Video & Transcript Research : 'premium increase'

Page 1 of 500
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Oklahomans pay some of the highest insurance premiums in the nation.
  • Texas had, from 2019 to 2024, a 55% increase in rates according to AARP.
  • in their premiums as well?
  • Thank you for that question. ...have had increases in their premiums as well.
  • There's been some unreasonable rate increase.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:13.120> premiums but each new mandate increases premiums but each new mandate increases
  • House File 400 is a way to mitigate premium increases if a new mandate adds cost.
  • take away all the other coverage for someone if they cannot afford the increasing base premium.
  • <00:26:36.320> premiums mandates and and increased premiums mandates and and increased premiums
  • that<01:08:11.680> was increases in premiums because that was increases in premiums because
Bills: HF3388, HF400
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from the prior day and then heard House File 400, a bill described as a defrayal measure for health insurance mandates. Representative Perryman said the bill would not block future mandates, but would require the state to pay the added costs of any new mandated benefits so those costs would not be shifted to premium payers. She and supporters framed the bill as a way to protect affordability for Minnesota employers, workers, and families, especially in the fully insured market. Testimony in support came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Council of Health Plans. They argued that Minnesota has a high number of mandated benefits, that each new mandate adds cost to premiums, and that businesses—especially small and midsize employers—are already struggling with rising health insurance costs. The health plans representative said the bill would use the existing Commerce defrayal process to reimburse plans for eligible mandate-related claims, allowing those costs to be removed from premium rates. Several members echoed support, saying the bill would improve transparency by showing the fiscal impact of proposed mandates and help prevent people from being priced out of coverage. Members also explored how mandates apply in the market and how premiums are set. Deputy Commissioner Julia Dryer explained that, unless otherwise specified, mandates generally apply to the individual, small group, and fully insured large group markets, while self-insured ERISA plans and other markets are generally outside that scope. Representative Elkins noted that the affected market is relatively small and said small businesses are increasingly moving to self-insured plans because of cost. He and others raised concerns about affordability, while Representative Smith argued that mandates often ensure needed care and that the bill shifts costs to taxpayers rather than insurers. Representative Bacham added a personal example from tribal self-insurance, saying preventive physicals had saved lives and asking whether other factors besides mandates are driving insurer costs. No amendments were offered, and the bill was laid over for possible future consideration.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • 25% 30% increase in premiums in that 25% 30% increase in premiums in that instance<00:24:36.799>
  • that really needs the coverage in it and leading to further increases in the premiums.
  • <00:26:57.440> in<00:26:57.600> the<00:26:57.760> premiums further increases
  • in the premiums further increases in the premiums uh<00:26:59.840> repeat<00:27:00.760> rinse
  • , which are driving the premium increases, and yet we are met, as Chair O'Driscoll eloquently put it,
Bills: HF837
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Commerce Committee Meeting - 2026-03-26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • At the time, premiums were projected to increase between 50% and 66.8%.
  • In fact, they will pay for the increased cost in premiums, keeping it affordable for the public.
  • <00:31:43.840> it increased cost in premiums keeping it increased cost in premiums keeping
  • Many were enacted for important reasons, but each new mandate increases premiums for employers and employees
  • c> and increases premiums for employers and increases premiums for employers and employees.<00:35
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Business and Insurance 2ND REVISED Apr 23rd, 2026 at 09:30 am

Business and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Will this increase taxes on certain products on the lesser quality tobacco?
  • would prevent the price from effectively remaining the same, they just pay less taxes, thereby increasing
  • So we know how many cans are being sold of a premium product like Copenhagen or Schull.
  • House Bill 3802 simply prohibits an insurance company from raising premiums on a motor vehicle policy
  • rights, especially as they continue to increase.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Edfin Committee Meeting - 2026-04-14

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Revenue Increase Revenue Increase Bill<00:01:41.960> is<00:01:42.080> in<00:01:42.160
  • We oppose any increasing exclusion.
  • actually increase costs over time. actually increase costs over time.
  • increased from 1,800 to over 1,900. increased from 1,800 to over 1,900.
  • <01:17:59.000> That numbers are increasing. That numbers are increasing.
Bills: HF3493, HF4114
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Jefferson County Legislation Committee Apr 17th, 2025

Jefferson County Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that base salary may not increase but shall not decrease after... increase but shall not decrease
Bills: HB375, HB494, HB375
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - Senate Public Safety

