Transcript Highlights:

• Sentencing alternatives have provided opportunities for people to, Sentencing alternatives have provided
• Courts sentencing a person as a persistent offender are required to impose a life sentence without the
• Courts sentencing a person as a persistent offender are required to impose a life sentence without the
• used for the sentence... ...set an expedited sentencing hearing if it finds that a conviction used for
• In 2014, we recognized the mistake of imposing life sentences for juveniles.

Bills: SB5873, SB5895, SB5945

Keywords: incarcerated individuals, escorted leaves, criminal justice, rehabilitation, state law, healthcare, incarcerated, extraordinary medical placement, criminal justice reform, medical care, persistent offender, three strikes, resentencing, juvenile conviction, youth offender, juvenile sentencing, life without parole, LWOP, most serious offense, sentencing reform

Summary: The committee began with a Department of Corrections work session focused on agency operations, culture change, and reentry. Secretary Tim Lang highlighted staff safety, the department’s “Washington Way” rehabilitation approach, improved visitation through the Reimagined Visiting Project, expanded community-corrections sanctions, and efforts to reduce contraband and improve treatment. Assistant Secretary Danielle Armbruster described progress on corrections education, transportation support at release, and expanded partial confinement and reentry pathways. Assistant Secretary David Flynn outlined health services modernization, behavioral health standards work with the Department of Health, HIPAA and electronic health record preparation, Medicaid waiver implementation, and budget requests for opioid use disorder treatment, close-custody capacity, and custody staffing relief. The new Office of Correction Ombuds director, Jeremiah Bourgeois, described the office’s limited resources, his intent to prioritize serious complaints, and recent reports and investigations, including a women’s prison use-of-force review that led DOC to adopt all recommended reforms. The committee then heard Senate Bill 5895, which would expand extraordinary medical placement eligibility when DOC cannot meet an incarcerated person’s serious medical needs. Supporters, including family members, Disability Rights Washington, and the League of Women Voters, said the current law is too restrictive and that the bill would provide a humane, medically appropriate alternative for people with serious illness while maintaining public safety. DOC testified that it supports the overall framework but has concerns about how the bill defines “basic medical care needs” and how the agency would determine when care cannot be delivered as required by law. A correctional physician suggested the bill could be improved by extending the prognosis window and using more flexible language. The bill was then heard and public testimony closed. Next, the committee heard Senate Bill 5873 on escorted leaves of absence. The bill would create a new escorted-leave category for reentry and rehabilitative purposes, while also updating family definitions for funeral and bedside visits and retaining existing security and reimbursement requirements. Chair Wilson said the goal is to support a “slow release” and help people practice everyday tasks and community navigation before release. Testimony from the Reentry Council, DOC, and Amend at UCSF supported the bill as consistent with evidence-based reentry practice and international models; DOC noted implementation may require some future resources. The hearing then moved to Senate Bill 5945, which would change the persistent offender statute so only convictions occurring after age 18 count toward a mandatory life sentence and would require resentencing for affected people, including those currently incarcerated. Supporters argued the bill aligns with youth brain-development research and would address racial disparities, while prosecutors and victim advocates opposed it, saying it would reopen painful cases, undermine finality for victims, and create fiscal and workload burdens. Public testimony on that bill continued with both support and opposition.

Transcript Highlights:

• Juvenile court dispositions are subject to statutory sentencing guidelines.
• The sentencing category called local sanctions is the least serious category for juvenile sentencing
• They tend to be convicted or adjudicated, I think is the juvenile parlance, and then they are sentenced
• I was sentenced to 52 to 65 weeks in juvenile prison. The system punished me for surviving.
• I was sentenced to 52 to 65 weeks in juvenile prison. The system punished me for surviving.

Bills: HB2389, HB2456

Keywords: juvenile justice, youth sentencing, juvenile rehabilitation, DCYF, Department of Children Youth and Families, community supervision, community transition services, suspended disposition, less restrictive alternative, sentencing grid, juvenile confinement, juvenile prison, rehabilitation, recidivism, mental health treatment, substance use disorder, chemical dependency, trauma-informed care, racial disparities, equity

