Transcript Highlights:

• ,</c> Association of Conservation Districts, Association of Conservation Districts, they<00:49:10.960
• </c><01:10:01.040><c> or</c> municipality or a water district or municipality or a water district or
• service district to improvement service district to understand<01:10:04.320><c> uh</c><01:10:04.960>
• At the bottom of that page, we have one master plan for the Shoshonne irrigation district for the amount
• /c><01:11:24.400><c> amount</c><01:11:24.640><c> of</c> irrigation district uh for the amount of irrigation

Bills: HB0078, HB0087, SF0070, SF0068, SF0017, SF0043

Keywords: forest health, grant program, state forester, wildfire prevention, environmental conservation, habitat improvement, water development, feasibility studies, appropriations, water management, rehabilitation, irrigation, public works, agricultural supply, municipal water, funding, maintenance projects, tax assessments, state law, forestry management

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:21:25.840><c> weren't</c> irrigation district you know why weren't irrigation district you know
• as well as the irrigation districts.
• as well as the irrigation districts.
• as well as the irrigation districts.
• </c> to the actual to an irrigation district? to the actual to an irrigation district? Thanks.

Bills: HB0078, HB0087, SF0070, SF0068, SF0017, SF0043

Keywords: forest health, grant program, state forester, wildfire prevention, environmental conservation, habitat improvement, water development, feasibility studies, appropriations, water management, rehabilitation, irrigation, public works, agricultural supply, municipal water, funding, maintenance projects, tax assessments, state law, forestry management

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, the next provision discusses the irrigation district approval that any project within an irrigation
• c> any</c> irrigation district approval that any irrigation district approval that any project<00:10:
• Chairman, Keith Kenny, on behalf of the Wyoming Association of Irrigation Districts, you do have a letter
• Chairman, members of the committee, the support of one of the irrigation districts that is within the
• basin, the Eden Valley Irrigation District, supports this.

Bills: SF0050, SF0084, HB0133, HB0116, HB0011, HB0044

Keywords: groundwater, water resource management, state engineer, aquifer study, corrective controls, monitoring wells, public reporting, water conservation, Colorado River, drought, irrigation, water rights, voluntary program, interstate agreements, conservation districts, supervisors, elections, agriculture, local governance, beneficial use

Bills: SF0050, SF0084, HB0133, HB0116, HB0011, HB0044

Keywords: groundwater, water resource management, state engineer, aquifer study, corrective controls, monitoring wells, public reporting, water conservation, Colorado River, drought, irrigation, water rights, voluntary program, interstate agreements, conservation districts, supervisors, elections, agriculture, local governance, beneficial use

Transcript Highlights:

• We irrigate over 5,000 acres and have about 7,000 members.
• Thank you. ...less for us there to irrigate because we don't have snow.
• Works Construction Fund is for irrigation.
• Works Construction Fund is for irrigation.
• I'm writing some notes as we go to the Irrigation Trust Fund.

Bills: SB193

Keywords: SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects

Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 193, which would increase the recurring transfer from the Irrigation Works Construction Fund to the Acequia and Community Ditch Infrastructure Fund from $2.5 million to $5 million annually. The sponsor and supporters said the fund is the only recurring source for acequia infrastructure, helps complete projects efficiently through a planning/design and construction process, and has a strong completion rate. They also said the proposed increase reflects recent spending levels and growing need, especially after fires, flooding, and erosion damage in acequia communities. Public testimony was uniformly in support. Representatives of the New Mexico Acequia Association, local acequia and water users groups, conservation advocates, and community members described urgent infrastructure needs, the importance of acequias to agriculture and local economies, and the value of the fund’s application process and project readiness requirements. Several speakers said the fund helps communities recover from wildfire-related damage and prepare for future flooding and erosion. Committee members asked about how the money is structured, whether the bill would affect other earmarks or the irrigation fund balance, and how the $5 million figure was determined. Witnesses explained that the bill changes the recurring allocation only, that the acequia fund and other earmarks remain separate, and that the irrigation works fund has sufficient balance and recurring revenue to support the increase. They also noted that current annual spending has been in the $5 million to $6 million range and that the unmet statewide need is much larger. The committee voted do pass on SB 193, and the bill was approved.

