Video & Transcript Research : 'pipeline'

Page 1 of 133
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • the last large petroleum pipeline the last large petroleum pipeline application<01:08:56.080>
  • The idea here is not to say it's a bigger pipeline or a smaller pipeline.
  • And when a pipeline company is putting in a pipeline at five or six million dollars a mile, they do a
  • a pipeline.
  • . pipeline. pipeline.
Bills: HF4236, HF4122, HF4377
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Apr 7th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I meet with all the contractors, utility operators, pipeline operators, municipalities, and cities.
  • The locators can be in-house locators working from the actual utility or pipeline, or they can be.
  • Both pipeline and non-pipeline violations, we see that on the pipeline side, the Railroad Commission
  • Everything from pipelines to eminent domain to oil and gas lease operations.
  • Currently, the pipeline safety fee is $1 per service line.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 612 is intended to prevent certain water districts from charging excessive pipeline construction
  • However, real estate developers who frequently extend water and sewer pipelines to support housing and
  • It prohibits water districts from imposing pipeline construction fees on a developer greater than the
  • We've talked to the county commissioner this morning about 400 yards of road that, when they put the pipeline
  • Senate Bill 612 by Senator Hinojosa, relating to the fees for pipeline construction imposed by certain
Summary: The Senate Water, Agriculture, Rural Affairs Committee heard several bills focused on groundwater management, water infrastructure, and agricultural land conservation. SB 612 would limit certain water districts in Hidalgo, Cameron, and Willacy counties from charging developers pipeline construction fees above actual, documented costs; the committee substitute removed a developer challenge mechanism to preserve district discretion over construction standards. HB 1633 would require groundwater conservation districts to consider registered exempt wells when reviewing or amending permits, and testimony from landowners, district representatives, and advocacy groups largely supported the bill as a way to protect domestic and livestock wells from drawdown caused by large export projects. HB 1689 would clarify that export fee revenues may be used for well operability, alternative water supplies, and aquifer monitoring, including through interlocal cooperation, and HB 3058 would give the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District authority to use export fees for county road improvements and environmental programs tied to well inspection and groundwater management. HB 2018 would clarify that the Texas Farm and Ranchland Conservation Program is intended to purchase conservation easements only on working agricultural lands, with support from cattle raisers and Farm Bureau representatives. The committee also considered HB 29, which would require large water systems to validate water loss audits and submit mitigation plans; a committee substitute removed the water-loss threshold and adjusted the timeline for more detailed validation. Public testimony on the bills was generally supportive, with several witnesses describing declining well levels, road damage from export projects, and the need to preserve agricultural land and local water supplies. The committee adopted committee substitutes and voted favorably on HB 29, HB 1689, HB 2018, SB 612, and SB 3058, recommending several of them for the local and uncontested calendar; HB 1633 was left pending awaiting a committee substitute.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 612 aims to prevent certain water districts from charging excessive pipeline construction
  • However, real estate developers who frequently extend water and sewer pipelines to support housing and
  • Districts are imposing pipeline construction fees on developers that are greater than the actual reasonable
  • I talked to the county commission this morning about 400 yards of road that, when they put the pipeline
  • in, they went right down the middle of the pipeline of the... ...of the road, dug it up eight feet deep
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 21st, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, members, uh, Senate Bill 612 is to prevent water districts from charging excessive pipeline
  • This prohibits the water districts from imposing pipeline construction fees on developers greater than
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, but there's, uh, you know, currently a list of housing pipeline projects, and it's very detailed.
  • Um, but there's, uh, you know, currently a list of housing pipeline projects, and it's very detailed.
  • Um, but there's, uh, you know, currently a list of housing pipeline projects, and it's very detailed.
  • So I think it's a reasonable step to come up with a scope of work before you... pipeline um projects
  • Um, so this won't show pipelines or storage tanks, etc.
