Video & Transcript Research : 'nomination hearing'

Page 1 of 500
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Business meeting to consider the nomination of Michael Faulkender, of Maryland, to be Deputy Secretary of the Treasury; to be immediately followed by hearings to examine the nomination of Mehmet Oz, of Pennsylvania, to be Administrator of the Centers Mar 14th, 2025 at 09:00 am

Finance Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • back into session for the hearing for Dr.
  • Falkender's hearing, the Finance Committee has an arduous nomination process and once the nominee completes
  • Faulconer's nomination. nomination. I now recognize Ranking Member Wyden for his remarks.
  • It is, I have to say, a refreshing moment to hear hear somebody in the Finance Committee hearing room
  • Congratulations on your nomination.
Keywords: Michael Falkender, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, IRS, taxpayer privacy, nomination process, committee hearing
Summary: The committee convened to discuss critical issues surrounding the nomination of Michael Falkender for the position of Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. This meeting included a series of remarks from committee members who expressed divergent views on Falkender's qualifications and the implications of his appointment. Senator Wyden voiced strong opposition, arguing that Falkender represents harmful policies expected to be perpetuated under the current administration, especially concerning taxpayer privacy and IRS tactics. Meanwhile, other members defended Falkender, noting his extensive experience, including a commitment to transparency in government operations if confirmed.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Hearings to examine the nominations of Patrick David Davis, of Maryland, John Andrew Eisenberg, of Virginia, and Brett Shumate, of Virginia, each to be an Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice. Mar 26th, 2025 at 09:15 am

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • You're no stranger to the role you've been nominated to.
  • to consider our nominations.
  • I also want to thank President Trump for nominating me.
  • from him in some committee hearings sometime soon, too.
  • With that, this hearing is adjourned. Thank you.
Keywords: John Eisenberg, assistant attorney general, national security, China Initiative, Department of Justice, judicial authority, executive actions, nomination hearing
Summary: The committee meeting primarily involved discussions around key nominations and pressing legal issues pertaining to the Department of Justice. Notable discussions included the nomination of John Eisenberg for assistant attorney general for national security, where concerns over the revival of the China Initiative were raised. Senators expressed significant apprehensions regarding previous actions taken under this initiative and its implications for national security. Additionally, there were critiques of the broader implications of executive actions that challenge judicial authority, aligning with ongoing dialogues about the integrity of the judiciary and executive oversight.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Business meeting to consider the nominations of Patrick David Davis, of Maryland, John Andrew Eisenberg, of Virginia, and Brett Shumate, of Virginia, all to be an Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice. Apr 10th, 2025 at 09:15 am

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It has long been the committee practice that we don't hold hearings on U.S. attorneys' nominations.
  • He initially said that he wanted to hold a vote today on whether to hold a hearing on the nomination.
  • I join my colleagues in calling for a hearing on Ed Martin's nomination and it's bad enough that he praised
  • I also urge this committee, and I join with several colleagues to hold a hearing on Ed Martin's nomination
  • I fully support Ranking Member Durbin's request that we have a hearing on the nomination and Mr.
Keywords: nomination, Patrick Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Ed Martin, January 6th, public testimony
Summary: This meeting focused primarily on the nomination of Patrick Davis to serve as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legislative Affairs. Members discussed Mr. Davis's qualifications and experience, emphasizing his commitment to effectively serving the American public and working collaboratively with Congress. The committee also briefly revisited the nominations of John Eisenberg and Brett Shumate but decided to hold them over until the next meeting. Additionally, concerns regarding the nomination of Ed Martin as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia were raised, particularly regarding his past statements and conduct related to the January 6th insurrection and its aftermath. The discussion highlighted the importance of reviewing Mr. Martin's responses to various questions before proceeding with a vote on his nomination.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Hearings to examine the nomination of Lieutenant General John D. Caine (Retired), to be general and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Defense. Apr 1st, 2025 at 08:30 am

Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel

Transcript Highlights:
  • General Kane, you have been nominated to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
  • We must start by acknowledging the usual conditions around your nomination.
  • General Kane, we will now hear your testimony. You're recognized.
  • regardless of whether or not they want to hear it.
  • Testimony that we've had at numerous hearings is it's inadequate.
Keywords: national security, military readiness, Kane nomination, defense budget, China threats, Russia, collaboration, modernization
Summary: The meeting centered on the nomination of retired Lieutenant General Dan Kane for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delving into various security concerns and the strategic environment facing the U.S. today. Testimonies highlighted the growing threats from adversaries such as China and Russia, with discussions around the necessity of maintaining and modernizing military capabilities to address these challenges. The need for agility in military operations and enhancing collaboration among various defense agencies was underscored. Further, concerns were raised regarding the defense budget and the importance of a strong national defense strategy were prevalent throughout the discussions. The committee members collectively emphasized the need for superior readiness and modernization to keep pace with global threats.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Business meeting to consider the nomination of Frank Bisignano, of New Jersey, to be Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Mar 31st, 2025 at 11:00 pm

Finance Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • You You RINGING BEEP to vote on the nomination of Frank Bisignano to be Commissioner of the Social Security
  • Bisignano's nomination, and we will notify members of a time and location later today to conduct the
  • At his nomination hearing, Mr.
  • I urge my colleagues to support his nomination. And I recognize now Ranking Member Wyden.
  • I am speaking against this nomination.
Keywords: Frank Bisignano, Social Security Administration, Doge, nomination, committee, customer service, staffing issues, Senate
Summary: The meeting of the Finance Committee primarily focused on the nomination of Frank Bisignano for Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Members discussed the nominee's qualifications extensively, raising concerns about his past connections to Doge and the implications for Social Security. Several Senators expressed doubts about Bisignano's ability to improve the existing issues faced by the Social Security Administration, particularly related to staffing, customer service, and the potential for service cuts that could ultimately harm beneficiaries. The atmosphere was contentious, with divisive opinions visible among the committee members as they scrutinized Bisignano's past dealings and strategies.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Hearings to examine the nomination of Michael Faulkender, of Maryland, to be Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. Mar 6th, 2025 at 09:00 am

Finance Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Falkender, congratulations on your well-deserved nomination.
  • hearing.
  • No typical nomination hearing for the Finance Committee. It is our understanding that Mr.
  • So today's hearing in effect becomes as much about oversight as it does the Falkender nomination.
  • I look forward to this hearing and certainly Mr.
Keywords: nomination, Deputy Secretary of Treasury, economic policy, inflation, tariffs, tribal nations, government relations
Summary: The meeting convened to consider the nomination of Mike Falkender for the position of Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. During the session, multiple members voiced concerns regarding current economic policies under the Trump administration, particularly around inflation, tariffs, and the impact on small businesses. Discussions frequently centered on the administration's approach to tariffs and taxation, and how these factors contribute to the rising cost of living and potential job losses. Additionally, the importance of bolstering government-to-government relationships with tribal nations was emphasized, highlighting the need for specialized offices focused on tribal affairs within the Treasury Department.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Business meeting to consider the nomination of Reed Rubinstein, of Maryland, to be Legal Adviser of the Department of State; to be immediately followed by a hearing to examine the nominations of David Perdue, of Georgia, to be Ambassador to the Peopl Apr 3rd, 2025 at 09:30 am

Foreign Relations Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • So anyway, let's go ahead. and start with the nominations hearing, and we will start with, we have two
  • people we're going to hear. here today, we're going to hear Senator David Perdue and Ms.
  • We will then hear from the two nominees.
  • Crowley, we hear about the actors.
  • Hearing is adjourned Thank you
Keywords: committee meeting, bill discussions, nomination, David Perdue, Monica Crawley, U.S.-China relations, foreign policy
Summary: The meeting of the committee was marked by significant discussions regarding various bills, including HB22 and SB5. A notable moment was the introduction of nominees Senator David Perdue and Ms. Monica Crawley, which led to discussions on the implications of their roles, particularly in relation to U.S.-China relations and foreign policy. Members exchanged views on the nominees' qualifications, emphasizing the importance of leadership in foreign diplomacy. Additionally, the committee heard testimonies from several witnesses both supporting and opposing certain bills, showcasing the diverse perspectives present.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Business meeting to consider the nominations of Stephen Miran, of New York, to be Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Jeffrey Kessler, of Virginia, to be Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, William Pulte, of Florida, to b Mar 6th, 2025 at 10:00 am

