Transcript Highlights:

• And my concern is the impact on other industries when we are using an air permit to address a... geological
• Us any concerns.
• Come back to us and tell us, here's the issue. I think you still need BEG.
• industry, you name it.
• This should not be required if there is no intention to use the land.

Bills: SB2037, SB1757, SB1758, SB1759, HB29

Keywords: rock crushing, permits, air quality, environmental monitoring, aggregate production, seismicity, public meeting, land use, SB 1758, cement kiln, portland cement, aggregate production operation, aggregate quarry, semiconductor wafer manufacturing, chip fabrication, semiconductor plant, vibration, seismic disturbance, liability limitation, TCEQ

Transcript Highlights:

• as an industry to explain the importance and need for us to have practical regulation that's protective
• of both the industry and the communities that we serve and at the same time allow us a third option
• We're not looking to shut the industry down. We all use the products.
• We're there, we're not looking to shut the industry down. We all use the products.
• We would add a level of burden which would prevent us from successfully using this permit for anything

Bills: SB2037, SB1757, SB1758, SB1759

Keywords: rock crushing, permits, air quality, environmental monitoring, aggregate production, seismicity, public meeting, land use, SB 1758, cement kiln, portland cement, aggregate production operation, aggregate quarry, semiconductor wafer manufacturing, chip fabrication, semiconductor plant, vibration, seismic disturbance, liability limitation, TCEQ

Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources took public testimony on Senate Bill 1757 and its committee substitute, a measure dealing with aggregate production operations and a new permitting option for rock crushers/aggregate facilities. Testimony centered on whether the bill should remain focused on air permitting or also include broader quarry operations such as stormwater, reclamation, monitoring, and public participation requirements. Supporters of the substitute, including representatives of the Texas Aggregate and Concrete Association and Associated General Contractors, said the bill would provide a voluntary third permitting option, preserve existing authorizations, and create a more practical regulatory path for Texas growth. Opponents and critics, including representatives of Texas for Responsible Aggregate Mining, Job Materials, and Public Citizen, argued the bill as written was too weak or too broad in the wrong ways. They said best management practices should be set in statute or through negotiated rulemaking rather than left to TCEQ rulemaking, and they raised concerns about limited monitoring periods, vague air-monitoring standards, public notice procedures, and the inclusion of non-air requirements in an air permit. Several witnesses said the bill should better balance industry needs with neighborhood impacts and public health protections. Chair Birdwell questioned witnesses about ongoing negotiations between industry groups and said the bill was intended to be a practical compromise. After testimony and questions, public testimony was closed. The committee left SB 1757 and its committee substitute pending, with no vote taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Use reclamation as a terminology.
• as an industry to explain the importance and need. ...for us to have practical regulation that's protective
• of both the industry and the communities that we serve, and at the same time, allow us a third option
• We're not looking to shut the industry down. We all use the products.
• We'd add a level of burden which would prevent us from successfully using this permit for anything.

Bills: SB2037, SB1757, SB1758, SB1759, HB29

Keywords: rock crushing, permits, air quality, environmental monitoring, aggregate production, seismicity, public meeting, land use, SB 1758, cement kiln, portland cement, aggregate production operation, aggregate quarry, semiconductor wafer manufacturing, chip fabrication, semiconductor plant, vibration, seismic disturbance, liability limitation, TCEQ

Transcript Highlights:

• An industrial land bank must be suitable for manufacturing, industrial, or commercial businesses, and
• Under the Growth Management Act, counties were authorized to create industrial land banks to have land
• use was just the need for more developable, buildable land.
• agricultural lands with incompatible uses.
• Local governments can allow for accessory uses on these lands, including non-agricultural accessory uses

Bills: HB2103, HB2388, HB2316, HB2006, HB2224

Keywords: renewable energy, nonemitting generation, public entities, contracting, electric generation, distributed energy, agricultural land, energy generation, renewable resources, siting regulations, land use, urban development, vegetation management, shrubsteppe, environmental regulation, economic development, sales tax, rural counties, industrial land banks, growth management

