Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal impact'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services May 23rd, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do have a resource witness and I think we're looking at, Madam Chair, I know this does have a fiscal
  • I was a little surprised about the size of the fiscal note.
  • And my question being, you know, it's a fiscal note of a biennial fiscal note of over $5 million.
  • Senator: And we were talking about his wisdom teeth and his impacted wisdom teeth.
  • The bill addresses the fiscal impact by requiring DSHS implementation of the testing requirement only
Bills: HB50
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There is a fiscal note associated with it.
  • I was a little surprised about the size of the fiscal note.
  • My question is regarding the fiscal note, which indicates a biennial fiscal note of over five million
  • We were talking about his wisdom teeth and his impacted wisdom teeth.
  • The bill addresses the fiscal impact by requiring implementation of the testing requirement only if funding
Bills: HB50
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 22nd, 2025

State Affairs

Bills: HB223
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs heard several House bills, with most measures left pending after testimony and later taken up in a batch of votes. Early in the meeting, HB 5624 on liability protections for motocross/off-road vehicle tracks, HB 223 on requiring competitive procurement for municipal lobbying contracts, HB 3709 on post-election audit procedures, and HB 5081 on protecting personal information of judicial officers and court staff were all discussed and left pending after testimony. Witnesses on HB 223 supported greater transparency in municipal lobbying contracts. HB 3709 drew sharp opposition from an election integrity advocate who argued the bill would reduce precinct-level granularity and make it harder to detect ballot errors, while a Secretary of State resource witness said the bill would simplify and standardize the audit process by location. HB 5081 received strong support from court administration and a district judge who described prior threats and an attack tied to publicly available personal information. The committee also heard HB 3546 on allowing school districts to move elections to November, HB 493 on barring certain felony offenders from serving as poll watchers, HB 5115 on increasing penalties for election fraud and related conduct, HB 4081 on trade secret filing procedures, HB 3909 on limiting restrictions on wireless devices at polling places, HB 2702 on limiting gubernatorial closure authority for certain veterans organizations during pandemics, HB 119 on foreign adversary lobbying, and HB 5138 on the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes. Several of these bills were explained with committee substitutes and then left pending before final action. Testimony on HB 493 and HB 5115 came from an election integrity advocate who supported both bills, saying the poll watcher restriction was appropriately narrowed and that the election fraud bill would help address invalid votes and refusal to count valid votes. Later, the committee took up pending business and voted out a large number of bills, generally along party lines or with broad support. HB 186 on minors’ social media use, HB 229, HB 2885, HB 3909 as substituted, HB 4285, HB 1661, HB 2820, HB 3181, HB 4157, HB 223, HB 521, HB 640, HB 1234, HB 2253, HB 2294, HB 3053, HB 3697 as substituted, HB 4281, HB 4463, HB 4995, HB 5081 as substituted, HB 5624 as substituted, HB 119 as substituted, HB 3225, HB 5138 as substituted, HB 5115, HB 481 as substituted, HB 3546, HB 493, and HB 4145 were reported favorably to the full Senate, with several also placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted committee substitutes for multiple bills, including HB 3909, HB 5081, HB 5624, HB 119, HB 5138, and HB 481. At the end, the chair noted another committee meeting would likely be needed before deadlines, possibly on a weekend, and recessed the committee subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you reduce that impact fee, the impact fee should be at cost and therefore you would hurt the city's
  • SB 14, as I understand, only will impact those political subdivisions that are already paying an impact
  • We're going to impact public education. We're going to impact public safety.
  • This will impact our economy; it will impact our local businesses, and that is concerning.
  • fiscal year and the current fiscal year.
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • My district and in my area that are very concerned about this negatively impacting them economically.
  • At its core, it's a retail and marketing bill, yet even that impact can be questioned given its true
  • Wine in Texas has a value of over $24 billion. ...dollar economic impact to the state's economy, and
  • How it impacts me is how do I, as an up-and-coming...
  • How does this impact you?
Bills: HB223
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, as many of you know, our main role is fiscal oversight.
  • I have not requested a fiscal note on this bill.
  • I think our discussion among the fiscal analysts is that we did not think this would have a large impact
  • I can only speak from my experience, but I think for fiscal analysts, we will request a fiscal note for
  • So we request fiscal notes in advance.
Bills: HF627, HF474, HF361, HF1837
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • expect to see really any uh cost impact expect to see really any uh cost impact because<00:16:16.079
  • that a committee chair can request a fiscal note.
  • this<00:53:56.760> bill requested a fiscal note on on this bill requested a fiscal note
  • > for that we will request a fiscal note for that we will request a fiscal note for any<00:54:
  • <00:54:15.319> note any member that requests a fiscal note any member that requests a fiscal
Bills: HF627, HF474, HF361, HF1837
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Border Security Mar 20th, 2025