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I asked questions for the record after a hearing to get detailed answers about how nominees think about
  • Jonathan McKernan, nominated to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is clearly being sent
  • Jeffrey Kessler is nominated to a key national security position.
  • The nominations hereby ordered reported favorably to the full Senate. Next we will consider Mr.
  • The nominations hereby are reported favorably to the full Senate.
Keywords: nomination, Senator Warren, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Undersecretary of Commerce, accountability, oversight
Summary: The committee convened to discuss several nominations, notably for key positions including the directors of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Undersecretary of Commerce. Senator Warren raised significant concerns during her opposition to all four nominees, citing their failure to provide satisfactory answers regarding their qualifications and policy perspectives. She expressed particular alarm over Jonathan McKernan's ties to external influences and Jeffrey Kessler's hesitance to acknowledge geopolitical threats, leading to discussions about accountability in nominations and oversight. The votes resulted in a mixed outcome, with some nominees being approved while others faced substantial opposition.
US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Business meeting to consider S.331, to amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and the nomination of Kashyap Patel, of Nevada, to be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Departmen Feb 13th, 2025 at 08:00 am

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • President Trump, I hope you hear that.
  • President Trump, I hope you hear that.
  • At his hearing, Mr.
  • He tried to deny that he had produced the song at his nomination hearing in response to my question saying
  • Patel spent his nomination hearing avoiding every hard question.
Bills: SB331
Keywords: fentanyl, controlled substances, drug trafficking, public health, research regulations, law enforcement, Kash Patel, FBI director nomination, S331, Fentanyl Act, committee meeting, legislative discussion
Summary: In this committee meeting, the primary focus was on the nomination of Kash Patel for the position of director of the FBI, which had sparked considerable debate over the past week. Members discussed the extensive vetting process Patel underwent, including a lengthy hearing where he addressed numerous questions, which emphasized his qualifications and the support he received from various law enforcement organizations. The meeting included significant arguments from both sides, reflecting the polarized nature of the nomination, especially regarding the allegations made against Patel by some committee members. As discussions continued, the committee decided to hold off on the Fentanyl Act, listed as S331, until the next meeting, indicating a prioritization of the nomination vote over new legislative measures at this time.
AZ
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • So first, thank you for hearing the bill.
  • So first thank you for hearing the bill.
  • Thank you for hearing House Bill 2976.
  • Let's hear. Yeah. I think we hear it will hold off on moving. Let's hear what we'll. Mr.
  • For the discussion, hearing none.
Bills: HB2226, HB2406, HB2663, HB2695, HB2805, HB2976
Keywords: veteran status, veterans court, treatment court, diversion program, initial appearance, arrestee processing, criminal procedure, DD-214, Department of Veterans' Services, prosecuting agency, court notification, military service, armed forces, veterans benefits, reentry, mental health court, drug court, specialty court, Arizona criminal law, pretrial hearing
Summary: The committee first took up HB 2663, which updates military leave protections for state and non-state employees by aligning statutory language with how service members’ orders are described. Representative Pena said the change was intended to remove confusion without affecting benefits, and members noted it would help protect employees called to training, deployment, or state active duty. The bill passed unanimously with a due pass recommendation. The committee then heard HB 2976, a bill addressing administrative control of justice courts and due process for elected justices of the peace when state or county entities take action affecting their statutory authority. Supporters, including two Pima County justices of the peace, described administrative orders that transferred control of their courts without notice, findings, or a meaningful chance to respond, and argued the bill would require notice, a hearing, written findings, and review before such changes. The Arizona Supreme Court’s government affairs director opposed the bill as unconstitutional, arguing the state constitution gives the Chief Justice administrative supervision over all courts and that the legislature cannot impose those procedures by statute. After a lengthy and at times contentious exchange over constitutional authority and the role of elected JPs, the committee voted 6-1 to give HB 2976 a due pass recommendation. After a recess, the committee considered HB 2406, which requires the Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services to study how aware veterans are of available state, local, and federal benefits and to report recommendations for improving awareness. Testimony in support emphasized that many veterans do not know the full range of benefits available to them and suggested surveys, outreach, and other low-cost methods to gather information. Some members questioned whether a study was necessary or how it would be conducted, but several said they would support it for now; the bill received a due pass recommendation by a 5-1-1 vote. Finally, the committee heard HB 2226, which requires courts at initial appearance hearings to ask whether a defendant is a veteran and, if so, to consider referral to veterans’ treatment or diversion programs. Supporters said the bill would help identify eligible veterans early in the process and connect them to services, while one member raised Fifth Amendment concerns about asking the question before counsel is present. The sponsor and testifier agreed to work on an amendment clarifying that the answer could not be used against the defendant in later proceedings. The committee moved the bill forward with a due pass recommendation, with members indicating support pending that amendment.
WY
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee, February 18, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

