Video & Transcript Research : 'penalty group'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation May 23rd, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • from the loss of blood, Caesar reached the man, treated him, and proceeded on to encourage another group
  • I'm with the US Army Ranger Association and I'm, I work with a group of Rangers out of Conroe and Ranger
  • I'm actually the secretary for that group.
  • To the lesser of 120,000 pounds or the sum of the actual group weight limits.
Bills: HB227
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • from the loss of blood, Cesar reached the man and treated him. and proceeded on to encourage another group
  • Army Ranger Association, and I work with a group of Rangers out of Conroe and Ranger Base Rudder.
  • I'm actually the secretary for that group.
  • overweight vehicles carrying any commodity to the lesser of 120,000 pounds or the sum of the actual group
Bills: HB227
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Mar 17th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So it's awesome, great group to be in front of that occasion. Happy Saint Patrick's Day as well.
  • One of the things that I hear most from the servicemen and women in my area, or, um, uh, Groups, advocacy
  • groups on their behalf is that the services are, are available but they don't know about them or connecting
  • We're a free market group here in town and I've written several books about the Middle East wars and
Bills: HB39, HB227
VA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Memorial Commission Tribute to Senator Yvonne Miller Work Group to order, and have the members introduce
  • If y'all are comfortable... ...and distribute to the work group.
  • Madam Chair, Chair, members of the work group.
  • You have a great work group here. I see. I see. You have a great work group here. I see. I see.
  • If there's no further business to discuss for the work group today, we will be adjourned.
Summary: The Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Commission Tribute to Senator Yvonne Miller Work Group met to discuss plans for Senator Miller’s portrait. Members introduced themselves, then took a walking tour of the Capitol to review possible placement locations. After returning, the group agreed the first-floor rotunda area appeared to be the best recommendation because of its visibility, traffic, and central location between the House and Senate, which was seen as especially fitting given Senator Miller’s service in both chambers. The work group also discussed how to select the portrait artist. Members described prior practices of reviewing artists’ websites or portfolios, narrowing the field to a few candidates, and then comparing style and pricing before making a choice. House staff noted that a portrait vendor or agent could help identify artists, and the group discussed whether a formal RFP was required. Counsel explained that the commission could seek an exemption under the VPPA, allowing a more flexible selection process without following the full statutory procurement procedure. Members said the exemption request would be handled quickly and included in the report for the full commission meeting the next day. They also agreed to provide a photo of the recommended portrait location for members who had not taken the tour, and to revisit the family’s preferred image so it could be matched to the portrait requirements. The meeting ended with plans to report the location recommendation and continue the portrait selection process at the full commission meeting.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Industry, Business and Labor Apr 8th, 2025 at 02:45 pm

Industry, Business and Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • mention that essential health benefits is a term that applies to the individual and small employer group
  • mention that essential health benefits is a term that applies to the individual and small employer group
  • And small employer group market, the PERS plan is a large employer group market.
  • Large employer, there are ACA requirements for large employer groups.
  • There's a lot of commonality between what's required, but from a large employer group, the Affordable
Bills: SB2160
Summary: The committee resumed work on Senate Bill 2160, which would move the Public Employees Retirement System health plan from grandfathered to non-grandfathered status under the Affordable Care Act. PERS officials Rebecca Frickie and Derek Holbein explained that the bill would allow more flexibility in plan design, including higher deductibles, co-pays, and out-of-pocket maximums, while also adding enhanced preventive benefits. They clarified that ACA “essential health benefits” apply to individual and small-group markets, not to PERS as a large employer, and that the bill’s projected cost increases were based on actuarial estimates and prior bid scenarios from Sanford and Blue Cross Blue Shield. Members debated whether the bill would actually save money or simply shift costs to employees. Supporters argued that non-grandfathered status would create more levers to manage medical inflation and could produce net premium savings through plan redesign, citing prior bid comparisons showing potential reductions of 1% to 8% depending on the option. Opponents, including Representative Schauer and North Dakota United president Nick Archelette, questioned how the state would pay for the estimated $25 million to $30 million in added benefits and warned that employees could face higher out-of-pocket costs amid already strained household budgets. Frickie said the legislature would control funding decisions and that current law requiring the state to pay full family premiums could be changed only by statute. The committee also discussed reserve funding, with members noting that a $4.3 million reserve draw in the bill was intended to cover the final months of the biennium and could be modified. After testimony and discussion, Vice Chair Johnson moved a do-pass recommendation and referral to Appropriations. The motion passed 10-3-1, with Representatives Ostlie, Schatz, and Schauer voting no. Representative Gump agreed to carry the bill.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • fully insured market, premiums this year have increased significantly both in individual and small group
  • market, and then the fully insured large group market. terms of what terms of what Repres I'll<00:14
  • market. fully insured large group market.