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 2456, which would create a juvenile firearm early intervention alternative for youth charged with unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree. Staff explained that the bill would allow dismissal after successful completion of a prosecutor-approved, 12-month intensive supervision program with searches, therapy, mentorship, and regular court reviews, funded by a $100 increase to concealed pistol license fees. The prime sponsor said the bill is meant to fill the gap between arrest and final case resolution and to provide a cautious, evidence-based intervention; one member questioned whether the CPL fee increase functioned more like a tax than a fee. The chair then held further testimony on that bill. The committee then took extensive testimony on House Bill 2389, which would expand suspended disposition alternatives and other community-based options for juveniles, broaden eligibility for some offenses including robbery and assault, require mid-sentence review hearings, reduce some robbery standard ranges, and add juvenile rehabilitation capacity and emergency transfer provisions. Supporters, including youth currently or formerly in juvenile facilities, defense advocates, restorative justice groups, and some judges, argued the bill would reduce overcrowding, address racial disparities, improve rehabilitation, and give judges more individualized options. Several witnesses described personal experiences with trauma, incarceration, and the benefits of treatment and community support, while researchers testified that juvenile incarceration has limited rehabilitative value and that periodic review can improve outcomes. Opponents and those testifying with concerns, including prosecutors, sheriffs, county officials, juvenile court administrators, DCYF, and victims or victim advocates, argued the bill would shift burdens to counties without adequate funding, add appeals and hearings, and reduce accountability for serious offenses. They warned that the first part of the bill would effectively lower many standard ranges to local sanctions for offenses such as robbery, assault, arson, and drive-by shooting, and said community-based resources and staffing are not in place statewide. DCYF and Green Hill staff said overcrowding has improved but emergency transfer authority is still needed, while some witnesses urged changes to preserve revocation tools, clarify transfer standards, and add resources before expanding community placement.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2389 is the bill that makes changes to juvenile offender sentencing and juvenile rehabilitation
• It allows certain juveniles to serve fewer than 30 days of remaining confinement time in a county detention
• facility or community transition program to be reduced to 15 days instead of 30 or more when the juvenile
• The policy before you modernizes how Washington deals with juveniles who are entering our juvenile justice

Bills: HB2230, HB2364, HB2389, HB2429

Keywords: community oversight, residential services, regulation, service providers, monitoring, poverty, task force, legislative, executive, social programs, juvenile justice, youth sentencing, juvenile rehabilitation, DCYF, Department of Children Youth and Families, community supervision, community transition services, suspended disposition, less restrictive alternative, sentencing grid

Summary: The Early Learning and Human Services Committee met in executive session on four bills. House Bill 2230, which streamlines DHS monitoring and oversight of community residential service providers and limits duplicate routine reviews, was amended with Harrow 796 to clarify that Adult Protective Services investigations are not subject to the routine review limits. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the substitute bill out of committee unanimously, 11-0, with a do pass recommendation. House Bill 2364, which renames and expands the Legislative Executive Workforce Poverty Reduction Oversight Task Force into the Legislative Executive Economic Justice and Well-Being Task Force, was reported out with a do pass recommendation on an 8-3 vote. Supporters said the bill updates language, broadens membership, and aligns duties; some members voted no or without recommendation due to concerns about the title change and other provisions. House Bill 2389, dealing with juvenile offender sentencing and juvenile rehabilitation capacity procedures, had no amendments to the proposed substitute and was passed out of committee 7-4. Members described it as a complex, balanced effort to modernize juvenile justice policy, address facility capacity, and preserve rehabilitation and public safety. House Bill 2429, supporting implementation of the Washington Thriving Strategic Plan for Children and Youth Behavioral Health, was amended with Wickham 846 to adjust leadership council membership and add two representatives of federally recognized Indian tribes, nominated by the Governor’s Indian Health Advisory Council, while preserving tribal consultation requirements. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the substitute bill unanimously, 11-0, with a do pass recommendation. At the end of the meeting, staff noted amendment requests for upcoming executive session bills were due by 10 a.m. Monday and to the EBB by 4 p.m. Monday, and the committee adjourned after announcing three bills would be up for possible executive session on Tuesday.

Transcript Highlights:

• It requires sentencing to only occur after review and approval by the indeterminate sentencing review
• They're either serving sentences or are there because they're a danger to the DOC population or they've
• This simply says that as part of the review, it needs to involve the original sentencing court in the
• He got let out early out of his life sentence and just simply because he was getting towards the end
• This simply says that as part of the review, it need to involve the original sentencing court in the

Bills: SB5873, SB5895, SB5911, SB5940, SB5942, SB5945, SB5957, SB5966

Keywords: incarcerated individuals, escorted leaves, criminal justice, rehabilitation, state law, healthcare, incarcerated, extraordinary medical placement, criminal justice reform, medical care, children, youth, financial stability, care services, department of children and families, housing assistance, foster care, pilot program, social services, accountability

