SB 1792, creating an exemption for those transaction records while allowing certain information to be released to alleged owners, was also reported favorably. The committee then approved CS/SB 500, which provides FDLE protective security details to major party nominees for governor, lieutenant governor, and cabinet offices after primary certification and until the general election is resolved; a technical amendment was adopted, and the bill was described as mirroring federal candidate protection practices. The longest and most contentious discussion was on CS/SB 1632, which would bar Florida courts from enforcing foreign or religious law in a way that overrides the U.S. or Florida constitutions and would create a process for designating foreign or domestic terrorist organizations, with related consequences for schools, funding, and student conduct. Senator Grall said the bill is intended to protect constitutional principles and target violent, criminal conduct rather than protected speech or religious practice, and she explained that designations would follow a public process with judicial review. Senators Smith and Polsky pressed repeatedly on First Amendment, due process, vagueness, and academic-speech concerns, asking how “promotion” would be defined and whether students, attorneys, or advocacy groups could be swept in; Grall said she was open to clarifying language but maintained the bill is aimed at furthering illegal acts, not mere opinion. Numerous speakers opposed the bill, warning it could be used to target Muslim students, religious communities, advocacy groups, and political dissent, while a few supporters argued it was needed for public safety. The transcript ends during public testimony on SB 1632, with no final committee vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• The median home value in the region and home value and...
• regional chamber of commerce serving Newton, Needham, Wellesley, and Watertown.
• The chamber and the businesses in our region urge you to pass this reform.
• I'm Legislative and Policy Counsel at the MMA.
• They recognize that housing challenges differ dramatically from region to region and community to community

Bills: H5009

Keywords: collective bargaining, worker rights, labor relations, public counsel services, state employees

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on Initiative Petition 25-03, House Bill 5000, which would allow single-family homes on smaller lots in areas with public water and sewer service. The hearing began with committee members outlining the Article 48 initiative process and then hearing from two subject-matter experts. Under Secretary Chris Clutchman of Housing and Livable Communities explained how the proposal would amend Chapter 40A, noted that Boston would be excluded, and said municipalities would still be able to adopt reasonable regulations on setbacks, bulk, height, and short-term rentals. He also flagged unresolved implementation questions, including how to treat wetlands, infrastructure capacity, and pre-existing nonconforming situations. Attorney Susan Murphy said the measure would significantly alter local zoning, could create conflicts with existing zoning districts and Section 3A/MBTA Communities rules, and raised concerns about infrastructure capacity and the lack of any home-size or affordability limits. Supporters of the petition argued that Massachusetts faces a severe housing shortage and that large minimum lot sizes are a major barrier to building starter homes. Proponents said the measure would legalize single-family homes on lots as small as 5,000 square feet with 50 feet of frontage where public sewer and water are available, and they cited polling showing public support for lot-size reform. They said the proposal could produce thousands of additional homes per year, help young families and seniors, and expand housing choices in high-cost suburbs. Committee members pressed the proponents on how the measure would interact with affordability, home size, frontage requirements, 40B compliance, and whether the bill would actually produce starter homes rather than larger expensive houses. The Massachusetts Municipal Association testified in opposition, urging the committee to take no action. MMA representatives argued that zoning is fundamentally a local decision and that the proposal would preempt municipal authority with a one-size-fits-all mandate. They also said the bill is impractical because public water and sewer service does not guarantee available capacity, citing examples of communities facing water and wastewater limits and costly infrastructure upgrades. MMA further argued the measure lacks affordability requirements and could be counterproductive, and pointed to existing and pending state tools such as Chapter 40Y, 40R-related proposals, and other housing funding or zoning reforms as better approaches. No vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• regional chamber of commerce serving Newton, Needham, Wellesley, and Watertown.
• The chamber and the businesses in our region urge you to pass this reform.
• I'm Legislative and Policy Counsel at the MMA.
• They recognize that housing challenges differ dramatically from region to region and community to community
• It depends on what region you're in and what's available. We're talking about 40Y now.