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on several local government bills. HB 2006 would extend the deadline for certain rural counties that collect a sales and use tax for economic development to designate industrial land banks under the Growth Management Act. The sponsor and county officials from Kittitas County said the bill would help create industrial land for jobs and economic growth, while Futurewise opposed it, arguing the large land banks could conflict with agricultural land protection and that the deadline should not be extended without stronger limits. HB 2103 would expand authority for public utilities and other public entities to enter contracts for the capability of renewable or non-emitting generation projects, including newer resources such as nuclear, renewable hydrogen, and fusion. Supporters from Energy Northwest, public utility districts, and the City of Richland said the bill would align contract law with the Clean Energy Transformation Act and give utilities more flexibility to secure future resources. Opponents, including several ratepayer and advocacy witnesses, warned it would shift financial risk to customers, weaken consumer protections, and repeat past nuclear power failures such as WPPSS. HB 2316 would limit local regulation of shrub-step vegetation inside urban growth areas by stating such vegetation cannot be treated as critical habitat or used to restrict development, and by barring mitigation or replacement requirements. The Tri-Cities sponsor and many local government, housing, and development witnesses said the bill would reduce delays and costs for housing and redevelopment on already urbanized land. Tribes, Audubon, and conservation advocates opposed it, saying it would remove protections for a rare and imperiled ecosystem, harm wildlife and habitat connectivity, and set a harmful precedent. HB 2224 would let a city form a single-city fire protection district without reducing its levy rate dollar-for-dollar, and would allow online notice and service contracts with municipal fire service authorities. City officials, fire chiefs, and the Association of Washington Cities supported it as a practical tool for funding fire service, while one taxpayer advocate opposed the broader trend of appointed bodies with taxing authority. HB 2388 would treat pivot-corner solar and agrovoltaic facilities on agricultural land as distributed energy resources and accessory uses, and deem them consistent with agricultural conservation. The sponsor and conservation groups supported it as a way to add clean energy without displacing productive farmland, while Futurewise raised concerns about definitions and whether the bill could unintentionally weaken farmland protections.

Transcript Highlights:

• use plans, designates a conceptual land use plan upon the commissioner's approval as the controlling
• land use designation for state lands and as having priority over any conflicting zoning.
• That's what the commissioner used: highest and best use of the trust land for the beneficiaries.
• use plans, designates a conceptual land use plan upon approval as the controlling land use designation
• if there is a conflict in proposed land use between mining and commercial use.

Bills: HB2150, HB2262, HB2267, HB2268, HB2351, HB2425, HB2426, HB2427, HB2755, HB2781, HB2913, HB2943, HB2956, HB2975, HB2985, HB4009

Keywords: state land department, mineral lease, renewals, indexed royalties, land use planning, auditor general, five-year plans, geospatial data, Arizona Geological Survey, resource analysis, geographic information systems, wildlife protection, public nuisance, renewable energy, wind farm, solar farm, residential property, public health, local regulations, state land

Transcript Highlights:

• of their property if a county refuses to change the underlying land use.
• Our focus is on working agricultural lands, ranch land, farmland, forest land.
• Our focus is on working agricultural lands, ranch land, farmland, forest land.
• and rural working lands.
• It cannot be in a rural land.

Bills: S0014, S0016, S0024, S0168, S0288, S0548, S0686, S0830, S1138, S1234

Keywords: negligence, settlement, police conduct, municipal liability, personal injury, compensation, injuries, Miami-Dade County, rural electric cooperatives, energy production, Florida law, energy tariffs, regulation, impact fees, transportation capacity, local government, interlocal agreements, growth management, community planning, extraordinary circumstances