Border Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • on our state and local services and impact on taxpayers.
  • It's not my intention to put a fiscal note on your bill.
  • Senator, it's not my intention to put a fiscal note on your bill.
  • It's the total economic impact, so... ...to have a full data.
  • It's the total economic impact, so obviously we define that very broadly.
Bills: SB825
Summary: The Senate Committee on Border Security heard testimony on Senate Bill 825 by Senator Middleton, as substituted, which would require an annual or biennial study of the economic, environmental, and financial impacts of illegal immigration in Texas. Middleton said the bill is intended to provide lawmakers with comprehensive data on costs to law enforcement, health care, education, infrastructure, and taxpayers, and to support possible federal reimbursement claims. Several senators, including Hinojosa and Eckhardt, agreed that a study is needed but raised concerns about bias, the scope of the study, and whether the Comptroller’s Office rather than the governor’s office should conduct it. Middleton argued the governor’s office was the best coordinating entity because it could direct multiple agencies to provide data, while Hinojosa and others emphasized the Comptroller’s expertise and prior 2006 study. Public testimony was generally supportive of the idea of a study but critical of the bill’s framing. Sarah Cruz of the ACLU of Texas said the study should be a full cost-benefit analysis and warned that focusing only on costs could create an anti-immigrant narrative. Danny Woodward of the Texas Civil Rights Project also supported the concept but recommended moving the study to the Comptroller or, alternatively, creating a neutral commission. Jaime Pointe of Every Texan likewise supported updating the 2006 analysis and said state agencies should be able to cooperate with a governor-led study. Resource witnesses from the governor’s office, HHSC, TEA, OCA, TDCJ, and DPS explained that data collection would be uneven across agencies. HHSC and TEA said they often do not collect immigration status and, in TEA’s case, federal law limits schools from requesting such information; OCA and TDCJ said they could provide only partial or indirect data unless new reporting requirements were added. DPS said it already has Operation Lone Star data but would need to collect additional information if tasked with the broader study. The chair asked the governor’s office to provide a follow-up answer on separation-of-powers and related authority questions by the following Tuesday, and the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair without taking a vote on the bill.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • with comprehensive data-driven insights. sites and to the economic, environmental, and financial impacts
  • . on our state and local services and impact on taxpayers.
  • . infrastructure, health care, education costs, the broader economic impact.
  • It's not my intention to put a fiscal note on your bill, Senator, but...
  • If it eliminates a fiscal note, my preference is still to have the governor as the unified commander
Bills: SB825
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AGR Public Hearing - Fri Mar 20, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Agriculture & Food Systems

Transcript Highlights:
  • and I believe a regulatory assessment to determine what these terms, once defined, will actually impact
  • and I believe a regulatory assessment to determine what these terms, once defined, will actually impact
  • <00:28:53.480> Um,<00:28:53.840> we other people who are impacted.
  • Um, we other people who are impacted.
  • both food security and the impacting both food security and the health<00:29:40.560> of<00:29
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Mar 3rd, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I'm curious, I mean, this is also to impact them as well.
  • So it's not just for clarification, it's not dependent, or it's not just impacting larger institutions
  • This goes into effect November of twenty-six, so it wouldn't impact primary or runoff.
  • I'm thinking if that would impact a 10-day out before the general. That's a possibility.
  • I wouldn't see the impact much greater in a statewide race and prefer it to be a December first date.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Taking the path to fiscal responsibility is often a lonely journey, but thanks to Elon Musk and Doge,
  • There is also some evidence that foreign aid can have a negative impact on target societies and even
  • FEMA also administers billions of dollars of mitigation grants to reduce the impact of natural hazards
Summary: The committee meeting addressed government spending and foreign aid, with a particular emphasis on perceived wasteful expenditures. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing a funding resolution for the committee, which received unanimous support from the members present. The chair noted a quorum at the beginning of the meeting, signaling that the committee was ready to conduct its business. Discussions highlighted ongoing debates concerning fiscal responsibility and the necessity of legislative oversight, notably regarding foreign aid allocations and their implications for domestic fiscal health.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