Summary: The Senate Human Services Committee met in executive session to review several bills, with staff briefing members on measures related to incarcerated individuals, DCYF foster youth programs, extraordinary medical placements, persistent offender resentencing, the Office of Homeless Youth Advisory Committee, and medically tailored meals. Chair Wilson announced that Senate Bill 5942 on the DCYF Oversight Board would be held until the following week for additional stakeholder input. The committee also noted fiscal impacts on several bills, including costs for foster youth housing, Social Security benefit protections, and resentencing-related local government expenses. The committee took up Senate Bill 5873 on escorted leaves of absence for incarcerated individuals and adopted only Amendment A1, a technical fix to the definition of immediate family. A series of Christian amendments to restrict eligibility, require electronic monitoring, limit duration and location, impose liability, require more staffing, add funding contingencies, narrow family definitions, and mandate restraints were all rejected. The committee then adopted the proposed substitute and advanced the bill to Rules. For Senate Bill 5895 on extraordinary medical placements, the committee rejected amendments that would have barred placements after recent serious infractions, required physician specialty qualifications, limited eligibility for those not in rehabilitative programming, added reporting and Washington-only placement requirements, and required sentencing court review. The proposed substitute was adopted and the bill was referred to Ways and Means. On Senate Bill 5911, the committee adopted Amendment C1 to place youth Social Security funds into protected accounts such as ABLE accounts, then advanced the bill as amended to Ways and Means. The committee also advanced Senate Bill 5940 on an extended foster care housing pilot after discussion of eligibility and program limits, and Senate Bill 5945 on persistent offender resentencing after rejecting amendments related to retroactivity, victim notice, ISRB review, programming participation, and exclusions for serious offenses; the bill was sent onward subject to signatures. Senate Bill 5957 on adding positions to the Office of Homeless Youth Advisory Committee and Senate Bill 5966 on medically tailored meals were also discussed, with the latter receiving proposed amendments on provider type, administrative limits, and a funding contingency, though the transcript ends before final action on those measures.

Bills: HB25, HB15, HB124, HB146, HB73, HB74, HB75

Keywords: juvenile delinquency, firearm possession, criminal background checks, state law, gun control, youth offense, conviction, public safety, medical injury, adverse outcome, health care provider, patient rights, confidentiality, settlement, legal counsel, HB124, New Americans Division, Workforce Solutions Department, immigrant workforce, refugee resettlement

Transcript Highlights:

• know that because when you're being resentenced, you're actually being sentenced.
• And for those that may not be aware, the Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board is what ISRB stands for
• know that because when you're being re-sentenced, you're actually being sentenced.
• But the... that because when you're being resentenced, you're actually being sentenced.
• And for those that may not be aware, the indeterminate sentencing review board is what IRS, ISRB stands

Bills: SB5917, SB6080, SB6085, SB5940, SB5945, SB5957, SB5966

Keywords: abortion medications, reproductive health, mifepristone, misoprostol, abortion access, medication abortion, early pregnancy loss, miscarriage management, Department of Corrections, Department of Health, health care providers, health care entities, Indian health care providers, pharmacy distribution, wholesale distribution, reproductive rights, women's health, emergency clause, immediate effect, public health

Summary: The Senate Human Services Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 5917 would change how the Department of Corrections and Department of Health distribute abortion medications from state stockpiles, removing the current requirement that they be sold at cost plus a $5 fee and allowing broader, more flexible distribution to health care providers and entities. Supporters, including the bill sponsor, the Governor’s health policy advisor, DOH, and advocacy groups, said the change would prevent expiration of existing stockpiles and improve access to medication abortion and miscarriage care. Opponents argued the bill would effectively give away state-purchased drugs, raised constitutional and taxpayer concerns, and objected to abortion medication distribution. No vote was taken on SB 5917 in the hearing portion described. The committee also heard SB 6080, which would require written federal contracts before local jails accept people in federal custody, require reimbursement of full detention costs, and prohibit contracts for people transported across state lines absent a valid judicial warrant. The sponsor said the bill responds to a Clark County situation involving out-of-state detainees and is intended to create clarity, accountability, and local control. Support came from local government and immigrant-rights advocates, while the sheriffs’ association raised concerns about unintended consequences for routine federal arrests and the practicality of requiring contracts in all cases. The hearing then moved to SB 6085, which would revise the institutional welfare account (formerly the incarcerated individual betterment fund) to require more feedback from incarcerated people and families, annual reporting, and changes to allowable uses. The sponsor and DOC supported the bill’s intent, while the reentry council and DOC raised concerns about law library funding and the use of funds for reentry services. The committee also took executive action on other bills: a proposed substitute for SB 5940 was adopted and sent to Ways and Means after several amendments were rejected; SB 5957 passed to the Rules Committee; and SB 5966 on medically tailored meals passed to the Rules Committee after one amendment failed and members noted a floor amendment would be offered to address small-business participation.

