Video & Transcript Research : 'guardianship grants'

Page 1 of 500
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Government Operations Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 11:00 am

Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have a $180,000 grant that's an education grant that we were the fiscal officer for, and we've had
  • We got notice that they are terminating that grant, which was under an extension.
  • We got notice that they are terminating that grant, which was under an extension.
  • For example, there were some airport grants.
  • Committee had brought it down to $100,000, but in visiting with some folks in tourism, and there are grant
Bills: HB1015
Summary: The Government Operations Division met to review proposed amendments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) budget, with the chair noting the bill would not be voted out that day and would likely be held until the following week for any technical corrections. Members discussed a series of amendments, generally without objection: a $1.5 million appropriation for a pro-life education committee; a $40,000–$45,000 deficiency appropriation for Uniform Laws travel costs; creation of a state deferred maintenance fund with $40 million for deferred maintenance projects; adding the state hospital project to the OMB budget with $200 million from the Strategic Investment and Improvements Fund (SIF) and $85 million from a line of credit, plus construction management oversight; $110,114 for custodial equity increases; $1 million for a retirement incentive pool; $3 million to cover a shortfall in the new and vacant FTE funding pool; and $4 million for space reconfiguration and rent/moving costs. Prairie Public Broadcasting was also discussed, with a suggestion to change the purpose from local programming to infrastructure and set the amount at $850,000, likely as one-time SIF funding. The committee also heard a heads-up about a possible $180,000 federal reimbursement issue tied to an education grant, but no action was taken on that item. The committee further discussed a broader amendment to reduce the transfer from the social services fund to the human services fund from $250 million to $232 million, based on DHS needs and available carryover funding. Members also agreed to add emergency clauses to the capital assets, deferred maintenance, and moving/space reconfiguration items. The chair indicated Brady could begin incorporating the discussed changes into a consolidated amendment, while noting there could still be additional items next week. Staff also reported the SIF balance was about $280 million positive, though some removed agency items, including airport grants, would need to be considered. The committee then reconsidered its earlier action on House Bill 1581 and restored it to its original form at $100,000 after hearing that the funding would support tribal tourism-related events tied to upcoming 2026 celebrations and the Theodore Roosevelt Library opening. A motion for do pass on the bill as originally introduced passed unanimously by roll call. Finally, the committee postponed action on another bill until later that day, directing that revised materials be distributed and that the item be taken up in the afternoon session.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Fraud Committee Meeting - 2025-05-05

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I am wondering, are you mostly looking at grants and grants to non-profits?
  • I receive employment in return for awarding a grant, or I recommend that an agency award a grant.
  • and grants management, grant monitoring, and grantee evaluation.
  • Agency staff who manage grants.
  • They are two very different things: the grants, I think, and Medicaid, which is not generally grants,
Bills: HF3043, HF2891
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 5/5/25

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, and I am wondering, are you mostly looking at grants and grants to nonprofits?
  • </c><00:36:26.880><c> Um,</c><00:36:27.200><c> is</c> grants and grants to nonprofits?
  • Um, is grants and grants to nonprofits?
  • </c> um not nonprofit grants. um not nonprofit grants. Representative<00:36:44.079><c> Greenman.
  • and grants management, grant monitoring, and grantee evaluation.
Bills: HF3043, HF2891
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Revenue Committee, February 19, 2026

Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> charging guardianship fees. charging guardianship fees.
  • <01:03:18.559><c> those</c><01:03:18.799><c> guardianships</c> guardianship those guardianships guardianship
  • </c> guardianship happen under title three. guardianship happen under title three.
  • </c> investigates guardianship complaints. investigates guardianship complaints.
  • </c> non-person by the guardianship. non-person by the guardianship.
Bills: HB0101, HB0062, HB0109
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • and to requiring criminal history record information and other information in connection. with a guardianship
  • of the ward's estate. guardianship association to resolve ambiguities related to overly broad and unclear
  • Generally, Senate Bill 23. 42 would require applications for guardianship to include the phone number
  • person under care limit background checks to caregivers directly responsible for a person under guardianship
  • I'm also on the, I'm now in visiting status mode and And on the board of directors of the Texas Guardianship
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships May 5th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • Avoid organizations who have a vested financial interest in continued conflict or receive grants related
  • Recent years, there have been issues with transferring guardianships between courts throughout Texas.
  • But when a probate case gets moved up, a guardianship case goes up to Dallas County, they'll tell But
  • A number of people have been complaining about how come these guardianships cost more and more and more
  • Grant me the opportunity. I will research that and get you an answer.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill clarifies a point of confusion in the estates code relating to the documentation granted by
  • Chairman and members, Senate Bill 1760 relates to guardianships for persons who are incapacitated, changing
  • Generally, the bill would set a fee of $45 for filing a guardianship case transferred from another county
  • , ensure the guardianship is concluded fully before the guardian is dismissed, and... streamline and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill clarifies the point of confusion in the estate's code relating to the documentation granted
  • Chairman and members, Senate Bill 1760 relates to guardianships for persons who are incapacitated changing
  • Generally, the bill would set a fee of $45 for filing a guardianship case transferred from another county
  • and ensure the guardianship is concluded fully before the guardian is dismissed and streamline and specified
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Veterans and Military Affairs Division 3/11/26

