Video & Transcript Research : 'emergency contraceptive'

Page 1 of 479
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The COVID-19 pandemic created extraordinary challenges forcing quick decisions under emergency conditions
  • Of a health emergency is something that we should not completely throw out just because you feel that
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The COVID-19 pandemic created extraordinary challenges, forcing quick decisions under emergency conditions
  • Including science communicators being able to educate the public when there is some sort of a health emergency
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • an assault. this emergency contraception on their own.
  • She had. no way to immediately access emergency contraception.
  • comes down to what does that emergency contraception pill do?
  • Movement has been cautious about emergency contraception for decades.
  • I have never experienced anybody promoting emergency contraception to a patient.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 31st, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Emergency contraception is a form of birth control meant for specific emergency situations, not as a
  • And it has nothing to do with emergency contraception.
  • It just said emergency. Contraception approved by FDA.
  • So I was just asking specifically what is considered emergency contraception.
  • options for emergency contraception.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

PBS Public Hearing - Fri Mar 20, 2026 @ 10:30 AM HST

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • to move on to relating to emergency to move on to relating to emergency management,<00:20:43.840
  • > currently are in a state of emergency currently are in a state of emergency currently and<00
  • emergency proclamation. emergency proclamation.
  • governor's emergency powers. governor's emergency powers.
  • It happened during COVID. emergencies in the state. There's a emergencies in the state.
Bills: SB2109, SB2151
Summary: The committee on Public Safety met on March 20, 2026, and the chair opened by noting severe rain and flooding conditions in Hawaii and said the committee would proceed with the hearing but defer decision-making until the next meeting on March 25. The first measure discussed was SB 2109, an omnibus bill on emergency preparedness communications. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support, including from state agencies and advocacy groups such as the Disability and Communications Access Board, Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Legal Clinic, the Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, and others. Supporters emphasized the need for funding and planning for multilingual emergency materials and language access, citing current evacuation notices that were not available in languages such as Ilokano or Tongan. The chair stated that action on SB 2109 would be deferred until March 25. The committee then heard SB 2151, relating to emergency management and changes to the governor’s emergency authority. Testimony was mixed but heavily focused on concerns about executive power. Earthjustice supported the bill with amendments, saying it should narrow extraordinary emergency powers, add definitions for emergency and disaster, preserve transparency under the Uniform Information Practices Act, and lower the legislative threshold to terminate an emergency proclamation from two-thirds to a simple majority. Other supporters, including the League of Women Voters of Hawaii and some individuals, also backed reform. Opponents, including Hawaii Emergency Management Agency and numerous individuals, argued the bill still gave the governor too much power, used overly broad disaster definitions, and did not sufficiently protect constitutional rights; several urged major amendments or repeal of portions of Chapter 127A. Some opponents specifically objected to the two-thirds termination standard and to provisions they said could enable compulsory immunizations or other mandates. Members questioned Earthjustice about whether the bill would suspend constitutional rights. Earthjustice responded that the bill would not authorize constitutional violations, but would allow suspension of laws enacted by the legislature, and pointed to existing statutory procedures for individuals to challenge emergency proclamations. The witness described a Mauna Kea case in which a three-judge panel granted relief to an individual under the current statute, and explained that the process could potentially affect a broader proclamation if allowed to run to completion. The hearing continued with additional testimony and questions, but no final vote or committee action on SB 2151 was taken during this portion of the meeting.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Higher Education Apr 29th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • and it will lawyers uniquely equipped for border security challenges, international business, and emerging
  • The Emerging Leaders Board. As well as yourself? Yes. Okay, wonderful. And sir?
  • My name is La Brea Owens, and I'm current a part of the Texas Emerging Leaders Board with Texas Network
  • A homeless liaison could have helped me with emergency housing, helped connect me with rental assistance
  • The bill directly responds to emerging concerns that despite prior legislative action many medical institutions
Bills: HB232
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Higher Education Apr 29th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • will produce lawyers uniquely equipped for border security challenges, international business, and emerging
  • Uh, Texas Network of Youth Services, the emerging leaders for, as well as yourself, yes, OK, wonderful
  • My name is Labrea Owens, and I'm currently a part of the Texas Emerging Leaders Board with Texas Network
  • A homeless liaison could have helped me with emergency housing, helped connect me with rental assistance
  • The bill directly responds to emerging concerns that despite prior legislative action, many medical institutions
Bills: HB232
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/15/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm the Emergency Tony Martin.
  • The bill will help improve emergency response time, especially during a large-scale emergency and high
  • The bill will help in improve emergency The bill will help in improve emergency response<00:14:46.920
  • resources, and allows emergency resources, and allows emergency responders<00:15:32.800> to
  • 2019-2021 statewide emergency 2019-2021 statewide emergency communication<00:16:29.040> board's
TX
HI
Summary: The joint hearing covered House Bill 251, which would require hospitals to report costs associated with Medicare and uninsured patients, and House Bill 1875, which would expand protections for gender-affirming health care services. On HB 251, the Department of Health said it supported the intent but described the bill as complicated and potentially impractical as drafted because the department lacks the expertise to produce the required analyses without outside help. Hawaii Health Systems Corporation echoed those concerns, while the Queen’s Health System said it was willing to work with the department to provide the information. In committee discussion, officials explained that hospital support in Hawaii includes public hospital appropriations and the provider tax program, which uses hospital and nursing home contributions to draw federal matching funds; a department witness estimated the net benefit at about $150 million for hospitals and $20 million for nursing facilities, though exact figures would be provided later. On HB 1875, the Insurance Division testified with concerns that the bill’s language on prohibited actions by malpractice insurers was broad and vague, and that a rate-increase prohibition could conflict with actuarially based insurance pricing. The division also noted it was not the primary enforcement agency for the statute. In contrast, many testifiers strongly supported the bill, including the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women, the Hawaii State LGBTQ+ Commission, the Hawaii Public Health Institute, PFLAG Oahu, the ACLU of Hawaii, the Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii, the Hawaii County Democratic Party, and others. Supporters argued that gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based, and protected by privacy and bodily autonomy principles, and that the bill would protect patients and providers from outside political interference. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.