Transcript Highlights:

• the code, to create the definition of machine gun and to provide for the mandatory enhancement sentencing
• for a... mandatory enhancement sentencing for a person who causes the death of another by means of a
• , and went through a trial with unfavorable peers... ...and he was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced

Bills: HB43, SB81, SB178, SB138, SB89, SB183, HB27, HB188, HB199, HB190, SB117, HB43, HB27

Keywords: criminal procedure, split sentencing, probation, Class A felony, Class B felony, minimum confinement, speedy trial, visiting judge, court administration, violent crimes, Alabama Supreme Court, employment, criminal record, certificate of employability, occupational licensing, negligent hiring, rehabilitation, limited relief, tribal police, law enforcement

Transcript Highlights:

• It's hard to put a real exact number on what it costs for the juveniles, the parole violators, and the
• It took three and a half years before any sentence would be delivered, and in the end, the man who had
• He received a sentence of 120 days in county jail and five years of probation, which, by the way,...
• Our family has been handed a life sentence due to no wrongdoing of our son or our own.
• I think I may have missed it, but how long did the person who did this get sentenced to?

Bills: HB153, HB1410, HB1461, HB1760, HB1762, HB3261, HB3773, HB153

Keywords: education, funding, student resources, technology access, equal opportunity, veterans treatment court, mental health, criminal justice, rehabilitation, eligibility criteria, veterans, treatment court, military service, legislation, private prisons, inmate confinement, criminal justice reform, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, government contracts, inmate housing

Transcript Highlights:

• state of Louisiana, they can address it with the sentencing court.
• Well, that's up to the sentencing court, though. Yeah.
• and concurrent sentences, consecutive sentences are a—" "...jail terms that must be served one after
• This means that if a person is sentenced to multiple terms, they will complete one sentence before starting
• to that first sentence and not both.

Bills: HB54, HB55, HB125, HB133, HB158, HB161, HB168, HB169, HB191, HB245, HB280, HB296, HB399, HB821, HB995

Keywords: parole, rehabilitation, mental health, substance abuse, criminal justice reform, alternative sentencing, juror confidentiality, public records, criminal procedure, privacy, court disclosure, sex offender, sex offense, child predator, registry, registration, notification, supervised release, probation and parole, juvenile offender

Transcript Highlights:

• sentence was if it was higher.
• And lastly, for offenses where a juvenile was originally sentenced to death and that was converted to
• Supreme Court ruling, which determined that a juvenile cannot be sentenced to death.
• Mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles under the age of 18 when the crime is committed
• Mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles under the age of 18 when the crime is committed

Bills: HB75, SB134, SB201, SB258, SB288, SB313, SB320, SB321, SB325, SB339, SB345, SB393, SB422, SB440, SB470, SB487, SB523

Keywords: HB75, Act 963, gaming, casino gaming, promotional play, promotional wagers, slot machine proceeds, net gaming proceeds, gross revenue, taxable revenue, gaming operators, gaming tax, Louisiana gaming, gaming revenue deduction, casino tax, gaming promotion, revenue cap, pilot program, child sexual abuse materials, sexting

Transcript Highlights:

• It provides relative to the minimum sentencing for child domestic convictions.
• This bill also establishes minimum sentences of one to three years for a first offense and three to six
• When the law treats child presence as an aggravated factor with clear minimum sentencing, it acknowledges
• It's strength in sentencing. When abuse occurs in front of a child, the distinction matters.

Bills: HCR7, HB76, HB84, HB132, HB265, HB275, HB322, HB635, HB808, HB883, HB1054

Keywords: juvenile justice, electronic monitoring, annual report, supervision outcomes, data transparency, inmate release, notification, law enforcement, victims, public safety, hit-and-run, crime of violence, felony, sentencing, battery, sound, intentional harm, physical pain, hearing impairment, video voyeurism

Transcript Highlights:

• The mental health sentencing alternative was established in 2021 with the intention to create a sentencing
• There's a program for that, the drug offender sentencing alternative.
• Under an FTOW, the court may waive the standard sentence and instead impose a sentence of up to 90 days
• It’s like two, almost two sentencing alternatives in one resolution.
• Deferred prosecution courts review as a sentencing alternative.