Summary: The committee met with a quorum present and took up a series of local claims, public records, growth management, permitting, and nuisance bills. It first heard and approved SB 16, SB 14, and SB 24, all uncontested claims bills providing relief related to injuries or settlements involving the City of St. Petersburg and Miami-Dade County. The committee also approved SB 288 on rural electric cooperatives, which narrows statutory language to protect co-op decisions on generation and power purchases while preserving consumer protections, and SB 830, which creates a public records exemption for certain personal information of county and city managers and their families due to reported threats against local officials. Members then considered SB 1138 on qualified contractors and development review, which would create a registry of licensed professionals to help local governments process pre-application reviews and plats more quickly. Local government groups raised concerns about preemption and preserving quasi-judicial authority, while private-provider supporters backed the bill; Senator Sharief voted no, and the bill was reported favorably. The committee also approved SB 168, expanding public nuisance law to include gambling houses and increasing penalties, and SB 686 on agricultural enclaves, which revises the enclave process, adds a public hearing path, limits it to certain residential projects in urban service areas, and was amended to change a date to June 30, 2026 before being reported favorably. The committee next approved CS for SB 548 on growth management and impact fees, which clarifies plan-based methodology, extraordinary circumstances, interlocal agreements, and refund procedures for improper fee collections. Testimony reflected support for clearer standards but also concerns about fee increases and refund administration. Finally, SB 1234 on building permits and inspections was reported favorably; it would extend permit validity, exempt some low-value work from permitting, create a statewide residential permit form, speed review timelines, and expand private-provider use, drawing opposition from a Miami-Dade building official who argued for continued local oversight and support from private-provider advocates. Senator Jones requested to be recorded as voting affirmatively on several tabs and negatively on tab 9, and the committee adjourned after all bills were disposed of.

Transcript Highlights:

• Of us, 10 miles of us, what is the right distance for us?
• the cement industry.
• And so I guess you're asking us.
• They're not affecting us.
• It just allows us to catch up with the technology that the marketplace has. Brought to us.

Bills: SB1757, SB1758, SB1898, SB2050

Keywords: rock crushing, permits, air quality, environmental monitoring, aggregate production, seismicity, public meeting, land use, SB 1758, cement kiln, portland cement, aggregate production operation, aggregate quarry, semiconductor wafer manufacturing, chip fabrication, semiconductor plant, vibration, seismic disturbance, liability limitation, TCEQ

Transcript Highlights:

• For nearly two years, Bellevue has been updating our land use code to increase housing and affordable
• us to unlock more buildable land within the areas that are served by water and sewer and other infrastructure
• SB 6026 removes barriers to housing, unlocks land, and helps us build the homes Washington needs.
• By allowing underutilized commercial land to be used for housing, the bill removes a real and unnecessary
• Using land area rather than parcels provides clarity and stability because parcel lines can change frequently

Bills: SB5820, SB5995, SB5467

Keywords: freight rail, rail corridor, short-line railroad, rail-dependent uses, industrial land use, growth management act, GMA, comprehensive plan, transportation element, land use planning, local government, county planning, city planning, critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, urban growth area, development regulations, notice on permits

Transcript Highlights:

• lands if the uses do not require urban government services.
• development of freight rail-dependent uses on such lands in the transportation element of the comprehensive
• development of freight rail-dependent uses on such lands in the transportation element of the comprehensive
• there, that's one thing, and they can already allow certain types of industry on those lands.
• It's a roughly 400-acre parcel of land for industrial development designed specifically to respond to

Bills: SB5820, SB5467, SB5995

Keywords: freight rail, rail corridor, short-line railroad, rail-dependent uses, industrial land use, growth management act, GMA, comprehensive plan, transportation element, land use planning, local government, county planning, city planning, critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, urban growth area, development regulations, notice on permits

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> pledge to us. pledge to us.
• And they reached out to us, and I tried to get us started on it, and Idaho got there in front of us and
• And they reached out to us, and I tried to get us started on it, and Idaho got there in front of us and
• And they reached out to us, and I tried to get us started on it, and Idaho got there in front of us and
• </c> reached out to us and I tried to get us reached out to us and I tried to get us started<00:54:29.839