Bills: H5009

Keywords: collective bargaining, worker rights, labor relations, public counsel services, state employees, 1212, all

Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on Initiative Petition 25-03, House Bill 5000, which would require cities and towns outside Boston to allow single-family homes on residentially zoned lots of at least 5,000 square feet with 50 feet of frontage, where public water and sewer are available. Committee members first heard from two subject-matter experts. Chris Clutchman of the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities explained how the proposal would interact with existing zoning law, noted that municipalities could still adopt reasonable regulations, and flagged unresolved implementation questions about wetlands, utility access, capacity limits, and nonconforming lots. Susan Murphy, a zoning and land use attorney, said the measure would be a major change to local zoning, could create conflicts with existing statutes such as Chapter 40Y and MBTA Communities, and raised concerns that it does not limit home size or address infrastructure capacity or affordability. Supporters of the petition argued that Massachusetts has a severe housing shortage and that large minimum lot sizes are a major barrier to producing more attainable homes. Andrew McCulla and other proponents said the measure would unlock incremental housing production, lower land costs per home, and help young families, workers, and seniors who are priced out of the market. They cited polling showing majority support, academic research linking larger lot sizes to higher housing costs, and estimates that the proposal could create hundreds of thousands of buildable lots and several thousand additional homes per year. Other supporters, including representatives from Abundant Housing Massachusetts, the Charles River Regional Chamber, and local residents, emphasized workforce retention, outmigration, and the need for more starter homes. The Massachusetts Municipal Association opposed the proposal, arguing that zoning should remain a local decision and that the ballot question would preempt municipal authority. MMA representatives also said the measure is impractical because many communities with water and sewer lack actual capacity, and that the proposal does not address infrastructure costs, affordability requirements, or the role of local planning tools. Committee members pressed both sides on how the measure would work in practice, including whether it could allow very large homes on small lots, how frontage requirements would apply in subdivisions, and how it would interact with 40B, 40Y, and MBTA Communities. No vote was taken at the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• If the regional council's office has adequate qualified counsel to do so, attorneys assigned from other
• And regional... ...to the JAC for reimbursement, subject to legislative appropriation, of course.
• to this opportunity for other regional conflict counsel to operate.
• regional council's office.
• Ita Nemoiton, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Council, Second Region, is speaking in support

Bills: S0500, S0536, S0762, S1582, S1632, S1634, S1742, S1750, S1792

Keywords: security detail, protective detail, candidate protection, election security, statewide office, governor, lieutenant governor, cabinet officer, nominee, officer-elect, FDLE, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, primary election, general election, canvassing commission, political party, minor party, campaign safety, election protection, public safety

Summary: The committee first considered SB 536, which updates Florida’s criminal gang statutes to reflect modern gang recruitment and communication methods, including social media and encrypted messaging. Senator Martin said the bill does not criminalize gang membership or increase penalties for merely being in a gang, but is intended to help law enforcement and prosecutors establish gang-related connections in criminal cases. After an amendment aligning the Senate bill with the House version, the committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably, despite concerns from Senator Smith about the lowered threshold for certain gang-member criteria and possible overbreadth affecting ordinary business settings. The committee then heard CS/SB 762, which allows chief judges to assign capital conflict cases across regional offices when conflicts exist and requires reporting and reimbursement documentation. An amendment clarified that judges should consider judicial economy and geographic proximity. The bill was supported by the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, which said it could save about $150 million over 10 years, and it was reported favorably. The committee also approved CS/SB 1742, creating a new offense for indecent exposure of sexual organs to minors and adding conduct involving viewing minors for sexual gratification; an amendment closed a gap for cases where the child may be unaware of the conduct. CS/SB 1750, which increases penalties and mandatory minimums for serious sex crimes and child sexual abuse material offenses, was also amended and reported favorably. Next, the committee approved CS/SB 1582, which creates statewide data sharing for secondhand dealer and pawnbroker transactions to aid theft prevention and law enforcement, while preserving confidentiality protections. Its linked public records bill, SB 1792, creating an exemption for those records with limited disclosure to alleged owners, was also reported favorably. CS/SB 500, providing FDLE protective security for major party nominees for governor, lieutenant governor, and cabinet offices after primary certification, was amended technically and reported favorably. The committee then took up CS/SB 1632, a controversial bill on foreign/religious law, domestic terrorist organization designations, and restrictions on public funds for designated groups. Senator Graal said it targets conduct, not belief, and includes due process and judicial review; however, Senator Smith and Senator Polsky raised extensive First Amendment, due process, vagueness, and religious-liberty concerns, and multiple speakers opposed the bill. The transcript ends during continued public testimony on CS/SB 1632, with no final committee action shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• was appointed the Interim General Counsel.
• We posted the position of General Counsel and received applications from dozens of excellent lawyers.
• Would the Interim General Counsel please introduce this item?
• Would the Interim General Counsel please introduce this item?
• In favor of fines, our Interim General Counsel, Ms.

