Video & Transcript Research : 'guarantee prohibition'

Page 1 of 458
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety REVISED Apr 21st, 2026 at 09:00 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • There was nothing that would prohibit you, as you said, from correctly doing that Senator Goodwin waves
  • districts, the fire protection districts who are not tied to a municipality, we didn't want it to be prohibitive
Bills: HB3045
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Guarantees are quite common. You know, you'll have guarantees with contractors and subcontractors.
  • <00:06:59.680> Guarantees approached about this, too.
  • Guarantees approached about this, too. Guarantees are are are quite<00:07:01.560> common.
  • > and guarantees with contractors and guarantees with contractors and subcontractors. subcontractors
  • > of<00:07:12.280> that Guarantee on rent, things of that Guarantee on rent, things of
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Signs, placards, and other objects of similar nature are prohibited.
  • Food and drink are prohibited in the hearing room. Members of the committee.
  • Signs, placards, or other objects of similar, similar nature are prohibited.
  • Food and drink are prohibited in the hearing room.
  • Texas has a law prohibiting abortion already in place.
Bills: HB7, SB 8
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Signs, placards, and other objects of a similar nature are prohibited.
  • Food and drink are also prohibited in the hearing room.
  • Signs, placards, or other objects of a similar nature are prohibited.
  • Food and drink are also prohibited.
  • Texas has a law prohibiting abortion already in place.
Bills: HB7, SB 8, HB7, SB 8
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/13/26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It also prohibits the application of animal waste and sewage sludge.
  • It also prohibits the application of animal waste and sewage sludge to impervious surfaces, streets,
  • I think what we have done, the precedent I would cite is a very old one, and there is a prohibition on
  • I think what we have done, the precedent I would cite is a very old one, and there is a prohibition on
  • I think what we have done, the precedent I would cite is a very old one, and there is a prohibition on
Bills: HF858, HF2577, HF2576
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Ways and Means Committee 3/23/26

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • damage to your property and they refused to pay you back, the platform or Airbnb will step in and guarantee
  • it, not warranty it, but guarantee and take care of it to make the person whole.
  • So we don't have an amendment. step in and guarantee that not warranty step in and guarantee that not
  • warranty it<00:30:02.000> but<00:30:02.240> guarantee<00:30:03.200> and<00:30:03.760
  • and uh take care of to it but guarantee and uh take care of to make<00:30:05.039> the<00:30:05.360
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/3/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's now 2026, and Minnesotans with disabilities do not yet have the right to accommodations guaranteed
  • 15.599> accommodations have the right to accommodations have the right to accommodations guaranteed
  • <00:54:18.800> House guaranteed in Minnesota statute.
  • House guaranteed in Minnesota statute.
  • With disabilities prohibited.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from February 24 and February 26. It then took up House File 3661, a bill originally authored by Representative Gomez and presented by Representative Feist, which would ban government use of facial recognition technology and be re-referred to the Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee. The committee adopted the A1 amendment, described as a technical amendment based on House Research recommendations, before hearing testimony on the bill. Representative Feist said the bill is aimed at preventing serious privacy and civil-liberties harms, including secretive surveillance, racial and gender bias, and the lack of statewide rules governing government use of facial recognition. Supportive testimony came from Chad Marlo of the ACLU, who argued the issue is bipartisan, the technology has accuracy problems, and government use is expanding against vulnerable groups. Chris Wayland of Restore the Fourth Minnesota also supported a ban, emphasizing the inability to opt out of facial recognition and the lack of standards, disclosure, and community input. Rich Newmeister urged stronger transparency measures, including agency policies and public notice in buildings using the technology. Major Spencer Baky of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office opposed an outright ban, saying facial recognition is used only as an investigative lead, not for positive identification or real-time surveillance, and that results are corroborated before use. He said the office has used the tool in hundreds of investigations and supports a statutory framework with safeguards instead of a ban. In member discussion, Representative Hudson argued a blanket ban was too broad and suggested a more targeted evidentiary approach, while Representative Moller and Representative Kurr expressed concern about misuse and the federal government's use of the technology. Representative Durant asked whether there was a current Minnesota problem and whether stakeholders and law enforcement had been involved in drafting the bill. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided, beyond adoption of the amendment and the committee’s continued consideration of HF 3661.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 2/26/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, House File 3642 as amended is a bill to prohibit crypto kiosks in Minnesota.
  • Um, so I just wanted to be here today to voice my support for prohibiting these ATMs.
  • support for uh prohibiting these ATMs. support for uh prohibiting these ATMs.
  • However, it is important to note that this ban does not prohibit cryptocurrency itself.
  • not prohibit cryptocurrency itself. not prohibit cryptocurrency itself.
Bills: HF3642, HF2700, HF3615
Summary: The Commerce Finance and Policy Committee met on House File 3642, which would prohibit virtual currency kiosks in Minnesota. The bill was laid over, and the committee adopted a DE1 author’s amendment. Chair Kaggel and Representative Perryman described the measure as a response to widespread scams using crypto kiosks, especially against older adults and other vulnerable people, and said they would continue working with the Department of Commerce and other stakeholders. Testimony from law enforcement and advocates strongly supported the ban. A St. Cloud police sergeant and a Woodbury detective described cases in which victims lost large sums, said the current safeguards and refund rules are being bypassed, and argued that the kiosks are difficult to investigate because funds move quickly and often overseas. An AARP Minnesota volunteer also supported the bill, saying kiosks are a preferred tool for scammers and that existing protections have not kept pace with the problem. The Department of Commerce said it strongly supports the bill and reported that it has received 120 complaints over three years involving nearly $1 million in reported losses, with 2025 the worst year so far. The main opposition came from CoinFlip’s general counsel, who argued that the problem is fraud generally, not kiosks themselves, and said Minnesota already has consumer protections, including refunds for eligible victims. He urged stronger regulation rather than a ban, citing blockchain analytics, hold periods, and 24-hour customer service as alternatives. Committee members then asked questions about how long kiosks have operated in Minnesota, how many there are, who owns them, and the scale of losses; Commerce said there are hundreds statewide, operated by a variety of companies, and that reported losses are likely undercounts.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Some of these foreign entities pose national security risks yet without clear prohibitions.
  • It strikes me as a problem to prohibit professors from endorsing that.
  • Amendment rights so that they don't feel afraid to speak But to have a prohibition...
  • I think a fix for that would be to instead of prohibiting endorsement to prohibit inculcation or to assert
  • And to Senator Creighton, we've heard a lot of comments concerning the prohibition against.