Bills: HB2217, HB2558, HB2641, HB2648, HB1239, HB1591, HB2209, HB2310, HB2526

Keywords: rehabilitation, felony offenses, criminal justice reform, first-time offenders, pathways to rehabilitation, mental health, sentencing alternative, criminal justice, diversion programs, HB 2641, ICE out act, law enforcement hiring, immigration and customs enforcement, ICE officers, former federal employees, sworn officer, police staffing, general authority law enforcement agency, limited authority law enforcement agency, immigration enforcement

Summary: The House Community Safety Committee met on January 29, 2026, and began with a decision to postpone all executive session action until the following Monday because of the large number of public hearing sign-ups. The committee first heard staff and sponsor remarks on House Bill 2558, which would narrow and restructure the mental health sentencing alternative. Staff explained that the bill would replace the current “serious mental illness” standard with a psychotic disorder standard, add eligibility restrictions for some domestic violence and prior violent offense cases, require more detailed DOC reports, lengthen community custody in some cases, require regular progress hearings, and shift HCA funding from reimbursement to contracting with providers. Sponsor Rep. Amy Wallen described the bill as a response to misuse of the current program in domestic violence and other violent cases, saying it should be refocused on people with profound mental illness tied to the offense. Public testimony on HB 2558 was held over for later in the meeting. The committee then took extensive testimony on House Bill 2217, which would replace the current first-time offender waiver with two new pathways: a pretrial deferral and a suspended sentence option. Staff said the bill would allow eligible first-time felony offenders to avoid a conviction if they complete conditions, with strong presumptions in favor of relief and eligibility expanded to some offenses such as second-degree assault and robbery, while excluding violent, sex, DUI, and certain drug offenses. The sponsor, Rep. Darya Farivar, said the bill is intended to improve rehabilitation and make the program more meaningful by allowing dismissal for successful completion, and she noted additional exclusions and technical changes were still being worked on. Supporters included public defense, immigration advocates, economists, judges, the Sentencing Guidelines Commission, and a youth advocate, who emphasized reduced recidivism, better employment outcomes, and immigration consequences of a conviction. Opponents from sheriffs, prosecutors, and victim advocacy groups raised concerns about including serious offenses, the lack of prosecutor consent, victim safety, and whether the bill would create uneven treatment across jurisdictions. Several witnesses and members also discussed whether the bill should be narrowed further, and the sponsor said she would remove the strong presumption language after a judge testified that it was a concern. The committee next heard House Bill 2641, the “ICE Out Act of 2026,” which would bar Washington law enforcement agencies from employing people hired as sworn ICE officers on or after January 20, 2025, with the restriction applying prospectively to hiring after October 1, 2026. Sponsor Rep. Tarra Simmons said the bill responds to community fear about ICE tactics and is meant to prevent hiring people she views as having participated in rights violations. Members questioned whether the bill was discriminatory and whether background-check reforms would be a better approach. The committee then moved to House Bill 2648, which would require state and local officers who encounter suspected ICE enforcement activity to activate body and dash cameras, report the encounter, attempt to identify the federal officer, and avoid escalation; it also would require state representation and indemnification for officers acting in compliance. Sponsor Rep. Mary Fosse said the bill is meant to protect both communities and local officers and is still being narrowed with stakeholders. Testimony was mixed: the State Patrol and Teamsters 117 said many of the requirements align with existing practices and could help document incidents, while the sheriffs’ and police chiefs’ association warned that the bill could discourage federal officers from seeking local assistance and asked for softer language and stronger indemnification. The committee ran out of time and ended further testimony without taking final action on the bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 1734, Juvenile Justice, by Chair Martin.
• This bill recognizes juvenile probation officers, or JPOs, and juvenile detention officers, or JDOs,
• Every felony sentence in Florida is calculated. We have an important gap in our sentencing process.
• within the standard sentencing range.
• The judges can't sentence them to 18 months. ...the judges can't sentence them to 18 months if the score

Bills: S0132, S0418, S0442, S0646, S0748, S1326, S1332, S1660, S1734, S1742, S1750

Keywords: voting rights, felony conviction, database, Florida Commission on Offender Review, restoration of rights, autism spectrum disorder, law enforcement, communication, training, blue envelope, blue card, search warrant, remote appearance, drones, data privacy, drug paraphernalia, narcotic testing, fentanyl, controlled substances, civil forfeiture