Bills: HB0116, HB0056

Keywords: water rights, beneficial use, industrial production, hydrogen, applications, public welfare, carbon capture, energy standards, public utilities, environmental regulation, state law, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• uses where hydrogen is an industrial product of the existing processes in Wyoming and and to make sure
• uses where hydrogen is an industrial product of the existing processes in Wyoming and and to make sure
• uses where hydrogen is an industrial product of the existing processes in Wyoming and and to make sure
• uses where hydrogen is an industrial product of the existing processes in Wyoming and to make sure.
• Because we do recognize that industry is important, but also maintaining water for agriculture uses is

Bills: HB0116, HB0056

Keywords: water rights, beneficial use, industrial production, hydrogen, applications, public welfare, carbon capture, energy standards, public utilities, environmental regulation, state law, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For certain projects that require state or county approval for entitlement for use.
• So, recommend amending page two, line seven as follows: 'January 1, 2026,' excluding lands owned by or
• :02.800><c> within</c> clarifies the allowable uses within clarifies the allowable uses within agricultural
• owned by or under excluding lands owned by or under control<00:05:04.960><c> of</c><00:05:05.000><c>
• That brings us Okay, thank you, members.

Bills: HB2592

Keywords: Mauna Kea, MKSOA, Mauna Kea Stewardship and Oversight Authority, University of Hawaii, UH, Board of Land and Natural Resources, BLNR, Department of Land and Natural Resources, DLNR, Hawaii Revised Statutes chapter 195H, land management, transition period, management plan, administrative rules, rulemaking, lease extension, sublease, public lands, Native Hawaiian rights, cultural stewardship

Summary: The Judiciary Committee met on several decision-making agendas and first considered HB 1696, which would lower the minimum age for commercial driving in-state from 19 to 18 and adjust qualifying criteria. The committee agreed to accept amendments, including changes suggested by the Operating Engineers Union, and voted unanimously to pass the bill with amendments. HB 2333, which would authorize airport special districts and increase penalties for certain aeronautics violations, was deferred after concerns were raised about treatment of people outside airport security perimeters. On the next agenda, the committee passed HB 1710 with technical amendments only. That bill would allow the State Historic Preservation Division to conduct phase reviews of certain private-property projects and revise concurrence deadlines. HB 1737, clarifying allowable agricultural district uses related to farm dwellings and farm employee housing, also passed with technical amendments only. HB 1823, dealing with coastal zone management and excluding certain state- or county-funded infrastructure projects in Lahaina from the definition of development, passed with amendments from the Attorney General’s office. The committee then took up HB 1897, an alternative dispute resolution measure for condominium-related disputes, including facilitated mediation, evaluative mediation, and binding arbitration. Despite noting broad opposition and a reservation from Senator Buenaventura, the committee adopted the measure and moved it forward as is. Finally, HB 2576, which streamlines background check requirements for health care facilities and workers, passed with amendments reflecting input from OHA, HAH, and DOH. The meeting concluded with notice of a later joint agenda and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it shows you land that is residential, land that is industrial, the purple is industrial.
• We use this land for educational purposes for the local school districts and the community.
• We use this land for educational purposes, for the local school districts, and the community.
• We have seen that land eventually becomes developed for other uses.
• We have seen that land eventually becomes developed for other uses. When it's gone, it's gone.

Bills: HB2201, HB2154

Keywords: urban growth, city planning, county regulations, development standards, land use, land ownership, conservation districts, property rights, regulatory authority, environmental policy, 904, all