GVO DEFER, AEN-GVO Public Hearings 02-12-2026

Government Operations

Summary: The committee met on February 12, 2026, to take decision-making on measures previously heard earlier in the month. Several bills were deferred indefinitely or set for later discussion, including SB 2064 on the Office of the State Architect, SB 3068 on procurement, and SB 3216 after its contents were moved into another measure. SB 2862 on gubernatorial appointments, SB 2781, and SB 315 were all deferred to Tuesday, February 17 at 3 p.m. in Room 225 for further work. The committee also noted that if technical problems interrupted the meeting, it would reconvene later for outstanding decision-making. The committee passed SB 2343 on the Legislature with amendments incorporating language from SB 3216, technical changes, and a defective date of 2525. SB 2075 was advanced as a Senate draft 1 after amendments responding to constitutional concerns raised by the attorney general and SPO. SB 2927 on procurement was also passed with amendments clarifying debriefing requirements and adding technical changes, and SB 2938 on search and rescue was amended to place the position in Hima rather than the Governor’s office before being adopted. SB 3249 on procurement protests was amended to remove the term "frivolous," reduce the forfeiture to half the bond amount, and note unresolved issues, then adopted. The committee also took up SB 3332 on state-funded travel, amending it to remove certain lines, report travel by position number to protect confidentiality, remove subsection G, and add a defective date of 2525; it was adopted. SB 2929 on public notice was amended into a pilot project for counties with populations between 100,000 and 175,000, with a year-end report to the Legislature, and was adopted. Later, the committee returned to SB 2094 on environmental action levels, heard testimony from the Department of Health in support of its current scientific process and from an environmental caucus witness in strong support of the bill’s transparency and petition provisions, and then deferred decision-making to February 17 at 3 p.m. in Room 225. In the joint hearing portion, SB 3233 on agricultural workforce housing drew generally supportive testimony from ADC, the Farm Bureau, the Chamber of Commerce, the Hawaii Farmers Union, and the State Procurement Office, with concerns focused on clarity, flexibility for smaller farms, and avoiding concentration of benefits in one large operation. The committee ultimately recommended passing SB 3233 with the State Procurement Office’s clarifying amendments and the Hawaii Farmers Union’s amendment to ensure workforce housing incentives benefit multiple farmers, and the measure was adopted.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • have a direct and significant impact. have a direct and significant impact.
  • This impact is impact um is 87 million.
  • is an impact.
  • So, we have impact and we have repeat impact, which is important.
  • and we have repeat impact we have impact and we have repeat impact which<00:15:47.519> is<00:
Summary: The committee approved the September minutes and heard two presentations focused on tourism and economic development. First, Visit Jessamine and local winery representatives described Jessamine County’s tourism branding, visitor center renovation at the old jail in Nicholasville, wayfinding signs, kiosks, murals, and the Jessamine Wine and Spirits Trail. They said Kentucky tourism generates more than $1 billion in taxes and $14.3 billion in economic impact statewide, and that Jessamine County tourism generates about $6.2 million in taxes and $87 million in economic impact. They emphasized that the wine trail and related events, including the Kentucky Wine and Vine Festival, draw repeat visitors, support surrounding counties, and attract visitors from across the country and overseas. Committee members praised the presentation and discussed local events such as Halloween activities in Nicholasville and Wilmore and the Great Jessamine Pumpkin event. The committee also received prepared comments on Fort Knox from Lance O’Brien of the Knox Regional Development Alliance after a Fort Knox representative could not attend because of the federal government shutdown. The remarks highlighted Fort Knox’s role as a military installation, economic engine, tourism draw, and workforce partner. The presentation cited an estimated $5.6 billion in annual output, about $1.3 billion in payroll, more than 60,000 retirees and veterans in the surrounding area, and roughly 11,000 to 13,000 soldiers stationed there at a time. It also noted major tourism-related activity such as Cadet Summer Training, the National Raider Challenge, and the George Patton Museum, along with more than $484 million in small-business contracts in fiscal year 2025 and Fort Knox’s role in IT and cybersecurity. Members discussed the importance of tourism revenue, out-of-state visitors, and the broader economic impact of both Jessamine County and Fort Knox.