Summary: The committee took up a series of criminal justice and public safety bills. SB 646, allowing the use of drug testing tools such as fentanyl test strips and reagent kits to detect dangerous adulterants, was presented as a harm-reduction measure and reported favorably after supportive testimony from advocates and criminal defense groups. SB 442, extending the return period for warrants involving digital evidence from 45 days to one year, also passed unanimously amid testimony from prosecutors and law enforcement about encryption, backlogs, and large volumes of child exploitation evidence. SB 418, creating autism-related law enforcement training and a Blue Envelope Program for traffic stops and other encounters, was reported favorably with support from police, disability advocates, and families. SB 132, creating a public database to help people determine eligibility for restoration of voting rights, and SB 748, requiring notice of voting-rights restoration information on sentencing score sheets, both passed with broad support from voting-rights and criminal defense advocates. The committee also approved SB 1734, recognizing juvenile probation and detention officers as officers under Florida law and extending related training and benefits, and SB 1660, designating June as Responsible Firearm Safety Awareness Month. SB 1742, which repealed the existing “unnatural and lascivious acts” statute and created a new offense for indecent exposure of sexual organs to a minor, was amended with a delete-all amendment and then reported favorably. SB 1750, a major overhaul of career offender registration requirements, was later reconsidered after a bill-number mix-up and then reported favorably as SB 1332, with FDLE and sheriff’s association support. The most contentious measure was SB 1326, which would eliminate the traditional insanity defense and replace it with a lack-of-culpable-mental-state defense, require malingering assessments in competency evaluations, and limit downward departures based on mental illness. Criminal defense attorneys and disability advocates argued it lacked a treatment component, raised scientific and cost concerns, and could worsen public safety by sending mentally ill defendants to prison without adequate care. Supporters, including the sponsor and the Attorney General’s office, argued it would close gaps and better protect the public. After extensive debate, the bill was reported favorably on a divided vote, with several members voting no. At the end of the meeting, members recorded additional votes on some bills, and Senator Pizzo moved for reconsideration of SB 1326 for a future meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• I was previously a representative of juvenile clients in our Baton Rouge Juvenile Court.
• So we already have the juggling of high caseloads, dealing with juveniles and the unique needs of juveniles
• And then the defendant is sentenced ordinarily to the same sentence he originally got.
• The defendant can move for the sentencing, the judge can deny it, or they can proceed to sentencing,
• Then you have sentencing.

Bills: HB36, HB52, HB56, HB68, HB92, HB119, HB140, HB147, HB160, HB171, HB289, HB351, HB552, HB784

Keywords: HB 36, Act 780, Acadiana Regional Juvenile Justice District, juvenile justice, juveniles, Evangeline Parish, regional district, board of commissioners, commission membership, Louisiana juvenile law, R.S. 15:1109, R.S. 15:1109.1, parish governance, district boundaries, local government, HB 52, Act 192, Louisiana criminal procedure, misdemeanor jury trial, six-person jury

Transcript Highlights:

• Juvenile justice diversion services, $500,000.
• Juvenile justice diversion, $500,000 one-time funding from Community Health... Oh.
• It's that last sentence that seems like the potential issue, at least to me.
• That sentence seems like the potential issue, at least to me, that they may implement any adjustments

Bills: SB2015

Keywords: corrections, rehabilitation, prison budget, department of corrections, adult services, youth services, correctional facilities, Heart River correctional center, Missouri River correctional center, James River correctional center, minimum security facility, county jails, regional jails, deferred maintenance, capital construction, strategic investment and improvements fund, Bank of North Dakota, line of credit, tasers, body cameras

Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources Division met with all members present and took up several bills, focusing most of the discussion on SB 1577 and SB 1619, along with a detailed review of the HHS budget bill draft. On SB 1577, Senator Magrum explained that the bill was being revised to focus on wastewater rather than raw water, possibly shifting the Washburn project to the Department of Water Resources so it could access matching funds, and potentially converting the bill into a line of credit if federal money is restored later. Members discussed whether to keep an emergency clause or instead use a date-based approach, and agreed the bill would likely be handled through the full committee and possibly reconsidered later. On SB 1619, Senator Davison said amendments were still being worked on, including changes requested by the Bank of North Dakota, and the committee planned to hold it for possible amendment before full committee consideration. The bulk of the meeting was a section-by-section review of the HHS appropriations bill draft. Members discussed one-time funding items such as technology projects, child care programs, housing programs, behavioral health facility grants, infant and toddler care provider support, juvenile justice diversion, medical housing, and other public health and human services projects. Several adjustments were noted, including reductions or changes to IMD-related funding, incarcerated-person treatment funding, the child welfare technology project, and the provider rate increase. The committee also discussed the FTE block grant structure at length, with staff explaining that the apparent increase in positions reflected budgeting mechanics, zero-dollar “phantom” positions, and positions approved previously but not counted in the FTE total. Members raised concerns about transparency and whether the bill should list FTE numbers, but staff said the block grant was intended to give the department flexibility while quarterly reporting would provide oversight. Other topics included Medicaid expansion funding and provider reimbursement rules, the move toward certifying human service centers as certified community behavioral health clinics, a moratorium on new ICF beds, and studies or reports on Medicaid, obesity, disability services, truancy, and behavioral health facility grants. The committee also discussed removing or revising broad intent language in Section 31 so the department would report findings rather than implement changes without further legislative action. No final votes were taken in the transcript; instead, members agreed to make a few technical adjustments, continue reviewing the bill, and likely revisit it the next day before moving it to conference committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• So no offense, Keith, if he walks out in the middle of your sentence. All right, very good.
• Sentence. All right. Very good.