Keywords: Texas Ethics Commission, legislative recommendations, general counsel appointment, foreign lobbying, political contributions, quarterly meetings, public testimony, rule amendments

Summary: The meeting focused on the Texas Ethics Commission's (TEC) evaluation of legislative recommendations and personnel updates, including the appointment of a new general counsel and discussions about upcoming quarterly meetings. Commissioner Schmidt reported on the progress of various bills, including amendments to existing laws, the need for increased regulation on foreign lobbying, and the publication of new rules in the Texas Register. Public testimonies were heard regarding compliance issues and proposed changes in political contribution regulations. The Commission agreed to schedule further review on the legislative items discussed and the proposed rule amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, you may be asking yourself why we're using special counsel.
• So, but I do have a question about the special counsel itself.
• A special counsel for gun violence prevention in Nevada will help save lives.
• A special counsel for gun violence prevention in Nevada will help save lives.
• Special counsel for the prevention of gun violence.

Bills: SB156

Keywords: gun violence, firearm safety, special counsel, data collection, community initiatives, grants, Attorney General, public safety, suicide prevention, 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 2026 to DPS and exempts DPS from the statutory prohibition against state agencies employing legal counsel
• the appropriation, you need the money, but the other part would allow DPS to employ outside legal counsel
• Really, there's conflicts of interest that happen, and sometimes they have to use outside counsel.
• We really want to see that be discussed in the budget, but the independent counsel is an entirely different
• I don't really understand the need for DPS having their own outside counsel, just, you know, other than

Bills: HB2148, HB2993

Keywords: federal funding, state budget, appropriation, block grants, noncustodial funds, legislative authority, Arizona attorney general, Department of Public Safety, DPS, consumer fraud revolving fund, consumer protection fund, gang and immigration intelligence team enforcement mission fund, public safety appropriation, supplemental appropriation, outside counsel, state agency legal representation, legal services, state settlement proceeds, general fund, A.R.S. 41-192

Bills: SB156, SB467

Keywords: gun violence, firearm safety, special counsel, data collection, community initiatives, grants, Attorney General, public safety, suicide prevention, cybersecurity, information security, state agency, data protection, confidentiality, 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 5203 concerns the maximum term of regional transit authority bond issues.
• An RTA, or regional transit authority, may issue general obligation bonds and revenue bonds in order
• For me in the Puget Sound region, we are waiting for light rail to extend from Lynnwood to Everett.
• The system being built today will serve this region for generations. And the state, ...important.
• The system being built today will serve this region for generations.

Bills: SB6148

Keywords: regional transit authority, RTA, transit bonds, general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, bond maturity, debt limit, 25-year cap, regional mobility grant program, public transit financing, transportation funding, Washington RCW, bond issuance, municipal finance, infrastructure finance, 904, all