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, there's an investigation. ...increase for sworn correctional officers and department-employed
  • Even with this pay increase, it would still trail many comparable agencies by 17% to 50%.
  • Fewer staff are doing more, increasing risk to employees, inmates, and the public.
  • The 25% pay increase would raise it to $57,018. And the 5% would bring them to...
  • in salaries and not... ...entirely to their increase in salaries and not into your profit margin?
Summary: The Public Safety Committee met to introduce staff and pages, then heard several bills. SB 1010 would designate Loop 202 as the Charlie Kirk Highway and require signage; an amendment to rename it the Freedom of Speech Highway failed, and the bill received a do-pass recommendation on a 4-3 vote after testimony both supporting the honor and objecting that it could affect existing freeway names, including the Ed Pastor Freeway. SB 1077 would impose felony penalties for using an interactive computer service to facilitate prostitution, pandering, or child sex trafficking, and to require age verification for harmful sexual material; it passed 5-2 after a brief clarification about the law-enforcement defense. SB 1093 would expand the definition of riot to include acts or threats causing property damage and add riot to racketeering and conspiracy provisions; one public commenter opposed it as overbroad and anti-protest, but the bill still passed 4-3. The committee also heard SB 1058, the Second Amendment Financial Privacy Act, which would bar government firearm registries and restrict merchant category codes tied to firearm purchases. A firearms industry representative said the bill protects financial privacy, and it passed 4-3. SB 1035 would appropriate funds for a 5% salary increase for correctional officers and department civilians; the sponsor and correctional employee representatives said raises are needed for retention, while others argued the increase should also cover private prison employees to preserve parity. The committee adopted a Payne amendment extending the raise to private prison workers under contract with the department, and the amended bill passed 4-3. The committee then adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm sorry, and so what you would see over time is those Medicare supplement premiums increasing more
  • I'm sorry, and so what you would see over time is those Medicare supplement premiums increasing more
  • I'm sorry, and so what you would see over time is those Medicare supplement premiums increasing more
  • I'm sorry, and so what you would see over time is those Medicare supplement premiums increasing more
  • I'm sorry, and so what you would see over time is those Medicare supplement premiums increasing more
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Tue Feb 24, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • reasonably explain changes in premium upon written request by the policyholder for any premium increase
  • <00:51:12.240> Insurers<00:51:12.960> shall of premium increase.
  • Insurers shall of premium increase.
  • <00:51:22.160> I for any premium increase at renewal.
  • I for any premium increase at renewal.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1697, which would exempt natural hair braiders from licensing requirements under certain conditions. The DCCA Board of Barbering and Cosmetology said it recognizes braiding as within the scope of cosmetology practice but warned that a broad exemption could create consumer protection gaps, especially around sanitation training, tool use, and enforcement. Supporters from the Institute for Justice and the Grassroots Institute of Hawaii argued the current licensing regime is overly burdensome and unrelated to braiding, citing the 1,250-hour training requirement, high tuition costs, barriers for low-income entrepreneurs, and the fact that many other states already exempt braiders. Committee members asked whether a standalone sanitation course or similar training could address the board’s concerns, and the board said it would bring that idea back for discussion. The committee also noted 16 written testimonies in support and 2 in opposition. The committee then took up HB 1678, relating to condominium and planned community association elections using cumulative voting. Supporters, including the Hawaii State Association of Parliamentarians, said the bill would clarify that cumulative voting applies to all candidates, including write-ins, and would help resolve confusion in association elections. One testifier urged the committee to remove proxy voting, calling it an abuse of power in some associations, while another asked whether cumulative voting and proxies could be manipulated to stack votes. In response, the parliamentarian explained that cumulative voting and proxy voting are different, that proxies simply allow someone to vote on another’s behalf, and that existing deadlines and counting procedures reduce opportunities for abuse. Testimony also emphasized that electronic or mail voting can be secure and efficient, and that the bill would make the process clearer and more democratic. Finally, the committee heard testimony on HB 1679, which would clarify an association board’s authority over electronic meetings, electronic voting, voting without a meeting, and mail voting without a meeting. Supporters said the measure would clean up statutory language, make electronic voting optional, and fix problems created by a 2024 change that made written-consent timing rules difficult to use for association actions. They also said the bill would clarify that proxies are only used at meetings, not for actions taken without a meeting. One opponent argued the bill needs further amendment because electronic voting is not well defined and could be abused, and questioned the neutrality of parliamentarians testifying on condominium bills. No votes were taken on any of the measures during the portion of the meeting provided.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Municipal May 20th, 2026