Bills: SB2015

Keywords: corrections, rehabilitation, prison budget, department of corrections, adult services, youth services, correctional facilities, Heart River correctional center, Missouri River correctional center, James River correctional center, minimum security facility, county jails, regional jails, deferred maintenance, capital construction, strategic investment and improvements fund, Bank of North Dakota, line of credit, tasers, body cameras

Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources Division met to finalize changes to the human services budget bill and related amendments. Members discussed several items, including a proposed $5 million appropriation for the Altru Hospital project to address inflationary costs, with the rest of the funding question left for conference committee. They also agreed to keep the 10-year operating requirement language for the project and remove a matching-funds provision that was no longer needed. The committee spent considerable time on the OASIS child welfare IT system. Donna Auckland explained that the project is still in the RFP stage, with vendor selection and contract negotiation likely taking months, and that the system will require 50-50 federal matching authority. Based on that testimony, the committee agreed to reduce the general fund amount from $14 million to $6 million and use a line of credit for the remaining authority, while preserving the federal match authority so the contract can be signed and the project can proceed. Members also approved a technical fix to add governor’s designee language for the Children’s Cabinet, which had been missed in another bill already on the governor’s desk. Keith reviewed updated long sheets showing additional budget adjustments, including provider inflation changes, a $50,000 Family Voices grant, reductions to CARES Act COVID funds, and moving the $5-per-day basic care rate increase from ongoing to one-time funding. No formal votes were recorded in the transcript, and the committee adjourned with plans to reconvene Monday if the final bill version was ready.

Bills: SB2015

Keywords: corrections, rehabilitation, prison budget, department of corrections, adult services, youth services, correctional facilities, Heart River correctional center, Missouri River correctional center, James River correctional center, minimum security facility, county jails, regional jails, deferred maintenance, capital construction, strategic investment and improvements fund, Bank of North Dakota, line of credit, tasers, body cameras

Summary: The committee first discussed a wastewater infrastructure bill, centered on whether state support should be provided as a grant or through the existing Clean Water State Revolving Fund as a low-interest loan program. Department of Environmental Quality official David Brushwine explained that the SRF already finances wastewater projects, can leverage federal funds with state bond proceeds, and could accommodate the Washburn, Lincoln, and Peasant projects if they are ready to proceed. Members noted that losing federal grant support would make projects harder for local residents to afford because costs would be recovered through utility rates or special assessments, but the projects would still be eligible for loans. Senator Magrum indicated he would likely concur with the budget after this discussion, and the bill was set aside for later consideration. The committee then turned to a proposed amendment for a four-plex housing project for people with disabilities or other special needs. Senator Mathern described Sections 7 and 8 as creating a design consultation appropriation and a revolving loan fund modeled on existing hospital and nursing home loan programs, while Section 9 would transfer $3.3 million from the state infrastructure fund. Members debated ownership, rent subsidies, repayment terms, and whether the state should finance the project directly or leave it to a private developer with Department of Human Services oversight. Concerns were raised that the state should not own the housing and that the proposal needed more work to be workable, but the committee ultimately reached consensus to adopt Sections 7 and 8 and leave out Section 9 for further conference committee discussion. The committee also reviewed provider inflation and long-term care rate issues, with members discussing whether to support a 2% and 1.5% inflation adjustment and how to handle the $5-per-day basic care rate. Staff explained that the $5 payment was already in the base budget, but members debated whether it should remain ongoing or be treated as one-time funding and paired with a study of rate rebasing. The committee agreed to have draft language prepared to remove the $5 from the base budget and add study language, then moved the bill forward for drafting.