Transcript Highlights:

• We irrigate over 5,000 acres and have about 7,000 members. First, we struggle.
• We irrigate over 5,000 acres and have about 7,000 members.
• Works Construction Fund is for irrigation.
• Works Construction Fund is for irrigation.
• Works Construction Fund is for irrigation.

Bills: SB193

Keywords: SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects, 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Our clients are irrigation districts, water conservancies, the state of Utah and Idaho themselves, and
• He said there are claims on surface water throughout the state, including by many irrigation districts
• six acre-feet per acre for irrigation crops, and of course that— ...acre for irrigation crops, and of
• you can’t irrigate new acres.
• We have a Buckeye, in Buckeye Valley Irrigation District, there's an elementary conservation education

Bills: HB2024, HB2053, HB2097, HB2116, HB2117

Keywords: water infrastructure finance authority, WIFA, water supply development, snowpack augmentation, cloud seeding, water augmentation, water financing, water infrastructure, Arizona water law, water conservation, groundwater recharge, stormwater recharge, reclamation and reuse, water rights, water supply projects, public-private partnership, long-term water augmentation fund, water provider, desalination, drought mitigation

Transcript Highlights:

• , what Senate Bill 193 does is it proposes to amend language relating to the transfers from the irrigation
• Bill 35, the Senate Finance Committee substitute, what it does is it combines the First Judicial District
• and the Second Judicial District into a new judgeship.
• So both of these districts went before the unified budget, and you all know what the unified budget is

Bills: SB193, SB132, SB35, SB145

Keywords: SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects, SB132, DOIT, Department of Information Technology, software replacement, equipment replacement

Transcript Highlights:

• And then an additional item for the Second Judicial District Court on juvenile drug courts.
• And then moving on to page two, $2 million for the Second Judicial District Attorney's Office related
• So if we go back to 134, irrigation works and construction fund—how much is in that fund? Mr.
• So if we go back to 134, irrigation works and construction. 134 irrigation works, and construction fund
• Districts didn't spend all that $12 million.

Bills: SB193, SB132, SB35, SB145

Keywords: SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects, SB132, DOIT, Department of Information Technology, software replacement, equipment replacement

Transcript Highlights:

• , what Senate Bill 193 does is it proposes to amend language relating to the transfers from the irrigation
• is it combines the First Judicial District's creation of a new judgeship and the Second Judicial District
• So both of these districts went before the unified budget, and you all know what the unified budget is

Bills: HB2, SB193, SB132, SB35, SB145

Keywords: general appropriation, budget, Medicaid, education funding, public safety, SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects

Summary: The Senate Finance Committee first heard Senate Bill 193, which would increase the transfer from the irrigation works construction fund to the acequia and community ditch infrastructure fund from $2.5 million to $5 million. Senator Campos said the bill was intended to provide additional resources for acequias facing ongoing needs, including fire and flood recovery in areas such as San Miguel, Mora, and Lincoln counties. Paula Garcia of the New Mexico Acequia Association testified in support. The committee approved the bill on a 6-0 do-pass vote. The committee then considered Senate Bill 132, sponsored by Senator Padilla with Department of Information Technology Secretary Manny Baca. The bill would modernize state IT planning by adding software to the equipment replacement framework and renaming the revolving fund to include software replacement and upgrades. Members discussed the need for more centralized purchasing and coordination across agencies, with Senator Woods expressing frustration that agencies often buy different software instead of using common systems. The bill received a 7-0 do-pass recommendation. Next, the committee took up Senate Bill 35, and first adopted a committee substitute for discussion. The substitute combined two judicial district judgeship proposals for the First and Second Judicial Districts and removed an appropriation. The committee then approved the committee substitute on a 6-0 do-pass vote. Finally, Senate Bill 145 was tabled permanently after Senator Woods moved to table it, with the motion passing 6-1. The committee then adjourned and announced it would meet again Monday.

