Video & Transcript Research : 'paternity'

Page 1 of 17
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships May 5th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • that would include medical procedures that meet evidentiary standards for the court in adjudicating paternity
  • happy to get back with you on that, but as I understand that the accepted procedures for determining paternity
  • or excuse me for determining paternity would allow for that.
  • As written, the bill does not require a paternity test.
  • fine if you acknowledge. the child is yours that's fine but there should be a requirement for a paternity
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/20/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • bill, Senate Bill 1661, on behalf of a constituent in my district that raised the issue regarding paternity
  • Currently, in Arizona law, there exist four automatic presumptions of paternity, but no manner for presumed
  • bill, Senate Bill 1661, on behalf of a constituent in my district that raised the issue regarding paternity
  • Currently, in Arizona law, there exists four automatic presumptions of paternity, but no manner for presumed
Summary: The Senate Judiciary and Elections Committee heard and advanced several election, judiciary, child welfare, and criminal justice measures. SB 1489 would require paid petition circulators for initiatives and referenda to disclose their name, state of residence, and paid status verbally and on a badge, add registration requirements for certain local circulators, prohibit pay by signature for local measures, and apply strict compliance and funding-disclosure rules to local initiatives. The ACLU opposed it as compelled speech and a burden on political expression, while the Arizona Chamber supported it as transparency and parity with state-level rules. The committee recommended the bill do pass on a 4-3 vote. SB 1609, an emergency measure concerning political party names, would require proposed party names to be distinguishable from existing parties and bar use of terms like “independent” or similar variations. The Arizona Independent Party opposed it as a retroactive change and “cartel protection,” while county election officials and the Arizona Association of Counties supported it as reducing voter confusion. The committee adopted an amendment and recommended the bill do pass on a 7-0 vote. SCR 1040, a voter-approved constitutional referral, would raise the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices of courts of record from 70 to 75; supporters argued it reflects longer life expectancy and preserves experienced judges, while opponents said voters previously rejected a similar proposal and that an age limit is preferable. It passed 5-2. The committee also considered SB 1234, which changes juvenile court representation rules by requiring a guardian ad litem in dependency and termination cases and allowing appointment of an attorney for the child depending on age and ability to express an opinion. Sponsor Senator Werner said the bill was part of a broader child-safety reform effort informed by cases such as Rebecca Baptiste, arguing that a guardian ad litem with attorney authority would better protect children’s best interests. Child welfare attorneys and advocates opposed the bill, saying children need a dedicated attorney-client relationship, confidentiality, and a voice separate from the court or DCS; DCS remained neutral. The committee adopted an amendment and recommended the bill do pass on a 5-2 vote. SB 1661 would allow a presumed father to be relieved of child support obligations if genetic testing shows he is not the biological father; supporters described cases where men remained liable despite exclusionary DNA results, and the bill passed 6-0. Later, the committee heard election administration and transparency bills. SB 1392 would give governing bodies canvassing elections access to locations where election materials are created, handled, processed, tabulated, or stored, so they can observe procedures and review records while protecting secrecy and security; county officials raised concerns about the term “agent,” and the bill passed 4-3. SB 1634 would require ADOT to provide county recorders with a copy of an applicant’s handwritten signature when facilitating voter registration; county officials said it would improve signature comparison, and the bill passed 5-2 after a vote correction. SB 1743 would redact an individual donor’s employer street number, employer name, or residence address from public campaign finance reports, with penalties for improper disclosure; supporters cited privacy and safety, while opponents argued employer information is important for transparency and identifying influence. It passed 5-2. SB 1099, a strike-everything amendment, set statutory criteria for defamation claims involving public or private figures and public or private concerns, including falsity, reckless disregard, and context; it passed 4-3. After a recess, the committee heard SB 1535, which increases penalties for buyers of sexual conduct, including making the conduct a class 6 felony and adding a $200 assessment to support anti-human trafficking services. The sponsor and supporters, including survivors, law enforcement, neighborhood advocates, and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, said the bill targets demand that fuels trafficking and neighborhood disorder. Opponents from criminal justice and anti-violence groups said the bill should include a rebuttable presumption to better protect trafficking victims. The committee adopted an amendment and recommended the bill do pass.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • An unrebutted presumption of paternity, an effective acknowledgment of paternity, and adjudication of
  • paternity, adoption. or the man's consent.
  • And specifically provides that maternity may be established in the same way as paternity under the Family
  • as a non-parent and, um, uh, and they don't I don't have, like a father has to register with the paternity
  • As I've investigated it myself, you know, my paternal grandmother passed away from a heart attack.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 22nd, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • The process involves collecting DNA to determine paternity with the unknown father.
  • We do need that piece of information, the paternity piece.
  • Ultimately, it gets submitted to the court, when appropriate, to determine paternity.
  • At the bottom, it's going to have that paternity determination on it.
  • The court has ordered a paternity test, right?
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (10/08/2025)