  • He said the increase in the cost of fully insured individual and small group coverage is part of that
  • <01:08:47.679> other of participation by another group other of participation by another group
Bills: HF3388, HF400
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from the prior day and then heard House File 400, a bill described as a defrayal measure for health insurance mandates. Representative Perryman said the bill would not block future mandates, but would require the state to pay the added costs of any new mandated benefits so those costs would not be shifted to premium payers. She and supporters framed the bill as a way to protect affordability for Minnesota employers, workers, and families, especially in the fully insured market. Testimony in support came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Council of Health Plans. They argued that Minnesota has a high number of mandated benefits, that each new mandate adds cost to premiums, and that businesses—especially small and midsize employers—are already struggling with rising health insurance costs. The health plans representative said the bill would use the existing Commerce defrayal process to reimburse plans for eligible mandate-related claims, allowing those costs to be removed from premium rates. Several members echoed support, saying the bill would improve transparency by showing the fiscal impact of proposed mandates and help prevent people from being priced out of coverage. Members also explored how mandates apply in the market and how premiums are set. Deputy Commissioner Julia Dryer explained that, unless otherwise specified, mandates generally apply to the individual, small group, and fully insured large group markets, while self-insured ERISA plans and other markets are generally outside that scope. Representative Elkins noted that the affected market is relatively small and said small businesses are increasingly moving to self-insured plans because of cost. He and others raised concerns about affordability, while Representative Smith argued that mandates often ensure needed care and that the bill shifts costs to taxpayers rather than insurers. Representative Bacham added a personal example from tribal self-insurance, saying preventive physicals had saved lives and asking whether other factors besides mandates are driving insurer costs. No amendments were offered, and the bill was laid over for possible future consideration.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 2nd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Morgan, you said the group you're with is Do No Harm. Is that correct? Yes, sir.
  • I'm a member of a ragtag group of doctors that help de-transitioners find medical care.
  • Just for clarity, this is a group of people not born just as male or female.
  • Like a broader group, if that makes sense.
  • Insurance companies also, by potentially denying coverage for mental health that relates to a group of
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 2nd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It was a very, very uniform group, as some of you've seen.
  • Texas law allows group insurance of commercial lines for large business risk.
  • HB3388 authorizes group property... ... casualty coverage for personal lines.
  • One group member cannot eat through the limit of another group member.
  • The larger the group, the better the rate would be associated with that group.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, beginning with the Zo Group. And you guys are at the table already.
  • Uh, beginning with the Zo Group. And you guys are at the table already.
  • I'm the president of Zo Education and a senior vice president with the Zo Group.
  • There were also credits or penalties when we failed to deliver on time.
  • And those penalties deliver on time.
Summary: The committee heard testimony from Michael McCurley, president of Zo Education and a senior vice president with Zo Group, about the company’s role in providing broadband and managed network services to Kentucky schools. He said Zo Education serves all Kentucky K-12 public school districts in partnership with the Kentucky Department of Education, offering more bandwidth at lower cost than the prior provider and also providing cybersecurity and network protection. He emphasized that reliable connectivity is essential for instruction, testing, remote coursework, and school administration. McCurley also addressed the ongoing contract dispute involving the Kentucky Communications Network Authority and Open Fiber Silicom, saying Zo Education is not a party to the litigation but is concerned about possible disruption to schools and students. In response to committee questions, he said the company incurred unexpected costs when it had to reroute connections and build alternate network paths, including one school move that cost more than $50,000 to serve a site generating under $2,000 per month. He said outages and incidents are more frequent when Kentucky Wired access is unavailable, and that Zo could not have bid at its current price without access to Kentucky Wired. Committee members discussed the broader implications of the dispute and the state’s broadband structure. Senator Williams said the committee’s priority is avoiding disruption to students and noted concerns about infrastructure purchases and upgrades tied to the network, saying he had not seen clear contractual support for some of the expenditures. He also referenced a future audit and said the committee should preserve options and taxpayer funds. The committee then reviewed its report to LRC, including changes related to infrastructure purchases and water asset management technology, and agreed to submit the report without a committee vote. The chair announced the next meeting would be in January, with no December meeting scheduled, and the committee adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And I can't imagine that where we are in society we are with this group of actors.