Municipal

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 485 by Senator Edmonds provides for the levy of premium tax in the city of St. George.
  • This transfers authority over insurance premium tax within the city of St.
  • So it clarifies that insurers may only be subject to one local insurance premium tax for the same risk
  • It defines insurance premium tax as a municipal license tax imposed on insurers, which is all consistent
  • premium taxes, and administer those taxes.
Bills: SB348, SB444, SB485
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 10th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's a request from them to increase...
  • There's a request from them to increase... We have a motion from Senator Hatcher.
  • Notwithstanding this section or any other provision of this chapter, the increases in fees under section
  • :28:35.760> the other provision of this chapter, the other provision of this chapter, the increases
  • in fees under section 12-9-90 increases in fees under section 12-9-90 provided<00:28:40.320> by
Bills: SB249, SB259, HB67, HB214
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/16/2026 - House Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Part of it is because oftentimes this Clean Air Act increases costs and other undue regulations.
  • Rising insurance premiums are not Arizona-specific, but are due to inflation and increased incidence
  • It takes money from the insurance premium tax collection.
  • So on each insurance premium written in the state, there is a small percentage that goes to a tax.
  • And what I just note is, on an annual basis, those premium tax revenues have seen pretty impressive increases
Summary: The committee heard three measures. HB 2013 would require the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to submit an exceptional event demonstration to the EPA when wildfires on federally managed land affect Arizona air quality. Sponsor Rep. Lisa Fink said the bill is intended to prevent Arizona from being penalized for wildfire-driven air quality problems and could help reduce regulatory burdens. Sierra Club opposed the bill, arguing the existing exceptional-event process already requires case-by-case analysis, that automatic filings could be unnecessary or ineffective, and that the bill lacked an appropriation. ADEQ testified neutral. The committee approved HB 2013 on a 5-1 vote. HB 2292 would create the Wildfire Prevention Authority and Fund under the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management; a committee amendment renamed it the Wildfire Mitigation and Risk Reduction Authority and Fund, capped administrative expenses at 8%, and prioritized funding for single-family and multi-family dwellings. Supporters, including Coconino County Vice Chair Geronimo Vasquez and the County Supervisors Association, said the bill would provide a coordinated, data-driven wildfire mitigation program funded by a $20 million annual diversion from insurance premium tax revenues, helping reduce wildfire damage and stabilize insurance costs. Members discussed the funding source as an existing tax diversion rather than a new tax. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed HB 2292 as amended on an 8-0 vote. HCM 2011 urges Congress to pass federal legislation to delist the Mexican wolf, defund the reintroduction program, and transfer management to local authorities. The sponsor said the memorial responds to ranching impacts from wolf predation and supports federal action already moving in Congress. Sierra Club opposed the memorial, saying the species remains insufficiently recovered and that delisting would be premature. After debate, including comments both supporting and opposing delisting, the committee approved HCM 2011 on a 5-2 vote and then adjourned.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPN Public Hearing 01-29-2026

Commerce and Consumer Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • > penalties<00:05:19.360> for This measure increases the penalties for This measure increases
  • premium rates.
  • exits, and potentially raising premiums exits, and potentially raising premiums for<00:36:58.400
  • <00:38:04.480> Refund increased premium rates. Refund increased premium rates.
  • So I get why we want to increase it.
Summary: The Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee opened its first hearing of the year with remarks from Chair Jared Kohole outlining hearing procedures, a two-minute testimony limit, rules for remote testimony and decorum, and a revised testimony-publication pilot that keeps 96-hour notice but returns to a standard 24-hour testimony deadline. He then moved through the agenda, beginning with SB 2004 on outdoor advertising, which would increase penalties for violations of billboard and outdoor advertising laws. Testimony on that measure was limited; Henry Curtis of Life of the Land was first up, and written support was noted from Hawaiian Electric and the Outdoor Circle. The committee then heard SB 2039 on election campaign finance, which would prohibit certain business entities from engaging in campaign finance activities. The Attorney General’s office offered comments and did not take a formal position at the hearing. Several proponents testified in support, including Josh Frost, Tom Moore of the Center for American Progress, Hapa/Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action, and Common Cause Hawaiʻi, all arguing the bill would curb corporate and dark-money influence and return elections to the people. Moore distinguished between regulating corporate “rights” and limiting corporate “powers,” and said the state can redefine the powers it grants corporations. In questions, Senator McKelvey asked whether the bill could be expanded to include unions; the Attorney General said he would need to get back with legal analysis, while Moore said his preferred approach would include all entities and that leaving out nonprofits or unions would create problems. Members also discussed whether the bill would affect PACs, and Moore explained that the proposal would prohibit corporate and dark-money flows into PACs while leaving individual political giving and existing political committees in place. The committee then moved on to the next measure. SB 2042, relating to insurance, was heard next. The bill would reduce the unimpaired minimum capital and surplus required of class 4 sponsored captive insurance companies under certain circumstances. The DCCA Insurance Division said it stood on its written testimony, and the Hawaii Captive Insurance Council testified in support, describing the change as a narrow, risk-based adjustment that would not affect the commissioner’s authority where actual risk resides and would help keep Hawaii competitive. The committee noted additional written support and proceeded without a vote or final action in the portion of the hearing provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/3/25 - Part 1

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:05:27.919> would<00:05:28.160> this<00:05:28.360> then<00:05:28.639> increase
  • <00:05:29.720> the I guess would this then increase the I guess would this then increase the
  • Chair, if I may, I want to make sure, with the delay in this, there's no premiums that would be paid
  • <00:15:57.120> raised<00:15:57.480> in having things tax increases raised in having
  • things tax increases raised in fiscal<00:15:58.000> notes<00:15:58.399> on<00:15:58.600
Bills: HF11
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:55.040> uh they could reduce their premium down. uh they could reduce their premium
  • we've made in this committee, we have seen cutbacks in that increased wage premium.
  • we've made in this committee, we have seen cutbacks in that increased wage premium.
  • we've made in this committee, we have seen cutbacks in that increased wage premium.
  • we've made in this committee, we have seen cutbacks in that increased wage premium.