Health, Human Services & Elderly Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • and in cases establishment of paternity and in cases it<00:38:03.599> might<00:38:03.839>
  • and or parentage if establish paternity and or parentage if you<00:52:16.880> will.
  • Specifically, birth records, marriage records, death records, paternity status records, and domestic
  • for as many uh children as we paternity for as many uh children as we can<00:57:23.280> serve.
  • So in that case, any kind of paternity test wouldn't back up this assertion.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

November 18, 2025 - 08:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • if your bill was to be applicable would unmarried parents need to determine paternity before a child
  • So in order for unmarried parents, there has to be an establishment of paternity.
  • I want to make sure I'm clear: would that paternity be established prior to birth, or would that be,
  • So would that paternity be established prior to birth, or is that something that would be established
  • That if paternity is at issue, it will have to be determined before there can be claim and damages.
Summary: The Civil Justice and Claims Subcommittee met to consider one measure, PCS for HB 289, which would amend Florida’s wrongful death statute to allow parents of an unborn child to recover damages for the child’s wrongful death and to include parents in the definition of survivors. The sponsor said the bill is intended to give parents a remedy when a wrongful act, negligence, breach of contract, or breach of warranty causes the loss of an unborn child, while also preserving existing protections for lawful medical care and the mother. Members questioned the bill extensively about the meaning of “survivors,” whether it could reach surrogacy situations, friends or family who assist someone in obtaining abortion care, paternity issues, and whether abusive or unqualified fathers could bring claims. The sponsor repeatedly said the bill is limited to parents, does not authorize suits against the mother or lawful medical providers, and would still require the normal wrongful death procedures, including appointment of a personal representative. He cited Duncan v. Flynn as the case holding that current law does not allow recovery for the death of an unborn child. Representative Gottlieb offered an amendment modeled on criminal-law protections, aimed at expanding explicit immunity for a pregnant woman and for persons providing medical care or abortion-related conduct with consent. Supporters of the amendment said it would better align civil law with criminal protections; opponents argued it was overly broad and could shield unlicensed conduct. The amendment failed on a voice vote. Public testimony was divided, with supporters from pro-life and Catholic organizations backing the bill and some asking to remove the health care exemption, while opponents from ACLU, Equality Florida, Planned Parenthood affiliates, Florida Voice for the Unborn, Voices of Florida, and others warned the bill could chill reproductive health care, increase liability for doctors and hospitals, and invite lawsuits involving surrogates, family members, and abortion-related care. In debate, supporters said the bill simply recognizes the value of unborn children and gives parents a remedy for wrongful loss, while opponents argued it could create unintended consequences in family law, surrogacy, IVF, and medical practice, and could empower abusive partners or rapists. After closing remarks, the committee voted 13 yeas and 3 nays to report PCS for HB 289 favorably. The meeting then adjourned.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary A May 5th, 2026

Judiciary A

Transcript Highlights:
  • What we seek to do is to simplify the process of acknowledgments of paternity.
  • So is this, is voluntary mean you're offering an acknowledgement of paternity or it's correct.
  • "Have nobody that is a financially responsible paternal party."
  • had an acknowledgment of paternity." "...had an acknowledgment of paternity, so about 70% had an acknowledgment
  • of paternity process."
Keywords: 974, senate, all