Bills: SB2015

Keywords: corrections, rehabilitation, prison budget, department of corrections, adult services, youth services, correctional facilities, Heart River correctional center, Missouri River correctional center, James River correctional center, minimum security facility, county jails, regional jails, deferred maintenance, capital construction, strategic investment and improvements fund, Bank of North Dakota, line of credit, tasers, body cameras

Summary: The committee met to review revised long sheets and section-by-section language for a human services/health budget bill, with much of the discussion focused on how to present block grant funding and full-time equivalent (FTE) positions for behavioral health clinics and CCBHCs. Members debated whether to keep FTE counts in the budget at all, ultimately leaning toward removing or zeroing out the FTE references while keeping the dollar authority, and reducing the salaries-and-wages block grant by about $4.75 million. They also discussed public health federal authority, agreeing to remove about $60 million in unused federal spending authority tied to COVID-era funds, and clarified that if federal money later becomes available it could be requested through the Emergency Commission. A major topic was the provider inflation increase. The House version had 2% and 2%, while members debated alternatives and appeared to settle, at least for further work, on 2% in the first year and 1.5% in the second year, with staff asked to recalculate the fiscal impact. The committee also reviewed FMAP changes, noting a revised 2027 FMAP estimate and its effect on general fund and other funds, and discussed whether to adjust public health and other line items accordingly. Several members emphasized that many of these numbers are still tentative and will be refined before final action. The committee also touched on several policy items and capital-related provisions, including behavioral health services, Medicaid expansion, the moratorium on new ICF beds, and a proposed amendment for a medical homes/fourplex-related item that would show a $400,000 legislative investment with repayment from a developer. There was extended discussion of the All True hospital/facility proposal, with some members favoring leaving it in with a smaller initial commitment and others preferring to remove it and revisit later in conference committee. The meeting ended with staff asked to continue updating the bill language and members instructed to review remaining sections before the next meeting; no final votes were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Donna, can I ask you, since I have it in front of me: Section 9, $750,000 from the General Fund for Juvenile
• So the $750,000 that is in Section 9, I believe, is for juvenile justice, or I believe House Bill 1425
• So the $750,000 was added by the House into our bill for juvenile.

Bills: SB2015

Keywords: corrections, rehabilitation, prison budget, department of corrections, adult services, youth services, correctional facilities, Heart River correctional center, Missouri River correctional center, James River correctional center, minimum security facility, county jails, regional jails, deferred maintenance, capital construction, strategic investment and improvements fund, Bank of North Dakota, line of credit, tasers, body cameras

Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources division met with a quorum and spent much of the meeting on a proposed “medical home” concept for people with significant disabilities and medical needs. Matt Schwartz described the need for small, community-based homes so adults like his daughter could live in a least-restrictive setting without losing housing if service providers change. Architect Jeff Eubel presented a conceptual budget for one roughly 5,000-square-foot facility for four residents, explaining that the design would likely include four large sleeping units, common space, support areas, and medical infrastructure such as emergency power, oxygen, sprinklers, and accessibility features. Committee members and George Sink, joining by phone, raised questions about layout, zoning, ownership, staffing, and whether families would actually move loved ones into such facilities if they were far from home. The department said the concept was not in the governor’s budget and identified staff who could continue discussions; the committee did not take final action and instead discussed refining the language with interested members. The committee then turned to amendments related to long-term care and behavioral health funding. One amendment would reduce a planned $4 million general fund incentive payment and instead create a withhold-based quality program for nursing facilities, to be developed collaboratively by the department and providers and reported to Legislative Management by September 2026. The department said it could live with the language but preferred the governor’s timing; several senators questioned whether the committee should be directing an operational policy change and whether the study would simply delay implementation. No vote was taken, and the amendment was set aside for later consideration. A second amendment would clarify use of an existing $2 million general fund item for behavioral health services in nursing homes and basic care facilities, directing it toward training, technical assistance, consultation, and direct patient care for residents with medically based behavioral health disorders. Members noted the funding was already in the bill and discussed it in the context of other budget items, but again deferred action. The committee also clarified that a separate $750,000 juvenile justice diversion appropriation in House Bill 1425 was distinct from a similar amount in the budget and should likely remain in that separate bill. The chair indicated a goal of having amendments ready by the end of the week, and the committee recessed without final votes on the discussed items.

Transcript Highlights:

• prosecution that causes our system, the juvenile system, to treat sexual assault victims of juvenile
• Due to the current juvenile law, there will be no outcry witness testimony.
• Senate Bill 1021 prevents these short sentences. in our system.
• A man sentenced in a seven-person money-laundering scheme that targeted U.S. victims.
• Classified as a first-degree felony, carrying a sentence of 25 years to life, and With that, Mr.

Bills: SB251, SB608, SB487, SB535, SB761, SB955, SB957, SB958, SB988, SB990, SB1019, SB1021, SB1120

Keywords: criminal law, magistrates, Bell County, judicial authority, legal framework, evidence collection, sexual assault kits, reporting, law enforcement, transparency, confidentiality, victim protection, stalking, indecent assault, invasive visual recording, criminal justice, privacy rights, SB 535, Texas criminal procedure, rape shield