Transcript Highlights:

• We also have two districts up there that are the local sponsors.
• You have to have a local soil and water district where FEMA is flowing money directly through that district
• You have to have a local soil and water district where FEMA is flowing money directly through that district
• I'm a San Miguel County Commissioner, District 3.
• But I'm here because this is my district and my home.

Bills: HB2, SB193, SB132, SB35, SB145

Keywords: general appropriation, budget, Medicaid, education funding, public safety, SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects

Transcript Highlights:

• We are still working on the situation that we find ourselves in with the San Carlos Irrigation Project
• The San Carlos Irrigation Project is operated by the BIA, which these days isn't really good at running
• District, the Gila River Indian Community, and the San Carlos Apaches—have all decided that we could
• District, the Gila River Indian Community, and the San Carlos Apaches—have all decided that we could
• district lands to be... ...they consider all enrolled irrigation district lands to be the area of influence

Bills: SB1202, SB1287, SB1418, SB1785, SCM1007

Keywords: groundwater, water conservation, Arizona water resources, drought management, water quality, irrigation, active management area, domestic use, stock watering, water rights, small modular reactors, energy regulation, environmental compatibility, utility construction, agricultural use, industrial users, water storage, recovery well, Arizona Revised Statutes, water management

Transcript Highlights:

• transfer to the Forest Land Protection Revolving Fund and uses funds already within the New Mexico Irrigation
• New Mexico Irrigation Works Construction Fund. It does not create a new tax or fee.
• I'm an irrigator.

Bills: SB154, SB187, SB193, SM3

Keywords: insurance, wildfire, flood damage, natural disasters, property coverage, water projects, appropriation, New Mexico, finance authority, infrastructure, New Mexico Finance Authority, funding, SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law

Transcript Highlights:

• transfer to the Forest Land Protection Revolving Fund, and uses funds already within the New Mexico Irrigation
• Very fortunate to have a property that does have an irrigator, do have a private acequia and also the
• Very fortunate to have a property that does have an irrigator, do have a private secuia and also the

Bills: SB154, SB187, SB193, SM3

Keywords: insurance, wildfire, flood damage, natural disasters, property coverage, water projects, appropriation, New Mexico, finance authority, infrastructure, New Mexico Finance Authority, funding, SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law

Summary: The Senate Conservation Committee first took up Senate Memorial 3, presented by Senator O’Malley on behalf of Senator Bergman and a group of Rio Doso High School students and Wild Friends. The memorial asks state agencies to participate in a no-cost workshop on insect identification, ecology, monitoring, and management, and to help educate the public about insects. Students, conservation specialists, and an entomologist testified that insects are essential to pollination, ecosystems, agriculture, and biodiversity, while also noting declining insect populations and the need for more public understanding. Some senators raised concerns about the memorial’s wording, including whether it should be broadened from insects to arthropods and whether the Department of Agriculture, rather than Game and Fish, should be involved. The committee discussed timing and implementation, and the sponsor agreed to work on amendments. The memorial passed on a due pass motion by a vote of 8-0, with one excused. The committee then heard Senate Bill 154, which would require wildfire-related homeowners coverage to include flood damage caused by post-fire conditions for a five-year period. Senator Duhigg and the Office of the Superintendent of Insurance argued the bill responds to the Ruidoso fires and subsequent flooding, noting that many homes were destroyed by mudslides and that flood insurance is often unavailable or inadequate. Supporters, including Ruidoso officials, affected residents, and attorneys, said the bill would help homeowners recover from cascading wildfire and flood losses. Opponents from the insurance industry and business groups warned the bill would be an outlier, could significantly raise premiums, and might reduce availability of homeowners insurance statewide. Committee members questioned how the mandate would work, whether it should be optional, and how costs would be allocated. The bill passed on a 5-4 vote. Finally, the committee briefly heard Senate Bill 187, which appropriates $202,000 from the general fund to the New Mexico Finance Authority’s Water Project Fund for future water projects authorized by the legislature. The Finance Authority said the funding would help address a gap between available money and the 113 recommended projects, totaling about $522 million, including water conservation, flood prevention, storage, wastewater, and watershed projects. Members asked for more detail on the locations and types of projects, and the Finance Authority said it would provide the list from the companion authorization bill. The committee then moved the bill forward on a do pass motion.