Summary: The committee first heard Second Substitute Senate Bill 5690, which would improve coordination between WSDOT and utilities on fish barrier removal projects and utility relocations. Staff explained that the bill would require WSDOT to provide proactive notice to utility owners when feasible, encourage collaboration to maximize federal funding, and report recommendations for improving reimbursement and grant access. The sponsor, Senator McEwen, said the bill was narrowed from a prior version to reduce fiscal impact and cited a project in his district where poor coordination led to wasted public and ratepayer funds. Utility representatives from Washington PUDs, Thurston PUD, and Grays Harbor PUD testified in support, saying better notice and federal funding pursuit would reduce costs and help them budget and plan relocations. No vote was taken, and the public hearing was closed. The committee then took up Senate Bill 6148, which would extend the maximum term for regional transit authority bonds from 40 years to 75 years and remove eligibility for regional mobility grant funds if an RTA uses bonds longer than 40 years. Staff and fiscal discussion focused on how longer bond terms could reduce near-term debt service but increase total interest over time, with illustrative examples showing higher total repayment on longer maturities. Supporters, including Sound Transit board members, local officials, labor, and transit advocates, argued the bill would give Sound Transit flexibility to manage inflation, preserve project schedules, and align with federal TIFIA loan authority, while opponents said it would burden future generations, increase costs, and was unnecessary because Sound Transit already has funding tools and unused bonding capacity. The committee heard extensive testimony but took no final action before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• increase the willingness of candidates to relocate to work at the Austin headquarters as well as other regional
• Uh, we received it from alleged counsel draft of our committee substitute late last night, OK, and we

Bills: SB 36

Keywords: transportation, regional authorities, mobility, infrastructure, sales tax

Transcript Highlights:

• He has a bill relating to the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission.
• He has a bill relating to the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission.
• And with that, I'm going to let Director Mattson from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trail
• And with that, I'm going to let Director Mattson from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trail
• :26.880><c> the</c> To achieve regional designation, the To achieve regional designation, the government

Bills: HF3564

Keywords: Greater Minnesota, regional parks, trails, grants, local government, 1183, house

Bills: SB198, SB179

Keywords: Alabama National Guard, National Guard legal services, legal assistance program, judge advocate, staff judge advocate, paralegal, military justice, military law, legal aid, preventive law, notary, notarial acts, Adjutant General, State Military Department, Office of General Counsel, Army Regulation 27-1, Army Regulation 27-3, Air Force Instruction 51-304, Air National Guard Instruction 51-504, Title 31

Transcript Highlights:

• and I think we could have offered up some solutions other than making the Birmingham Water Board a regional
• board. the Birmingham Water Board a regional board.
• Consequences related to water and gas systems could have negative consequences for regional utility systems
• The Black Belt region infrastructure.
• The Black Belt region communities across this region, including parts of Wilcox and Lowndes County, suffer

Bills: SB330

Keywords: water management, regional boards, municipal governance, ethics compliance, public utility, 1136, house, all

Bills: SB330

Keywords: water management, regional boards, municipal governance, ethics compliance, public utility, 923, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 4, the Sabine region.
• Have we done it for the other regions? Region 4 being East Texas. Is that not accurate?
• But planning regions collaborate very closely with the universities in that region.
• Looking at Region 4 in East Texas is beyond the other regions.
• Valley region.

Keywords: flooding, emergency response, communication systems, first responders, disaster management, Texas Water Development Board, regional planning, public safety

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on discussions around the recent floods in Texas, specifically addressing emergency preparedness, response coordination, and recovery efforts. Officials from various agencies provided testimonies on the challenges faced during the emergency, including issues with communication systems among first responders. Notably, the need for improved inter-agency communication and technology integration was emphasized, with recommendations for establishing regional communications units for better coordination during disasters. The audience included local government representatives and emergency management partners, who shared insights and experiences from the recent flooding events.

Transcript Highlights:

• Debbie Hinton, Executive Counsel for the Police Jury Association.
• Debbie Hinton, Executive Counsel for the Police Jury Association. Representative Owen.
• I'm Hannah Gettys, General Counsel, Louisiana Municipal Association.
• Sarah Terrell, who is the general counsel for the department. She's a former prosecutor under Mr.
• , we round these cases every single week, we bring in training, we bring in medical, we have the regional

Bills: HCR95, HB4, HB244, HB615, HB648, HB1049, HB1201

Keywords: sales tax, exemptions, credits, rebates, uniformity, legislative rules, fiscal report, constitutional convention, Louisiana constitution, electoral process, government structure, delegate elections, delegates, state election, ratification, Louisiana, public meetings, broadcast, transparency, government accountability

Transcript Highlights:

• felt that it was unfair. ...of a, they felt that it was unfair that Pinal Partnership, that Pinal Regional
• happy to stand for questions. of a, they felt that it was unfair that Pinal Partnership, that Pinal Regional

Bills: HB2065, HB2066, HB2071, HB2106, HB2237, HB2258

Keywords: appropriation, housing, Apache Junction, affordable housing, rehabilitation, blight abatement, broadband, fiber optic, technology, connectivity, infrastructure, rural development, workforce hub, health services, transportation tax, county excise tax, regional transportation authority, public transportation authority fund, regional transportation fund, ADOT

Transcript Highlights:

• Sometimes they will arrive at our regional police lockup already with a notification that had arrived
• notification comes to the agency that's holding them sometimes they they will they will arrive at our regional
• And I'll say in one particular situation also, we've seen offices of general counsel at our hospital.
• In a particular situation also, we've seen offices of general counsel at our hospitals be afraid to enforce

Bills: H4697, S2635, S2680, S2681, H5158

Keywords: constables, civil deputy sheriffs, law enforcement, training, certification, public safety, emergency response, red lights, Barnstable, town management, public health, safety standards, nuclear power, waste management, community protection, BMX, motocross, safety, regulation, insurance

Summary: The Joint Committee on Public Safety held a public hearing on several bills, including S. 2681 (Colby’s Law) on safety standards for BMX/motocross tracks, S. 2680 on expanding emergency preparedness around aging nuclear plants and nuclear waste sites, S. 2635 for Barnstable to use red lights on certain emergency response vehicles, H. 4697 on training and recognition of constables and civil deputy sheriffs, and H. 5158 (the Protect Act) concerning limits on cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement. Chairs Cronin and Cahill opened the hearing with time limits for testimony and noted the committee would recess at noon and resume later if needed. On Colby’s Law, family members of a child killed at a motocross track, along with supporters, described the bill as a response to unsafe track conditions and repeated serious injuries. They urged minimum standards such as medical staff on site, better barriers, safer track design, emergency planning, and clearer oversight, arguing the bill would prevent future deaths without shutting down the sport. One witness from the motocross community opposed the bill as overregulation and said some proposed measures, like nets and insurance mandates, could be costly or counterproductive. A track operator from Southwick said the bill was incomplete and should more clearly address protective equipment, weather-related shutdowns, age separation, and rider education. The committee also heard strong support for S. 2680 from Cape Cod downwinders, physicians, and nuclear safety advocates, who argued that Massachusetts should expand emergency planning from 10 miles to 50 miles and include nuclear waste storage sites. They said federal oversight is inadequate and that the state should better protect residents from radiation risks. Barnstable supported S. 2635, saying red lights would improve response times for harbormaster emergency vehicles on the Cape. The Hampshire County sheriff testified on H. 4697 that sheriffs are already working with POST and MPTC on training for civil process deputies, making the bill partly duplicative. A large portion of the hearing focused on the Protect Act. Sheriffs testified about ICE detainers, notification requests, and the difference between pretrial detainees and sentenced inmates, emphasizing public safety concerns and the discretion sheriffs use when notifying ICE about releases. Supporters of the Protect Act—including union leaders, teachers, health care workers, and physicians—argued that the bill is needed to prevent fear in immigrant communities, protect due process, and keep schools, hospitals, and courts safe and accessible. Several witnesses urged stronger language to bar 287(g) agreements, prohibit local assistance to ICE, and add protections for sensitive locations such as schools and health care facilities. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• So we talked with regional airports as well as the too big.
• There are 13 agencies that use this regional training academy.
• You know, that is a regional driving track, so I think we have to...
• Our academy, Northern Arizona Regional Training and Combat Academy, we have three...
• So again, I think that a regional training academy, when you have a user group...

Bills: HB2207, HB2225, HB2602, HB2641

Keywords: braille, disability access, education funding, state corrections, inclusion, HB 2225, Yavapai County, northern Arizona regional training academy, training academy, public safety training, law enforcement training, police academy, first responder training, capital appropriation, state general fund, state treasurer, lapsing appropriation, section 35-190, capital costs, regional training facility