Summary: The Local Government Committee first held a work session on the Washington Zoning Atlas. Commerce staff explained that the atlas is a statewide, web-based zoning map built from local zoning codes with help from university planning students. It lets users compare zoning across jurisdictions, query where uses like residential, industrial, commercial, multifamily, or agriculture are allowed, and link back to local development codes. Members asked about using the atlas as a “single source of truth,” layering it with other state data such as transportation or public works projects, update frequency, and whether environmental sensitivity data could be added in the future. Commerce said the atlas is not a parcel-specific buildability tool, is being updated on an ongoing basis, and needs additional funding because the planned update source is not in the governor’s budget. The committee then heard House Bill 2201, which would require counties to align planning and development regulations within urban growth areas with the city’s regulations unless the city agrees otherwise or another law requires a different standard. The sponsor and several city representatives said mismatched county and city rules can undermine annexation planning, infrastructure investment, and long-term development coordination. Cities from Vancouver, Pasco, Ferndale, and Lynnwood described “donut holes,” infrastructure misalignment, and the need for better annexation pathways. The Association of Washington Cities and planning groups said the issue is real and merits more policy work, but the bill needs refinement. Counties, the Washington State Association of Counties, and other opponents said the bill is too broad, does not account for existing interlocal agreements, would add workload without funding, and fails to require timely annexation by cities. The sponsor said the bill needs more work and invited continued discussion. No vote was taken. The committee also heard House Bill 2154, which would prohibit conservation districts from buying or acquiring interests in agricultural land 20 acres or larger that is actively used for farming and would require districts to inventory certain land holdings. The sponsor argued that taxpayer-funded district purchases can drive up farmland prices and reduce opportunities for private farmers to expand. Conservation district representatives, the Washington Association of Conservation Districts, the Puget Sound Partnership, and several local districts opposed the bill, saying conservation districts use voluntary tools such as purchases, easements, leases, and donations to keep land in agricultural production, support beginning farmers, and preserve farmland from development. They said many district-owned parcels are donated rather than purchased, often leased back to farmers, and used for education, demonstration, and conservation. Testifiers emphasized that farmland conversion to development is the larger threat and that the bill would remove an important preservation tool. The hearing closed without action on the bill.

Bills: HB112, HB117

Keywords: county regulation, impervious cover, land use, unincorporated areas, environmental management

Transcript Highlights:

• So where do we land from here?
• I'll let, let the record. that Chairman Dutton is also here on the dot with us.
• It is when we take away that choice and use virtual learning as a punishment.
• This task force helps us get this work done.
• Our parents depend on us so that they are able to comfortably return back to work.

Bills: HB117

Keywords: county regulation, impervious cover, land use, unincorporated areas, environmental management

Transcript Highlights:

• Jim, since you're also new to us, why don't you go ahead and introduce yourself, just as you kick off
• septic system, and there was ambiguity whether or not that was allowed given the language that we used
• the original bill. ...there was ambiguity whether or not that was allowed given the language that we used
• I am the legislative director for the Building Industry Association of Washington.

Bills: HB2269

Keywords: middle housing, zoning, unincorporated areas, affordable housing, land use, density, 904, all

Summary: The Housing Committee opened its 2026 session with member introductions and brief remarks about a light workload and interest in middle housing, especially in rural areas. Chair Peterson noted the committee would be looking for bills and possible work sessions if the agenda stays light. The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 2269, a trailer bill to last session’s middle housing legislation. Staff explained that HB 2269 would limit the authority for middle housing in limited areas of more intensive rural development to rural counties, expand eligible wastewater systems to include large on-site sewage systems, and clarify that the sewer system serving such development must be publicly owned. Representative Bernbaum said the bill was intended to clarify ambiguities from last year’s law so small counties could confidently plan for middle housing, and noted a technical amendment would remove an unintended restriction on urban counties. Testimony from Anthony Mixer, Curtis Steinhauer, Ken Short, Andrea Smiley, and Bryce Yadon was generally supportive, emphasizing housing supply, local flexibility, and the need for infrastructure and oversight. Committee members asked several questions about the difference between standard septic systems and large on-site sewage systems, state versus local oversight, flood-zone concerns, and how the bill interacts with rural ADU legislation. Witnesses explained that large on-site systems typically serve multiple units and involve more monitoring and state Department of Health oversight. No votes were taken; the committee closed the public hearing on HB 2269 and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• or forest lands and use those as a different type of classification.
• As you've heard me talk a lot over the last few years, you can currently use ag land, rural land, and
• in there, they can use that land, right?
• I was going to ask if that land was being, was zoned ag or if it was being used or if it was still useful
• need for the freight rail-dependent use land along Clark County's only short-line railroad.