Transcript Highlights:

• District board of directors to exclude collecting fees on land that is not being irrigated for several
• It just allows the taxpayers, uh, from being charged by irrigation districts when there is no intent
• We had a constituents that were getting a bill by the irrigation district even after they had, uh, uh
• So they tried to work with the irrigation district and see if there was any options, but they would still
• Their current water provider and then having to pay the irrigation district also even though it was no

Bills: HB 937, HB 2078, HB 2080, HB 3322, HB 3350, HB 4212, HB 4630, HB 4896, HB 4951, HB 5348, HB 5675, SB 565, SB 971, SB 1662, SB 2124

Keywords: special districts, notice requirements, Water Code, government transparency, public meetings, meeting notice, transparency, public engagement, notice, elections, groundwater management, water conservation, joint planning, environmental impact, desired future conditions, groundwater, conservation district, environmental quality, regulatory review, water utility

Transcript Highlights:

• District Board of Directors to exclude... fees on land that is not being irrigated for several reasons
• This just allows taxpayers to avoid being charged by irrigation districts when there is no intent to
• What about constituents that were getting billed by the irrigation district even after their land had
• Irrigation district because many years ago, you know, it was agricultural land.
• district for land that is no longer being irrigated.

Bills: HB937, HB2078, HB2080, HB3322, HB3350, HB4212, HB4630, HB4896, HB4951, HB5348, HB5675, SB565, SB971, SB1662, SB2124

Keywords: special districts, notice requirements, Water Code, government transparency, public meetings, meeting notice, transparency, public engagement, notice, elections, groundwater management, water conservation, joint planning, environmental impact, desired future conditions, groundwater, conservation district, environmental quality, regulatory review, water utility

Transcript Highlights:

• district director may be employed by the irrigation district when certain conditions are met.
• substitute labeled 4481.1 offered by Senator Schessler, which restricts the exemption to those irrigation
• districts with less than 200,000 acres.
• substitute labeled 4481.1 offered by Senator Schoesler, which restricts the exemption to those irrigation
• districts with less than 200,000 acres.

Bills: SB5816, SB5838, SB5930, SB5960, SB5971, SB6075, SB6097, SB6104, SB6216, SB6233, SB6318, SJM8015

Keywords: juice grapes, agriculture, commerce, state regulation, market access, tribal representation, natural resources, board of natural resources, environmental policy, community involvement, irrigation districts, director contracts, beneficial interests, transparency, governance, ungulate populations, wildlife management, habitat restoration, conservation, sustainability

Summary: The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee heard staff reports on a series of bills covering agricultural marketing, tribal representation on the Board of Natural Resources, irrigation district ethics, ungulate population management, a green fertilizer incentive program, agricultural mitigation and impact statements, conservation futures participation by tribes, timber sale efficiencies, wildlife penalty assessments, shellfish fees, and a joint memorial on federal wildfire response. Staff outlined fiscal notes and several proposed substitutes or amendments, including changes to tribal board representation, limits on the green fertilizer program, and revisions to the agriculture protection bill. During executive session, the committee adopted a proposed substitute for SB 5838 after rejecting amendments that would have required tribal board members to have forest-management experience or would have alternated representation between eastern and western Washington. The committee also adopted substitutes for SB 5971 and SB 6097, and advanced SB 5816, 5971, 6097, 6216, 6233, 6318, and SJM 8015. SB 5930, SB 5960, SB 6075, and SB 6104 were taken no action on. SB 6233 drew discussion about possible unintended consequences and the need for clearer definitions, while SB 6318 was supported as a way to avoid fees that could harm shellfish growers. Several members explained their votes, particularly on SB 5838, where concerns were raised about conflicts of interest and the need for relevant forestry expertise on the Board of Natural Resources. On SB 6233, supporters said the bill updated penalty amounts tied to endangered species enforcement, while opponents wanted more specificity. The committee concluded that all listed executive-session items had been either moved forward or dropped, and the meeting adjourned after the board signing process.