WY
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions, February 18, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

AZ
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're going to hear Mr. Colleton's bill first. It's HB 2908.
  • Well, let's hear 2608. Well, let's hear House Bill 2608. Mr.
  • Chair, members, I do appreciate you hearing this bill. Mr.
  • Chair, members, I do appreciate you hearing this bill.
  • Yeah, hearing none. Okay. So I guess we're going to hear your bill.
Bills: HB2424, HB2608, HB2775, HB2805, HB2908
Keywords: Arizona political parties, precinct committeeman, precinct committeemen, proxy voting, party bylaws, county committee, state committee, qualified elector, election administration, political party rules, precinct representation, adjoining precinct, county party meeting, proxy attestation, notary public, witnesses, transitional housing, military veterans, grant program, housing services
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2908, which would impose criminal penalties on faithless Arizona Article V convention delegates, require delegates to take an oath, and direct the legislature and governor to ratify any approved amendment through the normal legislative process. The sponsor argued the bill adds guardrails to any future convention, while Common Cause Arizona opposed it as ineffective and insufficient to prevent a runaway convention. After debate about whether the bill could meaningfully constrain delegates, the committee voted 5-2 to return HB 2908 with a do pass recommendation. The committee then considered HB 2608, a veterans housing measure creating a military transitional housing grant program at the Arizona Department of Housing with a $7 million General Fund appropriation in FY 2027 and changes to the military transitional housing fund. Testimony focused on revisions to the bill, including limiting use of funds to new construction and requiring veteran-led or veteran-managed organizations. Several members said the bill was too similar to prior versions and had not gone through the Veterans Caucus process. On a motion to table, the committee voted to lay HB 2608 on the table. After a recess, the committee took up HB 2805, as amended, which creates a secure online portal for nomination petition signatures for local governing board candidates and related election administration changes. The sponsor said the bill was intended to give school board candidates and other local candidates equal access to the state’s electronic signature system, while members debated whether requiring candidates to declare party affiliation would undermine nonpartisan races. The Gillette amendment was adopted, and the committee then voted 5-2 to return HB 2805 as amended with a do pass recommendation. Finally, the committee heard HB 2775, which would bar the state and its subdivisions from using state assets or money to implement or enforce rules, taxes, or policies of international organizations, and would add restrictions on Arizona public universities’ dealings with certain foreign entities. Members discussed a proposed amendment to create oversight of foreign funding at Arizona State University and the Board of Regents, but raised concerns about rulemaking authority and constitutional issues. The committee ultimately voted to hold HB 2775 for further work, and then adjourned.
HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

ECD Public Hearing - Wed Feb 10, 2021 @ 9:30 AM

HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HET Public Hearing - Wed Feb 3, 2021 @ 2:00PM

HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Tue Feb 9, 2021 @ 2 PM

HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HTH/PDP Joint Hearing - Fri Feb 26, 2021 @ 1 PM

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HWN Public Hearing 02-14-2023 1:00pm

MS
MS

Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Metro Area Utility Update Hearing - Room 113, Oct. 23, 2025; 10:00 AM

US
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

A joint hearing with the House Committee on Small Business to examine prosperity on Main Street, focusing on keeping taxes low for small businesses. Apr 8th, 2025 at 09:00 am

Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I hope to hear about their experience with your business as well. Thank you.
  • Chairman and thank you so much for holding this critical hearing today.
  • Thank you for inviting us to join you today for this hearing.
  • Thank you. this joint hearing today on such a critical issue.
  • We are almost ready to close our hearing. I want to thank everybody.
Keywords: joint hearing, small business, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, economic recovery, tax relief, job creation
Summary: In this joint hearing of the House Committee on Small Business and the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, the primary focus was on the importance of making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) permanent. The chair emphasized that small businesses are crucial for the nation's economic recovery, especially in the wake of current federal policies perceived as detrimental. Witnesses shared their experiences and highlighted how the tax cuts facilitated job creation and business expansion, stressing the need for continued support through ongoing tax relief measures. The meeting included discussions about the economic implications of the TCJA's potential expiration, with members voicing their concerns regarding how this could impact small businesses and the broader economy.