Bills: SB5820, SB6064, SB6077, SB6101, SB6013, SB6066

Keywords: freight rail, rail corridor, short-line railroad, rail-dependent uses, industrial land use, growth management act, GMA, comprehensive plan, transportation element, land use planning, local government, county planning, city planning, critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, urban growth area, development regulations, notice on permits

Summary: The committee heard several bill briefings and public hearings. SB 6064 would let certain large fire protection districts or regional fire authorities assume administration and enforcement of the International Fire Code within their boundaries, with notice to the county and displaced county workers offered equivalent jobs. Supporters said it would improve consistency, safety, and local control; opponents from counties, fire marshals, and builders argued it was unnecessary because interlocal agreements already exist and could add permitting complexity and delays. SB 6101 would require county coroners to be appointed rather than elected, while preserving existing medical examiner systems in larger counties. The sponsor and supporters said the change would address problems like the Yakima County coroner case, improve professionalism, and reduce partisan elections; opponents said it would reduce voter accountability, raise costs, and create conflicts of interest concerns. SB 6077 would extend the deadline for assessors and taxpayers to exchange valuation evidence in property tax appeals from 21 to 28 business days before a hearing, starting with petitions filed on or after July 1, 2026. Supporters said the extra time would improve due process and fairness; county assessors and some tax appeal practitioners said they were open to the timing change but wanted broader reforms to address long hearing backlogs. The committee also heard SB 5820, which would repeal Clark County-specific authority enacted in 2017 allowing freight rail-dependent uses on certain resource lands adjacent to a short-line railroad. The sponsor and supporters from FutureWise, local residents, and the City of Battleground said the prior law undermined Growth Management Act protections for agricultural and resource lands and had led to conflict and litigation. Opponents, including the railroad operator, Association of Washington Business, and former sponsor Linda Wilson, said the rail overlay supports economic development, jobs, and rail-served industrial land, and warned the repeal would harm local planning and investments. Members asked about how county and city comprehensive plans interact under the Growth Management Act, and staff said they would provide a summary of the appeals process. Finally, SB 6013 would update ski lift terminology to include aerial tramways, tows, and conveyors in the state safety and insurance requirements; State Parks supported it as agency-request legislation, and the bill was presented as a technical update with no opposition noted in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• over-regulation. 500,000 residents or adjacent counties strategically targeting areas of growth and industrial
• statewide plan that fortifies. domestic supply chains, attracts private investment and cutting-edge industries
• is an indirect impact to Samsung and really helps grow, not just Samsung, but the semiconductor industry
• The President has worked very aggressively in the Senate, and she has done a great job educating us all
• There have been instances where that rank was not used, or just the "peace officer" reference was placed

Bills: HB112, HB117

Keywords: county regulation, impervious cover, land use, unincorporated areas, environmental management, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• individual project decisions, not land use planning decisions.
• The second step is the land use.
• The second step is the land use.
• rail-dependent uses and include development of freight rail-dependent uses on land adjacent to... ..
• rail-dependent uses and include development of freight rail-dependent uses on land adjacent to...

Bills: SB5633, SB6279, SB6291, SB6274, SB6309, SB5903, SB6016, SB5820, SB6132, SB6189

Keywords: land subdivision, zoning, property development, local government authority, real estate, infrastructure, wildfire, wildland urban interface, WUI, building code, fire-resistant construction, defensible space, hazard map, risk map, state building code council, department of natural resources, fire marshal, regional fire defense board, roofing standards, exterior walls

