Video & Transcript Research : 'refund'

Page 1 of 85
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/20/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • the property tax refund often known as the property tax refund here<00:36:53.520> in<00:36:53.680
  • <00:37:00.920> which targeted uh property tax refund which targeted uh property tax refund
  • sure that we are getting uh more refund sure that we are getting uh more refund into<00:37:12.079
  • <00:42:37.680> from refund from refund from $1,000<00:42:39.319> to $1,000 to $1,000 to
  • Williams: So it's effective with refunds based on property taxes payable in 2026, so that's refunds filed
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/13/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • two ways: it increases the maximum credit from $500 to $1,000, and then it also makes the credit refundable
  • , so if your obligation isn't as great as what your refund is, you get to just have that back.
  • <00:02:08.679> as<00:02:08.800> what<00:02:08.879> your<00:02:09.000> refund
  • <00:02:09.360> is isn't uh as great as what your refund is isn't uh as great as what your
  • refund is you<00:02:09.560> get<00:02:09.679> to<00:02:09.840> just<00:02:10.000
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/10/25

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • have you done anything to refunds have you done anything to address<00:37:31.359> those<00:37
  • She noted that previous refunds, including the Jesse checks, were structured as a sales tax refund, and
  • Representative Johnson said that, on the property tax issue, renters receive property tax refunds in
  • He said there is an assumption built into the property tax refund for renters, that 17% of the total
  • would they qualify for this refund would they qualify for this refund represent represent represent
Bills: HF25, HF4
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/10/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • , summary on um homestead credit refunds, summary on um homestead credit refunds, the<00:02:22.480
  • > homeowners refund program assists homeowners refund program assists homeowners whose<00:04:56.320
  • > 15.9% Property tax refunds offset 15.9% Property tax refunds offset 15.9% of<00:05:13.760>
  • between Minnesota's property tax refunds between Minnesota's property tax refunds for<00:18:55.640
  • Refund.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Finance Committee 2/25/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • unknowingly sign their children up for substandard tutoring services and sign away their rights to tax refunds
  • the child is denied legitimate education and the parent is essentially robbed of their entitled tax refunds
  • essentially robbed of their entitled is essentially robbed of their entitled tax<01:05:18.400> refunds
  • while<01:05:19.480> they<01:05:19.920> these<01:05:20.160> entities tax refunds
  • while they these entities tax refunds while they these entities and<01:05:20.680> their<01:05
Bills: HF1, HF779, HF1034
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 2/25/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • , whether through property tax refunds or relief.
  • would be an account created to uh refund would be an account created to uh refund whether<00:02:
  • whether through property tax uh refunds whether through property tax uh refunds or<00:03:01.440>
  • We haven't heard anything about property tax refunds.
  • We haven't heard anything about property tax refunds.
Bills: HF4, HF173
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Taxation REVISED Feb 9th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • It reauthorizes certain income tax refund donation checkoffs for the benefit of veterans programs.