Transcript Highlights:

• There will be skeptics in each of our districts, but I'm absolutely convinced that 15 years from now,

Bills: SB5, SJR3, SB 5, SJR 3

Keywords: dementia, research institute, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, funding, grants, state health initiatives, research funding, state budget, prevention, healthcare, medical research, Dementia Prevention and Research Institute, disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, district apportionment, legislative rules

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2223 concerns irrigation district director beneficial interests and contracts.
• House Bill 2223 concerns irrigation district director beneficial interests and contracts.
• This bill would create a similar exemption to allow the spouse of an irrigation district director to
• be employed by the irrigation district, provided that the spouse is employed prior to the date of the
• Amendment S-5307.1 offered by Senator Schessler would restrict this exemption to irrigation districts

Bills: HB2104, HB2223, HB2348, HB2554, HB2619

Keywords: aviation, wildland fires, funding, disaster relief, emergency response, irrigation, district director, contracts, beneficial interests, agriculture, timber sales, land sales, process efficiency, legislation, department language, tribal rights, fishing rights, salmon management, state-tribal agreements, natural resources

Transcript Highlights:

• spouse would also be required for an irrigation district director's spouse in order for the exception
• In irrigation districts around the state...
• In irrigation districts around the state, rural areas are getting smaller all the time, and we're getting
• We're finding that in our irrigation districts throughout the state, and what this does is it basically
• And so if you live within the confines of an irrigation district, you want to serve the community in

Bills: HB2459, HB2480, HB2530, HB2129, HB2223

Keywords: school siting, urban growth, education policy, zoning regulations, community planning, residential development, commercial zones, mixed-use zoning, urban planning, state regulations, public facilities district, regional aquatics, sports facilities, local government, infrastructure, agritourism, agriculture, tourism, economic development, local businesses

Summary: The committee held public hearings on several local government bills, with most of the discussion focused on HB 2480, which would allow residential development in commercial and mixed-use zones for larger GMA-planning cities and limit local governments’ ability to require ground-floor commercial or mixed-use conditions. The bill sponsor and supporters, including the Lieutenant Governor, Governor’s Office, Commerce, builders, business groups, Microsoft, housing advocates, and several city officials, said the bill would help address the housing shortage by unlocking underused commercial land and reducing costly zoning barriers. Opponents and some cities, including Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, Des Moines, Bellingham, Lynnwood, Lacey, Pasco, and others, warned it could undermine walkable centers, reduce retail and tax revenue, harm small businesses, and interfere with local planning; several asked for narrower exemptions or amendments. A proposed substitute was described that would expand the bill to mixed-use zones, add exemptions, and require some height flexibility where mixed-use or ground-floor commercial requirements remain. The committee also heard HB 2223, which would create a conflict-of-interest exception allowing irrigation district directors to have a spouse employed under a contract with the district if disclosure and recusal requirements are met, similar to an existing exception for public hospital district commissioners. The sponsor and the Washington State Water Resources Association said the change would help irrigation districts recruit volunteer board members in rural areas. No vote was taken. HB 2530 would extend the deadline for forming a public facilities district for regional aquatics and sports facilities from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2028. Supporters from Olympia and Tumwater said the extension would give local governments more time to form a district and pursue a long-sought aquatic center; one testifier said removing the deadline would not slow the effort. The committee also heard HB 2459, which would expand authority to site schools outside urban growth areas and extend utilities to them beyond the current Pierce County-specific allowance. Supporters, including the sponsor, Tahoma School District, and school advocates, said it would let districts use land they already own to address overcrowding; opponents, including Futurewise, argued it would weaken Growth Management Act planning and should remain a local or regional issue. Finally, HB 2129 on agritourism drew support from farm interests and some county representatives for helping farms diversify income and preserve farmland, while counties and Futurewise asked for more work on definitions and implementation and raised concerns about unintended regulatory effects. The hearings were suspended and reopened multiple times to accommodate testimony, but no final committee action or votes were taken in the transcript.