Video & Transcript Research : 'parenting consultant'

Page 1 of 496
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/12/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Parenting consultants family law.
  • parenting consultant still had the parenting consultant still had the opportunity<00:45:19.440> to
  • And there are parental consultants.
  • <01:00:57.440> consultant must use what the parental consultant must use what the parental
  • <01:02:35.040> says parenting consultant says parenting consultant says um<01:02:36.799>
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • parenting time or legal decision-making if that parent has been awarded less than 35%. ...to award parenting
  • time or legal decision-making if that parent has been awarded less than 35% parenting time or no legal
  • or a co-parent.
  • may have a majority of time, or that both parents are entitled to 50-50 co-parenting time.
  • Instead, we have parents who spend... ...and parenting time.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 19, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Shared parenting deescalates backlog. Shared parenting deescalates the<00:37:31.839> war.
  • parents.
  • Uh please pass shared parenting parents.
  • two parents.
  • better off being raised by two parents. better off being raised by two parents.
Bills: SF0099, SF0116, SJ0006
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Retirement and Government Resources 2ND REVISED Apr 7th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Retirement and Government Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Central purchasing must post an assessment of the contracts, particularly where consulting is involved
  • Involved to make sure we get a report from the agencies that the consultant provided actionable items
  • Bill 3413 requires state agencies to include detailed information on their use of contractors and consultants
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 4th, 2026 at 09:26 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • And because they found out who the parenting students are, they were able to get family-friendly spaces
  • But I'm considering the student that only has a single parent because you become underneath the same
  • It makes it harder on the student and on the parent.
  • Yes, so any way we can support students, whether it's dual parents or single parents, any way we can
  • Okay, so they're not hiring consultants.
Bills: SB132, SM16, SM17
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Labor, Health & Social Services Committee, March 2, 2026

Labor, Health & Social Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's number six shared parenting day.
  • Since then, Missouri, parenting law.
  • parents even after separation. parents even after separation.
  • > healthier cooperative parenting builds healthier cooperative parenting builds healthier kids
  • <00:04:16.639> in irreplaceable role of both parents in irreplaceable role of both parents
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/24/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, this language is just adding disagreement alone over the amount of parenting time, parenting time
  • schedule parenting time, parenting time schedule parenting time, parenting time schedule or<01:42
  • of parents to cooperate, etc. of parents to cooperate, etc.
  • <01:42:43.400> So, parenting time discussion. So, parenting time discussion.
  • parents fully present in their lives. parents fully present in their lives.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 5th, 2026 at 04:07 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • a policy change of this magnitude warrants robust dialogue, broad stakeholder engagement, and consultation
  • But basically, when we go in, management is able to use the auditors as a tool, kind of as a consultant
Bills: SB145, SB143
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Feb 9th, 2026 at 09:04 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • . that teachers have to have, as well as the struggle with parents.
  • parents is championing something else.
  • parents is championing something else.
  • I know they don't want to have those difficult conversations with parents.
  • I was a former foster parent.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Feb 9th, 2026 at 08:33 am

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • My parents knew about it. Nobody's going after this girl. Just a statement. Just a statement.
  • understandable by the district, by the school, and the school impacts a lot of people in that—not only the parents
  • MSBA with the complete absence of consultation in development of the proposed legislation by the LESC
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Feb 11th, 2026 at 09:06 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Medical centers in a consulting role and operational role.
  • Chair, that UNM and Santa Fe Community College have already asked students if there are any parenting
  • With this legislature's investment in the Opportunity Scholarship, more and more parents are returning
  • We know parenting students are more likely to leave college before they receive a degree, and we must
  • These parents are attending school, almost always directly driven by their goals to improve the lives
Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Feb 11th, 2026 at 08:39 am