  • updates state income tax return forms to continue allowing taxpayers to donate a portion of their tax refunds
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/04/2026 - Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • seller, after the transaction is completed, to provide notice to the purchaser and offer a prorated refund
  • seller, after the transaction is completed, to provide notice to the purchaser and offer a prorated refund
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 2010, which would prohibit sellers of digital goods from using terms like “buy” or “purchase” in a way that implies unrestricted ownership when the consumer is actually receiving a license, and would require clearer disclosures, post-transaction notices, prorated refunds or alternative access if license terms change, and enforcement under the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act. The sponsor said the bill responds to consumers being misled about digital purchases and to concerns that licensed content can be altered or removed after sale. The bill was approved on a 7-0 do pass vote. The committee also heard House Bill 2192, which would require compensation protections for minors featured in monetized online content, including trust-account requirements similar to child actor protections, recordkeeping, and a process for adults who were featured as minors to request removal or editing of content that identifies them. Google testified in support, saying the bill mirrors existing protections for child actors and provides a uniform standard; the sponsor said it addresses the growing child influencer industry. An amendment was adopted to clarify that platforms may rely on existing trust-and-safety systems and are not required to proactively monitor user content or be liable for third-party content if they comply with mitigation requirements. The bill then passed 7-0 as amended. House Bill 2310 was described as a technical fix to Arizona’s qualified marketplace contractor law for gig-economy platforms, clarifying that contracts may be terminated without cause on reasonable notice and that the contractor may terminate unilaterally. Lyft supported the measure, saying it removes ambiguity without changing the independent contractor framework; one senator questioned the wording, but the sponsor and witness said the intent was to preserve driver independence. The bill passed 7-0. The committee then heard House Bill 2501, an agency-requested measure from the Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions that conforms Arizona’s appraisal management company definition to federal law by updating the definition to include administering appraisal panels and defining a 12-month period. It also passed 7-0.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, Senate Bill 771 corrects a discrepancy in state law by allowing a fuel tax credit or refund for diesel
  • Prior to 2003, Texas provided credits and refunds for both diesel and gasoline using APUs and PTOs, but
  • It ensures that there is a refund potential for APUs and off-road type usage in gasoline and straightens
  • It ensures that there is a refund potential for APUs and off-road type usage in gasoline and straightens
Bills: SB771, SB2345, HB135, HB135
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/12/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • With this bill, we are increasing the amount of that refund.
  • With this bill, we gives you a refund.
  • . refund. refund.
  • That's why I brought forward this bill to increase the homestead credit refund and the renters credit
  • also a limit on the refund of $1,000, and the bill would increase the limit on the refund to $2,500.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Tue Feb 3, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to waste, recycling, and environmental review. On HB 1924, which would establish a mattress stewardship program, the Department of Health said it stood on written testimony and offered comments, while Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition and one individual supported the bill and the International Sleep Products Association opposed it. No questions were raised and the committee moved on. A large portion of the hearing focused on HB 2121, which would prohibit the sale of disposable vapes in Hawaii. The Department of Health supported the measure but suggested the bill may be better placed in a different part of state law because the cited waste-management section regulates products after consumption, while still praising the effort to remove disposable vapes from the market and environment. Testimony in strong support came from the Coalition for Tobacco Free Hawaii Youth Council, Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii COPD Coalition, Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction Center, the City and County of Honolulu, and many individuals; supporters emphasized youth vaping, toxic waste, lithium battery fire risks, and environmental harm. There was at least one opposing individual and the International Sleep Products Association was listed in opposition. The committee noted there were many written testimonies and no immediate vote was taken. The committee also heard HB 1928 on the deposit beverage container recycling program. The Department of Health stood on written testimony. The Solid Waste Task Force of Hawaii Environmental Change Agents and Upstream supported the bill but urged amendments to better integrate reuse and reusables, strengthen enforcement, clarify definitions, and protect existing redemption centers. The Hawaii Food Industry Association supported the concept of a backdrop program but preferred strengthening the existing program and raised concerns about undefined fees, existing infrastructure, and future audit costs. The Chamber of Commerce Hawaii supported the bill, and the chair said the measure needs work and that decision-making would occur in a few days. Finally, the committee took up HB 979 on environmental review and HB 1650 on environmental assessments. For HB 979, OPSD offered amendments, HCDA supported the bill but suggested clarifying the affordable-housing definition, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative supported it, and Earthjustice was asked about the court process for environmental challenges; the chair asked about shortening the challenge period and the relationship between environmental court, the intermediate court of appeals, and the Supreme Court. For HB 1650, OPSD and the State Historic Preservation Division stood on written testimony, OHA asked to retain historic sites, and several groups and individuals testified in support or opposition. Opponents argued that removing Wiki special district and historic sites from Chapter 343 trigger language would weaken environmental review and risk impacts to iwi kūpuna and historic resources.