Video & Transcript Research : 'municipal notice requirements'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 27th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • , stormwater access requirements and stormwater mitigation requirements.
  • Under their 501(c)(3), which municipal... That's going to kill a municipality on infrastructure.
  • general notice, saving the taxpayer money currently spent on costly, unnecessary individual notices
  • So, but one of the concerns raised is that notice... ...It does away with the excessive notice requirements
  • So we have notice, we have fair notice, we have due process. ...process, we have the ability to petition
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 27th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Options if a municipality requires them to stop a non-conforming use: The person can either continue
  • Or the Zoning Board of Adjustment for a variance and seek judicial review if the municipality requires
  • if the person believes the municipality illegally required them to stop.
  • This would also prohibit a municipality from requiring a property owner to stop their non-conforming
  • And then Subsection F2 relates to the agreement for the notice required under Subsection E.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 10th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Welcome to this week's County and Municipal Government Committee meeting.
  • One of the most essential elements of fair elections is transparency, which requires access.
  • HB 67 is not required to reduce the cost.
  • not required to reduce the cost. not required to reduce the cost.
  • <00:21:05.039> a category and therefore do not require a category and therefore do not require
Bills: SB249, SB259, HB67, HB214
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • lots and certain municipalities.
  • Cemeteries require municipal services like street maintenance, utilities, and public safety, but due
  • Currently, municipalities require business owners to have original certificates of occupancy to be displayed
  • Municipalities have been requiring business owners who don't have their original CO to apply for a new
  • However, some municipalities have gone to requiring a full subdivision plat and plan as a means for delaying
Summary: The committee heard testimony and took action on several land use, housing, municipal utility district, and cemetery-related bills. House Bill 447, dealing with transportation impact analysis requirements tied to MUD bond issuance, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the sponsor’s closing remarks, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1202, on third-party review of home backup power installations, was substituted and reported favorably to the full House by a unanimous roll call. House Bill 2494, on disannexation for failure to provide municipal services, and House Bill 1835, removing barriers to HUD-code manufactured homes, were also substituted and reported favorably; HB 1835 passed on a 5-1 vote. Senate Bill 15, limiting lot size and density requirements in certain large municipalities, was substituted and reported favorably unanimously. The committee also heard House Bill 897, which would authorize the sale or long-term lease of two state-owned Austin properties used by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and HHSC. The sponsor said the properties are in poor condition and that proceeds would benefit the state; after questions, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Several template MUD bills were then laid out, including HB 5652, HB 5654, HB 5661, and HB 5656, each creating or authorizing municipal utility districts in Montgomery or Fort Bend counties for water, wastewater, drainage, road, and recreational improvements. These bills drew limited testimony in support and were left pending without objection. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would repeal last session’s change allowing new cemeteries within certain distances of municipalities and restore the prior rule limiting cemetery placement near growing urban areas. The sponsor and supporters argued the 2023 change created unintended consequences, removed valuable taxable land from future use, and complicated city planning; opponents, including a funeral service industry representative, argued the current law gives communities local control and helps address cemetery land shortages. After extensive testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4753, a bill allowing a property owner to use a municipal record showing a certificate of occupancy was issued when the original document is lost; it was left pending. Finally, HB 3680, a Cameron County-specific bill modifying subdivision/model rule procedures to reduce replatting burdens while preserving colonia protections, and HB 4812, clarifying that condominiums follow Chapter 82 of the Property Code rather than full subdivision platting, both received supportive testimony and were left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • lots in certain municipalities.
  • Cemeteries require municipal services like street maintenance, utilities, public safety, but due to their
  • Currently, municipalities require business owners to have original certificates of occupancy to be displayed
  • Municipalities have been requiring business owners who don't have their original CO to apply for a new
  • However, some municipalities have gone to requiring a full subdivision plat and plan as a means for delaying
Summary: The committee heard testimony on a series of land use, housing, and local government bills. House Bill 447, relating to TIA requirements for certain MUD bond issuances, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work already done, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the author’s closing, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. The committee then voted out Senate Bill 1202 (third-party review of home backup power installations), House Bill 2494 (disannexation for failure to provide services), House Bill 1835 (removing barriers to HUD co-manufactured homes), and Senate Bill 15 (lot size and density limits in certain municipalities), with House Bill 1835 receiving one no vote and the others passing unanimously. House Bill 897, authorizing sale or lease of two state-owned Austin properties, was laid out and left pending after brief questions and no public testimony. The committee also heard and left pending several MUD creation bills for Montgomery and Fort Bend counties, including House Bills 5652, 5654, 5661, and 5656, each presented as template district bills with local support and no opposition recorded at the table. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would restore prior restrictions on new cemeteries near growing urban areas by repealing changes made last session. Representative Lujan and supporters argued the current law created unintended consequences, including loss of developable land, tax-exempt property in urban cores, and conflicts with infrastructure planning; they said cities already have authority to establish their own cemeteries if needed. Opponents, including a funeral services industry representative, argued the 2023 change was intended to let communities decide and that the bill would take local decision-making backward. After extensive testimony from both sides, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 3680, which would create a Cameron County-specific process allowing local discretion under the model subdivision rules. Supporters said the bill would preserve colonia protections while reducing costly platting and replatting burdens on families trying to sell or pass down land; county officials and realtors testified in favor. The bill was left pending after closing. House Bill 4812, a clarification to the Texas Uniform Condominium Act to prevent counties from imposing subdivision platting requirements on condominiums, received support from builders and a condominium attorney who said current county practices create duplicative hurdles and higher costs; it too was left pending. Finally, House Bill 5148, which would allow certain single-stair apartment buildings up to six stories, generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including housing advocates and architects, said the bill would lower costs, improve unit design, and expand affordable, family-friendly housing while maintaining safety through sprinklers and other safeguards. Fire officials from Corpus Christi opposed the bill, warning that a single stairwell could hinder firefighting and occupant evacuation, especially if sprinklers fail or smoke spreads. The author said the bill was aimed at new construction only and was part of a broader effort to reduce outdated housing regulations; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending at adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Cemeteries require municipal services like street maintenance, utilities, and public safety, but due
  • Currently, municipalities require business owners to have original certificates of occupancy displayed
  • Municipalities have been requiring business owners who don't have their original CO to apply for a new
  • However, some municipalities have gone to requiring a full subdivision plat and plan as a means for delaying
  • You're the requirement...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • When the ESD receives that notice, the ESD is required to disanticipate. acts of territory and cease
  • Municipal notice, this bill requires the ESD board to evaluate within a 30-day period whether or not
  • territory or develop, and it does not change the level of services currently required by that municipality
  • If the municipality is not active within the time frame, it must be provided written notice that the
  • This occurs because municipalities exploit a loophole in the statute by requiring applicants to waive
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the third thing that we agreed on is that municipalities cost a lot of money to... ...municipalities
  • It says municipalities can adopt more stringent regulations.
  • at least 30 days' notice before the public hearing.
  • Currently, our bylaws require a 10-day notice in the current open meeting law.
  • This concludes our County Municipal Government committee meeting with 3 minutes...
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/24/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • To meet our statutory requirements, we had to find an alternative to publish our public notices.
  • To meet our statutory requirements, we had to find an alternative to publish our public notices.
  • To meet our statutory requirements, we had to find an alternative to publish our public notices.
  • To meet our statutory requirements, we had to find an alternative to publish our public notices.
  • <00:48:56.480> requirement, to meet the public notice requirement, to meet the public notice
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee, February 27, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, I’m probably missing it this early this morning, but I assume that the municipality would be required
  • We had uh Rock the municipalities.
  • of petitions in like in a municipal of petitions in like in a municipal referendum<00:13:09.920>
  • A recount under this subsection shall not be required if a recount is required under paragraph II of
  • And so the requirements of the bill.
Bills: HB0022, HB0052, HB0076
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) May 15th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • No, this is the electronic delivery of municipal zoning changes if the resident opts in.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met with a quorum and took up a series of pending bills, mostly local-government measures. Early action included final committee approval of Senate Bill 1633 and S.J.R. 60, followed by Senate Bill 3038 and Senate Bill 3045, both reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also considered House Bill 24, adopted a committee substitute, and reported the substitute version favorably; House Bill 2025 was likewise reported favorably and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. Members then handled several companion and local bills, including House Bill 2713 as the companion to Senate Bill 1331, which was reported favorably and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 3348, House Bill 3370, House Bill 3505, and House Bill 4506 were each reported favorably, with no objections to local-and-uncontested placement. House Bill 5424 passed on a 6-1 vote, and House Bill 5652 passed with one present-not-voting, both also sent to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted substitutes and reported House Bill 3687 and House Bill 4205, though both were later reconsidered because the wrong script had been read. After reconsideration, House Bill 3687 and House Bill 4205 were each re-voted and reported favorably to the full Senate, with both placed on the local and uncontested calendar. Senate Bill 3071 was also reported out on a 5-2 vote after adoption of a committee substitute. The meeting ended with no further business and the committee standing at recess subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • It expands the notice requirements so that landowners have a real opportunity to be heard before a change
  • It strengthens notice requirements by making it clear that proposed changes to allowable uses within
  • a zoning classification, not just boundary shifts, require proper notice to affected property owners.
  • These include requirements such as providing notice and holding public hearings.
  • Texas courts absolutely require strict compliance with these mandatory notice requirements.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you require assistance, please contact committee staff.
  • Requirements that apply to primary dwellings will also apply to ADUs on the same residential lot.
  • , it does not contemplate minimum square footage requirements.
  • Additionally, we have a significant parking issue due to overriding local parking requirements.
  • Careful infrastructure planning is required to support all that growth.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • HB4506 will allow municipalities to deliver notice of public hearings regarding zoning changes electronically
  • Any municipality that chooses.
  • To distribute notices this way, we'll create an online portal through which a notice recipient may elect
  • Current law gives a person two options if a municipality... ...requires them to stop a non-conforming
  • only requires a simple majority vote, the same as would be required without a petition.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions, February 25, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, and most importantly, it specifies that if the required written disclosures establishing an agency
  • It doesn't create new requirements or increase fees.
  • specifies<00:02:15.440> that<00:02:15.680> if<00:02:15.920> the<00:02:16.160> required
  • <00:02:16.640> written specifies that if the required written specifies that if the required
  • It doesn't create<00:02:34.080> new<00:02:34.400> requirements<00:02:35.040> or<
Bills: HB0002, HB0022