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • provide direct grants.
  • Office grants, and veteran service organization grants, since they each have their own statutory grant
  • A summary of the grants.
  • Veterans Service Office grants veteran service organization grants since they each have their own statutory
  • grant requirements.
Bills: HF3727, HF3684, HF3467
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill clarifies a point of confusion in the Estates Code relating to the documentation granted by
  • Generally, the bill would set a fee of $45 for filing a guardianship case transferred from another county
  • and ensure the guardianship has concluded fully before the guardian is dismissed, and streamline and
  • Generally, the bill would set a fee of $45 for filing a guardianship case transferred from another county
  • and ensure the guardianship has concluded fully before the guardian is dismissed, and streamline and
Summary: The committee heard several probate, family law, judicial, property, and contract-related bills. Senate Bill 1335, relating to decedents’ estates, would remove outdated references to a clerk’s certificate, allow courts to remove personal representatives on their own motion with notice by qualified delivery method, and add independent administrators to provisions that referenced only independent executors; an estate-planning attorney testified in support, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1760, concerning guardianship transfer fees and procedures, was described as setting a $45 filing fee for transferred guardianship cases and clarifying completion and dismissal procedures; it received no testimony and was left pending. Senate Bill 2127 would shorten the eligibility period for retired judges to serve as visiting judges from eight years to six, restrict practice in their assigned region for two years, and require conflict-related certification; it also was left pending without testimony. Senate Bill 302 would shift the cost of a traveling probate judge to the requesting estate or parties rather than the county; one witness registered in favor, no one testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then considered a committee substitute for Senate Bill 252, which would clarify the parental presumption in conservatorship cases, require non-parents seeking relief against a parent to file an affidavit showing significant impairment to the child if relief is denied, require courts to state specific findings when overcoming the presumption, confirm the clear-and-convincing standard, and clarify that agreed prior orders do not defeat the presumption. The substitute was explained as consensus language from a work group, public testimony was reopened, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1734, on deed fraud, would create a streamlined ex parte process for property owners to have fraudulent deeds declared void, modeled on the fraudulent lien statute; county clerk and title association representatives testified that it would provide a low-cost self-help remedy for a growing problem, and the bill was left pending subject to the chair. Senate Bill 1975 would prevent Texas contractors from being forced to litigate disputes in foreign jurisdictions and require disputes to be handled in the county where the project is located; it was presented as a repeat of a previously vetoed bill and was left pending. Finally, the committee took up a substitute for Senate Bill 1940, concerning transfer-on-death style beneficiary designations for manufactured homes. The substitute would allow one or more beneficiaries instead of only one, transfer the interest to surviving designated beneficiaries who survive by 120 hours, extend the application period for transfer to 365 days, void the designation if not timely filed, and require mailing by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested. The substitute was adopted without objection. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Government Operations Division Apr 16th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • works with guardians, and it was providing some justification for increasing the guardians' pass grants
  • Guardianship pass grants.
  • On your topic of the guardianship grant, I don’t remember that we had that discussion before.
  • But if we reduce the pro-life issue to a million and increase the guardianship by a million, we’re spending
  • I'll move Version 2006 with the additions of $1 million extra for guardianships, $500,000 less for the
Bills: SB2012
Summary: The Government Operations division met to consider House Bill 1015, the OMB budget, with several amendments already in hand. A major portion of the discussion centered on Senator Mathern’s concerns about the proposed new state hospital in Jamestown. He argued the project is outdated, too expensive, and should be delayed or reduced in favor of local behavioral health services and deferred maintenance at the existing LaHogue facility. Other members questioned him about staffing, capacity, constitutional issues, and the relationship between the hospital proposal and broader mental health investments in other bills. The committee also reviewed budget mechanics, including the transfer of up to $240 million from the Social Services Fund to the Human Services Finance Fund, a $40 million deferred maintenance fund, a $3 million deficiency appropriation for the new and vacant FTE pool, and other OMB-related items. Members discussed whether OMB should have managerial control over the Jamestown project and generally agreed that OMB oversight could help manage costs, though concerns about the hospital remained. The committee then considered two funding items that drew the most debate: guardianship grants and a pro-life education campaign. After testimony from a representative supporting the campaign, members agreed to reduce that item by $500,000 and add $1 million for guardianship grants, while leaving the overall bill to be finalized in conference. The committee adopted Amendment Version 2006 with those changes and then passed HB 1015 as amended on a roll call vote, with all members voting aye except Senator Burckhard on the amendment vote; he later voted aye on the bill itself. The chair indicated the bill would move to conference committee.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Government Operations Division Apr 3rd, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • Number six adds contingent funding for human trafficking victim grants.
  • The first one for the guardianship programs tied to Senate Bill 2029... ...first one for the guardianship
  • Section 8 updates the amount for human trafficking victim grants that you're appropriating in the bill
  • ... ...human trafficking victim grants that you're appropriating in the bill.
  • So, as we tally those things so far, ...$2 million from the grant that helped purchase the land.
Bills: SB2012
Summary: The Government Operations Division met to continue work on budget and bill amendments. The committee first took up the Attorney General’s budget and reviewed a detailed amendment package that adjusted FTE levels, salary equity funding, funding sources, and several one-time appropriations. Changes included removing some House-added items, adding contingent funding tied to other bills, restoring certain funding sources, increasing the electronic smoking device manufacturer fee, and adding a provision on 24/7 sobriety program fees. Senator Dwyer then offered a further amendment to make the electronic smoking device fee a $2,000 application fee with a $500 annual renewal fee, which passed. The committee then voted 4-1 to adopt the budget as amended and give it a do pass recommendation as amended. The committee next considered House Bill 1143, relating to Great Plains Food Bank funding. After testimony from Amy Cleary on behalf of Great Plains Food Bank, members discussed the organization’s statewide role and the project’s financing, including a planned $30 million facility and existing fundraising. Senator Burkhard moved to restore the appropriation from $5 million to $10 million, and the motion passed 4-1. The committee then voted 4-1 to give the bill a do pass recommendation as amended, with Senator Burkhard designated as carrier. Finally, the committee discussed House Bill 1524, which would fund regional planning councils and authorize 16 FTEs. Members expressed sympathy for the councils’ work but concerns about approving new state-funded positions. No action was taken, and the chair asked to hold the bill over for further review. The committee then recessed, noting remaining budget work and upcoming hearings.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Leg Committee Meeting - 2025-03-19

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Taxpayers, our constituents want to have confidence that we're making investments in grant programs and
  • And that's donations and other grants and such, I'm assuming.
  • Information today or quickly just as to the donations and other grants that all pay for the wages.
  • And so if this is going to the Board of Directors of Minnesota Humanities Center as a grant program,
  • , they would go through the grant process, correct?