Video & Transcript Research : 'election reform'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Appropriations May 8th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, the goal being we, we never want to raise taxes on our taxpayers of the tax reforms that we've
Bills: SJR 4
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, whether anything happens or not, I mean, we're, we're inflicting a penalty on the entire elected
  • sessions during certain periods, for example, 60 days after a regular session, 60 days before an election
  • You may recall 2217 was a was a bill that dealt with how we report election results and how procedures
  • They get within the 30 day window before the election. They're already registered to vote.
  • The election administrators brought this to the house because the law was kind of fuzzy before.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, we're inflicting a penalty on the entire elected body by doing this.
  • Rules that the judges are when they run for election or reelection.
  • For example, 60 days after a regular session, or 60 days before an election.
  • It was a bill that dealt with how we report election results and how procedures are conducted.
  • The election administrators brought this to the House because the law was kind of fuzzy before.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Appropriations May 8th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Raise taxes on our taxpayers for the tax reforms that we've given them so far and we intend to give them
Bills: SJR4, SJR 4
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Dickens trying to get TDCJ to get me the information, and the truth is I called somebody who I knew was elected
  • Have you consulted with any criminal justice reform advocates about potential unintended consequences
Bills: HB47
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ethics and Campaign Finance Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Ethics and Campaign Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • If you're an independent candidate, you have five days within the primary election.
  • If they miss the filing not more than five days after the date of the first primary election, would it
  • Would it be beneficial for them to have that information, their economic disclosures, before the election
  • Sir, just for clarity, qualifying papers in a local election are when they follow the clerk, correct?
  • I think even with a municipal election, you have to file a statement.
Bills: HB250
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 9th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • the election.
  • Election officials in Texas are entrusted with implementing our elections and election procedures in
  • So you've followed elections, the election process?
  • of election staff, election judges, and election clerks.
  • The election officials and the election...
NV

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 29th, 2025 at 01:00 pm

Legislative Operations and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • We did it last as election season two weeks prior to Election Day.
  • As a nonpartisan election reform organization, CLC believes that thoughtful expansion of this policy
  • This is a really important bill and a step in the right direction towards positive election reform, and
  • I've been a full-time election worker for the last five elections.
  • Reform.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate Judiciary and Elections Committee is called to order.
  • To prohibit it from influencing elections and election officials. Okay, thanks. Madam Chair? Yes.
  • They don't consider it an election, essentially.
  • the weekend before Election Day.
  • The causal factor of both findings to the 2020 presidential election, when a Republican election denier
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Elections and Ethics Feb 9th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Elections and Ethics

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then why would you put in a split between federal elections and state and local elections.
  • Chairman, general election, you've got some people that are not qualified to vote in state elections
  • but are qualified to vote in federal elections.
  • the county or state elections.
  • eligible to vote in federal elections.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It simply helps cities align municipal elections with November elections by moving the date. of the election
  • each election precinct.
  • County election officials want to run elections that are fair, secure, and efficient.
  • I've worked many elections as an alternate or presiding judge in Dallas County elections.
  • of certain election records.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • If there are no corrections, without objection, the Judiciary and Elections Committee minutes of February
  • , move the date of the primary election from the second-to-last Tuesday in July to the Tuesday before
  • With the consolidated election dates, do we keep three, or do we do four in odd-numbered years so that
  • And so I'm concerned about that, and I think that with these two, my town of Tempe has an election.
  • It really doesn't, I don't think it's right to have an election that early and not in November.
Summary: The Judiciary and Elections Committee met with a hard stop at 4:30 and approved the February 4, 2026 minutes. The chair announced several bills would be held for a later supplemental meeting, then took up SB 1426, the “squatter” bill. The bill was described as changing forcible detainer rules for unauthorized occupants and requiring immediate writs of restitution after judgment. Testimony from the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office supported the measure as a practical, collaborative response to unlawful occupancy. SB 1426 received a do-pass recommendation on a 7-0 vote. The committee next considered SB 1687, a strike-everything amendment moving the primary election date from late July to the Tuesday before Memorial Day starting in 2027. The sponsor said the goal was to give more time between the primary and general elections and align Arizona more closely with other states. County election officials testified in neutral, saying they generally supported more time but flagged several issues, including filing deadlines, consolidated election dates, polling place availability, redistricting timelines, signature calculations, and possible conflicts with presidential preference elections. The amended bill passed 4-3, with concerns raised about clean elections qualification periods and state versus local control over elections. The committee then approved SB 1110, which creates a home confinement program for certain nonviolent inmates, with GPS monitoring, eligibility limits, and a 50-to-1 inmate-to-officer ratio. Supporters said it would help families, reduce recidivism, and save money; an opponent criticized the retroactive effective date and questioned funding and monitoring capacity. SB 1110 received a do-pass recommendation on a 5-1 vote. SB 1275, which allows courts to consider PTSD and related service-connected conditions when sentencing certain veterans and first responders, drew support from the sponsor and advocates but opposition from county officials who argued it would undermine mandatory sentencing and victims’ rights; it passed 7-0. Finally, the committee heard SB 1140, as amended, which allows expungement of eligible misdemeanor records after a waiting period, with exclusions for serious offenses and special rules for shoplifting and peace officer employment. Supporters, including a formerly incarcerated advocate and a retired police chief working on anti-trafficking issues, said expungement would improve employment and stability and give people a real second chance. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed SB 1140 as amended on a 7-0 vote before adjourning.