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • parents on the status of their students.
  • So we wanted to lighten that load for teachers and kind of an parents to inform them.
  • And the other part is the parental notification that I find extremely important.
  • As well as the parents, there are some very concerned parents.
  • I am showing support of this bill as a parent in New Mexico.
Bills: SB234, SB210, SB243, SB244, SM16, HB8
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/26/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Summary: The committee first took up SB 1655, which would have allowed qualified jurors to serve as temporary election workers instead of jury service if summoned 90 to 120 days before an election. The Arizona Association of Counties opposed the bill, saying the timing would create major planning and tracking problems for county jury commissioners and courts, and noting that jury service can already be excused in some circumstances. Members also raised concerns that jury duty and poll work are fundamentally different responsibilities. The motion for a due pass recommendation failed, 4-5, and the bill did not advance. The committee then heard SB 1751 and the related SCR 1049, both dealing with Arizona execution methods. The bills would expand the available methods of execution to include firing squad and lethal gas, alongside lethal injection, with the SCR going to voters. Senator Payne argued the change was needed because Arizona has had problems with past execution methods and that the inmate would choose among the options. Opponents, including a death penalty attorney and a corrections chaplain, argued the methods raise constitutional, operational, staffing, and trauma concerns, and that Arizona should not revive methods with a history of botched or prolonged executions. SB 1751 received a due pass recommendation, 6-2 with one absent and one present, and SCR 1049 also received a due pass recommendation, 6-2 with one absent and one present. The committee next considered SB 1317 as a strike-everything amendment appropriating $20 million in opioid settlement/remediation funds for county coordinated reentry planning services and a statewide database. Supporters from the Arizona Sheriffs Association and county sheriffs said the program has shown strong recidivism reductions, helps people transition from county jails back into the community, and should expand to more counties. Members asked about data, funding timing, and whether all counties should participate; supporters said the amount would likely be negotiated in the budget process and that the database funding was needed to track outcomes. The strike-everything amendment was adopted, and SB 1317 as amended passed 9-0 with one absent. Finally, the committee heard SB 1656, which would change how courts appoint professional personnel in family court cases and set guidelines for those appointees. Court representatives submitted written concerns, saying the bill would duplicate existing practice, require unnecessary and costly depositions of experts before appointment, mandate recordings of all interactions, and extend the statute of limitations for lawsuits. With no sponsor present and no outside speakers, members expressed concern that the bill was unnecessary and potentially costly. SB 1656 failed to receive a due pass recommendation, with three nays, six votes not in favor, and one absent.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/19/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • don't always get spent in a way that benefits the taxpayers who foot the local property tax bill, the parents
  • CAP supports all educational options in Arizona and the ability of parents to choose among them.
  • What we hear from parents is they want smaller class sizes. They want better funded teachers.
  • It is a common-sense measure that is in line with the majority of Arizona parents and Arizona families
Summary: The Senate Committee on Government considered only SCR 1032, along with a strike-everything amendment. The amendment would require school districts, subject to voter approval, to dedicate at least 60% of operational spending to teacher pay, with a phased-in increase starting in FY 2028 for districts below that threshold. It also would penalize noncompliant districts by requiring unexpended Classroom Site Fund monies to revert, making districts ineligible for those funds until back in compliance, and directing JLBC to exclude those districts from per-pupil calculations. The Superintendent of Public Instruction could grant limited waivers of the forfeiture provisions for up to one year, not more than two consecutive years for the same district. Supporters, including representatives of Heritage Action, the Goldwater Institute, and the Center for Arizona Policy, argued that Arizona has increased school funding substantially while teacher pay has remained flat in real terms, and said the measure would improve accountability and ensure more money reaches teachers rather than district administration. They cited Auditor General findings and prior voter-approved efforts such as the Classroom Site Fund and teacher pay initiatives as evidence that districts have not prioritized classroom spending as intended. A rural school coalition testified in opposition, saying the proposal would be difficult for small districts to meet because it could force cuts to other essential costs such as fuel, insurance, facilities, and other operating needs, and that the Auditor General’s classroom-spending categories may not accurately reflect actual teacher pay. One committee member also raised concerns that the measure could harm special education and other legally required student services. During discussion, the sponsor said charter schools were excluded because they are private businesses under the state’s framework, despite receiving public funds. The committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and then voted 4-3 to give SCR 1032, as amended, a do pass recommendation.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • to state that one parent or the other isn't a parent.
  • ... ...and we're saying, you know, my client's a fit parent, but this parent isn't a fit parent because
  • The other parent of the child can't complain about that parent being in the home unless that parent has
  • between a parent... ...and a non-parent.
  • non-parent.