Video & Transcript Research : 'landowner'

Page 1 of 85
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Border Security Apr 15th, 2025

Border Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • Instead, a lessee can file the claim, but compensation goes to the landowner.
  • Instead, a lessee can file the claim, but compensation goes to the landowner, who could live hundreds
  • Thank you. these issues directly and negatively impact our landowners.
  • Instead, a lessee can file the claim, but compensation goes to the landowner.
  • of the landowner.
Bills: SB2601
Summary: The Senate Committee on Border Security met with a quorum and heard only one bill, Senate Bill 2601 by Senator Blanco, laid out by Senator Hinojosa of Hidalgo. The bill was presented as a committee substitute to revise the Landowner’s Compensation Program created last session under SB 1133. The changes would expand eligibility to include land lessees with the landowner’s permission, cover damage to the land itself as well as structures and real property, add continuous smuggling of persons as a qualifying border crime, prohibit insurers from using claims under the program in rate calculations, and require law enforcement to provide requested border crime reports to the Attorney General within 14 days. Public testimony was unanimously supportive. Charles Maley of the South Texans Property Rights Association said the program has been beneficial and that the bill helps clean up implementation issues, including clarifying compensation for debris and pollutants left on land. Stephen Diebel of the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association also supported the bill, saying it would help address fence damage, destroyed infrastructure, and other harms along the border, and that lessees who manage properties day to day should be eligible for direct compensation when they have the landowner’s permission. Members discussed border-related property damage, including vehicles crashing through fences, broken sheds, livestock escaping, and resulting highway hazards. Senator Hinojosa asked about how conflicts between landowners and lessees would be handled, and testimony indicated documentation of lease authority would be required. After public testimony closed, the committee adopted the committee substitute without objection and voted to report SB 2601 favorably to the full Senate by a 5-0 vote, recommending it as local and uncontested.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We received feedback from our members on potential changes needed to ensure the landowner compensation
  • Instead, a lessee can file the claim, but compensation goes to the landowner.
  • Instead, a lessee can file the claim, but compensation goes to the landowner, who could live hundreds
  • I completely support the idea that damage should be able to be compensated to either the landowner or
  • of the landowner.
Bills: SB2601
Summary: The Senate Committee on Border Security met with a quorum and heard one bill, Senate Bill 2601 by Senator Blanco, laid out by Senator Hinojosa of Hidalgo. The bill amends the Landowner’s Compensation Program, which was created last session and is administered by the Office of the Attorney General, to expand eligibility to land lessees, cover damage to the land itself as well as structures and real property, add continuous smuggling of persons as a covered border crime, prohibit insurers from using claims under the program in rate calculations, and require law enforcement to provide border crime reports to the Attorney General within 14 days. The committee substitute also makes the bill a legislative council draft. Public testimony was unanimously supportive. Representatives of the South Texans Property Rights Association and the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association said the program has helped landowners but needed cleanup and broader access, especially for lessees who manage property day to day and may otherwise not receive compensation. Testimony also emphasized ongoing problems with fence damage, debris, pollutants, and other border-related property damage. Members asked about implementation, including how conflicts between landowners and lessees would be handled; the response was that documentation of authority and lease responsibilities would be required. After public testimony closed, the committee adopted the committee substitute without objection. Senator Hinojosa then moved that SB 2601 be reported favorably to the full Senate with the committee substitute, and the motion passed on a 5-0 vote. The bill was also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar, with no objection.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 19, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's a group of issues or concerns that the rural electric utilities and all the landowners and a landowner
  • all the land owners and and a landowner all the land owners and and a landowner law<00:04:41.759
  • That's good for the landowners. It means the landowners can continue to use them.
  • Good thing for the landowners again.
  • <00:09:44.720> So landowner regarding that non-use. So landowner regarding that non-use.
Bills: SF0099, SF0116, SJ0006
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Education Committee, February 13, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 76, an exception for an annexation and landowner objections repealed.
  • House Bill 76, an exception for an annexation and landowner objections repealed.
  • So, there's the potential if you do get the 50% of the landowners that you are only making up a small
  • on municipal clerks because they are going to have to be certifying that those folks are indeed landowners
  • As we see it, this bill does just that by giving landowners the ability to object to being annexed by
Bills: HB0076, HB0102, HB0115
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources Committee, February 17, 2026 - AM

Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Western Landowners Association recently published a review of landowner conservation contributions.
  • Landowner licenses are issued first to those eligible landowners.
  • set a limit on landowner license issued. set a limit on landowner license issued.
  • We understand that we're not trying to take away landowner licenses from landowners.
  • going to issue any landowner permits. going to issue any landowner permits.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/09/2026 - House Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair and members, House Bill 2147 requires the Arizona Game and Fish Department to issue a landowner
  • What we’re asking is that a landowner be given a permit to take a deer as compensation for the loss of
  • Granting landowner tags or permits is a way to privatize wildlife, and that's something we in Arizona
  • Our members are very concerned about going down the path of landowner tags, privatizing transferable
  • So this bill undermines the science-based wildlife management by creating landowner deer permits that
Summary: The House Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committee heard a series of wildlife- and agriculture-related bills, with most of the discussion focused on conflicts between ranching, public hunting, and wildlife management. HB 2197 would revise the unlawful camping statute near watering sites; after a Griffin amendment and verbal amendment, the committee heard support from the sponsor, Arizona Game and Fish Commission, and a rancher, while one member raised concerns about expanded criminal penalties. The bill received a do pass recommendation on a 6-1 vote. HB 2497, which would recognize a statutory right to lawfully hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife and limit unreasonable restrictions, drew strong support from hunting groups and opposition from animal welfare and conservation advocates who argued it would undermine Game and Fish authority and repeat a measure voters rejected in 2010. After debate over whether hunting is a right or a privilege, the committee recommended the bill do pass by a 5-3 vote. HB 2147 would require landowner deer permits on private lands under certain conditions, with a cap tied to lottery-issued deer tags. The sponsor said it was meant to address deer damage to crops in St. David and planned an amendment to make the permit nontransferable; Game and Fish said population management hunts were already addressing the problem, while opponents warned against privatizing wildlife. The committee approved the bill 5-3. HB 2158 would expand the definition of predatory animals to include bears, cougars, mountain lions, and wolves; Game and Fish testified that big game status preserves data collection and science-based management, while supporters said ranchers need more flexibility to protect livestock and property. Opponents argued the bill would weaken protections and conflict with endangered species rules. It passed 5-3. HB 2159 would allow landowner permits for taking Mexican gray wolves on private and leased grazing lands and create a voluntary compensated trapping program. Opponents said it would violate the Endangered Species Act and privatize wildlife, while the sponsor and supporters argued it was needed to protect ranchers and challenge federal control; Game and Fish said the bill would be unlawful until the wolf is delisted, though they acknowledged ongoing recovery and stakeholder meetings. The committee still recommended it do pass by a 5-3 vote. HB 2162, which would require at least one Game and Fish Commission member to be a cattleman or rancher, was introduced as a way to ensure agricultural experience on the commission; Game and Fish opposed it, saying the current appointment process already includes ranching input and the commission is meant to represent all Arizonans. The discussion ended with the commission explaining its current membership and appointment structure, but the transcript cuts off before a final vote on HB 2162 is shown.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 27, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The reason that’s important is the landowners needed that.
  • The co-op members are landowners.
  • We went back and talked through it with the landowner groups.
  • What we have is sometimes we have out-of-state landowners.
  • The landowners all around them need that power.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture and Wildlife Feb 16th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Agriculture and Wildlife

Transcript Highlights:
  • It looks like it's pretty onerous on landowners to be able to do prescribe burn.
  • The landowner is left with no... ...meaningful remedy.
OK