Summary: The joint public hearing covered several housing-related bills and one building-code measure. HB 1719 would make manufactured homes a permitted use by right on residentially zoned lots in the urban district, HB 1742 would authorize self-contained relocatable housing units with restrictions, and HB 1737 would clarify that a farm dwelling in an agricultural district may include an accessory employee housing structure. Testimony on these bills was overwhelmingly supportive from groups including Hawaii Realtors, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, Housing Hawaii’s Future, the Modular Building Institute, the Hawaii Farmers Union, and others, with a few agencies offering comments. No one testified in opposition on HB 1719 or HB 1742, while HB 1737 drew one opposition and one comment in addition to broad support. No votes were taken during the hearing segment provided. A major portion of the hearing focused on HB 2049, which restructures the conveyance tax into a marginal-rate system and changes how the revenue is allocated, including funding for the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and the rental housing revolving fund, while also affecting the legacy land conservation fund. Supporters, including DHHL, Hawaii Appleseed, Aahu Youth Action Board, Hawaii YIMBY, and others, argued the bill would help Native Hawaiian housing and, for most transactions, function as a tax cut. Opponents, including NAP Hawaii, Hawaii Realtors, Hawaii Land Trust, Mhai Land Trust, and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, objected to using conveyance tax as a revenue-generating tool and raised concerns about higher upfront costs and reduced funding for other housing uses. Committee members and staff discussed the bill’s revenue estimates, the reduced percentage but higher cap for the land conservation fund, the effect on rental housing funding, and the bill’s cost-of-living adjustment language; staff said a line-by-line comparison of the current and proposed tax structure would be provided before decision-making. The hearing also took up HB 1725, which would extend the state building code adoption cycle from two years to six years, apply the IRC to triplexes and fourplexes, allow counties to adopt more or less stringent amendments, and appropriate funds for code adoption work. Most testimony supported the bill, with advocates saying the current process is unmanageable, too resource-intensive, and creates confusion because state and county codes can diverge; supporters said a longer cycle would improve clarity and allow more focused review. The International Code Council and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers opposed the measure, warning that delaying adoption could have negative consequences and urging the committee to let an existing statewide code-adoption strategy proceed first. Members asked about sequencing, county implementation, and whether the longer cycle would create catch-up problems, but no action was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Mar 17th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Grand Prix pipeline, which is a major pipeline, a couple billion dollar investment crossed through
  • And so, you know, typically when you develop a pipeline, and we know how important pipelines are, not
  • After we completed the pipeline. Performance bond was still there.
  • And it will be costly to continue to build pipelines.
  • These pipelines are very large.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Education Finance Committee 3/13/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Grant to pull this um and the pipeline Grant to pull this um program<00:21:01.480> off<00:21:
  • The special ed pipeline is exactly the same except it has a focus on special education.
  • She then explained that the special ed pipeline is the same, except it focuses on special education.
  • She also explained that the special ed pipeline is the same structure, but focused on special education
  • You’ve heard about the special education teacher pipeline, the special education teacher apprenticeship
Bills: HF846, HF1538, HF1959
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/18/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • increases the penalty on people who conspire to trespass or damage critical infrastructure such as pipelines
  • increases the penalty on people who conspire to trespass or damage critical infrastructure such as pipelines
  • damage critical infrastructure<00:04:42.600> such<00:04:42.800> as<00:04:43.000> pipelines
  • <00:04:43.840> utility infrastructure such as pipelines utility infrastructure such as pipelines
  • since 2002 to trespass on property containing critical public service facilities, utilities, and pipelines
Bills: HF7
TX
Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum present and took up several bills, mostly as pending business. HB 1089, creating the Gulf Coast Protection Account to be administered by the General Land Office, was laid out as the House companion to SB 795; Senator Alvarado moved it be reported favorably, and it passed the committee 8-0. The committee also adopted a committee substitute for HB 2970 and then reported it favorably 9-0, despite the motion wording recommending the substitute in lieu of the original bill. HB 2890, HB 1238, and HB 206 were each laid out and reported favorably to the full Senate by 9-0 votes. For each bill reported favorably, members also approved motions to place the bill on the local and uncontested calendar, with no objections. The transcript reflects brief procedural repetition and some garbled audio, but the actions are clear: the committee advanced all measures considered during the meeting without recorded opposition. The chair then announced there was no further business and the committee stood in recess subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part I) May 7th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • This can place an undue financial burden on pipeline developers and constructors and lead to regulatory
  • Therefore, pipeline infrastructure is essential, and construction can be hindered by the requirement
  • for a cash bond that is designed potentially to prohibit the development of a pipeline.
  • I'm here today for Target Pipeline. Thank you, sir. My name is James Mann.
  • I'm here today for Target Pipeline. We're in favor of House Bill 206.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum initially lacking, then took up several bills and heard brief testimony. HB 206, by Rep. Craddick, would prohibit counties from requiring cash bonds as a condition for pipeline construction approvals, while still allowing other forms of financial assurance; the sponsor and a Target Pipeline witness said cash-bond mandates create unnecessary costs and uncertainty, and the bill was left pending. HB 2890, by Rep. Patterson, would create an interstate compact among Gulf Coast states to coordinate and support the liquefied natural gas industry; the sponsor emphasized LNG’s economic importance and said the bill mirrors prior compact language that does not require congressional approval, and it was left pending after no public testimony. HB 1238, by Rep. Geren, would let TCEQ use third-party inspection reports and remote technology when reviewing proposed Class I injection wells; the sponsor and a uranium industry witness said it would streamline regulation and support industry, and it was left pending. HB 2970, by Rep. Paul, the House version of SB 410, would require the Gulf Coast Protection District’s final gate design to accommodate two-way vessel traffic and allow the governor to appoint the district’s presiding officer; the committee substitute was explained and the bill was left pending. With members scattered in other committees, the chair said the committee would recess and later reconvene to vote and complete its work.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • have begun imposing a cash bond requirement as a condition of approval for the construction of a pipeline
  • This can certainly place an undue financial burden on pipeline developers and construction companies,
  • I'm here today for Target Pipeline. We're in favor of House Bill 206.
  • As laid out in his explanation of the bill, we're now up to 12 counties along a pipeline route we're
  • After the entire history of the pipeline industries, we haven't needed them. Those.