Video & Transcript Research : 'implementation delay'

Page 1 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/3/25 - Part 1

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • that a year. will be started everything is delayed will be started everything is delayed for<00:06:25.880
  • <00:13:28.440> Mr delayed Mr delayed Mr according<00:13:29.920> to<00:13:30.040> the
  • And I don't think that a year's delay in implementing this program really does anything to combat the
  • anxiety about implementation.
  • <00:41:09.200> in think that a Year's delay in think that a Year's delay in implementing<00
Bills: HF11
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/3/25 - Part 2

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • We don't need to relitigate today when it was passed, and to not take the time to delay the implementation
  • <00:09:50.880> the to not take the time to delay the to not take the time to delay the implementation
  • We had no specifics from DEED regarding implementation.
  • We had no specifics from DEED regarding implementation.
  • mean representative Baker wants to delay mean representative Baker wants to delay the<00:32:03.200
Bills: HF11
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Senate in Special Session B Jan 28th, 2025

Florida Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • As we will delay such, I ask you to give wisdom and clarity to each one of our senators who have responsibilities
  • We have $375 million for the Chief Immigration Officer to implement machinations to ensure the full support
  • But as Senator Gruters explained, the purpose of the bill is to set Florida up to help implement President
  • Would you agree there are not enough ICE agents out there to implement the...
  • Personal risk, great risk, has put chips on the table in order to implement the vision of the guy he
Bills: SJR36, SR8, SR14, SR15, SR17, HCR54
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Jan 28th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a day to advocate and educate as we all work towards prevention and the implementation of stronger
Bills: SJR36, SR8, SR14, SR15, SR17, HCR54
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 14th, 2026 at 04:37 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The implementation support coming from the grant funding included helps schools implement these policies
  • Why are we doing this phased implementation? Why not?
  • Implement a K-12 ban.
  • that has funding that allows us to incentivize that implementation.
  • But if they don't implement, So we can tell them you have to do it.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • implementation of of uh House Bill 257. implementation of of uh House Bill 257.
  • <00:25:09.960> this<00:25:10.120> local wants to implement this local wants to implement
  • grant or $100,000 grants to implement grant or $100,000 grants to implement innovative<01:08:30.359
  • CTE program implementation. CTE program implementation.
  • a developmental [clears throat] delay. a developmental [clears throat] delay.
Summary: The Education Assessment & Accountability Review Subcommittee approved the minutes from its October 14 and November 4 meetings and also approved the Office of Education Accountability report analyzing student discipline data in Kentucky schools. The main presentation came from KDE Commissioner Dr. Robby Fletcher on implementation of House Bill 257, which he said has two major parts: selection of a statewide college entrance exam through a new procurement process, and development of locally designed indicators of quality for accountability. On the college exam, Fletcher explained that the state had to reopen procurement after Senate Bill 197, with the RFP released May 21, vendor questions handled through the Finance and Administration Cabinet, proposals due June 22, and scoring and review expected in July and August, with a vendor decision not likely until October. He emphasized that the exam is a norm-referenced college-readiness measure, not a test of Kentucky academic standards, which are assessed by the KSA. Members asked about the science requirement in statute, the possibility of multiple vendors or district choice, and whether the CLT could participate; Fletcher said vendors must address science in the RFP, multiple vendors could be possible, and any vendor could submit a proposal if it meets the rubric. He also noted that ACT and SAT differ in structure, that either can meet college-readiness benchmarks, and that there were no major complaints about the SAT during its first year of use. The second major topic was the locally developed indicators of quality under House Bill 257. Fletcher said these are intended to let districts measure themselves against their own goals rather than compare districts statewide, while still aligning with Kentucky standards. He described examples such as achievement, growth, student well-being, safety, fiscal responsibility, civics, internships, apprenticeships, project-based learning, and defenses of learning. He said districts may use local assessments such as MAP, STAR, and I-Ready alongside state data, and that local models should be developed with families, community members, and workforce partners. He added that KDE is providing technical assistance, has applied for a federal CGSA grant, and will use a one-time $15,000 cost offset for districts implementing local accountability models, with a superintendent webcast planned for August.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 10th, 2026 at 09:10 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • requirements around professional development, services coordination for children at risk of developmental delays
  • What is it going to do to those organizations by implementing this and getting fully enacted? Mr.
  • Cibola County, we may see, in talking to those officials yesterday after the hearing, we may see some delay
Bills: SB241, SB145
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • a new system and prevent to implement a new system and prevent encountering<00:08:56.720> some
  • Uh, is $151 million the all-in total cost of ownership, or just implementation?
  • Uh, what are the ongoing annual operating costs after implementation?
  • So my next question is what happens if this can't be implemented before December of 2030?
  • happens if this can't be implemented happens if this can't be implemented before<00:25:56.480>
Summary: The House Budget Review Subcommittee on Personnel, Public Retirement, and Finance held its first meeting and heard a presentation from personnel cabinet officials on a major request to replace the Kentucky Human Resources Information System, known as CHRIS, which currently handles HR, payroll, tax compliance, and health plan administration for state government and several local offices. Officials said the system supports payroll for about 48,000 employees, covers all three branches of government and 24 sheriff and county clerk offices, and stores records for nearly 475,000 current and former users. They explained that SAP has said the system will reach end of life and lose support by 2030, creating risks around security, maintenance, and tax compliance if it is not replaced. Commissioners and staff emphasized that the replacement is needed not just as an upgrade but as a full system replacement, especially because the current platform no longer receives meaningful HR enhancements and will eventually lose security updates and tax tables. They also described the Kentucky Employees Health Plan as a major driver of the project, noting it serves nearly 300,000 covered lives, many school boards, pre-65 retirees, and more than 700 entities, with significant complexity in billing, premium collection, and regulatory compliance. Officials said the new system would help address current manual workarounds, support changing insurance rules, and better protect personally identifiable and health information. Members asked detailed questions about the $151 million request, including why the estimate had risen by more than $50 million, what would happen if the project missed the 2030 deadline, how progress would be tracked, how vendor costs were estimated, and what the largest cost components would cover. Officials said the increase was mainly due to inflation and changing requirements, and that there was no real backup plan if the replacement was not completed before support ends. They said the project would be managed through an RFP process expected in July 2026, with kickoff in January 2027 and go-live by July 2030, and that oversight would include an enterprise steering committee, monthly updates, and existing quarterly COT reporting to LRC. They also explained that the largest share of the request is for implementation and integrator services, with additional amounts for software licensing and hosting, independent verification and validation, dependent verification, FSA administration, and limited contract support, and that payments would be tied to deliverables and acceptance testing.