Summary: The committee heard extensive testimony on SB 5633, a major rewrite of subdivision law. Staff described changes that would move many subdivision decisions from legislative bodies to administrative personnel, limit or eliminate public hearings for plats, expand notice to nearby landowners, clarify pre-application conferences, require concurrent review of related permits, and set a 100-day decision timeline for preliminary plats. Supporters from the building industry, Realtors, and some city officials said the bill would streamline an outdated process, reduce delays and costs, and help housing production. County and city representatives, while praising the stakeholder process and some technical improvements, raised concerns about eliminating public hearings, local accountability, and implementation details. The committee also heard testimony on SB 6279, which would incorporate the Wildland Urban Interface code into the state building code after wildfire maps are completed, with local amendment authority and consultation requirements. Fire marshals and some environmental advocates supported the goal but asked for clearer environmental protections, more transparency in mapping, and more local flexibility; builders and county officials opposed or sought changes, warning about costs, timing, and the practicality of applying the code before maps are finalized. The committee then heard SB 6309, which would streamline permitting for Sound Transit and other regional transit authority projects by allowing permit applications before land acquisition is complete, allowing rail facilities to exceed some local height and setback limits when practicable, and exempting certain land divisions tied to condemnation for essential public facilities. The committee waived the five-day notice rule for the bill, and the sponsor and Sound Transit representatives said the measure would reduce delays and help deliver light rail and bus rapid transit more efficiently while preserving local coordination and cultural resource review. The committee also heard SB 6291, which would extend from two to four years the period during which local health jurisdiction wastewater inspectors may work under supervision before certification; public health officials supported the change as a workforce and training fix, saying the current timeline is too short and costly. Finally, SB 6274 would require comprehensive plans to identify infrastructure barriers, including frontage and street standards that affect infill and middle housing, and to review those standards for consistency with housing and transportation goals. Builders and some planners supported the bill as a way to reduce costly frontage mandates, while city and advocacy witnesses asked for clearer definitions and cautioned about impacts on safety, accessibility, and local street design.

Transcript Highlights:

• Maybe it's not an ag park lessee; maybe it's a public lands or private lands issue.
• Uh you've heard us. We support comments. Uh you've heard us.
• Requires all state lands used in the commercial production of commodities, including any lands under
• </c><00:19:28.320><c> production</c> lands used in the commercial production lands used in the commercial
• </c> water land will defer this measure. water land will defer this measure.

Bills: SB2489, SB2310, SB2372, SB2426, SB2334, SB2925, SB3323

Keywords: invasive species, agriculture, biosecurity, lease provisions, environment, natural resources, flood management, vegetation removal, Kainahola stream, Hawaii legislation, trees, exceptional trees, significant trees, urban forestry, arborist advisory committee, DLNR, Department of Land and Natural Resources, University of Hawaii, county planning, tree preservation

Summary: The committee heard several measures related to agriculture, invasive species control, trees, reef protection, and land use. SP 2489 would require Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity leases to include access, invasive-species control, and termination provisions; DAB and DLNR supported it, as did several outside groups, while the Hawaii Farm Bureau and Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council raised concerns about notice, cooperation with lessees, and placing penalties on leaseholders for preexisting infestations. The chair noted six testifiers in support, one opposed, and three with comments. SP 2310 would appropriate funds to remove overgrown vegetation from the Kohola stream. DAB supported the bill but explained that the work already completed by its contractor stopped at a DOT boundary, and that the affected parcel appears to be a DOT highway segment on ceded lands; the committee discussed whether the appropriation should instead go to DOT. SP 2372, on exceptional and significant trees, received support from DNR and Outdoor Circle, with testimony describing trees as critical infrastructure and suggesting technical amendments to committee membership and the process for recommending trees to county councils. SP 2426, which would authorize DNR to contract with private parties to maintain sunscreen dispensers at state beaches and promote mineral-based sunscreen as reef-protective, drew support from DNR and reef advocates, while another witness questioned the science behind claims about mineral versus chemical sunscreens and urged broader environmental solutions. SP 2334 would impose a land conversion fee on agricultural land converted to other uses, create a fee fund for programs including healthy soils, and require state agricultural lands to use a conservation metric. DAB offered comments, and testimony from climate and farm groups generally supported the conservation goals but questioned references to programs not yet in place and objected to language excluding solar and wind uses, with one witness urging that agri-voltaics remain allowed. SP 2925, concerning coconut trees, would recognize them as food, water, and cultural resources, require signage for landscape palms, set labeling standards, and create a tax credit for naturally managed consumable coconut trees. DAB shifted from opposition to comments, DNR supported, and testimony from cultural and subsistence advocates strongly backed the bill as a response to coconut rhinoceros beetle impacts; committee questions focused on enforcement of signage, inspection resources, and the proposed tax credit.