  • These groups also solicit and say, well, we're offering them a free. Cremation.
  • Whatever it takes to have penalties for bad behavior in this area—hundred percent real criminal penalties
  • We've been working on the issue of group homes for a long time.
  • were being fed dog food in these group homes because...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services Apr 16th, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Where there's no penalty tied to it, it's just, that's what the law says, but there's no penalty.
  • Real criminal penalties, absolutely.
  • It causes harm to living people in groups, as you'll hear from others today.
  • Very much, very strong criminal penalties. We'll begin this. Yes, sir.
  • We've been working on the issue of group homes for a long time.
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 2480, which would clarify that the Texas Medical Board may collect license renewal surcharge fees from all licensees to fund the Texas Physician Health Program and related administrative costs. The bill author explained the funding fix was needed after prior language was found to allow surcharges only for physicians and physician assistants. Witnesses from the Texas Physician Health Program supported the measure and described the program’s confidential monitoring and treatment services; members asked about the fee amount, which was described as capped at $15 per two-year registration cycle. The bill was left pending. The committee then took up Senate Bills 1406 and 2721, both authored by Senator Parker, addressing the handling of human remains by non-transplant anatomical donation organizations, willed body programs, and related facilities. Senator Parker and several witnesses described alleged abuses involving unclaimed bodies, consent problems, body leasing, hotel-based dissections, and mishandling of cremains, and argued for strict licensing, inspections, transparency, and criminal penalties. Supporters included families of deceased veterans and other relatives, a biomedical ethicist, the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops, and some public safety and hotel industry representatives who said legitimate training should continue but bad actors should be shut down. Opponents or cautious witnesses from accredited donation organizations and bioskills labs said they support stronger oversight but warned the bills could unintentionally disrupt legitimate medical education and urged clearer language and implementation of existing law. Both bills were left pending. Senate Bill 1681, by Senator Menendez, would require counties and municipalities that regulate boarding homes to report facility standards and related information to the Health and Human Services Commission. The author said the bill is intended to improve state oversight of boarding homes that serve elderly and disabled residents and to address abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The bill was left pending after brief discussion. After the testimony portion, the committee returned to voting on pending business and unanimously reported Senate Bills 527, 912, 1580, 1952, and 2032 to the Senate with recommendations that they do pass and be printed, and each was also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted a committee substitute for Senate Bill 407 and reported the substitute favorably, with six ayes and three nays. The committee then moved on to Senate Bill 500 as pending business.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 27th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, each of you, based on your, the groups you represent and your own life's work, um, are in pro-life
  • hospitals that perform or permit a pregnancy termination will not be subject to civil or criminal penalties
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JDC-WLA, JDC, JDC Public Hearings 02-18-2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • a working group to specifically recommend how to handle these issues and ensure a smooth transition.
  • part of the stakeholder group.
  • And that's a to that particular group?
  • to choose a primary or a partisan group to choose a primary or a partisan group for<00:46:57.640
  • Um, a group and rights of crime victims.
Bills: SB2041
Summary: The committees heard SB 2041, which would repeal the Land Court, transfer its functions to the Bureau of Conveyances, and create a working group to recommend implementation. DLNR and Judiciary stood on their written testimony, while Realtors supported the bill and one testifier raised concerns about the loss of judicial authority, title disputes, adverse possession, and possible effects on Kuleana lands. Members questioned whether property could be deregistered and what the legal consequences would be, and the Bureau of Conveyances said deregistration is already available but burdensome. The committees ultimately recommended passage with amendments, and the measure was adopted by both committees. The Judiciary Committee then heard SB 2247, which restricts certain governor-appointed, Senate-confirmed executive branch employees from participating in campaign fundraising. The State Ethics Commission and Campaign Spending Commission supported the bill as a way to curb pay-to-play concerns and the appearance of undue influence, and several advocacy and civic groups also testified in support, with one person opposing. The committee agreed to amend the bill so the restrictions apply only after confirmation and continue until the person leaves the covered position. The committee voted to pass SB 2247 with amendments. Finally, the Judiciary Committee heard SB 2143, which would make the Attorney General the interim Chief Election Officer if that office becomes vacant until the Elections Commission appoints a replacement. Supporters argued the bill would provide continuity, prevent delays in certifying election results, and protect election integrity; opponents argued it would politicize the office, create a conflict of interest, and was unnecessary because current law already provides a process for filling vacancies. Testimony was extensive and sharply divided, with many speakers on both sides. The transcript provided does not include a final vote or action on SB 2143.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, I know I've been in work groups and things like that, and we've discussed this bill.
  • While this bill focuses on the right to refuse any type of care versus refusing care to a specific group
  • of people, the fact remains that specific groups of people are more likely to need certain kinds of
  • Nations with a minimum $5,000 civil penalty.
  • I'm with a group of health plans, and we're testifying in support of Senate Bill 1332 today, as you've
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, we will discuss ending the disability penalty to the basic allotment, which is causing
  • This session, I've learned about the disability penalty.
  • My friend, who's here today, serves more students in her groups than she's supposed to.
  • So the money in HB 2 is equivalent to what it would cost to erase the disability penalty.
  • We've got how many other groups? Sabrina is with ARCA Texas.
Summary: The meeting primarily focused on special education funding, with significant discussions around House Bill 2 (HB2), Senate Bill 568 (SB568), and House Bill 3928 (HB3928). Key speakers advocated for increased funding to close the estimated $1.7 billion annual gap that affects special education in Texas public schools. Several witnesses, including educators and students affected by dyslexia, provided personal testimonies about the impact of insufficient funding and the disability penalty, which penalizes schools financially for identifying students needing special education services. The committee demonstrated a strong commitment to advocate for changes that would improve special education resources and training for teachers, thereby ensuring that all Texas children receive the educational support they need to thrive.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Thu Apr 16, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • The third is convening a working group.
  • ecosystem as a whole and to also include ticket sellers on this working group.
  • Sure, we'd be happy to look at that, and if we're included in the working group...
  • I'm sure we'd be happy to look into that as part of the working group. Okay, thank you.
  • if we're included in the working group if we're included in the working group >> [laughter
Bills: SCR118, SCR173
Summary: The Committee on Consumer Protection heard two resolutions. SCR 118 SD1 would urge the Insurance Division and the Attorney General to convene a working group on climate change impacts on insurance availability and affordability. The Insurance Division deferred to written testimony, while the Attorney General opposed the measure because of an ongoing lawsuit, asking that references to legal recovery and the AG’s role in convening the group be removed. Members questioned how the resolution might relate to the state’s climate damages litigation and whether it could inform damages calculations. The committee later recommended passage with amendments, including removing the Attorney General as co-convener and changing certain membership references to board chairs; the motion passed unanimously with one excused member. The committee also heard SCR 173 SD1, which would create a task force on event ticket scalping. The Office of Consumer Protection supported the concept but asked to be added as a task force member and said the draft left its role unclear. Supporters, including the National Independent Venue Association and D-BAT, described high resale prices, fraudulent or speculative tickets, and harm to consumers and local businesses. StubHub and the Ticket Policy Forum supported the task force but urged broader scope to include the primary ticket market and ticket sellers, and StubHub also sought inclusion on the task force. Members discussed whether the task force should focus on the secondary market or the broader ticketing ecosystem, and whether the Office of Consumer Protection should be part of the task force or only consulted. The vice chair recommended passage with amendments adding the Office of Consumer Protection as a member and clarifying the consultation language, and the committee adopted that recommendation unanimously with one excused member.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:01:20.240> when provides higher criminal penalties when provides higher criminal penalties
  • <00:02:12.160> are from conflict, stronger penalties are from conflict, stronger penalties
  • The bill increases the charge and penalties when an assault of an employee or agent of an HRA occurs.
  • The bill increases the charge<00:03:48.400> and<00:03:48.640> penalties<00:03:49.120>
  • House File 3951 is one of those good bills where you have multiple different groups and advocacy groups
Bills: HF4141, HF3951